Look, Debbie, I understand that after I departed the House floor you directed your floor speech comments directly towards me. Let me make myself perfectly clear, you want a personal fight, I am happy to oblige. You are the most vile, unprofessional ,and despicable member of the US House of Representatives. If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face, otherwise, shut the heck up. Focus on your own congressional district!

I am bringing your actions today to our Majority Leader and Majority Whip and from this time forward, understand that I shall defend myself forthright against your heinous characterless behavior……which dates back to the disgusting protest you ordered at my campaign hqs, October 2010 in Deerfield Beach.

You have proven repeatedly that you are not a Lady, therefore, shall not be afforded due respect from me!

Steadfast and Loyal

Congressman Allen B West (R-FL)

And all because Wasserman Schultz blabbed this in congress:

“The gentleman from Florida. who represents thousands of Medicare beneficiaries, as do I, is supportive of this plan that would increase costs for Medicare beneficiaries, unbelievable from a Member from South Florida,” Wasserman Schultz said, saying the legislation “slashes Medicaid and critical investments essential to winning the future in favor of protecting tax breaks for Big Oil, millionaires, and companies who ship American jobs overseas.”

Poor Allen is wound way too tight.
Don’tcha just love these civil war re-enactments!

Asking what Prof. Warren’s position on carbon tax is now on the scale of asking for Obama’s transcripts. Can you believe mike cote???????

I only bring up grades when people call Romney stupid or moron. I think I am owed a thanks now that more people are careful what they write, I have actually cleaned up the language here.

Anyway, if you do know her position on carbon taxes, please let me know or when she is appearing on a local radio because I will be the first caller, if she takes any from the horde made up of people like me.

1) I don’t agree with any of their beliefs?

or

2) None?

When I wrote the following:

The only republicans I can honestly say I have ever agreed with are Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. The rest can pound sand for all I care.

I believe this answers both questions, in that if you create a Venn Diagram showing the beliefs of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln and the diagram them with the beliefs of the Libertarian Republicans, assuming that anywhere in this diagram there is an intersection, then within that intersection (assuming one exists, which I see NO Evidence of ANY), then by the associative property, I would agree with only those items where the beliefs of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln intersect with Libertarian Republicans. Since I doubt that any such intersection exists, then I further answered your question.

Now please answer this question, why are you such a Troll? What possible gratification do you get from highjacking nearly every post on this site for you insipid rantings. It isn’t my job to provide you with:
a) Transcripts
b) GPAs
c) Carbon Tax positions.
d) or whatever shiny object you want to distract everyone with while we wait for your guy to release his tax returns.

Again – Yawn.

For those of you who don’t know Allen West, his op/ed says it all:

http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/223473-critical-time-for-ideological-debate

That “stuff” does bother me.

For example. Do you know Congressman Allen West of Florida? While serving in Iraq, he started interrogating a suspect on the battle field. I believe an IED went off and he wanted to know where the other bombs were. So when the suspect wouldn’t talk, he pulled his gun and shot it near his head and asked him again. Even though he received important intel, it was against the Army operating manual, so he was reprimanded. That stuff doesn’t bother me, just needs to be kept quit, know what I am saying?

For those who don’t know Allen West, his commercial brings a tear to my eyes, take look.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wMkYSXOgI4Q

The only person who should care if Barack Obama is Christian, Muslim, or Non-Religious is Michelle Obama. (Saying this is very conservative- in a non-political sense.)

I couldn’t care less because it doesn’t matter. All that matters is how the man will govern.

Also, being a dentist is about the patient’s teeth.

Dondero has had a long and messy feud with Paul and Paul supporters (the falling-out stems from Paul’s anti-war views after 9/11 — Dondero is a “pro-defense libertarian”). He hasn’t supported Paul in either of his recent Presidential campaigns and even considered running “a balls-to-the-wall campaign” against Paul for his Congressional seat in 2008.

http://reason.com/blog/2007/05/16/blowback-texas-style

Yes, there was a good discussion about Ron Paul, but there was no mention (except by myself) of Dondero’s more controversial views.

I think to can tell the difference between the two.

So to repeat: you don’t have any problem with people deliberately trying to lie about your beliefs? Really? And are you really that stupid that you don’t understand why people are trying to paint Obama as a Muslim? Are you really that dense?

Where is the libertarian outcry on this? Why the utter silence from the libertarian movement? Why is it that Libertarian Republican is the ONLY website covering this story and this issue?

Please, anyone, can you answer those questions for me?

Is Human Rights no longer part of the libertarian agenda?
April 23, 2011 8:52 AM

I guess this is why he fell out of love with Ron Paul, because he thought he was too non-interventionist.

Anonymous, only problem with your expressed belief is that 99.9% of all non-interventionists say precisely that… “we’re not pacifists, if they come over here we want to fight back, blah, blah, blah…”

Yet when it comes to the fight back part, they are amazingly pacifist. “Oh no, we can’t do that, that would be intervening in their internal affairs, blah, blah, blah…”

I really do wish there was such a thing as a “walk softly, carry a big stick” non-interventionist libertarian out there. Unfortunately every single one who expresses that sentiment turns out to be just a “walk softly,” type, without the big stick.
April 24, 2011 7:56 AM

Basically, I’m saying that your use of Dondero is not so different than Brown’s — you’re both willing to cite his opinion as authoritative when you agree with it and it suits your purpose.

