Brooks vs. Kos

NYT blowhard David Brooks has a new target: Kos.  Here is tomorrow’s column (reg. req’d).  It would be hilarious, if it weren’t so … hilarious.

They say that the great leaders are gone and politics has become the realm of the small-minded. But in the land of the Lilliputians, the Keyboard Kingpin must be accorded full respect.

The Keyboard Kingpin, a k a Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, sits at his computer, fires up his Web site, Daily Kos, and commands his followers, who come across like squadrons of rabid lambs, to unleash their venom on those who stand in the way. And in this way the Kingpin has made himself a mighty force in his own mind, and every knee shall bow.

The Kingpin’s first enemy was the Democratic Party establishment, and it pleased him to see Howard Dean take it on. When the Dean campaign hired the Kingpin and his co-author and onetime business partner Jerome Armstrong as paid campaign consultants, this was an appropriate sign of respect, and the Kingpin did lay his hand of blog approval upon the Dean campaign (while disclosing the connection).

When Sherrod Brown, the Democratic Senate candidate in Ohio, hired Armstrong last year to help with his campaign, this was also a sign of respect. The Kingpin had instructed his Kossack cultists to support Brown’s Democratic primary rival, Paul Hackett. But the Kingpin switched sides and backed Brown over his former anointee.

The Kingpin often directs his wrath at the centrist Democratic Leadership Council. But the centrist Democrat Mark Warner has also hired Armstrong as a consultant, and the Kingpin has graciously exempted Warner from the seventh circle of Kos hell. Warner is frequently celebrated on Daily Kos as something akin to the second coming of F.D.R.

And so it is in the realm of the Kingpin. Those who offer respect get respected.

But lo, there are doubters. Chris Suellentrop, who writes the Opinionator column on TimesSelect, posted an item on June 16 noting the strange correlation between Armstrong contracts and Kos endorsements. He further reported that the S.E.C. has filed court documents alleging that in 2000 Armstrong touted a dubious software stock on a Web site in exchange for secret payments. Armstrong was accused of building Internet buzz to make money for himself.

The Keyboard Kingpin was displeased by this publicity.

But the Sachem of the Blogosphere restrained his mighty wrath and responded with the cleverness for which he is so justly self-adored. In a private letter to hundreds of his fellow progressive bloggers, the Kingpin declared he would “go on the offensive” in a “couple of months,” but in the meantime, a code of omertà was in order. “It would make my life easier if we can confine the story,” he wrote. “If any of us blog on this right now, we fuel the story. Let’s starve it of oxygen.”

But alas! There was a Judas on the listserve, who leaked the Kingpin’s missive to Jason Zengerle, who promptly posted a report on The New Republic Web site.

The Kingpin waxed Cheneyesque on the evils of leaking, and this time the squeaking fury of the Kossacks could be heard (to those capable of discerning high frequencies) far and wide. The Kingpin excommunicated The New Republic from the community of the saved. “If you still hold a subscription to that magazine, it really is time to call it quits. If you see it in a magazine rack, you might as well move it behind the National Review,” he wrote on Daily Kos.

“The New Republic betrayed, once again, that it seeks to destroy the new people-powered movement for the sake of its Lieberman-worshiping neocon owners,” the Kingpin charged. And so the magazine of Walter Lippmann was expunged from the community of the righteous, and its writers cast into the shadow of oblivion.

The Kingpin is not surprised by such betrayals. Sounding like Tom DeLay — who is his moral doppelgänger — Kos says that those who crash the gates and take on the establishment are bound to be attacked.

But the truth is that the new boss is little different from the old boss — only smaller. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi and many other Democrats bow and scrape. He has managed to spread the gospel of Kossism far and wide, which is not really about ideas and philosophy. “I’m just all about winning,” he has said.

And so the Kingpin has his relationships and his understandings and his networks and his compromises. In just a few short years he has achieved a level of self-importance it took those in the pre-blog political class decades to acquire.

He has challenged his enemy and become it.

Really, the most interesting part of this column (I have no idea what the deal is with this Armstrong/stock business, nor do I care) is in Brooks’s second-to-last paragraph: the “level of self-importance it took those in the pre-blog political class decades to acquire.”  Good to know that Brooks has been in that self-important “class” long enough to come right out and admit it.

This post was originally published with Soapblox and contains additional formatting and metadata.
View archived version of this post


6 Comments . Leave a comment below.
  1. In person

    If you've ever seen David Brooks in person, the line " the new boss is little different from the old boss—only smaller" is funny.

    Brooks is no taller than Markos, only with a much bigger head!

    • What size is he talking about?

      How does he know how "small" Markos is? I think this column says more about David Brooks and his own tragic personal insecurities than DailyKos. It is a cry for help.

      • DB's flaws notwithstanding, Kos will take a hit here

        Brooks is the latest to a Kos pile-on: There's Slate, Newsweek, National Journal, and New Republic

        The story was broken by an NYT reporter, not Brooks.  Basically, it does seem weird that Armstrong gets paid as "consultant" and then Kos endorsement soon follows.  I support Warner 2008, so while pleased to see him get nice ink from Kos, I wondered how it was possible - Warner is as DLC a centrist as exists, and Kos has an avowed hatred of the DLC.  But then it turns out that Warner hired Armstrong....sure raises a few eyebrows. 

        FWIW, Kos responds

        • It seems to me...

          that Kos is interested in winning elections with as progressive a candidate as possible in that particular race.  His beef with the DLC is that they undercut real progressives in areas where real progressives could win.

          For folks from the South and Mountain West, being a winning Dem means being a centrist.  Jon Tester isn't way to the left, and he's been a darling at Kos for a long time now.  Another darling is Bob Casey, running against Santorum in PA.  There were more progressive candidates in that primary, but Kos lined up behind anti-abortion Casey because he's the most progressive candidate Kos thought could win.

          Warner is from VA.  When he ran for governor, he had "hunter" orange signs with criss-crossed rifles that read "Sportsmen for Warner" in the western part of the state.  I seen 'em wit' me own eyes.  That Warner is involved with centrist DLC is irrelevant, because Warner is about as progressive as possible from a winning VA Dem.

          There's no conflict of interest and no hypocracy.  Kos' stance isn't even nuanced.  Win with the most progressive guy possible -- but win.  It's straightforward.

  2. Wow, he doesn't get it at ALL!!

    "The Keyboard Kingpin, a k a Markos Moulitsas Zúniga, sits at his computer, fires up his Web site, Daily Kos, and commands his followers..."

    No one commands anyone to do ANYthing! You see, in the blogosphere, even one as large as DK, ideas percolate through a MERITOCRACY. If enough people like an idea, they get to making it happen...en masse.

    Poor David Brooks. He must feel like aliens have taken over the process. You know. We the People of the United States. It's been a long time since we were in charge!

    • Disillussion with Kos

      Originally Kos was a conduit of information and support, but when his blog become a fundraising outlet and he told people whom to fundraise for it became a little suspicious, as a Dean supporter I initially liked the Dailykos blog until I realized that Kos and Armstrong were both hired by the Dean campaign and further disappointed that Kos did not point out the conflict of interest. Moreover the Hackett flip, him flipping on supporting Kerry, him ordering money and volunteers to Ned Lamont while also giving DINO Sen. Clinton a pass by not supporting the similiar anti war campaign of Jon Tasini is further signs of hypocracy. David Brooks is usually an idiot but he hit the nail on the head here, Kos has become a Kingpin and the only consistency in his positions lie within who he likes and who he dislikes, the ideology has become Kos and Kos is the ideology.

« Blue Mass Group Front Page

Add Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Tue 28 Mar 7:36 PM