The Casino Bill is Dead! Long Live the Casino Bill!

(The view from ... wherever Ernie sits. - promoted by David)

The blame game will start and the easy accusations of incompetence by our governor and legislature will be thrown around like Snookie throws F-Bombs. (Ya like that? A Jersey Shore reference. Man, I am so fresh)

The fact is this piece of legislation that will be voted on tomorrow should the be the subject of some piondexter’s doctorate dissertation at the JFK School. For it to get anywhere all the interests, which by the way have staked out their positions for the past 30 years(except Plainridge )had to be satisfied or there would not be enough votes to get it approved. The solons from the western part of the state wanted a casino, so did the southeastern/Bristol County boys. George Carney has a boatload of votes from members whose districts need/had jobs from/at the nearby track. Same too for East Boston/ Winthrop/ Revere/ and by the luck of the roulette wheel the Speaker of the House is from Winthrop.

So everyone is satisfied here. Charley Sarkis and Joe O’Donnell et al. will bid for a license as a joint venture and Carney and Plainridge will either join up or go head to head in bidding for that second license. Most likely join forces and they’ve probably already shaken hands. Without all these things happening a bill would not get the full support of the more finicky Senate.


But hey, the people wanted casinos and after their elected representatives talked about it the only way an agreement could be reached is if everyone got everything they wanted. Therefore they gave everyone what they wanted. The alternative was to let the bill die in conference committee or spit out a bill that would not pass.

When I say spit out a bill I mean they hucked a real looey at us. And they know it. “We tried our best,” they will say. And they did. It will get vetoed by the Governor. Nothing wrong with that. Many of the reps and senators that will vote for it tomorrow are quite happy Deval is vetoing it. It’s a bad bill.

Casinos/slots are like morphine and oxycontins when you start licensing them. Good in small and controlled doses but if you over do it you are fucked and fucked good. Unfortunately for the casino advocates this bill fills up the gambling syringe with too much of the good stuff forcing Dr. Deval to remember his Hippocratic Oath and do the right thing. Don’t let them scare you Governor, this veto will help you on November 2. The education thing is what may do you in.

The next session will start before we know it. And not too long after I suspect a new Senate Prez and soon after a new Speaker will take the gavels and cause the roulette wheel to get a couple of more spins. Whose chips will be where when it stops spinning the next time?  This time it almost stopped on the one number everyone was playing. But c’mon, that never happens.

This post was originally published with Soapblox and contains additional formatting and metadata.
View archived version of this post
.



Discuss

6 Comments . Comments are closed.
  1. let's hope

    The bottom of the trash bin is the best place for this bill. It never addressed the costs and it not only took us out on the ledge, but went full-in plunge toward the bottom.  

  2. Good analysis Earnie

    Especially this..........

    Casinos/slots are like morphine and oxycontins when you start licensing them. Good in small and controlled doses but if you over do it you are fucked and fucked good. Unfortunately for the casino advocates this bill fills up the gambling syringe with too much of the good stuff forcing Dr. Deval to remember his Hippocratic Oath and do the right thing. Don't let them scare you Governor, this veto will help you on November 2.
  3. Education thing? Keep dreamin' Ernst.

    If Mass gets the money, people will see dollar signs, not standards. The winners will be announced in August or September. Think of all those happy parents who won't see their kids classes grow by leaps and bounds.

    Deval should tell everyone the national standards are based on the Massachusetts standards. I'm sure they looked at them. And the 15% we don't like we can make stricter.  

  4. 'Splain somethin' to me?

    OK, the recap as I recall it is: DeLeo wanted 3 casinos and 2 slot parlors Murray wanted 3 casinos and 1 slot parlor Patrick wanted 3 casinos and no slot parlors, but he decided he could live with one.

    Do I have that right?

    If all that is so, why is a bill with 3 casinos and 2 slot parlors labeled a "compromise bill" by the Boston media?

    • Not quite right.

      DeLeo wanted 2 casinos and 4 slot parlors, one for each track. Murray wanted 3 casinos and no slot parlors. Patrick wanted 3 casinos and no slot parlors, but said he could live with one if competitively bid.

      So the bill is sort of a compromise between the House and Senate/Patrick versions.

« Blue Mass Group Front Page

Thu 24 May 1:27 AM