Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Front Page Posts

Greta Thunberg, TIME’s Person of the Year, has a message for Gov. Baker & Speaker DeLeo

December 12, 2019 By Charley on the MTA 4 Comments

Greta Thunberg is TIME’s Person if the Year. It’s a lovingly written profile, which portrays climate as an immediate, human crisis — indeed, a crisis of the human heart, and one that falls disproportionately on the young — who are speaking up in their own physical self-defense. It is compelling reading.

There’s an old lefty saw, reductionist but useful: “Think Globally/Act Locally”. So I want to bring this back to Massachusetts. Our legislature and Governor are sitting on a pile of bills which at this rate will never see the light of day, much less pass — most especially H.2836, to move us to 100% renewable energy.

Ms. Thunberg’s remarks to the UN are extremely apt for our so-called leaders, right here in our own State House. Speaker DeLeo, Governor Baker — all members of our legislature: This is you. She’s talking to you.

Her speeches often go straight to the gut. “You say you love your children above all else,” she said in her first big address at the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Poland last December. “And yet you are stealing their future in front of their very eyes.”

… In September, speaking to heads of state during the U.N. General Assembly, Thunberg pulled no punches: “We are in the beginning of a mass extinction, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth,” she said. “How dare you.”

In Massachusetts, our leaders tell us fairy tales of “combo platter” energy policy; of the necessity for gas infrastructure buildout — and our helplessness to resist it; that the automobile is king, and we can’t discourage driving via congestion pricing (thereby improving the alternatives); that modest, tinkering investments in transit are adequate; that the T is “where we need it to be”; that spending a fraction of 1% of the state’s budget on climate resiliency is all our legislature can manage this term.

I gladly concede that we have contracted for wind power, though as yet we have no results. It is good that our Governor is pursuing a multi-state initiative to drive down transportation emissions. But he gives with one hand (TCI) and takes with the other (Weymouth gas compressor). Our Speaker uses his welcome GreenWorks program as an excuse to do nothing else this term, when action on all fronts is both necessary and available, in the form of bills already written and ready to go.

Our leaders are not doing enough, fast enough. They still offer fairy tales, self-deception, and a betrayal of our children. Right here in Massachusetts.

Prove me wrong.

Please share widely!

The Squirrely Arguments Against Impeachment

December 11, 2019 By terrymcginty 17 Comments

My favorite arguments against impeachment:

1. The Dems can’t defeat Trump in 2020 so they have to resort to impeachment. REALITY: All of the leading Democrats currently lead Trump by nearly TEN POINTS.

2. There is no direct evidence against Trump; it’s all hearsay. REALITY: There are multiple testimonies of direct evidence witnesses from Sondland to Vindman and many others. In addition, there are multiple corroborating and contemporaneous documents that also are direct evidence. Finally, this argument is absurd, since Trump confessed publicly (legally, an ‘admission’), and also released the call notes, which show an obvious act of extortion.

3. Trump was just concerned about corruption in Ukraine. REALITY: Trump showed no interest in corruption in Ukraine in 2017-18, but of all countries and people on earth, it’s a coincidence that he happened to focus on his domestic political opponent. ABSURD. Finally, Trump and Giuliani are aligned with the forces in Ukraine that are aligned with Russia and are corrupt. Anyone with any knowledge of the region knows this. Read More…

Please share widely!

No One is a Progressive Angel, So Let’s Stop Pretending

December 11, 2019 By BKay 48 Comments

In an ideal world, people evolve and grow. Our actions are based on the historical period and political climate in which we live, and I don’t think we should punish politicians who take in new data, and change their minds. But hypocrisy is among the characteristics I find most loathsome, and when we hold ourselves out to a be a paragon of virtue (or, progressive ideals), while failing to mention our own limitations, it irks me no end. That is why I’m left shaking my head at the fundraising duo of Schumer and Markey.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is scheduled to be in Boston on Thursday to help Senator Ed Markey at a fundraising event. On the surface I don’t like it – just as many progressives were up in arms about the Democratic Party allegedly favoring Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Presidential Primary, I don’t like to see party leadership put their thumb on the scale like that. But when I paused to consider their histories, it made me even more unhappy.

