Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Silbert: 96.6% garnishment ain’t enough?

September 13, 2006 By Pablo

Harwich, home to Andrea Silbert, gets a pittance in local aid.  For an enrollment of 1,532 students, the state sends $1,562,804 to Harwich for their schools, or $1020 per pupil.

Under the existing charter school cap, the current charter school cap for Harwich is $1,509,527 for 149 students. 

If Harwich reaches the cap, the local aid remaining for Harwich would be $53,927.  At the cap, charter operators would get 96.6% of Harwich’s school aid.  Only 3.4% remains in town.  Andrea Silbert wants to raise the cap.

Wipe out state aid for Harwich.  More money for private charter operators.  What are her priorities?

Too much ain’t enough?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: charter-schools, lieutenant-governor, massachusetts, silbert

Comments

  1. gary says

    September 13, 2006 at 1:39 pm

    Take the state aid, add other revenue sources and Harwich looks like an above average district: spending per pupil of $8,266 (for regular education), ranking at 45 out of 308 districts

    • pablo says

      September 13, 2006 at 1:48 pm

      Tell that to the people who need to pay most of the freight for Harwich schools with the local property tax.

      <

      p>
      The issue that needs to be addressed is the lack of local aid and the impact on property taxes, not how to divert more state revenues away from local schools.

      • gary says

        September 13, 2006 at 2:37 pm

        All towns pay ‘most of the freight’ for their schools with local property tax.  But, let’s look at Harwich.

        <

        p>
        Look at the numbers:

        <

        p>
        Harwich school budget:

        <

        p>
        2004 – $12.5m
        2005 – $12.7m
        2006 – $12.5m
        2007 – $12.9m (est)

        <

        p>
        So, a budget that’s increased by 3% over the 4 year period, in a period where the number of pupils in the Harwich schools decreased.

        <

        p>
        But on the bright side, student performance was quite good (top quartile by most measures) by comparison to other Mass districts.

        <

        p>
        If anything is troublesome, it is once again, the entitlements:  health insurance paid by employer is increasing faster than the rest of the budget (which is also increasing). Health insurance (current employee plus retiree) increased from 13.3% of the budget to 15.6%.

        <

        p>
        I don’t see the school as a budget problem, but I do see entitlements as an issue and think the leaders should either 1) cause employees and retirees or future retirees to bear more of their insurance cost or 2) go for the Prop 2.5 override (which, I think, the Town is pursuing). 

        <

        p>
        Absent a 2.5 override, the employees will have to eventually eat the insurance cost increases.

        • pablo says

          September 13, 2006 at 2:40 pm

          If a town needs a Proposition 2.5 override to maintain current services, shouldn’t there be a local referendum before a charter school is placed in a town?

          <

          p>
          The same taxpayers have to pay for it.

          • gary says

            September 13, 2006 at 3:34 pm

            With your logic, we’d need a referendum to give employees raises.

            <

            p>
            You know as well as I that the Charters expenses are in the numbers I cited above; spending is level and up in the Town’s budget as well as in the School’s budget; spending on per pupil is high (relative to other districts) and performance is good.

            <

            p>
            What’s the problem that you’re tilting against?  What problem do you see in the student statistics that more money will solve?

            • pablo says

              September 13, 2006 at 3:45 pm

              There is a vote tied to local raises.  Proposition 2.5.  Budget approval in Town Meeting.

              <

              p>
              Go to Framingham and stand in front of the Juniper Hill Elementary School.  That school closed when the state approved a private applicant’s plan for a charter middle school in town, and the charter put a hurt on the school budget.

              <

              p>
              Framingham voters only had two of the three options in front of them:
              (a) close the elementary school
              (b) raise taxes to maintain the status quo

              <

              p>
              They couldn’t choose
              (c) we can’t afford the charter school, and it’s not at the top of our priority list.

              <

              p>
              Shouldn’t the voters decide these kinds of things?

  2. slushpuppy says

    September 13, 2006 at 2:15 pm

    Money, money, funding, money, $s, %, aid, money, operators, money, local aid, formulas…

    <

    p>
    Wish students, parents and education were part of the discussion.

    <

    p>
    The constant attack on charter schools, which educate about 2% of the our students, reminds me of GOP attacks like: Immigration, Gay Marriage and Flag burning amendments.  These are topics that don’t truly affect most of our day to day lives, but are symbolic and lend themselves to heated debate.

    <

    p>
    Enough already.  Stop worrying about the edges and focus on the larger problems.

    • pablo says

      September 13, 2006 at 2:25 pm

      teachers.
      textbooks.
      supplies.
      computers.
      library media specialists.
      school nurses.
      counselors.
      coaches.

      <

      p>
      Less money, fewer teachers, textbooks, supplies, computers, coaches.  Larger class sizes, fewer electives, less services for children.

      <

      p>
      Withdraw funding from public schools, the quality of education has to suffer.

      • slushpuppy says

        September 13, 2006 at 2:39 pm

        I never knew that money paid for things!  How compelling. 

        <

        p>
        Sorry for the sarcasm, but you missed my point about relevance.  Of course we want every public school to have more money, including public charter schools.  But charters are a blip on the budget screen.  Electing a Democrat will lead to a bigger education budget for every community/school district.

        <

        p>
        Whether more funding leads to a better educated student body in the future is up for debate.  My gut says (I’m not an expert) we need bigger structural changes than that.

        • pablo says

          September 13, 2006 at 2:46 pm

          State aid and school funding is a major issue.  I can’t believe you would dismiss the underlying funding issue as a distraction.

          <

          p>
          Silbert’s agenda makes things worse for students in public schools.  Silbert’s agenda hurts K-12 education and people struggling to pay local property taxes.  Silbert’s agenda helps the private charter school industry.

          <

          p>
          And Slushpuppy, you are using the term “public charter school.”  The only time I hear that phrase is from the charter school industry.  What’s your interest in charter schools?

          • slushpuppy says

            September 13, 2006 at 3:10 pm

            and don’t like the options i face.

            <

            p>
            your willingness to use hyperbole about Andrea Silbert is telling.

            <

            p>
            charter schools are public schools.  that’s a fact.  so don’t call them a private industry.

            <

            p>
            i get your point about the need for funding schools.  and i support it.  i just think you’re scapegoating charters.

            • pablo says

              September 13, 2006 at 3:19 pm

              I didn’t raise the issue of charter schools and raising the cap.  Gabrieli and Silbert did.  It’s the cornerstone of their education policies.  And it’s wrong.

              <

              p>
              I am merely illustrating the policy implications of their proposed policies. 

              <

              p>
              Commonwealth Charter Schools are publicly funded.  They are open to the public.  They are not publicly governed.  They are run by private, self-appointed trustees.  They are publicly funded private schools, and Commonwealth Charters are nothing more than a voucher scheme with a preferred provider list sanctioned by the state Board of Education.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.