I received an invitation to attend a fund raiser for Hillary Clinton. All I needed was $1,000 dollars and the ability to free my schedule for Wednesday May 4th, from 6:00 -8:00 PM. In return for my $1,000, I’d be able to have a conversation with with John Podesta, Campaign Chair, Hillary for America. The event is hosted by Bob and Liz Pozen. I assume Bob Pozen is the guy from Fidelity. His name rung a bell. Wasn’t he the same guy who served as a member of President George Bush’s Commission on Social Security? I always get nervous when Republicans want to tinker with Social Security.
So what does Mr. Pozen say about the projected shortages for Social Security and his cure? In short, “we can’t raise taxes on the rich so we must cut benefits and raise the age of eligibility”. Well, he does not come out and say it directly. But read Why my plan to fix Social Security will work and Why liberals should back Social Security reform and tell me what you think. To his credit, he does say that ”Contrary to popular opinion, the structure of federal retirement programs today favors middle and high earners over less well-off retirees.” but what he leaves out it the middle class wage earners are dwindling in this nation and have been for 40 years. He does say this No one has a legal entitlement to the current schedule of Social Security benefits. That’s rather chilling, eh?
Sorry Bob and Liz, sorry Mr. Podesta and Secretary Clinton, but while I can clear my schedule for Wednesday, I make $12 an hour at a part time job and at the age of 61, I simply don’t have $1,000 to spare. I used to be a middle class earner, I really was. Will those days return? The prospects don’t look good, do they? If we keep the same political positions, the return of a vibrant middle class is just a theoretical debate over something that will never, ever happen.
The leak came from an FBI supervisor who was taking money from a wise-guy informant. He got nervous and knew it was best if the guy was dead.
At his request The Globe Spotlight team (Kevin Cullen and the two authors of Black Mass) exposed the FBI informant and everyone waited for his underworld execution. It never came.
Years later in an interview on public radio Kevin Cullen was asked why the informant was not killed after the Globe exposed him. Cullen responded that he always wondered that himself. (He later explained that he once asked a wise guy the same question and was told “we didn’t believe it.”)
Think about this. The Globe intentionally tried but failed to have a person killed. Think some more please.
Putting this in prospective John Connolly was tried and acquitted in federal court in Boston for the exact same thing; diming out an informant to wise guys thereby causing his murder.
Fred Wyshak then went down to Florida, got sworn in as a special Florida state’s attorney, and retried Connolly on the same charge.
Double jeopardy you say? Bahaha! Fred don’t need no schtinkin Constitution.
Back to the leak. The corrupt FBI supervisor admitted to attemting to murder the informant and taking money from him. As a reward for his honesty he was promoted few times and then retired with a full pension.
This is good background for any story you read in the Boston Globe concerning federal investigations and indictments in Boston. The Globe and Fred Wyshak are joined at the hip. Wyshak does everything but cash the paychecks for Shelly Murphy, Milton Valencia, Kevin Cullen, and others.
There is a diagnosis for Fred Wyshak. Total whack job. Yet the home office lets him do his thing. He should not have the job he has. A high level dude named Margolis is most likely his enabler.
For the past five years Wyshak has cast his heavy shadow over Beacon Hill with grand juries sitting in Worcester (where his favorite judge sits) making every elected pol in MA shit their pants when they hear his name.
Please note: Carmen Ortiz like all US attorneys is a figurehead. A political appointment who does what she is told. Much like an ambassador. Wyshak and the Globe use her as a deflection. They don’t respect her. They use her.
Now Fred Wyshak wants the mayor.
He and The Globe want to walk in to a zoo, find a caged lion that wouldn’t hurt a fly, drug it so it becomes less of a threat,( remember, deep down they are big fucking pussies) shoot in the head, then convince everyone it was wild and dangerous and about to kill every living thing within miles.
That is what they are doing to Marty Walsh. Absotively.
So they have this poor bastard named Ken Brissette who use to work for Deval’s tourism board and was hired by the new mayor to do more or less the same for the city.
