Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Boston School Committee Member Meg Campbell…Listen Up!

May 28, 2013 By jshore 12 Comments

In a Boston Globe opinion piece this past Friday, Boston School Committee member, Meg Campbell wrote,  “I do raise the question of how 92 percent of our Boston Public School teachers can be rated proficient or exemplary when more than 50 percent of our schools are low performing? Shall we just blame the kids?”

Since Ms. Campbell raised the question, let me try to provide at least part of the answer.  During the School Assignment Process this past year the one piece of data, that parents and I repeatedly asked the Boston Public Schools (BPS) External Advisory Committee for, and never received, was the student test data broken down by neighborhood.  We asked that it be aggregated by those students currently attending traditional public schools, those attending charter schools, and METCO. We felt that school “quality” would change overnight as children were marched into different schools.  The children are the data; the “quality” of the neighborhood schools they attend would be determined by where kids who scored high on MCAS were placed.

I’ve written about this before but it is worth repeating here, communities that use a Unified School System model, always seem to make AYP? Why? Have you ever heard of schools in Lexington, Wellesley or Weston not making AYP? No! There is a reason for this, and it not that kids in those communities are smarter, or that their teachers are better.  In the communities making AYP, all students attend traditional “heterogeneous” schools. Their schools have programs that reflect the interest of the community and advanced students are offered Advance Placement (AP) courses, or have International Baccalaureate (IB) programs, WITHIN their regular schools. These communities don’t separate and send students to separate exam or charter schools!

Traditional public schools in Boston do not compete on a level playing field. Mayor Menino, supported by his appointed Boston School Committee, made the decision to adopt a “portfolio model” for our district, which has lead to a two-tier system in our schools.  In the Boston Public Schools (BPS) “portfolio of schools” there is 128 schools. Among these, the BPS has 3 exam schools, 21 pilot, 5 Horace Mann, and 4 “innovation” schools. Then there are the 23 Commonwealth Charter Schools in Boston, and they accept Boston students, but are their own separate districts and are not accountable to the Boston Public School District but to the Department of Education (DOE). One example of a Commonwealth Charter is the Codman Academy Charter School in Dorchester, Boston School Committee member, Meg Campbell, is the founder and executive director there.

Commonwealth charter schools are not “level funded” but are “average funded” by the sending district.  I wrote a detailed piece about it here on BMG titled “MADOE Commissioner Mitchell Chester…Listen Up!”  To briefly sum it up, to educate a Regular Ed student in a BPS traditional school cost $11,855. However, when you add the cost of all the BPS Special Ed and Ell students, the cost “averages” out to $15,227.  Charter schools are paid the “average” $15,227. even though their population of students is mostly regular ed, and in no way reflects the English Language Learner and Special Education demographic of the Boston Public Schools! This $15,227 tuition figure BPS pays, does not include the busing expense, which BPS pays for, nor does it include the “non-tuition” State, Federal, Foundation, and NMTC (New Market Tax Credit) investor revenue, which Codman Charter, and other Commonwealth charter schools, also receive.

At Codman Charter in Dorchester only 2%, (3 students) are LEP (Limited English Proficient) in a community like Boston that has a high population of new comers, only 3 LEP students! In 2011, they had .7% – that’s point seven percent! In the BPS 30.6% of its students are LEP.

In 2010, Codman Charter started out with a 9th grade cohort of 53 students. In 2011, when those students entered grade 10, an MCAS grade, 19 students vanished from Codman Charters roll! This June only 24 students from that cohort remain, they did not backfill those empty seats. There is no way to predict if all 24 of these students will graduate but historically Codman Charter has had a low graduation rate. In 2012, Codman’s four year graduation rate was 62.5%!

These Commonwealth Charter schools, like Codman Charter, take our children, try them out, and send those children that are “not the right fit” back to BPS. One way that happens is by Suspensions.  At Codman Charter the Suspension Rate is 23.5%.  In BPS it is only 4%.  How many days can a parent take off of work to address their kids issues before they don’t have a job?

