Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG
  • February 18, 2019

Let’s Fight for the Medicare Option

December 26, 2009 By neilsagan 8 Comments

We spent most of 2009 fighting for single-payer Medicare for All or, as a compromise, a robust public option. But Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson blocked both, and now demand our surrender. Will we surrender to LieberCare?

I believe we can fight, but with one caveat: for once, the broad progressive movement must work a bit harder to unite. We can only win this relatively brief fight if we’re all working together every day.

I believe the policy that would unite the broadest coalition is a “Medicare Option” – a “public option” that specifically lets Americans under 65 buy into Medicare if they want that choice.

Why “Medicare Option”? For two simple reasons:

  1. An overwhelming 64%-30% majority of Americans support the Medicare Option.
  2. Joe Lieberman himself supported the Medicare Option until he discovered how popular it was.

Of course many progressives have other “bottom lines” we should also fight for as a unified coalition:

  1. Tax the rich, not healthcare – a key issue for unions
  2. Mandate employers, not people – another key issue for unions and civil libertarians
  3. No new restrictions on abortion coverage – a key issue for feminists
  4. Prescription drug importation and negotiated prices – a key issue for patients

To succeed, we must unite as much of the progressive movement as possible:

  1. Across the organizational spectrum – blogs, c3’s, c4’s, unions, PACs, 527’s, for-profits
  2. Across the ideological spectrum, from single-payer to public option to universal coverage
  3. Across the tactical spectrum, from DC insiders to street protesters
  4. Across the technological spectrum – bloggers, emailers, Facebookers, Tweeters, texters

As a coalition, we should fight with all the weapons we have:

  1. Persuasive blogging and press outreach
  2. Direct lobbying of Members by DC insiders
  3. Email and phone lobbying by activists across the country
  4. Hard-hitting video ads for Youtube and broadcast
  5. Protests at district offices
  6. Google ads targeting Members

That’s my proposal in a nutshell – I welcome your thoughts here.

www.medicareoption.org

Share:
0
0

Filed Under: User

8
Leave a reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
bob-neerlasthorsemanneilsaganchristopher Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
christopher
Guest
christopher

I think the bulk of the constituent lobbying needs to come from the home states of the recalcitrant Senators to be most effective.  I’m also confused about why Lieberman would support something UNTIL he discovered how popular it was.  That seems awfully counterintuitive in politics.  Aren’t politicians generally inclined to jump ONTO the bandwagon of something popular?

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
neilsagan
Guest
neilsagan

I think Fertik is trying to coalesce the progressive movement around a single agenda on health care reform, maybe this one maybe a variation on it.  He knows that if progressives (who are willing to work for it) agree on what we’re working for, we have a chance to get it.  Progressives were divided by the Senate bill. Fertik seeks to unite progressives happy with the Senate bill and those displeased with it around a clearly stated agenda to pursue from now until the bill comes out of conference.  

<

p>So YES it would home state nationwide advocacy to have an impact and YES you’ve identified the same opportunity Fertik has with regard to Lieberman’s potential “reversal” on Medicare Option.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
neilsagan
Guest
neilsagan

<

p>Which points made in this segment ring true to you? Why? Based on the items you identify, what should progressives  focus on between now and when the conference bill is finished?  

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
bob-neer
Guest
bob-neer

Tavis hits the nail on the head at the very end in his assessment of the risks the White House is running here.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
neilsagan
Guest
neilsagan

I liked Markos’ comments too and …

<

p>… hold it …. even Joe Scarborough a little.  He’s much less inflammatory on MTP than MJoe. That said, he probably shoots from the hip on MJoe and reveals the real Joe on his own gig.  

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
lasthorseman
Guest
lasthorseman

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
neilsagan
Guest
neilsagan

you go first … i’ll be right behind you

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
neilsagan
Guest
neilsagan

By: Jon Walker Monday December 28, 2009 2:14 pm

Almost all evidence points to the simple conclusion that the new health insurance market places in the Senate bill called “exchanges” will not slow the out-of-control increase in health care costs. Similar exchanges have been tried in this country and have failed to slow the growth rate in health care. The two best examples are the Federal Employee Health Benefit (FEHB) plan and the California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS).

The FEHB provides health insurance for roughly 8 million Americans, while CalPERS provides insurance for roughly 1.3 million. Over the long term, both have health care growth rates on par with the average for large employer plans. This was the general conclusion of a GAO report in 2007, and similar study in 2009 by the Kaiser Family Foundation. A GAO study from 2000 found that small employer purchasing cooperatives (very similar to exchanges) also failed to bring down overall costs. If these two public employee exchanges with decades of experience managing health care benefits have failed to control costs, there seems little reason to suspect the smaller exchange in the Senate bill will perform any better.

read more

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
2019 years ago
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz

Election Day 2020 Countdown

Election Day 2020Countdown

Recommended Posts

  • Dems must win Senate in 2020 (5)
  • A Big Day for Corporations Making Huge Subsidy Packages Look Dumb (4)
  • Piketty on Warren on Piketty on the wealth tax (4)
  • Anyone See a Pattern Here? (2)
  • MA House progressives: Self-abasement to stay out of the basement (2)

Recent User Posts

Let’s slow down a bit before jumping to conclusions.

February 17, 2019 By edgarthearmenian 1 Comment

Stupid celebrities, and an apology

February 16, 2019 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

National Emergency

February 14, 2019 By Trickle up 3 Comments

A Big Day for Corporations Making Huge Subsidy Packages Look Dumb

February 14, 2019 By thegreenmiles 4 Comments

General Court Committees Named

February 14, 2019 By Christopher 4 Comments

Tulsi Gabbard vs Morning Joe

February 14, 2019 By couves 12 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Stupid celebrities, and an apologyI appreciate the kind words.
  • johntmay on Tulsi Gabbard vs Morning JoeThere is no "liberal media" on economic matters. It's al…
  • edgarthearmenian on Stupid celebrities, and an apologyI missed yesterday due to illness, Tom. I admire your ju…
  • SomervilleTom on Let’s slow down a bit before jumping to conclusions.I posted a diary with an apology to you yesterday.
  • fredrichlariccia on Dems must win Senate in 2020In Iowa, I like Democrat J.D. Scholten to take on (R) in…
  • gmoke on A Big Day for Corporations Making Huge Subsidy Packages Look DumbArticle by Richard Florida on the results of the most re…
  • gmoke on A Big Day for Corporations Making Huge Subsidy Packages Look DumbThere's a concept called Economic Gardening which builds…

Archive

From our sponsors




Google Calendar

Latest Tweets

  • RT @jglarusso: 19/ And as you can see in the @EIAgov chart below, about 2.5 Bcf/d in expansions to NE’s regional gas pipeline tran… https://t.co/yfc7ZITuNM

    1 month ago
  • RT @MassPLAN: Because @GlobeOpinion won't print full-length, fact-filled rebuttals of its year-long pro-pipeline series, here is… https://t.co/K4YhPtvPxb

    1 month ago
  • RT @alligroberts: U.S. Carbon Emissions Surged in 2018 Even as Coal Plants Closed. It’s time tackle emissions from #transportation &… https://t.co/nfSSYVfpLG

    1 month ago






Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2019 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.

wpDiscuz