One day some teamsters are bitching to him about Top Chef not hiring union labor – that’s what unions do, it’s their job – and tells Brisette they are going to picket the Parker House. Brissette lets the Parker House know. They say thank you very much. The Parker House tells anyone who will listen that Brissette gave them a friendly call that was greatly appreciated.
The Globe is then leaked info showing the feds pushing a case that by making that call to the Parker House Brissette was committing a federal crime and is in big fucking trouble.
(Question: Knowing this would you take a job with the city that required any thought?)
That is the case and the feds will indict Brissitte and tell him he’s going to prison for years and years unless he says that Mayor Walsh told him to threatened people on behalf of trade unions.
The proof? A few years ago when the mayor’s job was to get unioj workers hired on construction jobs throughout greater Boston he informed a developer in Somerville the well known fact the people who sit on the zoning board on Boston like to see 100% union on projects outside of Boston also.
Did you ever have a creative writing assignment in grade school? Usually a picture with one or two words and you were asked to create a story behind it? That’s what Fred Wyshak and the Globe are doing right now.
Just in time for election season. Tito Jackson as the person who is right to lead the city in the 21st century not like the federally investigated, union thug, Irish Catholic piece of shit from Savin Hill.
That’s what’s happening here folks.
They sell this fiction better than the great Ric Flair sold a flying-drop-elbow. Looks pretty believable even when unbelievable.
What’s funny is it now seems that Mintz Levin and Wynn and the Gaming Commission aren’t as close as they once were.
As a result Commonwealth Magazine received its marching orders and gave detailed accounts of the trial. Especially how Wynn and the Gaming Commission used the non-illegal activities on Lightbody to get tens of millions of dollars off the sale price.
How the hell does that work? Who paid whom what? Steve Crosby et al. gave Wynn a $40 million dollar kiss.
Where’s that investigation Fred?
And where is The Boston Globe reporting?
Yesterday the mayor announces that every Boston public school student who graduates with 2.2 g.p.a. or better will receive free tuition at Roxbury and Bunker Hill Community Colleges.
Look for it. It’s somewhere on the Globe web site. Below the fed probes and the grand prix pulling out and other bullshit.
The Boston Globe is a sad pathetic publication employing too many amoral social outcasts (like McGrory and Cullen) who have a special place in hell waiting for them.
In an earlier posting, JohnTMay made the claim that HRC’s claim to have 2.5 million more votes than Senator Sanders was in fact nothing but:
This is just another deliberate deception by a desperate campaign made possible by a corporate media endorsing their corporate candidate.
Surprisingly, there is not a single link to any other reputable site that may refute this claim. Instead, we are treated to a football analogy as proof. I don’t know Jack about Football, nor could you pay me enough to ever bother to learn about this criminal laden “so called” sport. However PolitiFact has noted that this claim is “mostly true“. As HRC remains the front-runner for the nomination, I think it is a bit hyperbolic to call this a “deliberate deception by a desperate campaign”. Eventually, the Party will need to rally around the actual nominee. Enough with the hyperbolic attacks already, our primary has come and gone, and our delegates to the convention are already chosen. I see no point in these attacks other than to instill resentment. I have included the link to PolitiFact, to support my assertion.
Aside from the fact that it ain’t over until it’s over, Democrats are sitting in a pretty good position for the general election.
The Republican brand is at an all-time low. The presumptive Republican nominee is widely reviled by women and people of color. He’s looking at testifying in a law suit against his Trump University scam and a convention that promises to be a circus. Big money donors are sitting out the presidential election. Even Charles Koch is expressing doubts. Republican voters are so pissed, they are ready to punish down-ticket GOP candidates. (See more here and here). We still have a long way to go, but the headwinds are favorable.
Their party has historically won elections by appealing to racial enmity and cultural anxiety, but its actual policy agenda is dedicated to serving the interests of the 1 percent, above all through tax cuts for the rich — which even Republican voters don’t support, while they truly loathe elite ideas like privatizing Social Security and Medicare.
