On a more nuts-and-bolts level, Reilly’s populist pitch for the tax rollback issue was effective, particularly as his opponents debated whether a formula (Gabrieli) was better than following the Legislature’s lead (sorry, but that is how Patrick’s statements came across). Reilly was talking about $200 for families who are up against it, while Patrick was talking about cutting property taxes without much in the way of specifics (again, sorry, but true). Meanwhile, Gabrieli was punching his calculator to figure out whether 40% of Deval’s Berkshire “glass mansion” (beyond inflation, that is) was worth more than his Louisburg Square brownstone. I realize that this generally pro-Deval audience won’t agree, but score a point for Reilly on this one.
Finally, there was Gabrieli’s question about standing up to the Democratic Party, which was clearly designed to trap Patrick (gee, ya think the other shoe might drop today?), but played perfectly for Reilly. Tom Reilly practically pulled out a notepad and a pencil, happily ticking off a laundry list: the rollback, charter schools, MCAS, publicly calling for Billy Bulger’s ouster from UMass, to which he added for good measure, “I was booed at the Democratic convention because it was the right thing to do,” i.e. What have you guys ever done that would have caused that kind of reaction from Democratic insiders?
Tom Reilly had a big night. Don’t believe me? Well, consider a couple of nuggets from some non-Reilly folks commenting in David’s Debate live-blog and open thread. In a thread nearly devoid of anything more than my guy won/your guy lost, I was impressed to find the following:
[H]e [Reilly] gave a very good answer in specifying streamlining business’ interaction with the state government. – Lynne’s husband
Reilly was at his best tonight. . .I think he gave the public his best and he had a few really good moments. His answer about tracking students was absolutely brilliant, authentic and effective. – Benny
Brilliant, authentic, and effective. . .Five more days of this can make Tuesday another big night for Reilly.
Yes I said that about his answer on tracking and I even agree with what you said (I think it was you) on another blog thread somewhere, that Reilly’s answer to that question was the high point of any candidate in any debate thus far – still, I don’t think many rate his overall debate performance (of highs and lows) this week as a clear win (outside of his camp) – most agree that his performance showed much improvement over the prior week’s egg laying that it was noteworthy, but that type of assessment is faint praise. It will be interesting to see what the next batch of polls show.
<
p>
It ain’t over till Tuesday night, on that much we should all agree…