One of Scott Brown’s asbestos ads features a guy who thinks Obama is a Muslim (and that’s not all)

Painful. Scott Brown falsely claims that the people in Warren's ads are paid; and then it turns out that one of the folks in his own ads is ... well, this guy. Here's the ad. Mr. Patriarca appears to have deleted his Facebook account (at least, I couldn't find it). There are some screenshots at the HuffPo post, and also at this link, at which you can see that he calls the First Lady "a useless communist piece of trash." Classy.
- promoted by david

[Post's title has been edited for clarity. -ed.]
If you can judge people by the company they keep, Scott Brown’s in trouble.  Huffington Post reports that a local construction worker who appeared in Brown recent campaign ad about — what else — the Travelers/asbestos case, has a Facebook page full of offensive stuff.

Some of the highlights from the past month or two (almost all of this up before Brown’s ad was filmed):

  • Paging Lynne: He called Elizabeth Warren a “douchebag” and invited her to ride a motorcycle without a helmet.
  • He called Obama a “faggot” and said “we have a Muslim in the White House”
  • He called his alma mater, Brandeis, “Jew U.”  Full quote: “I attended Brandeis. Jew U. Great school. the people, not so much. One thing I learned is that Jews have a persecution complex and they hate themselves. That is why I believe they vote for liberals.”
  • Racially insensitive “dialect” and references to “slaves in the Democratic plantation” in discussion of the black voters who support Obama because he gives them all free cell phones
  • Would support Allen West for president
  • Called the Obama administration “pure evil”
  • Another “douchebag” reference for Janeane Garafolo: “The day I wake up, turn on the news to find that that (creatively spelled c-word) was involved in a bizzare meat grinder accident that chopped up her already rotten carcass will be a great day for me. ;-) ”  Apparently in this guy’s world “douchebag” should be applied primarily, if not exclusively, to women.
  • Naturally he blames Warren for the nasty tone of the Senate race.

I wish I could say I’m surprised by this, but I’m not.

Of course, Brown isn’t just an ass by association.  He’s done plenty to make clear he’s a jerk in his own right.  Today he’s even walking back his lame apology for falsely claiming the relatives of asbestos victims in Warren’s ads were paid actors.  You see, it’s all Warren’s fault for “representing those large corporations against those victims.”  Thus, this whole flap is “unfair” to Scott. If Warren hadn’t worked on a case that’s complex enough for Scott to lie about, she wouldn’t have defended her record, and he wouldn’t have been forced to lie about her defense of her record.  Got that?

Step 1: Cynically distort facts.

Step 2: Lie about the people who call you out for cynical distortion of facts.

Step 3: Blame opponent when caught in lie about the people who called you out for cynical distortion of facts.

Step 4: Repeat your original cynical distortions.

Step 5: Repeat Step 4 until the election’s over.



Discuss

16 Comments . Leave a comment below.
  1. What vetting process?

    Ya gotta wonder, with the amount of facetime our angry friend has in the Brown ad, did Brown’s staff actually bother to vet this gimoke?

    They either didn’t or they were so desperate to get a union guy in their ad, they overlooked his “flaws.”

    File this under: Self-inflicted Wound

    • Other vetting problems?

      I remember an ad that came out a couple of weeks ago with lots of supposed real people talking trash about Warren. One day it was one set of people and the next day a couple of new guys were spliced in, same ad, but a couple new heads. What happened, did one of his supporters get caught taking a leak on a Warren lawn sign?

    • It's not like

      his facebook page isn’t, apparently, fully public!

  2. while it would be hypocritical to call out this person for his word choice ..

    in one reference as it has been used here as well. But it seems that this guy as amassed an impressive collection of stupid. Seems to be in Scott Brown’s wheelhouse.

    • Lynne, though

      used the term in response to Brown’s perpetuating specific patterns of misrepresentation, despite their having been shown to be misleading. This guy used it because, I guess, he just hates all Democrats or liberals.

  3. Again with the Janeane Garofalo.

    I still do not understand the right’s obsession with her. It’s been, what, eight years since she was on the radio? Her political appearances at this point amount to the occasional guest spot on some unwatched show on Current TV maybe? I don’t get it.

  4. I't seems like only a week ago, that douchebag-liar was the word of the day.

    Excuse me, but did we not just have a lively posting called Proof Positive Scott Brown is a Douchebag Liar. I’m just saying.

    • And all those who didn't like it then

      shouldn’t like it now. Paging EB-3 and co.

      I don’t think that word, taken alone, is such a big deal (though I generally don’t use it myself). But here it’s completely out of thin air (he uses it not in response to anything in particular, but just because he doesn’t like her). Much more importantly it’s joined by all this other crap.

      It’s true, Scott’s got his real supporters in his ad. No paid actors there.

  5. Phew,

    I’m certainly glad the Brown campaign isn’t using paid actors in the advertisements. That’s a relief.

  6. I saw that, I cracked up

    But let’s be specific…I used the term “douchebag liar” for which I have many, many facts to back me up on.

  7. You can help.

    Who are the other people in this ad? You can help with the research, if you recognize anybody. Compare their images with pictures on facebook or the Internet. For example, who is the guy who claims he is a “life long democrat”? It would be really great if somebody could discover that Brown is using paid actors! You can help by doing the research!

« Blue Mass Group Front Page

Add Your Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Mon 20 May 4:49 PM