Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Professor’s Study gives Failing Grade to Casino Gambling.

September 22, 2007 By pericles 7 Comments

2.  ECONOMIC EFFECTS SHOWN TO BE ACTUALLY HARMFUL:  The legalization of gambling activities eventually causes: (1) increased taxes, (2) a loss of jobs from the overall region, (3) economic disruption of other businesses, (4) increased crime and (5) large social-welfare costs for society in general and government agencies in particular. For example, two studies of the riverboat casinos in Illinois concluded that for every one job created by the riverboats, most of the surrounding communities probably lost one or more jobs from pre-existing businesses (Grinols 1994; Grinols and Omorov 1995).

3.  GAMBLING OFTEN ACTUALLY RESULTS IN TAX INCREASES: Field research throughout the nation indicates that for every dollar the legalized gambling interests indicate is being contributed in taxes usually costs the taxpayers at least 3 dollars– and higher numbers have been calculated (Politzer, Morrow and Leavey 1981; Better Government Association 1992; Florida Budget Office 1994). These costs to taxpayers are reflected in: (1) infrastructure costs, (2) relatively high regulatory costs, (3) expenses to the criminal justice system, and (4) large social-welfare costs (Illinois Governor's Office 1992).

4.  IMPACT ON LOCAL POLITICS:  Political scientists have raised concerns that the newly developing constituencies in the licensed gambling industry are becoming so widespread that the industry can dictate economic, social, and tax policies.

5.  SOCIAL WELFARE COSTS: Legalized gambling activities act as a regressive tax on the poor (Clotfelter and Cook 1989). Specifically, the legalization of various forms of gambling activities makes “poor people poorer” and can dramatically intensify many pre-existing social-welfare problems.  For example, one report concluded that without casino gambling, many local citizens would have increased participation in other “outside” activities. “More than 10% of the locals would spend more on groceries if it were not for the casino, while nearly one-fourth would spend more on clothes. Thirty-seven percent said that their savings had been reduced since the casino had opened …” (Thompson, Gazel, and Rickman 1995).

6.  ADVERSE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT:  Companies tend to avoid locating in areas allowing legalized gambling.  Gambling activities and the gambling philosophy are directly opposed to sound business principles and economic development.

7.  PATHALOGICAL GAMBLER PROBLEM:  States which embrace legalized gambling activities can expect enormous socioeconomic costs and a decline in the quality of life. Unlike traditional business activities, legalized gambling activities cater to a market consisting of addicted and potentially addicted consumers, and most pre-existing traditional businesses will find it quite difficult to compete for “consumer dollars” which are being transformed into “gambling dollars.”  Additionally, each newly-created pathological gambler has been calculated to cost society from $13,200 to $52,000 per year (Maryland Department of Health 1994; Better Government Association 1994).  Sociologists almost uniformly report that increased gambling activities which are promoted as sociologically “acceptable” (the acceptability factor) and which are made “accessible” (the accessibility factor) to larger numbers of people will increase the number of pathological gamblers (Goodman 1994: Politzer, Morrow and Leavey 1981; Better Government Association 1992; Maryland Department of Health 1994).

8.  CONCLUSION:  Increasingly, taxpayers and businesses are beginning to realize that, as Professor Jack Van Der Slik has summarized for much of the academic community, state-sponsored gambling “produces no product, no new wealth, and so it makes no genuine contribution to economic development” (Van Der Slik 1990)

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: casino-gambling

Comments

  1. wbennett says

    September 22, 2007 at 1:35 pm

    Earl Grinols had publshed a more recent review than those cited here. It appears in his book “Gambling in America: Costs and Benefits” Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. His review is entirely consistent with these points.

    <

    p>
    It’s odd that so little recognition is given to the fact that casinos are special monopolies granted by the states, or secured by Indian tribes, and that this is the reason why they are so profitable. It is also the reason why they produce corruption at every turn. Patrick’s claim that there will be “transparency” in the administration of casinos is already belied by the utter opacity of his deliberations in reaching his position. Why aren’t citizens of all political stripes at least demanding that he do Dick Cheney one better and make public all his sources, every analysis he relied on for his conclusions, everyone he talked to, including stakeholders?

    <

    p>
    Grinols conclusion is that the only social “benefit” of casinos is shortened travel time to the nearest casino.

    <

    p>
    He makes particular hash of the “job creation” myth. (Job creation is actually not, in itself, a social benefit. Potholes creat jobs. Crack addicts create jobs. This does not mean that freeze-thaw cycles or drug pushers should be credited with creating net social benefits.)