Meg Campbell is an APPOINTED member of the Boston School Committee, after reading her article I’ve come to think of her as carpetbagger. You would think that she would be relieved and proud that 92% of the teachers in the Boston Public Schools were evaluated proficient and exceeds expectations.  You would think that she would be the first to step up to the plate and investigate why there were discrepancies in nationality, color and age for those teachers that did not meet the cut.  You would think she would have Investigated the many educational vendors who have been allowed to saturate our schools to tell teachers “how to do it” without addressing or even acknowledging the systemic problems that a two-tiered system has created and which Ms. Campbell, in pursuit of HER dream of Expeditionary Learning for a few, has contributed negatively to the rest of Boston’s children.

Personally, I feel that Ms. Campbell is intentionally trying to deflect the role that charter schools, like Codman Charter, have contributed to the underperformance of traditional public schools. If you took all the exam, pilot, Horace Mann, innovation and Commonwealth charter school students and salted them in Boston’s Traditional Schools would 50% of our schools be “low performing?”  I don’t think so!

Shrewdly, Ms. Campbell slams the findings generated by the administrators in our schools, who have been professionally developed on the “evaluative instrument” ad nauseam and, not unionized, work at the “will of the superintendent!”  What Ms. Campbell is unfolding is a generalized process of demonization of an entire population group, Boston Teachers and Administrators, committed people, on the frontline, who are in direct service to Boston’s children!  Ms. Campbell has forgotten, or never considered, that we are part of the Boston Public School team!

It is clear that she has her own agenda, and there is, I feel, a conflict of interest. Back in February of this year, she applied to the DOE and received a wavier to increase maximum enrollment, and to change the grade span served at Codman Charter. She plans to open a k-8 charter school in Hyde Park. What better way to “make a compelling argument for the need for a K-8 school in the area it serves” than by making an unsupported allegation on the quality of the teaching force she plans on replacing! Would someone tell me, with a charter school graduation rate as dismal as Codman’s, how that school is considered “high quality” enough to expand?

I was surprised and questioned Mayor Menino’s wisdom in placing Ms. Campbell on our school committee. As the executive director of Codman Charter, Ms. Campbell represents her own school district and as she has demonstrated that is her priority. Busing students is costing BPS 79,993,027 million a year.  The Boston School Committee just spent the past year trying to get kids off the bus and into a “quality” neighborhood school in an attempt to reduce this expense and reallocate this money back into the schools.  Yet Meg Campbell is not only putting 200 kids back on the bus, as a charter school these students will be bussed citywide, and BPS will be required by State law to pay for it!  I have no trust that Ms. Campbell can make the decisions that will unite our school system as a whole, and will be in the best interest of ALL our children moving forward.  Ms. Campbell needs to resign from the Boston School Committee, and parents, of students currently enrolled in Boston’s Traditional Public Schools, need to be appointed to any openings.

 

Please share widely!
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: BPS, BSC, charter-school, Meg Campbell

12
Leave a reply

Please Login to comment
5 Comment threads
7 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
10 Comment authors
garboesquejshoreopusedgecolumwhytesabutai Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
Mark L. Bail
Member
Noble Member
Mark L. Bail

in facts and logic.

Campbell writes:

Ron Edmonds’s groundbreaking research at Harvard in the 1970s on effective schools for low income children of color established that the single most important factor in determining whether or not a school is successful is the school principal. Why? Because the principal is responsible for hiring, supporting, and evaluating teachers. A school can only be as strong as its principal and teachers.

First of all, the “single most important factor” canard. Ron Edmonds aside, others have argued that a rigorous curriculum is the most important factor. Other than justifying Campbell’s position, a “single most important factor” is irrelevant. What’s the single most important part of a car? The wheels? The steering wheel? The engine? The car doesn’t run without any of them. It’s stupid to talk about a “single most important factor” in a complex system like education. Even if principals were the most important factor, how much more important are they?

Evaluations are ratings. Lower ratings do not, as Campbell suggests, mean that there isn’t room for improvement or that teachers won’t continue to improve.

as a charter leader, I too am going through the new state evaluation process, and that in my own self-evaluation, I had noted areas where I “need improvement.” If I don’t have any areas for continued growth, then I ought to hang it up. I believe it is important to model a culture of continuous improvement, and it happens also to be what I believe.

