The link: http://www.ncsl.org/?tabid=15363 One of your tech types could probably insert it. What I found of the greatest interest is that Massachusetts already requires, and creates photo IDs for every registered lobbyist. What is the big deal about popping that photo ID into a lapel holder, or clip on holder, and wearing it visibly when such a paid, professional lobbyist is n a state owned or rented building – included but not limited to the State House? I would find that helpful and cannot see why anyone would find that “insulting”. Why? I remember faces easily but really have to work at it to remember names.
Plus, lobbyists are paid to influence government decisions. Why not wear those state-created IDs as a mark of pride, of membership in a hard working and well paid guild, which lobbyists are at any event?
One more thing – every special education school, most employers, already require such badges – and visitors to wear clip on badges for many of the same reasons it makes sense to have lobbyists display their state-issued lobbyist registration ID cards. Many states already do. Just review that lovely and instructive table.