Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

This isn’t rocket science.

July 15, 2013 By robconsalvo 9 Comments

This isn’t rocket science. Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey and Steve Lynch proved that the People’s Pledge works.

Yesterday I stood in front of City Hall to renew my call for all candidates running to replace Tom Menino to sign on to an agreement to prevent outside special interest groups from meddling in the race. Boston needs a mayor who is beholden to the people, not outside groups who care more about their own agenda than the City of Boston.

I’m calling it the Boston Pledge and it’s modeled after the groundbreaking agreement reached between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown last year. Senator-elect Ed Markey and Rep. Steve Lynch also agreed to ban on third-party advertisements in their primary earlier this year.

After studying the effect of the People’s Pledge on the Brown/Warren race, Pam Wilmot of Common Cause said “there is every reason for such a pledge to regulate Massachusetts elections from now on—and if popular support is strong enough, it will.”

I agree with Pam. Outside special interests pushing their own agendas shouldn’t get to decide who replaces Tom Menino, Boston voters should decide.

This is the first wide-open race for Mayor of Boston in this post-Citizens United world we live in and I’m worried that agenda-driven outside special interest groups will dump enough cash into this race to dominate it unless we all agree that Boston is not for sale.

Under the Boston Pledge, candidates who benefit from advertising by outside groups would agree to make a donation from their campaign to the One Fund for 50 percent of the amount spent by the outside group.  If outside groups try to interfere with this election, proceeds from the Boston Pledge will go to the One Fund to provide continuing assistance to victims of the Boston marathon bombing.

Here’s the full text of the Boston Pledge that I am asking all of my fellow candidates to sign:

The Boston Pledge

Because outside third party organizations – including but not limited to individuals, corporations, 527 organizations, 501(c) organizations, SuperPACs, and national and state party committees – may air, and may continue to air, and/or deliver direct mail and/or print hand delivered independent expenditure advertisements and/or telephone solicitations and issue advertisements and/or telephone solicitations either supporting or attacking any or all of the certified candidates for Mayor of Boston signed below (individually the “Candidate” and collectively the “Candidates”); and

Because these groups function as Independent expenditure organizations that are outside the direct control of any of the Candidates; and

Because the Candidates agree that they do not approve of such independent expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements and/or telephone solicitations and want those advertisements and/or direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements and/or telephone solicitations to immediately cease and desist for the duration of the 2013 Boston Mayoral election cycle; and

Because the Candidates recognize that in order to continue to make Boston a national example, and provide the citizens of Boston with an election free of third party Independent expenditure advertisements and/or direct mail, and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations they must be willing to Include an enforcement mechanism that runs not to the third party organizations but instead to the Candidates’ own campaigns:

The Candidates on behalf of their respective campaigns hereby agree to the following:

  • In the event that a third party organization airs any independent expenditure broadcast (Including radio), cable, satellite, online advertising, and/or deliver direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations in support of a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified Candidate or Candidates, that candidate’s campaign .shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy  to One Fund.
  • In the event that a third party organization airs any Independent expenditure broadcast (including radio), cable, or satellite advertising, online advertising, and/or deliver direct mail and/or printing off hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations in opposition to a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified Candidate or Candidates, the opposing Candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to One Fund.
  • In the event that a third party organization airs any broadcast (including  radio), cable, or satellite online advertising, and/or deliver direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations that promotes or supports a named, referenced (including by title} or otherwise Identified Candidate or Candidates, that Candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to One Fund.
  • In the event that a third party organization airs any broadcast (Including radio), cable, or satellite online advertising, and/or deliver direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations that attacks or opposes a named, referenced (including by title) or otherwise identified Candidate or Candidates, the opposing Candidate’s campaign shall, within three (3) days of discovery of the advertisement buy’s cost, duration, and source, pay 50% of the cost of that advertising buy to One Fund.
  • The Candidates and their campaigns agree that neither they nor anyone acting on their behalf shall coordinate with any third party on any paid advertising and/or direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations for the duration of the 2013 Boston Mayoral election cycle. In the event that any Candidate or Candidates or their campaign or anyone acting on their behalf coordinates any paid advertisement and/or direct mail and/or printing of hand delivered advertisements, and/or telephone solicitations with a third party organization that Candidate’s campaign shall pay 50% of the cost of the advertisement buy and/or direct mail cost to One Fund.

Penalties For Breach

In the event that the undersigned Candidate fails to make the charitable donation within the three day time requirement, then the charitable donation shall double the required amount for an additional five days after which if the charitable contribution is not made, then the charitable donation shall increase an additional amount representing an increase of 50% to the immediately preceding required charitable amount.

The Candidates and their campaigns agree to continue to work together to limit the influence of third party advertisements and to close any loopholes (including coverage of sham ads) that arise in  this agreement during  the course of  the campaign.