Moreover, a proficient rating doesn’t mean that a teacher was found proficient in every indicator. There may very well be indicators that have been identified areas for improvement.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
petr
Member
Noble Member
petr

Ron Edmonds’s groundbreaking research at Harvard in the 1970s on effective schools for low income children of color established that the single most important factor in determining whether or not a school is successful is the school principal. Why? Because the principal is responsible for hiring, supporting, and evaluating teachers. A school can only be as strong as its principal and teachers.

First of all, the “single most important factor” canard. Ron Edmonds aside, others have argued that a rigorous curriculum is the most important factor….

foctor, component, variable, whatever… Why do we have to complicate things, when they are not complex? I do not think that the school is as strong as the principal/teacher. I think that the school IS the principal/teachers. And I do not think that a curriculum is one something the school has among a continuum of somethings…. No, the curriculum is what the school DOES. Principal/teachers curriculum. Noun verb classroom I don’t think, at its essence, there is much more complexity to it than that. Students come upon this system in its classroom setting (and mostly only in its classroom setting) and while they are the reason FOR the system, students are not part of the system (any more than is the eater part of the restaraunt in which they dine…) The school is the principal/teachers and the process is the curriculum; students come and go partaking of the curriculum and the school refines it’s curriculum according to response and adaptive behaviours of students; rinse lather repeat.

The fallacy Meg Campbell flogs, and it’s a whopper, is that a rating of 92 percent of teachers as either proficient or exemplary must translate to a school rating of equal stature: if 92 percent of the teachers are proficient or better, she asks, why are 40% of schools performing poorly? Rather than posit, as I have, the difference between the school, the curriculum and the student, she goes for the jugular calling this a form of ‘grade inflation’: clearly implying that a large portion of the 92 percent of teachers rated proficient or exemplary do not deserve the label. She would shoot the rider who, after having led the horse to water, could not get him to drink…

The student passes through the system and, one hopes, picking up skills along the way. But the student is not the outcome. A better, continually improving curriculum is the outcome. What we are dealing with is the best principals and the best teachers forging the best curriculum hidden behind pain, apathy and/or distraction. That’s one way in which a 92 percent teachers proficiency can exist in a system where 40 percent of schools are performing poorly and in which both are true statistics. A hungry student, no matter how willing to learn cannot learn as well as the well-fed. The anxious student, whether it’s anxiety over hunger or a morning commute through gang-infested streets, cannot learn as well as the calm student. There are few variables to a good school and we know what they are but each student brings a hundredweight of other variables and, often, puts those variables between them and the school. And we are bass ackwards if we think that the students experience can tell us anything comprehensive about the teachers.

One of the other things Meg Campbell gets wrong, I think, is the notion that she can hold up superintendents/principals as so important while relying on external evaluations as, well, somehow evaluative. Either you trust the principals and throw out the external evaluations, or you trust the external evaluations and throw out the principals.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
Mark L. Bail
Member
Noble Member
Mark L. Bail

full of it down the line. The best management focuses on continual improvement of the organization; it doesn’t obsess over those who are below average. It identifies and remediates those teachers, but helps others to improve.

The letter Cannoneo posts is right on. I know who the great teachers (are or were). Most teachers know who their good and great colleagues are. The great teachers are invariably those who dedicate their lives to teaching, often to the point of neglecting their families. Many other great teachers are either unmarried or don’t have children. My school has a lot of good teachers, but I wouldn’t say there are more than 2 or 3 who might qualify as great. In my 20 year career, I’ve known fewer than 10 teachers who I would consider great.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
cannoneo
Member
Member
cannoneo

I want to share this letter to the editor that appeared in today’s Globe, from a former English teacher of mine. It’s not adversarial. Based on long years of experience, it simply calls attention to the realities that most “teacher performance” talk suppresses in the goal of creating and exploiting a crisis.

JAMES VAZNIS raises two vital issues in the provocative article “Ratings high for most Hub teachers” (Page A1, May 24). One is that of the qualifications of the evaluators, those contracted to judge the teachers in their schools. Very few department heads, principals, or curriculum and instruction supervisors have been trained in teacher evaluation. We shouldn’t blithely assume that anyone who is promoted to these positions automatically understands the process, never mind recognizes the nuances, of judging colleagues.

