I did it. One of the pleasures of being an un-enrolled voter in Massachusetts.
My ballot: read it and weep.
tblade
| Mon, Feb 27, 2012
8:02 PM EST
Dear Lord, what have you done. - promoted by Bob_Neer
tblade
| Mon, Feb 27, 2012
8:02 PM EST
-
- Sun 19 May 8:33 AM
Do as I say
by wolverine on Gomez stiffed a plumber who fixed his toilet. Seriously. - Sun 19 May 1:06 AM
And this is a position of strength?
by lynne on Gomez FURIOUS at accurate description of his position - Sun 19 May 1:02 AM
Amen...
by lynne on Gomez FURIOUS at accurate description of his position - Sun 19 May 12:56 AM
Actually, specifically
by lynne on Gomez FURIOUS at accurate description of his position - Sat 18 May 11:25 PM
Hold on
by sabutai on Citizens First: A Call to Create “Charter” Police and Fire Stations, brought to you by Democrats for Public Safety Reform (DFPSR) - Sat 18 May 8:09 PM
You're only picking on someone if they've done nothing wrong
by sabutai on Gomez FURIOUS at accurate description of his position - Sat 18 May 8:07 PM
Don't conflate
by sabutai on PPP: Markey Up by 7 - Sat 18 May 7:07 PM
Should be
by fenway49 on Cool image from Minneapolis, MN - Sat 18 May 7:07 PM
The Hawaii
by fenway49 on Cool image from Minneapolis, MN - Sat 18 May 6:38 PM
Mixing concrete with a toothpick
by margiebh on Senate Ways & Means Budget for FY 2014
- Sun 19 May 8:33 AM
Return to the Home Page
Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.
RSS - Front Page
RSS - Latest Posts
RSS - Latest Comments
ADVERTISE ON THE BLUE MASS GROUP NETWORK | WORDPRESS HOSTING & WEB DESIGN BY PONTICLARO
Discuss
12 Comments . Leave a comment below.your ward doesn’t have a Republican committee on the ballot.
The nominees are below the fold as I thought it was unnecessary to include that in the graphic. The empty spaces on the right I guess are just extra write-in spaces.
It seems to me (a non-lawyer) to be in violation of Chapter 56, section 25 of Massachusetts General Laws, which prohibits showing your marked ballot to other people.
http://www.malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleVIII/Chapter56/Section25
What purposes are not authorized by law? Is blog-posting your ballot not authorized by law?
I’m sure BMG could drum up $100 in donations to pay your fine if push come to shove. I’m in for a ten spot.
As I said, I’m not a lawyer and this is certainly not legal advice. But how I would read it is that purposes authorized by law would be someone viewing your ballot in an official capacity, such as an election officer hand counting your ballot, should the machine not scan it properly.
The reason why I know about this law, by the way, is that I was considering doing something similar. (Taking a photo of my ballot and then posting it to Facebook with some silly caption like “ew, I need to take a shower”) However, I’m an election clerk, so violating election laws, even in a minor way, would be unseemly and potentially jeopardize my ability to be one in future elections, so I decided to check if it was legal to photograph your ballot before I did anything.
…and I hope I am not violating the law. And I appreciate the heads up.
you are not allowed to publish a picture of your own ballot. I mean, there’s nothing stopping you from TELLING us what ballot you took and how you marked it…why would an actual picture do anything further than that?
It seems that unless there is another place prohibiting one from one’s free speech in this matter, that this would be awfully hard to argue as illegal. I mean, do you have to be authorized by law to publish a picture? To post on a blog? To talk about your ballot and how you voted? Nope.
…. that it looks to be a law designed to discourage either electioneering and/or covert signalling in actual polling places. Perhaps it is a throwback to earlier times when machine politicians would bus illiterate and semi-literate people to the polls and ‘indicate’ to them how they are to vote by having a marked ballot from which they would copy.
Since this is an absentee ballot, I don’t think that sort of stricture applies… but if you were to take this ballot, or even a picture of it, to the polls on March 6 and wave it around, you might fall afoul of the law. Of course, I’m not a lawyer either…
I’m assuming Santorum’s thugs didn’t show up at tblade’s door and demand he prove his loyalty to their boss by posting a picture of his ballot to BMG, but you never know…
A poorly worded statute is the lawyer’s livelihood.
It could mean– you cannot show to marking of your ballot to any person for an illegal purpose OR
you cannot show the marking of your ballot to any person for any purpose not specifically authorized by law.
In any event, probably not enforceable against a BMG post, even if BMG is not specifically authorized by law.
If this is a crime, I am also guilty.
When I voted for President in 2008, I took my cell phone out of my pocket and photographed my ballot. A vote for the first African-American President of the United States, I thought it was a historic moment that I wanted to preserve.
It was absolutely no secret who I was going to vote for, and I can’t imagine why the public good is well served by applying Chapter 56, section 25 of Massachusetts General Laws to this situation.
« Blue Mass Group Front Page
Sun 19 May 8:57 AM