Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Is John Edwards for real?

August 28, 2007 By daveburt 11 Comments

I’d be curious to hear what people think of John Edwards.  He’s been making news all over the progressive blogosphere for his recent attack on corporate Democrats and the excesses of corporate power.  Edwards’ own comment, ‘You can’t make a pig fatter by weighing him’ in regard to testing in education, may apply in a way to his own candidacy.  Can this pig (apologies to Edwards) be weighed? And if found to be a true liberal democrat, who supports economic reforms and limits on corporate power- would an Edwards/Kucinich ticket be viable? 

I say this with the caveat that I disagree with Edwards on many issues, but I understand how ruthless national politics is, and that it will take a lot more than one election to muzzle the national military/imperial/industrial complex.

Check out his site at johnedwards.com

Also, I apologize for talking about an election that is more than a year away, and one in which the media has rushed to annoint the front runners a year and a half ahead.

Opinions, anyone?

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: democratic-primary, john-edwards, national, presidency

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    August 28, 2007 at 1:59 am

    John “we need to recognize that there are two Americas” Edwards, or

    <

    p>
    John “I’m angry at the world and fighting to stay in third” Edwards?

    <

    p>
    I liked the first one.  I saw from him a genuine, human concern for poverty.  I saw from him an understanding and interest in extending American opportunity to all.  In 2004 he was the last one standing with a vision, with a trace of inspiration.  He could connect with poor rural whites, which was politically useful.  The old Edwards remains my second choice in 2008 after Governor Bill Richardson. 

    <

    p>
    The second one showed up a couple of weeks ago.  I don’t know if his campaign felt Obama was out-Edwardsing him or what, but suddenly Edwards has become vague and angry.  Here’s a spot of his new stump speech:

    <

    p>

    It’s not about being ready to grab the reigns of establishment Washington and stand on the side of corporate elites. If it is, there are plenty who will do a better job than me at protecting the status quo, and preserving the policies and politics of the past…On that new path lies One America, where possibility is unbound and opportunity is the birthright of every American. Where the voices of the people are heard again in the halls of government, and government heeds their call. One America, where every individual takes responsibility for our common good, and the chance to reach one’s God-given potential is every individual’s common right.

    <

    p>
    It sounds like the winning speech in a VFW high school essay contest.  What does any of this mean?  Among the noise of Edwards’ renewed attacks on corporate power, insurance, banks, and possibly the gold standard, he hasn’t said what he’s going to do.  Is he going to change the tax code?  How?  Is he going to regulate insurance companies?  How, with whom?  And does he still have a foreign policy platform?

    <

    p>
    I feel like the new Edwards is playing me for a sucker — maybe if he convinces me that he’s as angry as I am at the same people I am, I won’t notice that he doesn’t have any better idea of how to stop them than I do.

    <

    p>
    As I mention elsewhere, his pig-fattening line is of a piece with this. It’s all good and folksy, but it gives me zero idea about whether he’d vote again for NCLB, or how he’d reform it or add to it.

    <

    p>
    (As for Edwards/Kucinich, no.  Just no.  A VP nominee should add to a ticket, and Kucinich takes away from it.  You need an experienced VP nominee from outside the South who at this point almost has to be a woman and/or minority.)

    <

    p>
    I hope the old Edwards comes back, because the new Edwards is making Joe Biden look pretty good in my eyes.

    Log in to Reply
    • raj says

      August 29, 2007 at 3:19 am

      It sounds like the winning speech in a VFW high school essay contest.  What does any of this mean?

      <

      p>
      What does it mean? Nothing.

      <

      p>
      I agree with you yet again.  It means nothing.

      <

      p>
      An observation (I like doing these).  If Edwards was to make a specific proposal, he would be skewered by the special interest groups that would lose by the proposal.  (Witness the insurance companies that sponsored ads opposing sHillary’s health care proposal in 1993-94) 

      <

      p>
      That is why American politicans, at least at the national level, are not going to publish specific proposals.  Your politics are screwed up, and I don’t know how to unscrew them. 

      <

      p>
      Baring a depression of course.

      Log in to Reply
  2. jimc says

    August 28, 2007 at 10:19 am

    No need to apologize at all.

    <

    p>
    I think Edwards is really appealing, and I don’t care if the “two Americas” thing happens to be a convenient theme, or “frame” as we like to say online, but it’s also true. There’s a lot of good things to say about Edwards.