The other issue is the word “great” in Superintendent Carol R. Johnson’s comment that she wants every student to have “the opportunity for a great teacher.” Having spent almost half a century in school systems as a teacher evaluator, I confess to having seen only a handful or two of teachers I would call great. Most teachers were at least good— that is to say, competent and, in important respects, good enough.

How many professionals do we meet anywhere in life who are demonstrably great? Not many, I suspect, although with teachers we tend to throw the term around liberally.

As a retired professional, a parent, a grandparent, and a taxpayer, I’d confidently settle for a competent teacher in every classroom. I would be at least as demanding, however, that schools have a competent administrator evaluating those teachers.

DICK SHOHET
Carlisle

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
edushyster
Member
edushyster

Campbell’s school, Codman Academy, loses an average of 30% of its teachers every year. Her school isn’t unique – in fact that number is actually low when compared to the likes of Roxbury Prep which lost 50% of its teachers at the end of last year or Edward Brooks which lost 49%. I’d love to know whether Campbell sees such high turnover as a problem–or if that’s actually our goal.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
Christopher
Member
Famed Member
Christopher

…for someone who runs a charter school to be on the school committee, unless the point is for the school committee to include representatives of stakeholders in which case I hope there is at least one member of the Boston Teachers Union on the committee as well.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
columwhyte
Member
columwhyte

Ha ha ha, that’s funny…good point

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
garboesque
Member
garboesque

is of no concern to the charters. It is actually part of their operating plan, and they count on fresh newbies to fill their ranks. This keeps costs down, which means more money for the directors and companies “managing” them.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
sabutai
Member
Trusted Member
sabutai

Have you ever heard of schools in Lexington, Wellesley or Weston not making AYP?

I know one year Weston did not make it because one “subgroup” — not students as a whole but the 50 or so minority students in the system — did not make AYP.

Outsiders to the debate should understand that is the endgame. Sure, most money is to be had in privatizing the big school systems, but in due time it will be “proven” that pretty much all other schools are failing as well.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
jshore
Author
jshore

As soon as I read your post, it started to come back to me, kind of like a surreal Stephen King movie. I’m not sure if it was Weston, but the community had a town hall debate and people tried to “un-invite” METCO. They argued that real-estate values would go down because the town didn’t make AYP.

The town ended up creating a kindergarten for METCO students. It was financed in part by consolidating the METCO busses with other communities. So kids as young as 4 were traveling additional hours a day riding through and stopping in different communities until they reached their METCO destination. What a way to spend your childhood.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
opusedge
Member
opusedge

our mayoral candidates respond to this…

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
jshore
Author
jshore

I’d also be curious to see how our mayoral candidates respond to the “management fee’s” paid to EMO’s (educational management organizations) to take over and operate Boston public schools. For example, “Unlocking Potential” EMO for UP Academy Dorchester “service fee” will be 14% percent of the average number of students enrolled during that school year, multiplied by the Approved per Pupil Allocation set by BPS. Unlocking Potential’s management fee is projected to be $552,722 in FY14, $557,548 in FY15, and $626,377 in FY16. This is above the operating budget! $552,722 to Unlocking Potential to “manage” 546 students that 1st year at UP Dorchester increasingly more every year after as they increase students? We pay Superintendent Johnson $323,722.49 and she manages 57,100 students!

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz

Election Day 2020 Countdown

Election Day 2020Countdown

Recommended Posts

  • Biden's Foreign Policy Experience: An Unexpected Trump Card For 2020 (3)
  • My "I know Joe" new button idea (3)
  • The Squirrely Arguments Against Impeachment (3)
  • The Press Lets Our Polity Down Yet Again (2)
  • Time to play hardball with fascist pukes (2)

Recent User Posts

Time to play hardball with fascist pukes

December 14, 2019 By fredrichlariccia 2 Comments

Attend a DNC Caucus Training Near You!