As far as Democrats are concerned, our
party defines itself as the protector of the poor and the middle class, and especially of nonwhite voters. Does it fall short of fulfilling this mission much of the time? Are its leaders sometimes too close to big-money donors? Of course. Still, if you look at the record of the Obama years, you see real action on behalf of the party’s goals.
We’re in good position, but there are always wild cards, the most important being Bernie Sanders and the Sandernistas. Bernie has inspired a lot of voters, but they aren’t all typical Democratic voters. There are the conspiracy theorists and the revolutionaries, the biggest revolutionary being Sanders himself. I wrote previously, one of the biggest differences between Sanders’ side and Clinton’s side of the primary was a theory of change. Kevin Drum says much the same thing in Mother Jones:
if you want to make a difference in this country, you need to be prepared for a very long, very frustrating slog. You have to buy off interest groups, compromise your ideals, and settle for half loaves—all the things that Bernie disdains as part of the corrupt mainstream establishment. In place of this he promises his followers we can get everything we want via a revolution that’s never going to happen. And when that revolution inevitably fails, where do all his impressionable young followers go? Do they join up with the corrupt establishment and commit themselves to the slow boring of hard wood? Or do they give up?
If Sandernistas were to change democracy for the better, I’d happily eat my words. But I’m worried that they truly don’t understand American politics. All the talk of revolution sounds great, but we haven’t had a revolution since 1776. As Drum says in his article, we’ve never had a revolution since then.
Ed Kilgore writes in New York Magazine that a group of laid off Sanders campaign staff has started what amounts to its own party with the political initiative A Brand New Congress:
the closer you get to the Sandernistas’ Brand New Congress initiative — the new project by recently laid-off Bernie staffers to create a revolution in Congress beginning with the 2018 elections — the less it looks like the instrument for a difficult but achievable task and the more it looks like the product of a very strange set of beliefs about American politics. It’s not focused on boosting progressive turnout in general elections, but on recruiting and running candidates in Republican as well as Democratic primaries who meet a rigid set of policy litmus tests. The idea is very explicitly that people alive with the Bern can literally elect a “brand-new Congress” in one election cycle to turn public policy 180 degrees.
President Obama began his presidency believing he could work with Republicans. We know how that worked out. If that weren’t weird enough, A Brand New Congress also believes it can work with tea party activists.
Corbin Trent, another former Sanders staffer, said bringing Republicans on board is “the key to it being a successful idea” and there’s enough overlap between Sanders’ platform and tea party conservatives to make the PAC’s goals feasible.
Reality television star Donald Trump’s current status as the Republican front-runner demonstrates that GOP voters are eager for candidates who, like Trump, criticize the corrupting influence of money in politics and the impact of free trade deals on American workers, Trent said.
“This will allow Republicans to say ‘Yeah, I’m a Republican, but I believe climate change is real and I don’t believe all Muslims are terrorists,” he said. “It will allow people to think differently in the Republican Party if they want to pull away from the hate-based ideology.”
Bernie Sanders and the Sandernistas have an excellent opportunity to change the Democratic Party. They won’t affect a revolution, but they can exert the force necessary to reorient the party. Sanders can get concessions on party platform, convention speakers, and DNC operations. They can work for progressive Democrats already running for office. Maybe they’ll make enough money from this initiative to keep themselves employed, but in the end, we need them to work on the presidential election.
Bernie will continue to run and make appearances. That’s okay. But we need to start working on party unity. Half-baked political initiatives won’t help.
INDIANAPOLIS (The Borowitz Report)—In choosing the former Hewlett-Packard C.E.O. Carly Fiorina as his running mate, Senator Ted Cruz hopes to tap into the immense popularity of one of the most beloved public figures in America.
Minutes after the news of Cruz’s selection leaked, political insiders called the choice of the wildly adored Fiorina a game-changer for the Cruz campaign.
