Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

And Visions of VP danced in their heads…

September 23, 2007 By hlpeary

Politico.com (www.politico.com/news/stories/0907/5978.html)

is reporting that Senator Evan Bayh, former Democratic contender for President, will endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton on Monday, Sept. 24.

Do you think he is vying for the VP nod with the possibility of turning midwest from red to blue…

If Clinton wins the nomination, how could she bypass Richardson (with the resume and the western state appeal)for Bayh?

One thing is fairly certain. Obama has as much chance as Kucinich to be tapped for VP.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: bayh, clinton, democrat, presidential-candidates, vp

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    September 23, 2007 at 10:27 pm

    I think it would have to be a mystery candidate who follows this profile:

    <

    p>
    white
    male
    strong national security background
    South and/or Mountain West background
    outside the Senate and probably House

    <

    p>
    That leaves out everyone on that list.  What about Wes Clark?

    • pablo says

      September 24, 2007 at 10:44 am

      From the list, Richardson is the most likely (governor, swing western state), but he would need to strengthen his campaigning skills to get there.

      <

      p>
      Wes Clark is a logical choice (southern, military).  Male swing state governors would be at the top of my list.  Strickland (OH) is a possibility. 

      • sabutai says

        September 24, 2007 at 5:05 pm

        Richardson’s a bad campaigner, plus he’s Hispanic.  I have trouble seeing a ticket without a white male on it winning.

      • joeltpatterson says

        September 24, 2007 at 8:20 pm

        He’s an Arkansan.  Pres and Veep must be from different states.

        <

        p>
        Cheney was living in Texas when he joined the 2000 ticket, he just switched his voter registration back to Wyoming before the convention.  So Wes would have to do something similar.

        <

        p>
        But I think he’d be a good SecDef or SecState, too.

        • sabutai says

          September 24, 2007 at 8:28 pm

          What state does Hillary Clinton represent again?

          • laurel says

            September 24, 2007 at 8:43 pm

            Have you seen this?  I hadn’t heard of the Fellowship before.

          • david says

            September 24, 2007 at 9:05 pm

            Hillary’s not from Arkansas anymore.  But we can’t have a Clinton/Bloomberg or Clinton/Spitzer ticket.  Which is too bad, in a way!

            • sabutai says

              September 24, 2007 at 9:11 pm

              It’s a massive pain in the shmuckus renewing my license when I have a new address in the same county, but Cheney and Clinton can change their home state virtually overnight.  Must be nice to be connected.

              • hlpeary says

                September 25, 2007 at 8:22 am

    • striker57 says

      September 25, 2007 at 4:10 pm

      • sabutai says

        September 25, 2007 at 6:26 pm

        What does Vilsack bring electorally or to the ticket?  A firmer hold on the Midwest?  I’m not being dismissive, but genuinely curious.

        <

        p>
        I’d love to see Clinton/Webb.  In other pairings:
        Obama/Webb or Obama/Schweitzer
        Edwards/Richardson or Edwards/Tester
        Richardson/Edwards or Richardson/Spitzer

  2. david says

    September 23, 2007 at 10:43 pm

    • pablo says

      September 24, 2007 at 10:40 am

      How many electoral votes would Obama add to the ticket that Hillary wouldn’t get on her own?

      • joeltpatterson says

        September 24, 2007 at 8:24 pm

        Hillary’s going to need as many Dems in the Senate as possible to get her legislation passed.  So Bayh, Webb, and other red-state Dems are staying put.

        <

        p>
        I recall that early in Bill Clinton’s admininstration, he had to limit the number of Congressional Dems he could appoint to his cabinet for fear of losing votes in the House and Senate.  Hilllary seems to be keen to learn from her husband’s errors.

  3. freshayer says

    September 24, 2007 at 9:58 pm

    Would be nice to have someone affiliated with running the executive branch who actually knows what they are doing.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.