In 1994, then-Representative Ed Markey voted for the now-infamous Crime Bill. Worse yet, then-Representative Chuck Schumer championed it. He fought for it. As Chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice, Chuck Schumer wrangled Republicans and liberal Democrats alike to get the 1994 Crime Bill passed. Democrats at the time were accused of “rushing to the right” on crime. Then-called “liberal Democrats” (aka “progressives”) felt that the heavy emphasis on punishment was a problem. The ACLU was appropriately outraged at the implications for communities of color and social justice. This was the law that created the 3-strike rule (mandating life imprisonment for federal crimes), expanded the number of crimes punishable by death from 2 to more than 60, elevated drug-related crimes to warrant more severe punishments, increased funding to build more prisons by billions of dollars, and eliminated higher education for incarcerated individuals, among other things. It fueled mass incarceration in this country, an issue most affecting communities of color (and black men, in particular). At the time, Chuck Schumer said, “Those on the left are wringing their hands, but they’re going to wind up voting for the bill.” (In fairness, he also noted that Republicans were unhappy, for the opposite reason.)

Then-Representative Schumer was right – the progressive (then-“liberal”) wing of the party voted for it, including the full MA delegation. This is not an issue specific to only Senator Schumer or Markey. But it is an issue that warrants more careful shading of Senator Markey’s progressive record.  It is a reason for him to speak out about it now. And it is a reason to stop pretending that Senator Markey is a progressive angel, who is alone in his ability to deliver on progressive ideals. I’d like to hear a lot more (anything?) from Senator Markey on this issue, the sooner the better.

 

Worth reading on the topic:

https://www.aclu.org/blog/smart-justice/mass-incarceration/how-1994-crime-bill-fed-mass-incarceration-crisis

https://www.nytimes.com/1998/09/25/nyregion/schumer-and-d-amato-try-to-out-tough-each-other-on-crime.html

Full disclosure: I am a volunteer for Joe Kennedy and have voted for Ed Markey.

Please share widely!

Biden’s Foreign Policy Experience: An Unexpected Trump Card For 2020

December 10, 2019 By terrymcginty 43 Comments

With sycophantic senators like Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, and Senator Richard Burr (disgracefully) of North Carolina, running around parroting Russian propaganda about Ukraine interfering in the American election of 2016 – an absurd theory that has been debunked repeatedly by our own intelligence agencies – it is more apparent than ever that the Democrats are going to be far more electable if they nominate Joe Biden.

I put my own keister on the line spending over a year in Central Asia working for the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs on elections, civil society, media, and women’s programs, as well as conducting later trainings in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Colombia.

Among other challenges in Central Asia, an Al-Qaeda allied group was leafleting my street in Dushanbe regularly. Much more importantly, President Putin was already putting pressure on the various Central Asian presidents to crack down on any foreign organizations that had been invited in by the small Central Asian governments if they were running any kind of trainings explaining how government worked in the West. The only candidate who would be fully prepared to understand such an experience and run US foreign policy on his first day is Joe Biden.

Unlike virtually all of the other Democrats running, Joe Biden has deep first-hand experience and knowledge about not only the modern foreign policy of the United States, but also of the historical antecedents that led to it.

For many years, Joe Biden was an innovative thinker in foreign policy matters, not at all the rubber stamp for US foreign intervention that some on the left caricature him as.

For example, while others were just advocating withdrawal from Iraq – which ultimately resulted in the emergence of ISIS/Daesh – by contrast Joe Biden was trying to find ways to strengthen local governments in Iraq such as increasing federalism so that local Sunni chieftains in Anbar province would have more of a say in what happened to the oil underneath their tribal lands, thereby giving them a natural incentive to oppose ISIS.

Most of the other candidates who would stand on a debate stage with Donald Trump just don’t have that depth of experience in many parts of the world beyond the Middle East, and it will show.