“It’s no secret that Ted Cruz has some trouble with likeability,” the Republican strategist Harland Dorrinson said. “What better way to fix that than by choosing Carly Fiorina, a person everyone is absolutely crazy about?”
Fiorina’s reputation for winning the hearts of everyone she comes in contact with dates back to her days as the incredibly well-liked C.E.O. of Hewlett-Packard and, before that, Lucent Technologies.
“At Lucent, she could light up any room with her smile,” former Lucent employee Tracy Klugian said. “If you had to say what people loved about working at Lucent Technologies, it all came down to two words: Carly Fiorina.” …
WEST PALM BEACH (Satire from The Borowitz Report)—Ben Carson, the retired neurosurgeon, stirred controversy on Thursday by saying in a televised interview that he had no recollection of running for President of the United States.
Appearing on the Fox News Channel, Dr. Carson responded to host Sean Hannity’s question about his ten-month-long candidacy by saying, “I do not recall any of that occurring.”
“I’ve been told that I did it, but I find it impossible to believe,” he said. “I don’t think I’d forget a thing like that.” …
While Carson insisted that “there is no way I ran for President,” he did not rule out running for the Republican nomination in the future.
“Today, Carly Fiorina was announced as Ted Cruz’s running mate. Fiorina said it’s always been her lifelong dream to lose twice in the same election.” –Jimmy Fallon
“According to a new poll that just came out, 50 percent of Republicans say they could support Donald Trump. The other 50 percent are a group calling themselves ‘Women.’” –Conan O’Brien
“Yesterday, Donald Trump said, ‘If I lose, I don’t think you’ll ever see me again.’ So finally, a Trump campaign promise we can all get behind.” –Conan O’Brien
“A woman who looks exactly like a female Ted Cruz has been asked to star in a porn movie. So finally, a cure for your porn addiction.” –Conan O’Brien
“If you think that you’re worried about what is going to happen in this race, just consider Reince Priebus, RNC chairman and man whose name is an anagram for ‘crisp bee urine.’” –Stephen Colbert
“House Speaker Paul Ryan this afternoon issued a formal statement ruling himself out as a potential replacement candidate if there is a contested Republican convention. And you know things are bad in the Republican Party when people who aren’t even running are dropping out of the race.” –Seth Meyers
“After losing in Wisconsin, there has been a big shake-up in the Trump campaign staff. In fact, the guy in charge of racist comments is now in charge of sexist comments.” –Conan O’Brien
I read Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals (published 1971) in the 1990s and wanted to remind myself of what my thought was then of what Alinsky wrote long before his name became a conservative slur.
Alinsky was a successful organizer and a seasoned tactician. Alinsky, however, was not a strategist. The difference between strategy and tactics is often confused: Tactics are the means used to gain an objective and strategy is the general campaign plan or goal.
Here are some of the tactically radical rules of Saul Alinsky that I noted then and now note again:
Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
Never go outside the experience of your people.
Whenever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.
Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.
A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
Keep the pressure on.
The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside.
The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
Pick a target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
The real action is in the enemy’s reaction.
The enemy properly goaded and guided in his reaction is your major strength.
Tactics, like organization, like life, require that you move with the action.
For a different take on community organizing, my notes on Grace Lee Bogg’s The Next American Revolution: Sustainable Activism for the Twenty-First Century are at http://hubeventsnotes.blogspot.com/2016/04/the-next-american-revolution.html
WASHINGTON — A group of House Democrats is organizing an effort that could slow down an Obama administration plan to reduce drug prices, according to a letter obtained by The Huffington Post.
The Department of Health and Human Services is working toward finalizing a new rule that would experiment with ending the financial incentive doctors have for prescribing some extremely expensive medications. The rule has been well-received among some patient advocates, but congressional Democrats have been largely silent, while the pharmaceutical industry and medical community have waged an aggressive campaign to stop it.
