Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Tony Blankley fails logic 101.

January 12, 2007 By Mr. Lynne

This particular time, Tony Blankley takes offense at Barbara Boxer’s exchange with Condoleezza Rice:

From http://www6.cnn.com/…

“`Who pays the price?’ Boxer asked Rice. `I’m not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You’re not going to pay a personal price, as I understand it, with an immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families… not me, not you.'”

Many on the right, including Tony Blankley, are spinning this exchange as some kind of low blow attack by Boxer on Rice.  That is to say that they assert that the act of pointing out that Rice has no children was some kind of attack on Rice’s character.  (Or he lives in a state cognitive dissonance where he understands logic yet also feels that he is `right’)

Tony Blankly, on the McLaughlin Group, looked like he took genuine offence calling the event a “vicious as-hominem attack”.  This demonstrates that he is either a brilliant actor, or he doesn’t understand (or is willing to ignore) logic.  He is either comfortably ignorant of reason, or comfortably deceitful in his fake disgust.

For those who haven’t had a logic course (something I’d like to see included in every high school education), an ad-hominem attack is a “change the subject” trick where one attacks a person’s character rather than the person’s argument or reasoning.  This kind of attack isn’t valid when that person’s character is in fact irrelevant to the truth or falsehood of their conclusions, or irrelevant to the formal validity of their argument.  Even Hitler is correct when he asserts (hypothetically) that:

? Editorialists who dispense with reason in favor of pre-supplied talking points are not worth reading.

? Tony Blankley dispense with reason in favor of pre-supplied talking points.

? Therefore Tony Blankley is not worth reading.

Pointing out to Hitler that he is? well? Hitler? doesn’t work against this argument.  However much it may satisfy our sense of moral perspective on the subject of Hitler, attacking Hitler’s character does nothing on the subject of his argument.  It doesn’t show falsity in his statements or invalidity in his argument’s form.

The amazing thing here is the argument proffered by Boxer isn’t an ad hominem attack.  Boxer asserts that it is important to note that who “pays the price” and then asserts that `who’ does not include Boxer or Rice:

? Neither Boxer nor Rice are in the American military.

? Neither Boxer nor Rice have family in the American military.

? The American military and the families are the ones who would pay the price for any escalation of the Iraq war.

? Neither Boxer nor Rice would pay the price for any escalation of the Iraq war.

None of Boxers assertions are ad hominem distractions into Rice’s character.

There is one interesting aspect of this whole brouhaha that I do take offence at.  If one were to believe that Boxer was attacking Rice’s character in a vicious ad hominem attack, one would have to believe to be a childless woman is somehow a major character flaw,? major enough that the mere act of pointing it out might be considered vicious.  If this is true then I truly have learned something new today.  I’ve learned of yet another reason to loath Toney Blankley.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: mclaughlin-group, national, national-media, pundits, tony-blankley, washington-times

Comments

  1. lynne says

    January 12, 2007 at 10:00 pm

    You finally got your own user ID here, and can stop using mine. ;P

    <

    p>
    Though, the bullet points didn’t come through, as you of course didn’t copy and paste HTML into your post…I can help you fix that when I get home.

  2. sco says

    January 12, 2007 at 10:15 pm

    I couldn’t watch.  Blankley looked like a candy cane threw up all over him.  What grown man wears so many different shades of pink?

    • mr-lynne says

      January 12, 2007 at 10:23 pm

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.