Support BMG PAC!
About BMG PAC
Make a secure credit card contribution using Google Checkout:
$
Or send a check to BMG PAC, PO Box 877, Medford, MA 02155.
View BMG PAC's latest disclosure report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?



FREE COPY OF BOB'S BOOK Barack Obama for Beginners to every 50th Facebook Friend!
BMG on Facebook

About
About us
Rules of the road - please read!
Formatting and multimedia tips
Email us
RSS feed

BMG TRAFFIC REPORT
Blue Mass. Swag
Creative Commons License

Event Calendar
February 2010
(view month)
S M T W R F S
* 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 * * * * * *
<< (add event) >>

Active Users
Currently 3 user(s) logged on.

Search




Advanced Search


Blog Roll
Massachusetts Left
.08 Acres
Below Boston
Berkshires Blog
Blue News Tribune
Chimes at Midnight
Eisenthal Report
Granby 01033
Health Care for All
Left in Lowell
MA lefty blogs
Marry in Mass.
Mass Engagement
Massachusetts Liberal
Michael Forbes-Wilcox
My Dedham
Progressive Mass.
Quriltai on the Shore
Ryan's Take
Someday I Will
ShrewsBuried
Talking Stoneham
The Fray
Universal hub

Differently-Winged
John Daley
Mass. Pro-Life
No Looking Backwards
Peter Porcupine
Pundit Review
Red Mass Group
Scaling the Hill 2010

Mass. Media
David S. Bernstein
Cambridge politics
CommonWealth Unbound
Globe bloggers
Herald bloggers
Hub Blog
Jon Keller
MassBeacon
Media Nation (Dan Kennedy)
Open Media Boston
Adam Reilly
Toll Talk (Mary Connaughton)
Weekly Dig Blog

Legal
ACS Blog
Balkinization
Election law
How Appealing
SCOTUSblog
Volokh Conspiracy

General
Accountable Strategies
Billionaires for Bush
Blue Works Better
Crooks and Liars
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Eschaton (Atrios)
Glenn Greenwald
Grist (environment blog)
Hullabaloo (Digby)
LiberalOasis
MyDD
Oliver Willis
Pandagon
Political Animal
Political Critic
Political Wire
Poor Man
Progressive Blog Digest
Real Climate
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Tapped
Talking Points Memo
Think Progress
Truth and Progress
Turn Maine Blue
Wonkette

www.BlueMassGroup.com

Tsongas backs SCHIP expansion; Ogo apparently doesn't

by: David

Thu Sep 13, 2007 at 12:33:07 PM EDT


Just in from Tsongas Tcentral:

"Millions of Americans, including 9 million children, don't have access to health care.  Millions more can't afford the plans they have. Yet President Bush says he'll veto the Children's Health Insurance Program that provides health insurance for millions of children and Mr. Ogonowski is in lockstep with the Bush administration.  We cannot let that happen.  I strongly support expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program that will reach out to an additional 42,000 Massachusetts children who are eligible for coverage but remain uninsured, and, if I'm elected, I'll vote to get them covered. 

"Jim Ogonowski, on the other hand, has made his position clear:  he opposes expansion of the SCHIP program and he will join Congressional Republicans in preventing an override of President Bush's veto of the legislation.  For voters who want to see change and progress in Washington, it's clear it won't come with Mr. Ogonowski."

The vote on SCHIP is important, and the vote in the House to override Bush's expected veto could be close.  So here's a nice clear choice for the "independents" up in MA-05, a lot of whom apparently like Mr. Ogonowski.  You want more kids to have health coverage?  Vote for Tsongas.  You want to leave them to their own devices?  Ogo's your man.  Nice and easy.

David :: Tsongas backs SCHIP expansion; Ogo apparently doesn't
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
funerals (4.00 / 1)
Just wondering if Ogonowski has plans to graciously attend the funerals of every MA-05 child who will die from lack of medical care?

