Here’s Hoping “Glass Jaw” Scott Brown Gets Bitchy at Debate – Was Graft Involved in Amy Bishop Cover-Up? One of Many Questions Needing Answers

The Herald's Peter Gelzinis has more on debate strategy, including Brown's ties to sleazy mortgage companies. - promoted by david

Here’s hoping Liz Warren hits Glass Jaw Scott Brown with quick and succinct hits on votes he’s taken that have cost jobs and hurt the economy. Past quotes of his help.

It would also be nice if Scott’s asked to explain his representation of sketchy mortgage companies for loans that most likely included language that Scott’s clients knew or should have known would result in the borrower defaulting. How many “no-doc” loans did Scott represent the mortgage company on?

This of course only as an attack after she is forced to defend her professional background.

BTW Warren has credentials to represent her clients. Other than being a legislator what credentials/ training did Scott have? When in relation to his elected position did he start getting financial institutions as clients?

What votes in the legislature did he take that were favorable to his banker clients and a heavy handed slap to the person paying their mortgage on time?

As for the surrogates, remind people that Scott is anti-women. He pimped his mother’s illnesses out to help his election and sell a book. My god he won’t let anyone forget it. He brings it up more than the Red Sox ownership reminds us how good things were years ago.

Am I the only one that finds Brown’s familial disloyalty not only bizarre but anti-American, wait, anti-human. Imagine building an identity around one’s mother’s failures. Especially a political identity. Uncool dude, uncool.

Anyhoo, Glass Jaw Scott Brown throws wild punches, is not quick with counter-punches and allows his emotions get the better of him when hit hard. And…. he’s never been hit hard.

He only knows sound bites that Eric “See You in Hell” Ferhnstrom feeds him.

After that he’s like…”Oh yeah! Well you lied about being an Indian, and you represent insurance companies, and you make a lot of money and you’re a four-eyes, and and you think you’re sooo cool. Well I gut news for ya sweetheart, you’re not cool. I’m cool. I’m Scott Brown cool.”

Scott will loose it even more when Warren kills him with kindness as she constantly jabs with quick facts forcing Brown to defend himself with all the rhetorical muscle of a third grader.

And of course Liz will have one or two attempts at a knock out punch.

Bottom line, the guy’s a wuss with an ego and position dwarfing his intelligence and ability and he has a  pretty boy temper problem.

So I’m hoping that tomorrow Miss Lizzie will bring out the worst in Scotty.

Let it shine, let it shine, praise Jesus let it shine!

————-

The details of the Amy Bishop murder in Braintree raise obvious questions that should not be ignored. A murder was committed that was not properly investigated resulting in the guilty going free and killing again.

The facts indicate gross negligence with no accountability. Were any law enforcement officials pressured, bribed, or blackmailed?

Why isn’t there an independent investigation? Where is the special investigator on this? What involvement did past and present Norfolk district attorneys, assistant district attorneys, and police officers/state troopers have in the initial cover-up.

Was/is there a cover-up by the Norfolk County District Attorneys Office post the Alabama shooting?

Why is that office investigating themselves?

Can D.A. Michael Morrissey point to other homicide cases in Massachusetts where the Commonwealth decided not pursue charges? For any reason at all?

These are all proper questions that seem to be going unasked by the press and Martha Coakley.

Does this pass anyone’s smell test?

 

Recommended by patrick, trickle-up.



Discuss

4 Comments . Leave a comment below.
  1. No, you are not alone...

    “Am I the only one that finds Brown’s familial disloyalty not only bizarre but anti-American, wait, anti-human. Imagine building an identity around one’s mother’s failures. Especially a political identity. Uncool dude, uncool.”

    This is a very astute observation, particularly because my wife has said the same thing for quite some time now. In this state, among multi-generational ethnic working families, Mom is always – I repeat – always a saint. Mom is never thrown under the bus to win a vote or cop a plea in Juvi Hall. Never give up Mom to the neighbors, cops, court officers, counselors or two-bit candidates and their high-priced DC ghost writers. Its just bad form.

  2. I doubt she brings this up.

    Obviously, you’ve seen all the buzz plastered across the Internet about Brown’s work as a title agent for a pair of major mortgage companies, Fidelity National and First American.

    Was there that much buzz? I read the bit on the Credit Slips site. The comments on that post were generally of the opinion that wasn’t anything meaningful there and it would be silly to pursue it.

  3. other debate questions

    For all the praise of Jkeller for the debate, he was surprisingly light on a few key issues for Brown.

    1. Gay Marriage.
    2. Labor issues – remember Scotto dashing down there to stop Craig Becker’s appointment to the NLRB? [And personally, as a pre-6AM 93S commuter, I am starting to see the Elizabeth Warren stickers make it onto the bumpers of the pick-up trucks.
    3. Loyalty to the caucus versus loyalty to the state. Under what circumstance would Scotto leave the caucus and be an independent?

« Blue Mass Group Front Page

Add Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sat 25 May 12:09 PM