<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NRA gun industry hacks go after Obama&#8217;s children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bluemassgroup.com/2013/01/nra-gun-industry-hacks-go-after-obamas-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bluemassgroup.com/2013/01/nra-gun-industry-hacks-go-after-obamas-children/</link>
	<description>Reality-based commentary on politics and policy in Massachusetts and around the nation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomervilleTom</title>
		<link>http://bluemassgroup.com/2013/01/nra-gun-industry-hacks-go-after-obamas-children/#comment-308561</link>
		<dc:creator>SomervilleTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemassgroup.com/?p=52461#comment-308561</guid>
		<description>You ask &quot;What kind of crisis does this country spin into if, God forbid, one or both of his children are kidnapped?&quot; The &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Five_(The_West_Wing)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;West Wing version&lt;/a&gt; made for riveting television and had a happy outcome (as I recall). It was an auspicious debut for the episode&#039;s director, Christopher Misiano.

All kidding aside, I think this demonstrates that significant portions of the right wing really &lt;b&gt;are&lt;/b&gt; domestic terrorists who remain absolutely serious about taking down Barack Obama and the &quot;liberal&quot; culture he represents &#8212; using whatever means they deem appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ask &#8220;What kind of crisis does this country spin into if, God forbid, one or both of his children are kidnapped?&#8221; The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Five_(The_West_Wing)" rel="nofollow">West Wing version</a> made for riveting television and had a happy outcome (as I recall). It was an auspicious debut for the episode&#8217;s director, Christopher Misiano.</p>
<p>All kidding aside, I think this demonstrates that significant portions of the right wing really <b>are</b> domestic terrorists who remain absolutely serious about taking down Barack Obama and the &#8220;liberal&#8221; culture he represents &#8212; using whatever means they deem appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://bluemassgroup.com/2013/01/nra-gun-industry-hacks-go-after-obamas-children/#comment-308560</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemassgroup.com/?p=52461#comment-308560</guid>
		<description>the NRA knows all of that.  They&#039;re not in this for a serious debate.  They&#039;re in it to rile up their extremist base.  But this ad strikes me as a bridge too far, even for some of the more conservative NRA members.  Nobody sane thinks that going after the President&#039;s kids - in any context - is a good idea.  Would be nice if we started seeing some dropped memberships as a result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the NRA knows all of that.  They&#8217;re not in this for a serious debate.  They&#8217;re in it to rile up their extremist base.  But this ad strikes me as a bridge too far, even for some of the more conservative NRA members.  Nobody sane thinks that going after the President&#8217;s kids &#8211; in any context &#8211; is a good idea.  Would be nice if we started seeing some dropped memberships as a result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stomv</title>
		<link>http://bluemassgroup.com/2013/01/nra-gun-industry-hacks-go-after-obamas-children/#comment-308557</link>
		<dc:creator>stomv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bluemassgroup.com/?p=52461#comment-308557</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s simple national security.  What kind of crisis does this country spin into if, God forbid, one or both of his children are kidnapped?

Wikipedia lists the following presidents as assassinated
    1.1 Abraham Lincoln
    1.2 James A. Garfield
    1.3 William McKinley
    1.4 John F. Kennedy
and the following as failed attempts [I&#039;ve removed duplicates]
    2.1 Andrew Jackson
    2.3 Theodore Roosevelt
    2.4 Herbert Hoover
    2.5 Franklin D. Roosevelt
    2.6 Harry S. Truman
    2.8 Richard Nixon
    2.9 Gerald Ford
    2.10 Jimmy Carter
    2.11 Ronald Reagan
    2.12 George H. W. Bush
    2.13 Bill Clinton
    2.14 George W. Bush
    2.15 Barack Obama

Now some are weaker than others -- and a few occurred either before or after the man was serving as POTUS. Still, that&#039;s 17 out of 44: 39%.  Sure, at attempt on the president is not the same thing as an attempt on a family member, but it&#039;s simply not too far a stretch of imagination.

P.S. Any political video which uses black and white, fast segments, and quick-pans is almost always crap.  This one included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s simple national security.  What kind of crisis does this country spin into if, God forbid, one or both of his children are kidnapped?</p>
<p>Wikipedia lists the following presidents as assassinated<br />
    1.1 Abraham Lincoln<br />
    1.2 James A. Garfield<br />
    1.3 William McKinley<br />
    1.4 John F. Kennedy<br />
and the following as failed attempts [I've removed duplicates]<br />
    2.1 Andrew Jackson<br />
    2.3 Theodore Roosevelt<br />
    2.4 Herbert Hoover<br />
    2.5 Franklin D. Roosevelt<br />
    2.6 Harry S. Truman<br />
    2.8 Richard Nixon<br />
    2.9 Gerald Ford<br />
    2.10 Jimmy Carter<br />
    2.11 Ronald Reagan<br />
    2.12 George H. W. Bush<br />
    2.13 Bill Clinton<br />
    2.14 George W. Bush<br />
    2.15 Barack Obama</p>
<p>Now some are weaker than others &#8212; and a few occurred either before or after the man was serving as POTUS. Still, that&#8217;s 17 out of 44: 39%.  Sure, at attempt on the president is not the same thing as an attempt on a family member, but it&#8217;s simply not too far a stretch of imagination.</p>
<p>P.S. Any political video which uses black and white, fast segments, and quick-pans is almost always crap.  This one included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