Alas, as Mr. Gershon fully admits, and as we’ve long suspected, it’s not about sexual liberties; rather it’s about living off the government dole.
Our libertarian Republican view of gay marriage of course, is go for it. You wanna get married. Fine. Go to a park, hire a couple lawyers, have a big gay wedding party, and Matzeltoff! Who are we to interfere, or anyone else for that matter?
Why do two gays or lesbians need government’s sanction to get married? What’s wrong with marriage privatization?

We really need a third party.

Continuing to predict using Probability and Statistics, I predict your next at least 8 of your next 10 comments will be off-topic insipid Trolls.

If some one called me something I am not, I wouldnt act like its a bad thing. I would certainly react in a much more positive way, explaining there is nothing wrong being a Muslim (in this example), but I am actually xyz.

–Eric Dondero, former Ron Paul aide

I, for one, would not call Paul’s remarks in his newsletter “silly,” yahoo.

You guys didn’t seem to think he was a “nut” when he was making a point you agreed with.

About Libertarian Republican

What’s a Libertarian Republican?

Libertarian Republicans are libertarians who believe in working within the Republican Party to advance the agenda of liberty. Many libertarian Republicans are former member of the Libertarian Party who have left to join the GOP. Others keep their current affiliation with the Libertarian Party while still participating in Republican politics, as well. Still others are lifelong Republicans who have always felt a kinship to the libertarian movement, and libertarian beliefs. Most libertarian Republicans are active to some degree with the Republican Liberty Caucus, which represents the libertarian wing of the GOP.

Libertarian Republican Beliefs:

Less Taxes!, Cut Spending, Deregulation, Privatization, Protect Property Rights, Energy Independence, School Choice, Repeal Affirmative Action, Say No to the Nanny-State, End Victimless Crime Laws, Oppose Political Correctness, Protect our Gun Rights, Secure our Borders, Strong Military, & Support our Troops!

They also believe in gay marriage, even though they also usually profess to be pro-life because even embryos have gun rights.

Want to see something funny? There’s an advertisement on the LibertarianRepublican front page for a blog called – i’m not making this up – IntercourseAndConception! I love the call for religious freedom that includes “Objectionists”

A founding leader must work both to heal old rifts and to embrace new groups. Leaders of the 21st Century must tolerate Jews, Baha’is, Objectionists, and all other religious communities if they hope to build a lasting legacy.

And then a post about LGBT freedom:

A COUPLE CELEBRATIONS OF LOVE
1:53 am by Joseph Dunsay. Filed under: Freedom of Assembly,Freedom of Speech,Freedom of the Press,Sex
The New York City, USA Gay Pride Parade was today (www.nycpride.org). It celebrates the freedom to have romantic relationships with whomever one chooses and reminds the public of the a historic milestone in the struggle for equality. In 1969 the Stonewall Riots occurred in New York City. In those years, the police regularly raided gay bars and arrested patrons at those bars who were not harming anyone. When the police broke into the Stonewall Inn, New York City’s queers fought back with the Stonewall Riots. Activists shaped frustrations into a long term movement to secure rights for LGBT individuals. They held the first Gay Pride Parade on the one year anniversary of the Stonewall Riots. Half a century later, the tradition is still going strong.

Parades were an important part of 20th Century activism. The internet is a major player in 21st Century activism. Nivea is paradoxically using the internet to promote romantic face to face contact (www.nationalpdaday.com). June 20th, 2012 was National PDA Day, where PDA stands for “Public Display of Affection”. Nivea encouraged people to kiss, hug, or hold hands in public and document their action online. In some sense, this is a Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender and Straight holiday. Hopefully, the idea will become an annual tradition.

Of course there is not necessarily anything offensive about being referred to as a Muslim if you are one. But it is deeply offensive to lie about someone’s religion with the intention of building on anti-Islamic bigotry.

So just for the record, you don’t care if we falsely characterize your beliefs?

- Different
- Not Christian
- Black / Not “Anglo-Saxon” / (Chose your own racist expletive)
- Foreign / Not Native Born / Un-American
- A Terrosist / Terrosist sympathizer
- An Apologist for America / Traitor
- Unqualified

You may not care if someone calls you a “Muslim” but supporters of the President are rightly appalled by the rather clear implications as detailed above.

This whole debate reminds me of the cop who called Crawford a “Monday” recently and was fired. What’s the big deal in calling someone a day of the week? It’s what the term means to the speaker that matters.

So it’s okay to use Maher’s money, correct?

Bill Maher doesn’t speak for the President and I am not aware of the President touting Maher’s words in his own ads or fundraising letters the way Brown has in this example.

Personally, why is it offensive to be called a Muslim? Someone called me that, I would care less.