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

funerals (0.00 / 0)

Just wondering if Tsongas has plans to graciously atttend the funerals of every MA-05 child without SCHIP or other medical insurance who will die from lack of medical care?

 

 

I like Tsongas' position better than Ogonowski's in this case -- but she's got a long way to go on health care coverage methinks, SCHIP notwithstanding.



[ Parent ]
thank you for clarifying. (0.00 / 0)
that is indeed what i meant.

and fair point.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.


[ Parent ]
Funerals (0.00 / 0)

Considering that the SCHIP expansion is principally aimed at poverty level x 300%, and considering that MassHealth coverage goes up to 300%, then SCHIP, even if expanded, won't cover any additional children in MA-05. 

But, nice strawman strawchild anyway.

 



[ Parent ]
Because (0.00 / 0)

He's running for Federal office.  You're the one who brought up MA-05 children, the effect of which SCHIP expansion is nil.

 The Federal question, is why should middle class taxpayers pay for families earning upwards toward $72,000 for their children's health insurance.  The SCHIP program expansion does nothing for improving the health of the needy, it's merely a middle class expansion/subsidy.

 

 



[ Parent ]
"the effect of which SCHIP expansion is nil" (0.00 / 0)
not to those children.  you're looking at this backwards.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

[ Parent ]
SCHIP (0.00 / 0)

The MassHealth system:

 Massachusetts:  We're Mass. We're Blue.  We want all kids in the state covered and will pay for families up to about $60K through a combo of Medicare, MassHealth, and Mass Choice.

Federal Government:  We'll fund the Medicare system and Mass Health and increase your SCHIP Subpart F state payments.  Hmmm...looks like you're paying for families earning $60K.  Whew that's expensive.

Massachusetts:  Ok, true. But, it's our money, our choice.

Federal Governmente: writes a check.

Massachusetts:  Er...you're right.  It's expensive.  Can we have some more?  Because otherwise, those people earning $60K won't get coverage, AND WILL HAVE TO PAY FOR IT ... THEMSELVES!  Quick! A vigil! Please Federal Goverment.  Give us more money.

Ogonowski: no

Tsongas: yes.



[ Parent ]
not bad but (0.00 / 0)
can you put a little David Mamet in there?  snap up the dialogue. 

[ Parent ]
David Mamet (6.00 / 4)

Tsongas: The Children,

Ogonowski: The Children? What about them?

Tsongas: It's all about them.

Ogonowski: Them?

Tsongas: Them.

Ogonowski: Not about the taxpayers.

Tsongas: Them too.

Ogonowski: There's only 2?

Tsongas:   Vote for me.

 



[ Parent ]
Without providing money needed... (0.00 / 0)
to sustain the program.  Let's really talk about what's going on.  Without the SCHIP dollars the state will have trouble adding children that are up to 250% of the poverty level, nevermind 300%.

[ Parent ]
SCHIP (0.00 / 0)

In massachusetts, 300% poverty is a family earning $56,550.  As a matter of platform, Mr. Ogonowski contends that a family at that income level should purchase insurance, or, if the state seeks to deliver free coverage by expanding Medicaid, then of course the State's free to do so, on the State's dime, not the Federal government's.

BTW, under the Mass Connector policies, the approximate cost to cover that 301 % poverty family's two children is about $3,600 per year.

Is it a reasonable position to believe that that 301% poverty family can pay $3600 per year for the health of their kids?  Apparently Ogonowski believes it is.

Also BTW, there are about 82,000 uninsured children in Massachusetts, most of which would be covered under an existing plan (i.e. SCHIP, Medicaid, Medicare) if the parent or guardian were educated and motivated to sign them up.  SCHIP expansion will reach into the middle class as a subsidy, but will do nothing to address the uninsured-and-otherwise-qualifying that are currently receiving no coverage but are entitled to it.



[ Parent ]
Do you understand we use SCHIP money to do this? (0.00 / 0)
Ogonowski does not want to fund what you are describing.

[ Parent ]
Yes (0.00 / 0)
And the current SCHIP coverage to Mass is already funded and continuing.  The Bush budget actually increases the SCHIP funding by $5 billion. 

