I’ll Gladly Pay You, Tuesday, To Be In The Herald Today

[Bumped.] This strikes me as a pretty good catch. Also, could someone remind me of the last time Holly Robichaud was right about something?
- promoted by david

How does a freshman state representative get mentioned as a “serious threat” to Democrats looking to retain the Congressional seat being vacated by Barney Frank? Seventeen grand should do it.

Among the names floated as potential Republican candidates by Herald columnist Holly Robichaud the other day was first-term Taunton state representative Shaunna O’Connell. Holly pumps up a potential O’Connell candidacy:

State Rep. Shaunna O’Connell (R-Taunton), who defeated long-term state Rep. James Fagan in a heated battle last year, could pose a serious threat for the Democrats. She lives in the heart of the district and has proven she can win in a city.

How is Holly so familiar with the ins and outs of Bristol County politics? Aside from being a Herald columnist, Holly is the principal of the political consulting firm Tuesday Associates. Among Tuesday Associates’ clients is none other than Shaunna O’Connell. According to OCPF reports, since 2009, O’Connell has paid Tuesday Associates $17,264.95 for campaign services.

I get that Holly is a columnist, rather than a strict news reporter. There’s obviously going to be some flexibility in what she can and can not write. However, there should at the very least be some disclosure on Holly’s part when she writes about her own clients.

UPDATE (by David): Well, wouldja look at that.  OCPF screenshot on the flip (click for larger).  There are so many entries that I couldn’t get them all in a single screenshot.

OCPF records of Shaunna O'Connell's expenditures to Tuesday Associates



Discuss

15 Comments . Comments are closed.
  1. I'll go so far to say

    that somebody should lose a job over this. That’s just brutally unethical journalism.

  2. Thanks for adding the OCPF data, David.

    n/t

  3. It used to drive me bananas...

    …when she would trash Christy Mihos, without mentioning that she had been his campaign manager.

    When he was initially running in a primary against Healey, Robichaud was his principal campaign advisor. Their relationship did not end well. At all. He later ran as an independent, and her jihad against him began then.

    Four years later, when he ran again, she made no disclosure of their prior relationship. She merely kept planting every spiteful item she could conjure. Eventually, she had to desist (another interesting story), but refused to acknowledge the conflict she had.

    So if you hire her, remember – if she’s not happy at the end of your campaign, she’ll use her pulpit to ruin you no matter how long it may take.

  4. Wow.

    Not shocked. Now that she’s working for Tom Keyes it will be interesting to see if attacks on the Senate President slip into her propoganda.

    Seeing a screencap from her hilarious Greater Boston appearence has
    me wondering: Is Elizabeth Warren “top tier” enough for you, Holly?

  5. Loser?

    In that image, is she attempting to make the sign language gesture for “loser?” If so, she’s doing it wrong.

    It’s always deliciously ironic when somebody does that.

  6. Another GOP loser

    The decision by Shaunna O’Connell to use Ms. Robichaud as a political consultant tells voters all they need to know about her judgment (or lack thereof).

    Where does the GOP find these losers, and why?

  7. Annnd Tom Keyes too

    You can find contributions from Tom Keyes, Therese Murray’s opponent in the OCPF database also. Holly wrote in the Herald how she felt Tom could win.

  8. So I did some searching

    The article “Keyes to beating Therese Murray” was posted on August 26th 2010. The first check paid to Tuesday Associates was cut on September 7th, 2010. There are also another dozen or so payments during 2011.

    • Legit or not?

      So are you suggesting this was fine since she wasn’t “on the take” when the column was written?

      Or are you suggesting there was a quid pro quo where she got paid once the article actually appeared?

      • No I don't think it was fine

        She should always explicitly state her relationship with clients if she’s going to write about them. And if no business relationship existed when she wrote the article it was likely in the works.

  9. Among other things, there are multiple violations

    … of the American Association of Political Consultants Code of Professional Ethics:

    I will not indulge in any activity which would corrupt or degrade the practice of political consulting.

    I will treat my colleagues and clients with respect and never intentionally injure their professional or personal reputations.

    I will respect the confidence of my clients and not reveal confidential or privileged information obtained during our professional relationship.

    I will use no appeal to voters which is based on racism, sexism, religious intolerance or any form of unlawful discrimination and will condemn those who use such practices. In turn, I will work for equal voting rights and privileges for all citizens.

    I will refrain from false or misleading attacks on an opponent or member of his or her family and will do everything in my power to prevent others from using such tactics.

    I will document accurately and fully any criticism of an opponent or his or her record.

    I will be honest in my relationship with the news media and candidly answer questions when I have the authority to do so.

    I will use any funds I receive from my clients, or on behalf of my clients, only for those purposes invoiced in writing.

    I will not support any individual or organization which resorts to practices forbidden by this code.

  10. How it is done

    A Michael Goldman column on the Mass. Congressional delegation in today’s Lowell Sun discloses which members of the delegation are Goldman’s former clients. (Per Dan Kennedy tweet.)

« Blue Mass Group Front Page

Wed 16 May 11:32 PM