    <

    p>
    The bad things are minor, but they are nagging me. He’s on the board of a bank that is foreclosing homes in New Orleans. He’s so good on the stump that he can seem phony. The guy is a lawyer — and I like lawyers — but I can’t shake the salesman aspect. From an issue point of view, I can’t see a single reason to vote against him.

    <

    p>
    I agree that Kucinich would bring nothing to the ticket. Richardson might be good, or Dodd. Dodd is another guy I like, but we’re talking about Edwards.

    <

    p>

    Log in to Reply
    • diane says

      August 28, 2007 at 2:27 pm

      The slick lawyer thing really bothers me, as does the fact that he’s not that great off-the-cuff.  I want to see a president who can think on his feet.

      <

      p>
      I’m leaning towards Dodd, who is smart, experienced and strikes me as a real grownup.  I also trust Dodd more than I do any of the others.  And whose campaign gets zero oxygen from the press.  I like that the Firefighters endorsed Dodd – they put a lot of muscle into their endorsements.

      <

      p>
      The campaign is so accelerated it certainly isn’t too soon to give it some serious thought.

      Log in to Reply
  3. peter-porcupine says

    August 28, 2007 at 10:56 am

    HERE

    Log in to Reply
    • amberpaw says

      August 28, 2007 at 4:07 pm

      There is a fine tradition of doggerel to scurrilously attack the other guy’s candidate.

      <

      p>
      I don’t think Ms. Porcupine’s web site shows how “the electorate” sees John Edwards – but I know he scares Republicans – and there is nothing like resorting to mindless doggerel show opposition.

      <

      p>
      So, no I am not impressed by doggerel, and I am firmly supporting John Edwards as a man of both vision, and passionate belief in an endangered America where “innocent until proven guilty” has meaning, and all Americans are equal before the law and the state.

      <

      p>
      The America sof the Republicans that says “All Americans are equal, but our kind of people are MORE equal” is just not the country my people came to as a haven.

      <

      p>
      And as to “fast on his feet” – he was great in person, responding to all comers and all questions – I was there.  Were you?

      Log in to Reply
      • peter-porcupine says

        August 30, 2007 at 10:56 am

        Log in to Reply
  4. davemb says

    August 28, 2007 at 11:06 am

    Marc Ambinder of the Atlantic is impressed with this moment from the Portsmouth rally, where John and Elizabeth both vow to fight for universal health care.

    <

    p>
    The “fight the system” rhetoric that sabutai doesn’t like is something of a recent change, I’ll admit.  (I had another friend who saw him in Keene who is worried that he’s now being too divisive whereas Obama wants to reunify the country.)  But this clip gets back to what has always appealed to me about him — his willingness to stand up and say that the existence of two Americas is wrong, in this case that such a rich country cannot provide universal health care is wrong.

    <

    p>
    In the case of health care he’s made a detailed proposal.  In the case of NCLB he hasn’t addressed implementation in much detail that I’m aware of  — he’s just spoken of goals like increasing aid to failing schools rather than decreasing it, and returning more control over student evaluation to teachers from standardized testing.  He did say in Keene that NCLB might be beyond repair but in any case should be changed in these directions.  I think there’s a simple answer to the apparent conflict between his Senate vote for the original NCLB and his opposition now — like Ted Kennedy, he believed some of the “compassionate conservatism” line from the administration in the first year, and didn’t account for the type of implementation NCLB has had.

    <

    p>
    Electing Edwards will not bring a national revolution.  He would start his presidency with more of a commitment than Bill Clinton had to change the system in the direction of fairness.  Bill accomplished a lot, and I think as president John Edwards could accomplish a lot.  You have to pick a candidate based on a combination of what they would try to do and how much they might be able to achieve.  Edwards’ ambition towards fairness is the strongest of the three major candidates, and all three of them are relative unknowns as to how they would perform in office (except that Hillary has seen a somewhat successful administration up close).

    Log in to Reply
    • sabutai says

      August 28, 2007 at 11:18 am

      It’s not the “fight the system” vibe that I have a problem with.  As I said above, it’s the fact that we’re not given any idea of how Edwards is planning on fighting the system, aside from complaining about it.

      <

      p>
      Dean was all about changing the system, and I’d have canvassed Hell for him — because he had very clear plans grounded in clear decisions he’d made in the past.  Edwards isn’t doing that.

      <

      p>
      I do agree that Edwards got suckered by Bush on NCLB, the Patriot Act, and the war, as Kerry did.  And I still can’t understand why anybody could have gotten fooled in any of those cases — which is why I think Russ Feingold stands out.