So beyond the importance of uniting the Democratic Party and bringing together the African-American community with white liberals and progressives, as well as working class Democrats and independents of all races, the unexpected emerging primacy of foreign policy is just one more reason why we need Joe Biden, a perennially underestimated candidate, to defeat Donald Trump in 2020.

Please share widely!

Once again, Democrats pull their punches

December 10, 2019 By SomervilleTom 12 Comments

I am disgusted by my party this morning.

After years of investigation and mountains of compelling evidence, the Democrats offer just two articles of impeachment, one about Ukraine and the other about obstruction. Does anybody anywhere believe that ANY GOP senators will care even a little bit about the latter?

No mention of emoluments. No mention of ANYTHING from the Mueller report or investigation.

Most significantly to me, no mention of the enormous stinking carcass of a dead and rotting elephant in the room — the pervasive pattern of doing Vladimir Putin’s bidding on virtually EVERY decision made by this administration and enthusiastically supported by its GOP collaborators. We betrayed South Korea. We betrayed the Kurds. We are dismantling NATO. This week, we learn that this administration is dismantling the WTO, so that it can continue to destroy the economy of the west with self-destructive trade wars. Who benefits? Vladimir Putin. Who loses? Each and every one of us.

What happened to elected officials who actually care about national security? What happened to an electorate who valued law and order? How much more obvious does betrayal have to be?

We are watching in slow motion as the great American experiment crashes and burns. Our government, judicial and political systems are proving themselves utterly powerless to stop or slow this Russian takeover of our government.

The silence of the Democrats on the multitude of presidential abuses means that the constraints that kept the power of the presidency in check have been removed. The treason, bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors of Donald Trump, his administration, and the GOP will be viewed as normal and acceptable behavior from here on. How can ANY Democrat object to any future abuses those abuses aren’t even mentioned in the impeachment articles?

This is a tragic day for America.

Please share widely!

Warren and Buttigieg made money as corporate consultants. So what.

December 9, 2019 By Andrei Radulescu-Banu 3 Comments

The two front runners in the Dem primary asked each other to be forthcoming about work they did as corporate consultants many years ago.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/memo-in-1990s-pollution-case-shows-elizabeth-warren-in-action-as-corporate-consultant/2019/12/09/6a6fade0-1a9b-11ea-b4c1-fd0d91b60d9e_story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/buttigieg-releases-summary-of-his-work-for-consulting-firm-mckinsey/2019/12/06/d1f10bd6-1897-11ea-a659-7d69641c6ff7_story.html

“…On this occasion, Warren was not arguing on behalf of vulnerable families, nor was she offering the sort of stinging rebuke of corporate greed that would later define her political career. Rather, Warren was representing a large development company that was trying to avoid having to clean up a toxic waste site.

“The memo, which Warren wrote in 1996, used legalistic and often dense language to argue that businesses faced the “risk of the unknown” from a growing threat of lawsuits, and that defended the company’s right to “maximize its returns to its unpaid creditors and to survive as an employer.”

And from Pete Buttigieg:

“I was assigned to months-long stints on ‘teams’ of typically three or four people working on a study for a client. The bulk of my work on these teams consisted of doing mathematical analysis, conducting research, and preparing presentations […] I never worked on a project inconsistent with my values, and if asked to do so, I would have left the firm rather than participate.”

This was a purity test Buttigieg and Warren could have done without. Obviously, with these revelations, nothing changes – not even the disdain felt, in some far corners of the party, for the evils of corporatism.

Democrats are at their best when they protect, preserve and promote the social safety net. Many struggling people, forced to work multiple part time jobs to barely make ends meet, however, need a strong economy and seek opportunities for good jobs.

Where are these jobs? Sometimes at small businesses, and, yes, sometimes, at corporations.

This spat between Warren and Buttigieg has achieved nothing. It hurt both candidates, and projected an anti-business image that hands Republicans ammunition for the general election.

Donald Trump is the most corrupt president in modern history, but he will not run boasting how corrupt he is. Trump will instead run on the strength of the economy, and will promise jobs.

