-
- Thu 23 May 11:46 PMAnd now a message from bulls##t mountain
0
by kbusch - Thu 23 May 3:30 PMState Senate Votes Are Online
0
by pauldcraney - Thu 23 May 1:24 PMThousands falling through the cracks in the DDS system
3
by dave-from-hvad - Thu 23 May 10:42 AMLynch joins rest of N.E. delegation in voting against pro-Keystone XL bill
1
by fenway49 - Thu 23 May 10:08 AMGomez Refuses to Release his 2005 Tax Returns
3
by johnk - Wed 22 May 3:44 PMMy post disappeared!
3
by fenway49 - Wed 22 May 3:41 PMGlobe calls Gomez out for his dishonest, whining ad
9
by fenway49 - Wed 22 May 2:49 PMLt Gov. Murray's Letter To Friends and Supporters
1
by hlpeary - Wed 22 May 1:55 PMGomez drinking game (Proposed)
0
by mike_cote - Wed 22 May 11:25 AMMassKidsCount.org - What Can We Do to Help Kids?
2
by massbudget
- Thu 23 May 11:46 PMAnd now a message from bulls##t mountain
marc-davidson
Person #1460: 7 Posts
Recommended: 2 times
sorry (0 Replies)
didn’t mean to downrate
sorry (0 Replies)
I didn’t mean to vote you down — don’t necessarily agree but think that your comments are reasonable.
Sorry about the hit and run (0 Replies)
… not that he’ll face any consequences. Mahony and Ratzinger like Cardinal Law will continue to enjoy the privileges associated with their holy station. All will likely take part in the next conclave receiving divine guidance as they cast their ballots.
Let's face it (1 Reply)
this unprecedented-in-modern-times move is being done before the Cardinal Mahoney scandal makes its way inexorably back to the Vatican. Ratzinger is high tailing it out of Dodge.
Indeed (0 Replies)
We, on the left, should feel good about her nomination being scuttled by the GOP; the Keystone Pipeline won’t have a possibly strong advocate in the highly influential office of SOS for its construction.
and 1 EV (0 Replies)
for Jill Stein?
oops (1 Reply)
only 538 EVs
it reminds me of (1 Reply)
the Dan Rather memogate fiasco of 2004, regardless of who’s behind it. This is dangerous territory for Democrats to be in.
probably too complicated (0 Replies)
for the very low information voters who comprise the ranks of the undecided. These people are more likely to be swayed by the color of Elizabeth Warren’s dress than by the strength of her positions let alone by any calculus of congressional majorities.
He whiffed big time on this one (0 Replies)
and in his stroll through the spectrum of SC ideology mispronounced “Sotomayor” to boot — “sotomayir” or similar
hardly a Democrat anyway (0 Replies)
He’s endorsed Mitt Romney too.
unless you get rid of the (0 Replies)
earned income credit, this makes no sense. Think about it… instead of getting the EIC benefit from the government, many poor working people would have to pay instead. In many cases that would actually be a net difference of far more than $5.
right (0 Replies)
It’s hard to imagine a candidate trashing in this fashion a very big part of his own base. Unfortunately a lot of them don’t care so long as he hates gays and immigrants and is anti-choice… but we’ll see this time.
I don't necessarily disagree with Bob (1 Reply)
There’s plenty of reason to be cynical. It just seemed like a rather hard and hopeless indictment of the mess we’re in.
Sorry if I’m oblivious to some inside information.
wow! (1 Reply)
I hope that’s not the case. That sounds pretty cynical.
Maybe that says a lot about our nation, that our elected officials might be incapable of leading.
On nearly every important vote (2 Replies)
Scott Brown votes with his very conservative party.
The notion that he’s one of the few Republican advocates of bipartisanship is unsupported by the facts.
Hey (0 Replies)
He did convince GHWB to appoint David Souter to the SC.
that's your feeling (1 Reply)
but it’s not supported by the facts. SS is an extremely well funded program and will pay out indefinitely with only minor adjustments.
I thought you were going away (2 Replies)
for two weeks. A promise is a promise.
that's not what you said (1 Reply)
read it again