Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG
  • April 26, 2018

Why would Scott Brown filibuster his own bill?

June 30, 2011 By David 2 Comments

In the annals of bizarre Senatorial behavior, this has to be right up there (if you don’t count Larry Craig and David Vitter, that is).  HT to HesterPrynne for calling this to everyone’s attention.

Scott Brown (along with John Kerry, 4 other Democrats, and 2 other Republicans – actual bipartisanship!) is a co-sponsor of S. 493, the “SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011,” known on the House side as “The Creating Jobs Through Small Business Innovation Act of 2011.”  According to the NIH’s legislative office,

S. 493 would reauthorize the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer Programs (STTR) for 8 years; increase the SBIR set aside to 3.5 percent over 10 years and increase the STTR set aside to 0.6 percent over six years; and allow small business concerns majority-owned and controlled by venture capital firms to be eligible for up to 25 percent of the SBIR funds.

Some fairly technical stuff, but basically, this is a jobs bill.  It’s also one that seems especially likely to benefit Massachusetts, as both the SBIR and STTR programs “help fund small innovative companies on the brink of new technologies and discoveries” – exactly the kinds of companies that we have lots of here, and that generate good jobs.  Indeed, as Scott Brown himself said just a couple of weeks ago while visiting a center in Cambridge devoted to start-ups and emerging businesses in connection with some different legislation,

“The businesses at work here have the potential to create new industries and jobs for Massachusetts,” said Senator Brown. “But these entrepreneurs need help converting their new ideas into jobs; that’s why I continue to push for pro-growth policies and have filed targeted legislation to speed their success.”

Makes total sense, and no doubt that’s why Brown co-sponsored S. 493.

But then he filibustered it.  WTF?  Why would you filibuster a bill that you actually co-sponsored?  Now, maybe there’s a perfectly good reason, like some evil amendment got slipped in or something.  If so, I’d love to hear about it.

Or maybe Scott Brown was doing what, sadly, he does a lot: following Mitch McConnell’s lead when not too many people are watching.  Sure, he likes the bill – that’s why he co-sponsored it.  But Mitch wants a filibuster?  OK, he’ll go along.  Wouldn’t want to annoy Mitch too much.

Pathetic.  Surely, Massachusetts can do much better.

0
0

Filed Under: User

Leave a Reply

2 Comments on "Why would Scott Brown filibuster his own bill?"

You must be logged in to post a comment.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

newest oldest most voted
karenc
Member
karenc
Share On TwitterShare On Google

because Brown would not have been the 60th vote that would have broken the filibuster. There were only 52 yes votes. There was only one not voting Democart (Akaka) who likely would have been there if he were the deciding vote. Incidentally NO Republicans voted for it.

As to the amendments,
2 of Coburn’s passed – and Brown voted for it.

Inouye’s failed – Brown voted for cloture, the Republicans filibustered it.

Then there were the 4 amendments on the EPA – all of which failed. Brown voted for McConnel’s and amendment to stop the EPA on greenhouse gases and Rockefeller’s to delay it for a year – and against the Baucus and Stabenow ones.

It is hard to believe that Brown and Snowe would vote against the bill they worked on because they were angry that the Democrats defeated the EPA regulation. The Inouye amendment seems to be the only additional vote they lost – and it was the Republicans who stopped it. The listed purpose was:

“To provide for the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to submit recommended rescissions in accordance with the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 for Government programs and agencies with duplicative and overlapping missions.”

I tried looking at his Senate site, but found nothing explaining it – under legislation, all you get are links from Thomas – which say what happened, but nothing on the reason. Under press releases, agin nothing here in the month after he voted against it.

I looked to see if he spoke on the floor – something I would expect if someone who was a co-sponsor and who “rose in strong support” of the bill on March 17 in a speech on the floor would explain his flip flop – when there seemed nothing added that he was against. But – no speech on that bill.

00
6 years ago
richardmathews
Member
richardmathews
Share On TwitterShare On Google

Snowe and Ayotte were in the same situation: co-sponsors who voted to continue debate. Snowe was even a co-author.

Here is the explanation:
http://boss.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/11/small-business-regulation-bill-gets-and-loses-a-vote/

Snowe wanted to debate an amendment to this bill, but Democrats refused. All Republicans voted for a filibuster in protest, killing a bill at least some of them wanted. Dems eventually allowed the same amendment to be debated in terms of attaching it to a different bill, but the amendment failed.

00
6 years ago
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz

Election Day Countdown

Election Day 2018Countdown

Donate to BMG’s slate for US Congress

BMG’s MA Democratic primary directory
MA primary day is September 4, 2018

Recommended Posts

  • Bad legislation from the Bad Markey (3)
  • What's the Downside of Demanding Wage Transparency? (2)
  • White spaces persist in Boston (2)
  • Advocating for her daughter’s care got a woman banned from DDS-funded group home; and her daughter got an eviction notice (1)
  • Boston Strong on Patriots Day (1)

Recent User Posts

Does Kevin Cullen Have a Nephew “Timmy” Who Died of Injuries Sustained In Iraq War? He Said He Does. Am I a Dick For Asking?

April 24, 2018 By eb3-fka-ernie-boch-iii 2 Comments

Advocating for her daughter’s care got a woman banned from DDS-funded group home; and her daughter got an eviction notice

April 24, 2018 By dave-from-hvad Leave a Comment

Bad legislation from the Bad Markey

April 23, 2018 By uncaffeine 2 Comments

RIP State Representative Jim Miceli

April 21, 2018 By Christopher Leave a Comment

What’s the Downside of Demanding Wage Transparency?

April 20, 2018 By johntmay 6 Comments

RIP First Lady Barbara Bush

April 17, 2018 By Christopher Leave a Comment

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Does Kevin Cullen Have a Nephew “Timmy” Who Died of Injuries Sustained In Iraq War? He Said He Does. Am I a Dick For Asking?There's also this: ... Then [an interview with Ivan Yate…
  • SomervilleTom on Does Kevin Cullen Have a Nephew “Timmy” Who Died of Injuries Sustained In Iraq War? He Said He Does. Am I a Dick For Asking?FWIW, it took me thirty seconds to find this 2008 report…
  • SomervilleTom on Bad legislation from the Bad MarkeyFor anyone who cares even a little bit about privacy and…
  • johntmay on Bad legislation from the Bad MarkeyCue the racist dog whistles on this line: "without the n…
  • Christopher on Quick hitsI always got the sense her old House district was what w…
  • marcus-graly on Quick hitsThe old 18th Essex was pretty red too. L'Italien never g…
  • petr on White spaces persist in BostonI’d like to think the homo sapiens species is a lot more…

Archive

From our sponsors




Google Calendar

Latest Tweets

  • RT @MSzafranski413: A significant point, including the reverse that no big Dem money from the DGA & Dem SuperPACs were getting into… https://t.co/UJou6ukqDl

    4 hours ago
  • RT @gintautasd: President Obama's EPA chief Gina McCarthy and top #MBTA overseer Joe Aiello considered for UMass Boston chancellor… https://t.co/GBvQmd326Q

    3 hours ago
  • A bad moment for accountable government: Setti Warren drops out of #MAGOV | Blue Mass Group #mapoli https://t.co/Fd27VgUDiA

    3 hours ago






Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2018 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.