CANDIDATE SIGNATURE _____________________________________________________________________

– Rob

Please share widely!
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bmg, Boston mayor, Boston Mayor Election, Boston Pledge, election, Peoples Pledge, Rob Consalvo, tom-menino

9
Leave a reply

Please Login to comment
4 Comment threads
5 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
7 Comment authors
Christopherkittyoneilmike_cotethinkliberallyKevin L Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

newest oldest most voted
seamusromney
Member
seamusromney

I don’t get it. If a third party attacks Elizabeth warren, we know it’s to help Scott brown, so he pays the price. If a third party attacks a mayoral candidate, how do we know who they’re supporting? Or does every candidate have to pay in? Seems unfair to those who aren’t well funded. If a third party destroys Connolly and consalvo gets most of the votes Connolly loses, walczak pays the price? This would be a great idea in the general or if it took out the part about opposition ads, but this particular proposal clearly was not well thought out.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
HR's Kevin
Member
HR's Kevin

While I don’t like the idea of outside parties influencing the race, is there any reason to believe that this is actually going to be a problem in this race? I don’t remember this being a big issue in any past elections.

I am disappointed that your first post here is devoted to a long call for people to take a pledge rather than to discuss your mayoral platform or to talk about issues that Bostonians care about. When there are so many people in the race, I don’t think this pledge is going to have much resonance with the voters and I don’t think this is a great way to differentiate yourself.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
Kevin L
Member
Kevin L

Evidence here.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
HR's Kevin
Member
HR's Kevin

I see nothing there. Please be more specific. I have better things to do than to fish through links to figure out what you are talking about.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
thinkliberally
Member
thinkliberally

The idea of charter advocates spending a gazillion corporate dollars on the race is truly awful and has the potential to distort this election in a big way.

On the other hand, the idea that one of our city’s unions wouldn’t be allowed to go door-to-door for an endorsed candidate, even with their members, seems odd. The idea that a group like (just a for instance) the Sierra Club couldn’t do a mailer on their favorite environmental candidate doesn’t seem to be a good thing. I would think we’d want to know who the environmental candidate(s) in the race are.

There is certainly no evidence of any negative campaigning being at stake. This somehow feels very different than a statewide race with national groups pouring millions of negative ads into our living rooms.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
mike_cote
Member
mike_cote

If there was an elected school committee rather than the current patronage system with the Mayor playing benevolent dictator over every aspect of Boston government with Rubber Stamps, then there would be no need for a pledge or a concern about undo influence.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
kittyoneil
Member
kittyoneil

that this is aimed at preventing Emily’s List from airing ads helping Golar Ritchie.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
Christopher
Member
Famed Member
Christopher

Emily’s List specifically assists prochoice Democratic women and this race is nonpartisan. Plus are we expecting abortion rights to be an issue in this particular campaign?

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
thinkliberally
Member
thinkliberally

http://emilyslist.org/news/releases/emilys-list-endorses-charlotte-golar-richie-mayor-boston

emily’s list isn’t just an abortion group. They support efforts to get more women in politics. I don’t know if this is targeted at Charlotte. Probably more at Connolly.

Frankly I’d be far more impressed with Consalvo’s bold stand if he could prove in any way it’s boldness by informing us about which organizational support, mail, contributions, etc. he’s offering to sacrifice for the good of clean special-interest-free elections. If he’s unable to point to anything he’d be giving up, then this whole charade just seems far less about his cool new idea and much more about blunting his opponents potential advantages.

You Must Be Logged In To Vote00You Must Be Logged In To Vote
6 years ago
wpdiscuz   wpDiscuz

Election Day 2020 Countdown

Election Day 2020Countdown

Recommended Posts

  • Kerry endorses Biden (3)
  • More Media Mediocrity (3)
  • "Don't mess with me" Pelosi leads by example (2)
  • Blistering report: MBTA “safety is not the priority” (1)
  • Buttigieg versus public goods (public goods win) (1)

Recent User Posts

Warren and Buttigieg made money as corporate consultants. So what.