The task of Warren and Buttigieg, in this election, whoever wins, is not just to show who is more immaculate. It is to demonstrate voters will be better off, economically, with a Democrat in the White House.

“It’s the economy, stupid” was Bill Clinton’s mantra. That, of course, was expressed at a time when the economy was hurting in George H. W. Bush’s first term.

We often think of elections as being high minded affairs, where philosophical arguments have primacy. What if, instead, politics is but a thin veneer on top of the real driver -which are the economic interests.

 

Please share widely!

More Posts from this Category

9:23

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

Ah, here comes social security.  "Headed toward bankruptcy" -- big lie!  big lie!  "Bankruptcy" has no meaning in this context -- it's just a scary word that makes people think something bad is … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

9:19

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

"Clear skies" really is a big fat lie.  No way is that going to improve the environment for anyone but the big power plants. … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

9:18

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

Here we go: junk lawsuits.  This oughta be good.  Wait for it....frivolous class actions and asbestos claims.  Well, no specifics so hard to call it a "lie."  But I don't think too many small businesses are hit … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

Full text of SOTU is available

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

As we wait to hear the big State of the Union speech, you can prep by reading the "official" text at Americablog. … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

LIE blogging the State of the Union

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

With so many other bloggers out there live-blogging the State of the Union tonight (a few are listed here), it seemed redundant for us to add our voice to the mix.  But we had so much fun live-blogging His Excellency's State of the … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

The Republican playbook on social security

February 2, 2005 By David Leave a Comment

This link will take you to an excellent resource for the coming debate on Social Security.  (Hat tip: TaxProf via ACSBlog.)  The 103-page document was prepared by the Chairs of the House and Senate Republican Conferences, Deborah … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

GET OFF THE PHONE!

February 2, 2005 By Charley on the MTA 3 Comments

Sorry to get all liberal/paternalistic, but I really think we need a law banning cell phone use while driving. Link:A report from the University of Utah sayswhen motorists between 18 and 25 talk on cell phones, they drive likeelderly people … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: random

Mo’ Money Mitt

February 1, 2005 By Charley on the MTA 2 Comments

So the Guvnah has started to, uh, massage* the various parts of the Republican body politic: Friends and supporters of Governor Mitt Romney have established apolitical action committee that has lavished more than $250,000 onRepublican … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: massachusetts

Mailbag: Social Insecurity

February 1, 2005 By Charley on the MTA Leave a Comment

Well, maybe not a whole bag, but this is from an esteemed reader:If you can get your hands on today's NewYork Times, the Krugman op-ed piece [reg. req'd] is worth a read.  He's much tooshrill most of the time, but he makes an essential … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User

The Social Security Tax Reduction Act of 2005

February 1, 2005 By David 7 Comments

Here's the basic problem.  Everyone agrees that if the system is not adjusted, then at some point many years down the road (2042 or 2052, depending on whose estimates you use), the social security system will not have enough funds to … [Read more...]

Filed Under: User Tagged With: national

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3289
  • 3290
  • 3291
  • 3292
  • 3293
  • …
  • 3309
  • Next Page »

Election Day 2020 Countdown

Election Day 2020Countdown

Recommended Posts

  • Biden's Foreign Policy Experience: An Unexpected Trump Card For 2020 (3)
  • My "I know Joe" new button idea (3)
  • The Squirrely Arguments Against Impeachment (3)
  • The Press Lets Our Polity Down Yet Again (2)
  • Time to play hardball with fascist pukes (2)

Recent User Posts

Time to play hardball with fascist pukes

December 14, 2019 By fredrichlariccia 2 Comments

Attend a DNC Caucus Training Near You!

