Jehlen is extremely doubtful about the prospects of DiMasi’s more coercive proposal to force municipal unions into the state insurance system, saving many millions of dollars for municipalities. I’m kind of surprised to hear that, but apparently the union opposition is just too strong in the legislature. Nevertheless, the weaker proposal favored by Gov. Patrick and many legislators (requiring 70% union member approval to join the state’s insurance system) will still get significant buy-in from many unions.
I asked about Gov. Patrick’s intriguing language in the education rally yesterday: Isn’t he calling for new revenue streams? Jehlen seemed to agree that’s what it sounded like, but didn’t know what exactly the governor was proposing any more than I did. She seemed open to the idea that a new revenue stream might be tied to a dedicated education trust.
We talked more generally about the trends and currents at play in winning elections in Massachusetts, and in passing legislation. I’ve been extremely impressed at the recent string of successes by the progressive movement in getting their own elected, not least of all Sen. Jehlen, and then Gov. Patrick. While this would seem to indicate the burgeoning strength of a real populist, grassroots movement, the legislative process is still largely Godzilla vs. Mothra — vast, incomprehensibly powerful interests duking it out for dominance, far beyond the control of the fleeing multitudes. To her great credit, Jehlen recognizes this, and sees the town-meeting format as one way to help develop her own grassroots, empowering people through information.
daves says
Do you know where Sen. Jehlen stands on the proposals that would make it easier for cities and towns to turn their health benefits plans over to the Group Insurance Commission?
charley-on-the-mta says
… and I take it that she doesn’t support DiMasi’s tougher version — in any event she’s extremely dubious it’ll pass.
jimcaralis says
Any one else going?
charley-on-the-mta says
nt