Person #870: 12 Posts

Recommended: 4 times

Posts   |   Comments

  1. Privacy Rights (1 Reply)

    Developmentally disabled people have the same privacy rights as everyone else. Under the Fair Information Practices Act, the state should not release the report. If COFAR wants the full report, there is an easy way to get it. The patient’s estate can request and receive a full copy, and give it to you. If the patient’s family doesn’t want to release it, that’s their right.

  2. Fast Track (2 Replies)

    The so called Fast Track bill is not a vote on the terms of the TPP. It renews an authority for the President that has been used from time to time since 1974. In essence, it allows the President to negotiate a treaty and requires the Congress to bring the treaty to a straight up or down vote, without amendments for filibuster, promptly.
    So, President Obama did not create the idea of Fast Track just to screw the American people, and a vote on Fast Track is not a vote on the Trans Pacific Partnership. Even if Fast Track is approved, Congress can disapprove TPP.
    I’m disappointed that Senator Warren, whom I support, is confusing the two in her public comments.

  3. This Might Be the Rule You Are Looking For (1 Reply)

    From the ABCC web site:

    204 CMR 2.00:

    204-2.08: Inducements

    No licensee shall give or permit to be given money or any other thing of substantial value in any effort to induce any person to persuade or influence any other person to purchase, or contract for the purchase of any particular brand or kind of alcoholic beverages, or to persuade or influence any person to refrain from purchasing, or contracting for the purchase of any particular brand or kind of alcoholic beverages.

  4. A Solution (0 Replies)

    Wrap your head in aluminum foil instead.

  5. Mostly True (0 Replies)


    A lawsuit was brought to obtain certain records of the Judicial Nominating Council. The Court ruled that records of the JNC are the Governor’s records, and therefore not within the scope of the Public Records Law. The Court ruled:

    The JNC was created to assist the Governor in carrying out his constitutional obligation. It is an interviewing and screening body whose sole purpose is to assist the Governor.[7] It has no public function. The JNC’s records are essentially the Governor’s records on judicial appointments. Those records are not within G. L. c. 4, § 7, Twenty-sixth.[8]

    The SJC has spoken.

  6. Public Records Law (1 Reply)

    I don’t believe that the Public Records Law applies to the offices of the Governor or Lt. Governor. Accordingly, it doesn’t matter who owned Murray’s cell phone.

  7. Here is What State Law Says (3 Replies)

    Cities and towns cannot take actions that are not authorized by state law. Herewith, two definitions from Section 4J of Chapter 40:

    “Governmental unit”, a city, town, county, regional transit authority established under chapter 161B, water or sewer commission or district established under chapter 40N or by special law, fire district, regional health district established under chapter 111, a regional school district or a law enforcement council.

    “Law enforcement council”, a nonprofit corporation comprised of municipal police chiefs and other law enforcement agencies established to provide: (i) mutual aid to its members pursuant to mutual aid agreements; (ii) mutual aid or requisitions for aid to non-members consistent with section 8G of this chapter or section 99 of chapter 41; and (iii) enhanced public safety by otherwise sharing resources and personnel.

    It seems clear that LECs are authorized by state law, and are governmental bodies. They are subject to the open meeting law and the public records law. As to the former, file a complaint with the open meeting unit of the AG. For the latter, complain to the Secretary of the Commonwealth.

  8. No Audio (1 Reply)

    The audio fails after 21 seconds, before Dr. Berwick starts to speak.

  9. Maybe (0 Replies)

    My main point is that some of Guardia’s supporters depict him as the sole progressive, the candidate of labor, etc. As you state, labor is divided.

  10. Odd (2 Replies)

    I took a look at the web site for the Boston Public Schools. I found these statements:

    Regarding the current budget:

    The proposed Fiscal Year 2014 (FY14) general fund budget totals $934,360,000, representing a 6.9% increase from the FY13 appropriation of $873,693,227.

    Regarding the upcoming budget:

    The proposed FY15 budget totals $973.3 million and reflects our commitments to allocate financial resources equitably to schools to meet the needs of students. The proposed budget expands educational opportunities and continues to improve school quality across the city. The figure is approximately $36 million higher than FY14, thanks to Mayor Martin J. Walsh’s decision to increase the city appropriation to schools by nearly four percent when other city departments are facing reductions.

    Massive cuts?

  11. Some Folks Didn't Get the Memo (1 Reply)

    I received a flyer from SEIU 1199 endorsing Jason Lewis. So I went to his web site, and saw that he is endorsed by SEIU, several locals of the Laborer’s union, the Mass Teachers Association and the United Food and Commercial Workers.

  12. Where to Focus (2 Replies)

    I admire your goals. I think your focus is wrong.

    If you want to advance the triple aim, you should start with the Department of Public Health and the related healthcare regulatory agencies. DPH has been a mess for years, as shown by the crime lab fiasco and the compounding pharmacy disaster. Under new leadership, DPH is now well positioned to boldly march forward into the 1990s. The Division of Health Care Quality is obsessed with paperwork and administrivia. The Determination of Need program rewards high volume providers with permits to build new facilities, while innovation in care processes and increases in efficiency are ignored.

    Single payer has its virtues, but it is not a magic bullet. You would still need to figure out the best way to pay physicians, hospitals, and other providers, how to set budgets and the like. From a political point of view, I question whether the legislature will have the appetite to tackle another big healthcare bill only two years after Chapter 224. Improvements and adjustments are much more likely to pass and there are many opportunities for incremental improvement in our system that do not involve flipping over the table.

    Vermont has not enacted single payer. Vermont has approved the creation of a plan to create a single payer system. Crucially, the law did not include a funding mechanism to pay for it, and this is still up for debate in Vermont. One of the architects of the plan proposed to fund it with an 11% payroll tax, but that has not yet been enacted. Also, the Vermont plan requires a Medicare and ACA waiver, neither of which have been applied for.

  13. Legally and Otherwise (1 Reply)

    From a legal point of view, there is no question that once the reports exist the reports are public records, and cannot be withheld. If the reports named individuals, then it is likely that they would not be public records.

    I have trouble with the argument that if the methodology is imperfect that the reports should be kept secret. The better remedy is a full explanation of the methodology and its limitations so that the limits of the evaluations can be understood. This also would create pressure to come up with better methods of evaluation. The problem of imperfect measurement comes up in all fields, not just education.

  14. Edited? (1 Reply)

    Was the original post edited since it first went up? I seem to remember it being worded a bit differently this morning.

  15. Please Explain (0 Replies)

    What can the Attorney General do about the soaring cost of college tuition? Is this really going to be his signature issue?

  16. Its hard for me to imagine . . . (0 Replies)

    . . . a bigger insult to the memory of George V. Higgins.

  17. You are Wrong (2 Replies)

    The President should follow the law, not act like a terrorist. Assuming it continues, the shutdown will impact more and more people over time. Federal courts are closed, no SBA loans, DOL offices closed, etc. etc. etc.

    Do I understand you correctly? Community hospitals should go bankrupt? Nursing homes should stop buying food for their residents? The President should announce that he has voluntarily decided that Social Security checks should not be mailed?


  18. Don't Have To (1 Reply)

    The City doesn’t have to pay up if it will be bad for other aspects of City government. The City Council can send the Mayor and the union back to the bargaining table.

  19. Not Exactly (0 Replies)

    In can’t be appealed, but its not binding on the appropriating authority of the city or town. The negotiating body, the executive, cannot argue against it, but the appropriating authority can reject it and send both sides back to the bargaining table.