The campaign is bearing fruit. The letter from House Democrats, according to Drew Hammill, a spokesman for House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), was made necessary because Big Pharma and oncologist lobbyists had pushed many Democrats to the brink of signing a much more aggressive Republican letter. The letter expresses concerns with the proposed rule, but doesn’t call for it to be withdrawn.
… Hammill said Pelosi is urging members to sign the letter, which is being circulated by Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.).
Well how about that. Glad someone is looking out for the little guy.
As I wrote about earlier this month, there is big MA GOP showdown this weekend to elect loyal Trump delegates to the RNC Convention between the Real Donald Trump camp and the Cruz camp, who are running as Trump delegates and will then abandoned Trump if he doesn’t win on the first ballot.
I’m on Trump’s email list and just got their “all hands on deck” call to attend one of the nine caucuses this Saturday. The email had three links, all bringing you to the same webpage, where you’re supposed to be able to learn where your caucus will be.
Just below the video on the page, the first line reads: “Find your caucus location here” and takes you to the Secretary of State’s page to find your local polling location…not your caucus location. Whoops.
Even better, the email ends, “and then join us this Saturday at 7AM at your local caucus location to vote for the Trump slate of delegates.”
Hmm…7 am sounded awfully early for me, so I checked the MA GOP site, which listed the start time for each caucus at 10 am. And it kindly lists the location of each caucus. (And I suppose by writing this post, I’m giving them enough time to correct it…but the Trump organization is hapless and I’m pretty sure they’ll screw up the second chance they’ve been given.)
I wasn’t going to post, but I felt like I had to after reading the estate sale write up. Obviously, it doesn’t seem that the Patrick’s had anything do to with the write up, but this part was my favorite.
Also to be included will be a fabulous selection of Couture and Jewelry. Many of which have been worn as Mrs. Patrick attended several high profile functions at the State House and also at the White House as guests of President and Mrs. Barack Obama.
So if you don’t have any plans on May 7th, the sun room rod iron table and chairs looked nice.
Ted Cruz announced today in Indiana that Carly Fiorina will be his running mate. (I swear, The Onion is not my source for this!) Talking heads seem baffled by this strategy. Nobody seems sure if and how this helps him with delegates. Not since 1976 when Reagan tapped PA Senator Richard Schweiker in a failed bid to woo not only PA delegates, but others who thought Reagan too conservative (RS was firmly in the Rockefeller Republican wing.), has someone selected a running mate without having clinched the nomination. Maybe it’s to get under Trump’s skin, or pressure him to name someone.
I can’t help but think, though, that if Clinton had done this even though she IS almost certainly the Dem nominee (Cruz, of course, isn’t even his party’s frontrunner.), she would have been slammed for being presumptuous. It’s looking like the conventional wisdom is settling on the idea that she should take advantage of the fact that Republicans go first this year and wait until after their convention to name someone so she can take what happens in Cleveland into account.
[Your editor adds the following trenchant commentary:]
Today my wife and I spent the day on Georges Island in Boston harbor. I gave a brief presentation for the National Park Service on Boston’s Civil War memory, which went really well. Afterwards, we spent some time walking through Fort Warren.
A number of prominent Confederate officials, including James Mason, John Slidell and Alexander Stephens were held as prisoners for various periods of time. In addition, Richard Ewell, Isaac Trimble, Simon Bolivar Buckner and a small number of Confederate soldiers were also held as prisoners during the war.
I knew all of this, but what truly surprised was this monument to those Confederates who died as prisoners, which was dedicated by the Boston chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy in 1963. Yeah, that’s right, there was a UDC chapter in Boston.
Kudos to Levin for breaking the story, in a sense.
The Law Center urges community members to “organize campaigns to remove these symbols from public spaces and place them in museums or similar venues where a full account of the history can be provided.” Noted Civil War historian Eric Foner has argued it is more effective to leave such memorials in place, but add additional material that puts them in historical context. WaPo:
“In the south, I don’t think they should take down statues of Confederate leaders,” Foner continued. “They should put up statues of black congressmen and senators. It makes the public history more accurately reflect our entire history.”