    <

    p>
    What most people also tend to ignore is that addicted gamblers are only a small part of the problem. Their spouses and children are often gravely affected. They often embezzle to keep their habits going. The argument that “drugs and alcohol do it too” seems rather beside the point.

    <

    p>
    William Bennett

    Log in to Reply
    • david says

      September 22, 2007 at 2:03 pm

      he released hundreds of pages of materials.  Have you read them, or are you just assuming they’re incomplete?  I summarized the meetings with outside players here.

      Log in to Reply
      • wbennett says

        September 22, 2007 at 5:16 pm

        I certainly saw your post with the list of meetings. One economist.
        Where are the hundreds of pages released? I checked with a state representative, who was unaware of them?

        Log in to Reply
        • david says

          September 22, 2007 at 11:07 pm

          is that they were handing out these large packets at the Dept. of Economic Development in One Ashburton Place the day Deval made his announcement, for the cost of the copying.  Someone who had the packet passed the list of meetings along to me.  Apparently I’ve got better sources than your rep.  😉

          <

          p>
          Re “one economist,” as I noted in the post, I was disappointed to see little input from outside economic experts.

          Log in to Reply
          • wbennett says

            September 23, 2007 at 5:48 pm

            I’ll get one. Interesting that you have better sources than the rep. I’ll check.

            Log in to Reply
  2. ryepower12 says

    September 22, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    It’s always good to have more data and analysis to shed this myth of casinos being cash cows for the state. They’re not. In the end, we’ll be lucky to break even. I’d rather not take those odds.

    Log in to Reply
  3. pbrane says

    September 24, 2007 at 9:33 pm

    … but this study seems to draw a different conclusion.  I don’t know if this can be explained by the differences between the Ct model and those that were the subject of the 1994 study or if one or both of the studies are biased in some way.

    <

    p>
    http://ccea.uconn.ed…

    <

    p>

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
58m

ADI Insider Trading Case Could Use More Detail, Judge Hints – Law360 https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/17/adi-insider-trading-case-could-use-more-detail-judge-hints-law360/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1559838457374990336 Retweet on Twitter 1559838457374990336 Like on Twitter 1559838457374990336 Twitter 1559838457374990336
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
1h

Mayor Wu Introduces Plan to File Home Rule Petition to Establish Fossil Fuel-Free … – EIN News https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/17/mayor-wu-introduces-plan-to-file-home-rule-petition-to-establish-fossil-fuel-free-ein-news/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1559830399177527299 Retweet on Twitter 1559830399177527299 Like on Twitter 1559830399177527299 Twitter 1559830399177527299
openletterbot Open Letters @openletterbot ·
2h

🖋 Sign “POTUS, appoint new Acting IGs for DoD and DHS now!” and I’ll deliver a copy to your officials: https://twitter.com/messages/compose?recipient_id=835740314006511618&text=sign%20PQZEFR

📨 No. 214 is from Kathleen to @POTUS #MA03 #MApoli #MApols

Reply on Twitter 1559829016902713344 Retweet on Twitter 1559829016902713344 1 Like on Twitter 1559829016902713344 Twitter 1559829016902713344
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
2h

Editorial: For Harmony’s sake, justice and closure is needed – Lowell Sun https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/17/editorial-for-harmonys-sake-justice-and-closure-is-needed-lowell-sun/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1559826127241109504 Retweet on Twitter 1559826127241109504 Like on Twitter 1559826127241109504 Twitter 1559826127241109504
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
2h

Early Files: Louis Armstrong performs at Cape Cod Melody Tent in 1962 – Barnstable Patriot https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/17/early-files-louis-armstrong-performs-at-cape-cod-melody-tent-in-1962-barnstable-patriot/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1559817693733085184 Retweet on Twitter 1559817693733085184 Like on Twitter 1559817693733085184 Twitter 1559817693733085184
johnshreffler0 John Shreffler @johnshreffler0 ·
2h

Say Amen, Somebody! @TommyVitolo has always been effective at building winning coalitions to deliver on his program which is progressive in the best Brookline traditions. Vote for him! Like @PaulJWarren that’s how I’m voting! #mapoli

PaulWarren @PaulJWarren

No surprises tonight. Tommy is collaborative, effective and he delivers for Brookline. I’m voting Vitolo. @TommyVitolo

Reply on Twitter 1559817419975278593 Retweet on Twitter 1559817419975278593 Like on Twitter 1559817419975278593 Twitter 1559817419975278593
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.