December 9, 2019 By Andrei Radulescu-Banu Leave a Comment

Joe Biden Doesn’t Have Enough Ethics to Sell Stamps

December 7, 2019 By bob-gardner 13 Comments

Warren takes on Buttigieg (video)

December 7, 2019 By pogo 13 Comments

Shift away from caucuses gives advantage to Biden, Bloomberg

December 7, 2019 By Andrei Radulescu-Banu Leave a Comment

More Media Mediocrity

December 5, 2019 By terrymcginty 11 Comments

“Don’t mess with me” Pelosi leads by example

December 5, 2019 By fredrichlariccia 36 Comments

Recent Comments

  • petr on Kerry endorses BidenA 16-year-old Swedish girl has done more for climate act…
  • SomervilleTom on “Don’t mess with me” Pelosi leads by exampleThis comment is unresponsive and irrelevant. Did you wat…
  • SomervilleTom on Joe Biden Doesn’t Have Enough Ethics to Sell Stamps@MADE legal: I suppose we will again have to agree to di…
  • couves on “Don’t mess with me” Pelosi leads by exampleI disagree with your characterization of this as somethi…
  • Christopher on Joe Biden Doesn’t Have Enough Ethics to Sell StampsUm, the Iraqi invasion was MADE legal precisely because…
  • SomervilleTom on Joe Biden Doesn’t Have Enough Ethics to Sell Stamps@ Are you suggesting...: No. I'm saying that Joe Biden's…
  • doubleman on Kerry endorses BidenThe American center of political gravity also tends to b…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Blue Mass GroupFollow

Reality-based commentary. Necessary but not sufficient. Doing the other things. Massachusetts and beyond.

Blue Mass Group
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
WendyWendy48Wendy Cullivan@WendyWendy48·
22h

Remember when our governor went to DC at the beginning of the year to lecture the feds on climate change?
Here we are closing out same year with dozens of climate activists getting arrested across the state because @MassGovernor flat out refuses to hear, speak & protect them/us. https://twitter.com/MassGovernor/status/1093967720524201984

Charlie Baker@MassGovernor

"The magnitude of the impacts from #climatechange requires all of us – at the federal, state and local levels - to put politics aside and work together. That is the path we have taken in Massachusetts."

#ActOnClimate | http://ow.ly/p3Dw30nDny3

Reply on Twitter 1204020497479897089Retweet on Twitter 120402049747989708933Like on Twitter 120402049747989708957Twitter 1204020497479897089
bluemassgroupBlue Mass Group@bluemassgroup·
8h

At what point do we just say, actually, Charlie Baker has no idea what he’s doing on the #mbta ?

That he’s failed us — and the failure was predictable?

I shall not accept that 2+2=5, or that we’re just doing the best we can. #mapoli

Michelle Wu 吳弭@wutrain

How many more reports do we need documenting what we already know? There’s no vision from @MassGovernor for transportation, just disastrous management of the details & deflection of accountability. https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/12/09/study-mbta-safety-practices-released-baker-state-transportation-officials/hPLzLyvMU528sxUzk5rVVJ/story.html @MBTA 3

Reply on Twitter 1204234697372577794Retweet on Twitter 12042346973725777942Like on Twitter 12042346973725777947Twitter 1204234697372577794
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
lib_crusherOafs for Biden@lib_crusher·
17h

I'm tired of Bernie and Warren getting slammed for being unrealstic with their plans when Biden and Buttigieg's plan is to hope Senate Republicans suddenly all become good government moderates overnight https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1204044117585616897

Sahil Kapur@sahilkapur

NEW: Joe Biden and Pete Buttigieg are pitching voters on their ability to unite Congress and bring Republicans aboard to pass their agenda.

But actual Republicans and Capitol Hill veterans say that’s not gonna happen.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-12-09/biden-buttigieg-dream-of-congress-unity-runs-into-d-c-skeptics

Reply on Twitter 1204100076253011969Retweet on Twitter 12041000762530119691522Like on Twitter 12041000762530119697228Twitter 1204100076253011969
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
aquaponicdaveAbraham Davenport@aquaponicdave·
10h

Holy fuck.

We need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 15% per year?

We're still INCREASING our emissions. https://twitter.com/MichaelEMann/status/1204194564719775744

Michael E. Mann@MichaelEMann

Actually, more like 15% rather than 7.5% 🙁 https://twitter.com/liminalmessages/status/1204194278408196096

Reply on Twitter 1204197407409541120Retweet on Twitter 120419740740954112045Like on Twitter 1204197407409541120114Twitter 1204197407409541120
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
AlexBMorseAlex Morse@AlexBMorse·
8h

There’s no question that @RepRichardNeal has power. But instead of using it to hold Trump accountable, he uses it to give Trump a trade deal that leaves our communities behind. I’m running to redefine power and help Western Mass. Help us compete https://secure.actblue.com/donate/morse2020-soc?refcode=soc_tw_20190722_launchpost https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1204219998773956608

Brian Beutler@brianbeutler

The deal ran through @RepRichardNeal, who chairs one of the nominal impeachment committees. Meanwhile, Trump continues to flagrantly violate the law requiring him to transmit his tax returns to Neal's @WaysMeansCmte.

Reply on Twitter 1204226018686459904Retweet on Twitter 120422601868645990459Like on Twitter 1204226018686459904182Twitter 1204226018686459904
Load More...

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2019 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.

wpDiscuz