Then again, Foner did preface that comment with “In the south.” Maybe here in the North, we don’t need a relatively recent confederate memorial complete with the seal of the CSA and its motto “Under God, Our Vindicator” on George’s Island, and it would be better off in a museum as the Center recommends — complete with additional contextualizing material. The Robert Gould Shaw Memorial on Boston Common says more, better.
“We started off with 13,000 riders the first year from May to September. Up over 15,000 last year, so there’s definitely an interest,” McGee says. He’d like to see the ferry become permanent and run year-round, to give commuters on the North Shore another option for getting into town.
“We’ve got a state-of-the-art facility with two berths for ferry boats and other operations,” McGee explains. “This is also land that’s also part of the project. [It’s] city-owned, for extra parking spots. Parking’s free, with a building here as planned as a terminal and then a restaurant on the top. You can see how beautiful it is here.”
McGee says the ferry terminal — located a short walk away from a commuter rail stop and parking garage in Lynn Center — could become a major transportation hub for the entire North Shore, especially if long-ago shelved plans to extend the MBTA Blue Line to Lynn were revived.
In general, ferry service is a great idea! Lower carbon, you don’t have to build & maintain new pavement, and it’s just plain way more fun than driving.
But there’s a big problem in Lynn that’s a great example of how we can’t solve our transportation problems without also dealing with housing and development policies.
The problem is the ferry’s location. Here, take a look:
In the nobody else has so I guess I will department, here is a thread regarding today’s primaries. All five states (CT, DE, MD, PA, RI) close at 8PM EDT. PA and MD also have closely watched Dem primaries for the US Senate. I figure for the presidency the front runners in both parties run the table. Sanders will fight to narrower gaps in the New England states than the others. Kasich will have a better night than Cruz. What say you all?
Again and again, the media keeps pushing Hillary, parroting her talking points without challenge or question. In the past two days, Rachel Maddow and Andrea Mitchell both tell their viewers that “Hillary has 2.7 million more votes” than Bernie.
This is just another deliberate deception by a desperate campaign made possible by a corporate media endorsing their corporate candidate.
In context, these votes are best understood as the collection of points scored in individual games now being disguised as more important that the number of games won.
For example, if the NY Jets had a 12-2 record and the NY Giants had a 11-3 record, one would clearly see that while ahead in the rankings, there is little that separates one from the other and with two games left in the season, anything is possible.
However, in this case, the NY Jets are bragging that they scored a total of 336 Offensive Points and the NY Giants only scored 121 Offensive Points and as it is clear that no football team can realistically score 215 points with two games remaining, the season is over and a winner is clear.
Yes, Hillary has won many states as has Bernie. Yes, Hillary has those super delegates, for now. But no, this is not over.
The media is deliberately fanning the flames of this lie to discourage voter turnout of Sanders voters. If successful, they better worry when that chicken comes home to roost….
Traffic is getting worse. That’s the conclusion of Boston-area residents surveyed in a new WBUR poll (topline, crosstabs).
Fifty-seven percent say it’s gotten worse in the last five years. You could point to the rebounding economy, but whatever the reason, almost 2 in 5 residents say traffic has caused them to be late for work. And 14 percent say they’ve considered leaving the area to get away from the traffic.
This is, of course, completely at odds with our Governor and Speaker DeLeo, who insist upon the strategy of “the beatings will continue until morale improves.” Budget cuts, austerity, no vision, no hope ever.
I stipulate that the politics are exacerbated by the unavoidable, structural regional rivalries for transit dollars; and the looting by the T’s contractors and unions; absurdly outdated procurement; so that even approved money gets lit on fire. Better procurement is obviously necessary, but it’s not sufficient.