December 13, 2019 By Christopher Leave a Comment

The Squirrely Arguments Against Impeachment

December 11, 2019 By terrymcginty 17 Comments

My “I know Joe” new button idea

December 11, 2019 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

No One is a Progressive Angel, So Let’s Stop Pretending

December 11, 2019 By BKay 48 Comments

Biden’s Foreign Policy Experience: An Unexpected Trump Card For 2020

December 10, 2019 By terrymcginty 43 Comments

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on Time to play hardball with fascist pukesThe Russiapublicans installed that urine soaked orange c…
  • SomervilleTom on Time to play hardball with fascist pukesThe historical "solution" most often turned to in cases…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentExchanges like this — not to mention the entire GOP mant…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentHere are your exact words (emphasis mine): Trump is cash…
  • SomervilleTom on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentIt appears to me that "they" are a projection of you, ev…
  • Christopher on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentYou made the comment about a distinction without a diffe…
  • johntmay on The Squirrely Arguments Against ImpeachmentI never said I speak for all working class voters. Do yo…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Blue Mass GroupFollow

Reality-based commentary. Necessary but not sufficient. Doing the other things. Massachusetts and beyond.

Blue Mass Group
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
AlexSteffenAlex Steffen@AlexSteffen·
12 Dec

Our entire public debate is decades behind the realities we know we face now, and as we understand those realities better, most of our findings will reveal our problems to be even more pressing than we thought they were.

That's just what the 2020s are going be like. https://twitter.com/DrNoelHealy/status/1204204976953626624

Noel Healy@DrNoelHealy

This final slide from @MichaelEMann is devastating. The time for incremental climate policy is over.🚨He estimates annual emissions may have to drop by 15% a year (rather than 7.5%)🚨. In other words we have zero years to tackle climate change. We need a #GreenNewDeal now #GND

Reply on Twitter 1205201555386814465Retweet on Twitter 1205201555386814465212Like on Twitter 1205201555386814465358Twitter 1205201555386814465
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
TPMTalking Points Memo@TPM·
7h

Terrible, Terrible, Terrible https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/terrible-terrible-terrible

Reply on Twitter 1206017639035867136Retweet on Twitter 12060176390358671364Like on Twitter 120601763903586713613Twitter 1206017639035867136
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
TheViewFromLL2Susan Simpson@TheViewFromLL2·
11h

The take away of this story doesn't seem to be that impeachment is bad for Democrats. It's that opposing impeachment is so bad for Democrats they can't remain Democrats. https://twitter.com/AndrewDesiderio/status/1205949264515481600

Andrew Desiderio@AndrewDesiderio

NEWS: Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a Democrat who opposes impeachment, plans to switch parties and become a Republican.

Staff were informed today. Question now is when, not if, he makes it official.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/14/jeff-van-drew-change-parties-085036

Reply on Twitter 1205961091282604034Retweet on Twitter 1205961091282604034472Like on Twitter 12059610912826040341861Twitter 1205961091282604034
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
everywhereistGeraldine@everywhereist·
13 Dec

My friend's insurance coded his brain surgeon wrong on their forms and billed him $250k and he had to figure that shit out while dying of cancer https://twitter.com/SmithInAmerica/status/1205546782425538561

David Smith@SmithInAmerica

Buttigieg: “I trust you to figure out your own health care.”

Reply on Twitter 1205561944884670464Retweet on Twitter 12055619448846704644197Like on Twitter 120556194488467046423749Twitter 1205561944884670464
Retweet on TwitterBlue Mass Group Retweeted
grumpygrumpyowl🦉grumpygrumpyowl@grumpygrumpyowl·
13 Dec

Please video or take pictures before you call. This is very important.

Also... don’t go there for fun, mmmkay? https://twitter.com/frracs_ma/status/1205527547695509506

FRRACS@FRRACS_MA

If you smell strong odors at or near the site, see workers with no protective gear, or witness trucks leaving w/ muddy tires, call and alert the following numbers:

Weymouth Mayor's Office: (781) 340-5012
MassDEP Emergency Hotline: (888) 304-1133
Enbridge Hotline: (888) 331-6553

Reply on Twitter 1205529333416239105Retweet on Twitter 120552933341623910513Like on Twitter 120552933341623910514Twitter 1205529333416239105
Load More...

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2019 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.