[ Parent ]
The additional dollars are needed... (0.00 / 0)
to get past 250% then work our way up to 300%, probably the children Nikki is talking about.

[ Parent ]
In other words (0.00 / 0)

A family earning $60K should receive welfare. 



[ Parent ]
But (6.00 / 1)
Why won't anyone think of the children?

[ Parent ]
If you consider health insurance "welfare" (6.00 / 2)
then I believe families earning up to eleventy gajillion sawbucks should get welfare.

[ Parent ]
You said we're already doing it.. (0.00 / 0)
I pointed that we're getting there with SCHIP dollars.  Now your off to something else. if it's solely a money issue for you then I have a post down thread about dollars.  You like speand more money?

[ Parent ]
Can I sell a vowel? (3.00 / 1)

You like speand more money?

 Er...maybe?



[ Parent ]
nice comeback (0.00 / 0)

If you weren't trying to be a horse's ass, I was trying to write, "you like spending more money then".

But either way, your non-response speaks volumes.



[ Parent ]
I wonder what Ogonowski is thinking.... (0.00 / 0)

Maybe there is a reason why he doesn't have a health care plan link to his web site, or any other kind of plan for that matter.  This "Aw shucks, I'm runnin' for Congress" crap can only last for so long.  The SCHIP program works, the results are clear.  Why in the world would Ogonowski take this extreme view?  Maybe we know already.

Let's for a minute pretend to be Ogonowski and not care about sick children in the state that he hopes to represent.  Let's just go over some facts and let me pose a question.

BYU has a study that determined that SCHIP which provided children with preventive care and the ability to go to a primary care provider on minor health issues found that the SCHIP program actually saved more than $2000 per child.  Children not under the SCHIP program is less likely to go to routine doctor visits or a clinic.   Children were 21% more likely to go to the ER when having health issues.

So here's some quick math:

 $2000 * 48000 uninsured children = $84,000,000

The question:  Would you support a person who believes

a) We should pay an additional $84 million to have more sick children in the state

b) Providing better care for children in the state while saving $84 million



schip (0.00 / 0)

Ogonowski on SCHIP:

 

The recent passage of the SCHIP bill is nothing but another illustration of the business-as-usual mentality down in Washington. Congress has failed us in recent years on so many issues, from comprehensive immigration reform to finding an energy policy that works for America. Instead of fixing a broken system, Congress continues to pass bills that are bad for America.

SCHIP was originally intended to help poor children. Instead Congress worked to expand another big-government program that actually harms those working class children and families it was supposed to help.



[ Parent ]
I hope you agree that's pretty weak.... (0.00 / 0)
GOP talking points aside, is he insane?  I know I read an op-ed by JudyAnn Bigby recently discussing the impact on adding more children within the state.

[ Parent ]
that's 42000 uninsured not 48000 - total $'s are correct thought n/t (0.00 / 0)


[ Parent ]
Back in August Jim Ogonowski Wrote This Op Ed in the Eagle Tribune (0.00 / 0)

Let's not distort facts.  Here is what Jim had to say on that.

Counterpoint: Out-of-touch  Congress is wrong again

 

Jim Ogonowski

 

The recent passage of the SCHIP  bill is nothing but another illustration of the business-as-usual mentality  down in Washington. Congress has failed us in recent years on so many issues,  from comprehensive immigration reform to finding an energy policy that works  for America. Instead of fixing a broken system, Congress continues to pass  bills that are bad for America.

 

SCHIP was originally intended to  help poor children. Instead Congress worked to expand another big-government  program that actually harms those working class children and families it was  supposed to help. We all support helping poor children and families, but  government seems unable to help those who need us. When I helped organize the  largest airlift of aid in New Hampshire National Guard history to the victims  of Hurricane Katrina, I saw firsthand how big government programs like FEMA  don't work for the American people.