As many of you saw, last week BMG had some great discussions on the ballot initiative to regulate marijuana like alcohol that will be voted on this November. It began with my post asking why progressive organization ActBlue was working with the campaign to continue prohibition, and a petition I created for progressives to ask them to stop. Senator Jason Lewis then issued a detailed response explaining his opposition to the initiative. Both of these posts generated tons of comments (47 and 92, respectively, as of this writing), and I’m really thankful to the BMG community for a great discussion. Someone asked that I make my comment responding to Senator Lewis’ points into its own post, so here it is (small edits to add links):
Potency & Edibles
Senator Lewis is absolutely correct that the average potency of marijuana today is higher than it used to be (which it’s worth pointing out was driven by prohibition, as more potent drugs are easier to smuggle – same reason we had “rum runners” and not “beer runners” during alcohol prohibition). While it does come with more potential for dosage mistakes, education about these products is the most important thing. People know that you drink 12oz of 5% beer but only 1.5oz of 35% liquor – many tourists in Colorado don’t know that 5mg is the standard dose, so seeing a 30mg label means nothing to them. Education like the industry “Start Low, Go Slow” campaign is the best way to alleviate this problem. And while it is a problem, luckily it’s impossible to fatally overdose on marijuana, unlike alcohol – people who consume too much will have a bad time, but their organs won’t shut down and they won’t die. Additionally, a legal marijuana market allows for greater variety of dosages, as many people prefer less THC, just like many people prefer beer or wine over shots of liquor. The black market incentivizes potency, legal markets incentivize variety. There are many low-THC products on the market in CO and other states, as there will be in MA post-legalization.
It’s looking like the film tax credit is going to be with us for quite a while longer. Last year the Governor’s idea of scrapping it altogether in favor of a tax credit for working poor families met with very stiff resistance from film tax credit fans. This year his more modest plan to prune it back to its Romney-era size (in part by imposing a cap of $7 million per movie and by eliminating the option to sell the credit) hasn’t really been heard from since its January launch.
But if we can’t stop this perpetual train robbery, we can at least learn where the money is going (h/t to Jamie Eldridge and other members of the Senate who succeeded in getting us this window to peer into). In 2014, the most recent year for which film tax credit information is available, one very big winner was Massachusetts native Mark Wahlberg, the star of Ted 2, which was filmed here that year. (If, like me, you haven’t caught Ted 2 or the original Ted yet, Wahlberg’s co-star is an animated bear and both stars’ vocabularies are largely scatological.)
We taxpayers ponied up $14 million toward Ted 2‘s production costs. For that money we could have paid for upgrades to 30 subway cars to extend their service for the better part of a decade or funded a year’s worth of rental vouchers for 2000 homeless families. So far, Ted 2 has taken in over $240 million in box office and video sales, an amount that ought to reassure investors in Mark Wahlberg’s next Massachusetts venture that the film tax credit is not strictly necessary to its commercial success.
And as we were particularly reminded this past Monday, Mark Wahlberg’s next Massachusetts venture is already in production. Opinions vary on whether it’s too soon for a movie about the Marathon bombing and whether a Marathon bombing movie made by Mark Wahlberg will ever be appropriate, but come December, we’re going to have one called Patriots Day. Wahlberg and his production company at CBS have tiptoed around the movie’s possibly explotative nature and have offered a solemn but indefinite vow to “get it right.”
Apparently getting it right does not include respecting the wishes of any 2016 Marathon runners who don’t care to appear in the movie.
Here’s an idea. If the Patriots Day folks are really interested in getting it right, they could announce that they’re making this movie on their own dime and won’t ask us taxpayers to chip in a quarter of the production costs via the film tax credit.
Part 2 of the Anglophile Obsession, today is both the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare’s death as well as his 452nd birthday. Many things are happening this weekend to celebrate the anniversary, including BBC’s lists for the Anniversary Programs.
Hopefully, unlike earlier this week, this will not get anyone angry or prevent anyone from celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Easter Uprising on Sunday. IMHO I believe you can celebrate both. Or as I believe Polonius might say:
“This above all: to thine own self be true
And it must follow, as the night the day
Thou canst not then be false to any man/Farewell, my blessing season this in thee!”