      Log in to Reply
  5. progressiveman says

    August 28, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    I laugh when people find other candidates more specific than John Edwards…he has offered more specifics in his campaign than any candidate I have seen in my over 30 years of voting. Checkout his website and look at his positions on Iraq, the Economy, etc…

    <

    p>
    He is far more specific than Howard Dean was in 2004 and his interest in policy far broader than Dean’s.

    <

    p>
    It is so odd when people try to discredit someone trying to do things for working families because they managed to get out of the working class. No doubt John Edwards has made his share of mistakes, and he is the first to admit them, but how does one make investments and take jobs without having some negative impact somewhere? It is a trap we should not fall into on the progressive side. Otherwise you just get an inbred permanent political class who never venture outside of government. Isn’t that one of the things we are trying to struggle against?

    <

    p>
    I have tremendous respect for Dodd, Biden Richardson and the rest…but they are not going to get working people, not in the habit of voting democratic, voting democratic. There is not enough in their background, nor their message, that gets to the heart of the economic and social insecurity people feel across America. In John Edwards’ message there is that hope.

    Log in to Reply
  6. smithie says

    August 28, 2007 at 6:58 pm

    And my father, who still hasn’t chosen a candidate, finds him to be very sincere.  He’s seen Edwards a number of times in 04 and now.  And he’s seen the other candidates as well.  Edwards is the only one he refers to as sincere.

    <

    p>
    As for me, I’m convinced.  I saw him at yearlyKos and in NH over the weekend.  The thing about him is that his positions are related to experiences he’s had in his life.  In particular, issues with health care and coverage, workers rights, access to college and trade issues are based on watching his father lose health insurance when his mill closed, watching high school friends lose their jobs, and watching his mother close her business to take a job with health insurance.

    <

    p>
    I disagree with him on marriage equality and some other things but on the whole I see him as someone who cares about the lives of individual people.  I know that he’s considered attractive but I don’t feel like I’m being sold a bill of goods when I’m there in the room with him.  He doesn’t come across as phony nor as slick.

    <

    p>
    As for his policies, if you don’t agree with them and find another candidate who shares more of your priorities then perhaps John Edwards isn’t for you.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

raylaforma RaylaForMA @raylaforma ·
34m

Interesting little case going on in Virginia. Don't you think? @wbz @7News #historic #mapoli

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0QFrSq5KzjuQwRMrMeXwgzdvd7khKPuFsueDAMKsF1aapQKLzkUpiMsd4b23suXgwl&id=100057082794984

Reply on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Retweet on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Like on Twitter 1559930291506085888 Twitter 1559930291506085888
robyn4senate Robyn Kennedy @robyn4senate ·
36m

Thank you Viviana Abreu-Hernandez and Linda Maykel for hosting an incredible gathering yesterday. I am empowered by our conversations and look forward to putting in the work in the senate to ensure that the concerns of our communities are heard. #mapoli #worcpoli #senate

2

Reply on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Retweet on Twitter 1559929893877678086 Like on Twitter 1559929893877678086 1 Twitter 1559929893877678086
supaman90692910 Supaman @supaman90692910 ·
37m

no diehl #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Retweet on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Like on Twitter 1559929729427406849 Twitter 1559929729427406849
nwayne66 I slapped SCOTUS & Ouiser Boudreaux💉💉💉😷🇺🇦 @nwayne66 ·
40m

Leader of police advisory panel 'shocked' to be denied access to internal #Pittsfield police report on fatal shooting https://www.berkshireeagle.com/news/local/advisory-panel-police-pittsfield/article_3c590570-1dbb-11ed-8995-93f5c15d3873.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=user-share via @berkshireeagle #mapoli #westernmass #MiguelEstrella

Reply on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Retweet on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Like on Twitter 1559928967271964678 Twitter 1559928967271964678
martilliforrep Martilli for Congress @martilliforrep ·
44m

Thank you @newsmax for having me on alongside some great guests.

@ShaunKraisman @EmmaRechenberg @mgburkholder @ButlerForIL1

#MA01 #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927827310546945 Retweet on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Like on Twitter 1559927827310546945 2 Twitter 1559927827310546945
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
45m

GOP governor hopeful Chris Doughty and running mate Kate Campanale are holding a presser to bash the “deceit” from Democratic candidate for governor AG Maura Healey on tax relief. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Retweet on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Like on Twitter 1559927756749692928 Twitter 1559927756749692928
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.