david

Opera singer, blogger, lawyer. You can reach me by email at david [at] bluemassgroup [dot] com.

Person #2: 4071 Posts

Recommended: 481 times

Posts   |   Comments

  1. The fisherman story is from 2010, (1 Reply)

    not from this campaign cycle. Which makes the whole thing a bit more suspect. (a) Baker hasn’t heard an affecting story this entire campaign, so he has to reach back to 2010 to find one? (b) Baker still chokes up telling a story that he has been telling for 4 years?

  2. I agree with this comment. (0 Replies)

    These proposals have nothing to do with safety. They are all about increasing onerous regulations in order to increase expenses to the point that they force certain facilities to close.

  3. I believe (1 Reply)

    that the $2 million for Harvard from the Globe story refers only to Boston. I don’t know how much they pay to Cambridge.

  4. To be clear, Harvard paid (2 Replies)

    a little over $2 million. Less than the city wanted, but better than nothing.

  5. There was a very good letter to the editor (1 Reply)

    pointing out that this wasn’t exactly the collapse of Lehman Brothers…

  6. FYI, this poll was commissioned (1 Reply)

    by a pro-Coakley Super PAC. There is, however, another independent poll out today showing Coakley up 45-41. So, ya know, just get out there and vote.

  7. I really think (2 Replies)

    that this was etched in stone since primary day.

  8. Just read the endorsement for the answer. (2 Replies)

    See, according to the Globe, that policy yakkity-yak doesn’t really matter – after all, they don’t actually talk about it. We just need a manager who can fix bureaucratic stuff.

  9. "Note the absence of anyone mentioning the Hillary/Coakley rally yesterday." (0 Replies)

    Feel free to post it yourself! This site works best when members post things that are of interest to them and that they think are noteworthy. The editors all have actual jobs and don’t have time to write everything up.

  10. How did Baker (1 Reply)

    not win the nomination “fair and square”? Fisher got on the ballot; Baker walloped him.

  11. Meh, this has DC perspective written all over it. (3 Replies)

    Don’t get me wrong – the race is indisputably very close, and Coakley could lose. But comparing this race to Scott Brown in 2010 is just facile. Very few of the factors that really drove the result in 2010 are present in this race, IMHO.

  12. Heh that is the same article (1 Reply)

    that I linked in the post! Looks like it’s a reprint of some sort.

  13. Oh no (0 Replies)

    This is terrible news. He will be sorely missed in this community. Condolences to his friends and family.

  14. Anyone seriously thinking about Tisei (1 Reply)

    needs to think about John Boehner. Elections like this are in substantial part about the balance in the House. Until Tisei openly proclaims that he won’t support the current GOP leadership, a vote for him should be considered a voter for Boehner.

  15. I'm wondering whether (3 Replies)

    this is sort of a “gut feeling” argument. In some respects, surge pricing “feels” wrong. After all, it is jacking up the price of something exactly when people need/want it most, right? Isn’t that taking advantage of the circumstances to make a quick buck?

    Well, sorta. But it does neither Uber nor its would-be customers any good if, during peak usage hours, the demand so overwhelms the supply of drivers that only a small percentage of people can get a ride. If you’ve ever tried to get a Boston cab during rush hour when it’s raining – and this is a problem even in NYC where the supply is much higher – you know what I’m talking about.

    Uber has, basically, one tool with which to try to control that problem, and surge pricing is it. It gets more drivers on the road, and it discourages some customers from calling a ride. Does it mean that, when surge pricing is in effect, the average wealth of a typical Uber user will be higher than when it’s not? Maybe – it would be interesting to know. I’m just not sure that that makes it necessarily a bad thing, nor a good thing. It’s simply a feature of any supply and demand system.

  16. Well, (2 Replies)

    that’s not really how it works. Look at the price of gasoline, which in recent weeks has dropped rapidly. We all know that’s a commodity whose price fluctuates all over the place, often day-to-day and week-to-week. Or think about the stock market. No fixed prices there – indeed, that’s the point.

    At the end of the day, every business operates based on supply and demand. IMHO your expectation that a business should “set a price, and raise it occasionally” is due more to inertia on certain businesses’ part (it’s easier and less work not to be constantly adjusting your prices based on current market conditions, even if it’s less efficient) than it is to any generally understood and respected norms of how the marketplace should operate. Technology makes it easier to assess the market, and to change prices rapidly. Just as technology has made Uber’s business possible at all, it has enabled Uber to price its services differently than car services have traditionally done.

  17. "Uber by definition has no motive to discourage use" (1 Reply)

    This is true, sort of. Obviously, Uber wants people to use their service. But it’s also I think indisputable that, when surge pricing is in effect and is clearly announced when you summon an Uber (as noted above, that has been the case when I’ve used it, though I gather the complaints claim that it’s not always so), there will be people who choose not to call the car precisely because of surge pricing. Uber knows this.

    I don’t doubt that Uber carefully calculates when to use surge pricing, and how much of a surge to impose at any given time, in order to maximize the amount of money coming in. (If your fares are double, you can afford to lose a few and still make more money than you would otherwise.) But, I mean, that is exactly how we’d expect a rational market participant to behave.

  18. There is another possible purpose for surge pricing, (2 Replies)

    which is to increase supply (as well as to reduce demand). If drivers know that surge pricing is likely to be in effect at certain times (say, rush hour, or 2 am when the bars close), they’ll have an incentive to work during those hours, thereby making it possible for more people to get rides. No?