December 13, 2019 By Christopher Leave a Comment

The Squirrely Arguments Against Impeachment

December 11, 2019 By terrymcginty 17 Comments

My “I know Joe” new button idea

December 11, 2019 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

No One is a Progressive Angel, So Let’s Stop Pretending

December 11, 2019 By BKay 48 Comments

Biden’s Foreign Policy Experience: An Unexpected Trump Card For 2020

December 10, 2019 By terrymcginty 43 Comments

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on Time to play hardball with fascist pukesThe Russiapublicans installed that urine soaked orange c…
  • SomervilleTom on Time to play hardball with fascist pukesThe historical "solution" most often turned to in cases…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentExchanges like this — not to mention the entire GOP mant…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentHere are your exact words (emphasis mine): Trump is cash…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentIt appears to me that "they" are a projection of you, ev…
  • Christopher on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentYou made the comment about a distinction without a diffe…
  • johntmay on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentI never said I speak for all working class voters. Do yo…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Blue Mass GroupFollow

Reality-based commentary. Necessary but not sufficient. Doing the other things. Massachusetts and beyond.

Blue Mass Group
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
AlexSteffenAlex Steffen@AlexSteffen·
12 Dec

Our entire public debate is decades behind the realities we know we face now, and as we understand those realities better, most of our findings will reveal our problems to be even more pressing than we thought they were.

That's just what the 2020s are going be like. https://twitter.com/DrNoelHealy/status/1204204976953626624

Noel Healy@DrNoelHealy

This final slide from @MichaelEMann is devastating. The time for incremental climate policy is over.🚨He estimates annual emissions may have to drop by 15% a year (rather than 7.5%)🚨. In other words we have zero years to tackle climate change. We need a #GreenNewDeal now #GND

Reply on Twitter 1205201555386814465Retweet on Twitter 1205201555386814465212Like on Twitter 1205201555386814465359Twitter 1205201555386814465
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
TPMTalking Points Memo@TPM·
9h

Terrible, Terrible, Terrible https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/terrible-terrible-terrible

Reply on Twitter 1206017639035867136Retweet on Twitter 12060176390358671364Like on Twitter 120601763903586713613Twitter 1206017639035867136
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
TheViewFromLL2Susan Simpson@TheViewFromLL2·
13h

The take away of this story doesn't seem to be that impeachment is bad for Democrats. It's that opposing impeachment is so bad for Democrats they can't remain Democrats. https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1205949264515481600

Andrew Desiderio@AndrewDesiderio

NEWS: Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a Democrat who opposes impeachment, plans to switch parties and become a Republican.

Staff were informed today. Question now is when, not if, he makes it official.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/14/jeff-van-drew-change-parties-085036

Reply on Twitter 1205961091282604034Retweet on Twitter 1205961091282604034478Like on Twitter 12059610912826040341888Twitter 1205961091282604034
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
everywhereistGeraldine@everywhereist·
13 Dec

My friend's insurance coded his brain surgeon wrong on their forms and billed him $250k and he had to figure that shit out while dying of cancer https://twitter.com/SmithInAmerica/status/1205546782425538561

David Smith@SmithInAmerica

Buttigieg: “I trust you to figure out your own health care.”

Reply on Twitter 1205561944884670464Retweet on Twitter 12055619448846704644206Like on Twitter 120556194488467046423809Twitter 1205561944884670464
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
grumpygrumpyowl🦉grumpygrumpyowl@grumpygrumpyowl·
13 Dec

Please video or take pictures before you call. This is very important.

Also... don’t go there for fun, mmmkay? https://twitter.com/frracs_ma/status/1205527547695509506

FRRACS@FRRACS_MA

If you smell strong odors at or near the site, see workers with no protective gear, or witness trucks leaving w/ muddy tires, call and alert the following numbers:

Weymouth Mayor's Office: (781) 340-5012
MassDEP Emergency Hotline: (888) 304-1133
Enbridge Hotline: (888) 331-6553

Reply on Twitter 1205529333416239105Retweet on Twitter 120552933341623910513Like on Twitter 120552933341623910514Twitter 1205529333416239105
Load More...

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2019 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.

wpDiscuz