 

What bothers me the most is the  benefits SCHIP gives to illegal immigrants. My great-grandmother emigrated  from Poland in 1904; widowed and with four children. She settled in the  Merrimack Valley and had very little. America should continue to be the  beacon of hope for the world and welcome immigrants. But they must come here  legally. I do not support amnesty for illegal immigrants. Laws like the SCHIP  bill send the wrong message that our immigration laws are made to be broken,  and that it's OK to come here illegally. That is just plain wrong and unfair  to American families who depend on those benefits to survive.

 

The influx of illegal immigration,  first and foremost, has strained our schools and hospitals. This bill opens  the door for illegal immigrants to apply for Medicaid, because it removes  requirements to show identification when applying. Since we have no idea how  many illegal immigrants are actually in our country, we have no way of  knowing the costs or likely decrease in the quality of care for our children  and elderly. In fact, we will probably not know the damage this bill causes  in its current form for many years, because Congress is not required to  review the bill on a regular basis.

 

What Congress has done with SCHIP  is take a bill that was originally intended to help poor, uninsured children  - those who need us the most - and then fill it with reckless spending, cuts  to our seniors, and benefits to people who have broken the laws of the United  States.

  We need a revolution of new ideas  down in Washington - a national vision. When my kids were born, I gave them  the vision that they were going to go to college and we've achieved that  goal. We don't seem to have a national vision anymore. Congress is too  focused on partisan bickering and rewarding those who break the rules. As a  lifelong farmer, I recognize manure when I smell it, and the people of the  Merrimack Valley should be angry that our leaders in Washington are now  shoveling it.

 



Okay, so he's a nutjob. Thanks for the update. (5.75 / 4)
SCHIP doesn't work because of FEMA.  Then, whoever smelt it dealt it.  Great, can't see why he doesn't get 100% of the vote.

[ Parent ]
You can take what you want out of context (0.00 / 0)

the main point is the SCHIP legislation takes money from seniors and gives it to illegal immigrant children without asking for ID.   Plain and simple.  That is what Jim is against. He is not against healthcare for poor children.  He is against illegal immigrants sucking money from the law abiding tax paying citizens of this country, and especially taking money away from senior citizens to do it.

 



[ Parent ]
SCHIP money is administered by the state not federally (0.00 / 0)
Maybe he should run for state rep.  Do you think these whack job GOP talking points help with moderates?

[ Parent ]
but yes.... (0.00 / 0)
there are federal guidelines included.

[ Parent ]
Wow, wow and wow. (0.00 / 0)
That's really one of the worst op-ed pieces I've read in quite some time.  Even if I lived in MA-05, I'd never consider voting for a Republican in Congress because of the question of electing the Speaker etc., but I was certainly willing to give Ogo a chance to prove that he's not just a clown clone.

Alas, he failed that one.  But thanks for posting!


[ Parent ]
Misplaced Priorities (0.00 / 0)
The real reason Ogonowski doesn't support S-CHIP. A comment from his press release on the passage of the bill:

"Included in the SCHIP Bill is legislation that would allow illegal immigrants to access government health benefits. This is flat wrong. This is another example of how our broken congress has failed the American people. Illegal immigrants have broken the law of the United States and Congress has yet again sent a message saying that it is ok to do so. It's time to end the business as usual mentality in congress and its free giveaway's to illegal immigrants that undermine our laws and costs the taxpayers."

Isn't it an odd appropriation of concerns when a potential candidate would vote to deny health coverage to millions of American children for fear that an illegal immigrant might benefit from the program?  To me, that's just insane.

Does it bother you at all (0.00 / 0)

Doesn't it bother you at all that the expansion of SCHIP reaches so high?

 Forget immigrant issues.  The expansion of SCHIP covers families earning up to $60K in Mass and up to $72K in certain other geographic areas of the US.

Data point:  In mass, the average spending per capita on the lottery is $774 per year.  Insurance is available for a kid at a cost of $1800 per year.



[ Parent ]



I support WWF


Political insider ad network Law blog ad network
Advertise Liberally









Powered by: SoapBlox