Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Full Senate calls on Wilkerson to resign

October 30, 2008 By David

The entire state Senate has passed a resolution calling on Dianne Wilkerson to “resign immediately her position as Senator from the Second Suffolk District.”  Here’s the resolution (pdf).

UPDATE: Wilkerson had previously written in a letter to Sen. Pres. Murray that she would “respect whatever decision you make.”  My guess: that “respect” will not extend to resigning her office.  It just means that she won’t raise a stink about being stripped of her committee appointments — not that she’d get anywhere anyway.  But maybe Wilkerson will surprise us all by stepping down and ending her sticker campaign.

FURTHER UPDATE: Governor Patrick has just issued this statement (email, no link):

“On a bi-partisan basis, the Senate today unanimously re-affirmed that elected officials should be held to the highest ethical standards.  I support and respect their action.”

Hmm.  I mean, I guess he’s calling for her to resign, but it’s hard to tell.  A  more definitive statement would have been preferable.

STILL FURTHER UPDATE: Surprise!  Wilkerson has rejected the Senate’s call for her to resign, but assures us that she is “committed to do what is in the best interest of the residents of this district.”  Ah, I feel better now.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: wilkerson

Comments

  1. ryepower12 says

    October 30, 2008 at 3:56 pm

    she’d listen.

    <

    p>I’m looking forward for the Sonia era.  

  2. bft says

    October 30, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    If she goes away quietly, does her time and keeps her mouth shut about the other dirty secrets on Beacon Hill, then rest of the senate mafia will take care of her family while she doing her time.

    • laurel says

      October 30, 2008 at 4:30 pm

      just curious.

    • stomv says

      October 30, 2008 at 4:35 pm

      Senate mafia?  Puh-leaze.  And in what world would issuing a public call from the entire Senate calling on her to resign result in her “go[ing] away quietly?”

      <

      p>If you want her to go quietly, the last thing you do is shine a spotlight on her while wagging your shame finger.  If she’s got any real goods on anyone, you can bet she’ll trade them for some leniency.  It’s not like she’s got much of a future public career at this point — why would she help bury any other alleged dirty secrets?

      <

      p>If anything, she’s now a loose cannon.  But keep spreading the tripe that every single elected official is a sleaze…

    • kbusch says

      October 30, 2008 at 4:46 pm

      Perhaps there are social contexts where cynicism can fly without substantiation.

      <

      p>This isn’t one of them.

  3. alexander says

    October 30, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    on Campbell Brown last night.

  4. laurel says

    October 30, 2008 at 4:58 pm

    that none of our RMG friends have asked about why the same hasn’t been demanded of Marzilli.  But it is clear that I;m thinking along those same lines myself.  Regardless of the reasons for his arrest (emotional or criminal), he needed to resign.  He didn’t, but it’s clear he’s not coming abck.  Why hasn’t Mr Speaker pushed a similar resolution?  

    • shillelaghlaw says

      October 30, 2008 at 6:08 pm

      I’m guessing that there’s probably some taboo about one house of the legislature making resolutions about another house’s members. Kind of a separation of powers type of thing.

      • laurel says

        October 30, 2008 at 6:31 pm

        I’m questioning why DiMasi hasn’t pushed a house resolution asking Marzilli to resign.

        • shillelaghlaw says

          October 30, 2008 at 6:38 pm

          If DiMasi already pushed a resolution to ask for Wilkerson to resign, then by all means, he should do the same in regards to Marzilli. But again, I’m not sure it’s appropriate for the House to be making resolutions about Senators.

          • laurel says

            October 30, 2008 at 6:45 pm

            For some reason I’m still thinking of him as Rep Marzilli.  Duh!  SO then the original question should have been: Why hasn’t Sen Murray pushed a resolution calling for his resignation also?

            • shillelaghlaw says

              October 30, 2008 at 7:52 pm

              But my hunch is that Wilkerson’s crime was considered to be  more grievous, in that she was using her position for illegal gain. Marzilli didn’t do that. (Well, he did try to use his positon as “State Rep. Marty Walsh” to evade arrest…)

              • laurel says

                October 30, 2008 at 7:56 pm

                on the other hand, he was arrested months ago and is still sitting on the payroll, whereas wilkerson will be gone in a month anyways.  

  5. christopher says

    October 30, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    If she were not already headed for defeat next week in her bad-sportsmanship sticker campaign, I hope and assume she is now.  Let her constituents not have a gap in their representation and by January it will all be history.  As for the Governor, I’m not sure it would be appropriate for him to explicitly call for her resignation.  There is a tradition of the executive not stepping on legislative prorogative going back to Crown-Parliament relations in the 1600s.

    • john-beresford-tipton says

      October 30, 2008 at 7:49 pm

      An old saying.  True?  Well, I won’t count out Dianne until Wednesday.  There’s a history in another Massachusetts politician.  

      <

      p>But, I don’t don’t blame the state house crowd for showing their best righteous indignation.  After all, she made them go to ground for awhile.  And just before Christmas…

    • ryepower12 says

      October 31, 2008 at 12:05 am

      having her in office a) is a disgrace and b) will only add to the confusion and distraction at the state house, slowing down everything. The sooner she’s out, the better.

      <

      p>Meanwhile, if a state senator or rep resigns, their staff still stays in place, so the district is not totally unrepresented.  

  6. peabody says

    October 30, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    Marzilli?  DiMasi?  Trav?  Rogers?  Finnegan?  Flaherty? Bulger?  Countless others!

    <

    p>Diane, you were right at home in the den of thieves on Beacon Hill.  Your colleagues will now feign shock and discust.   Call them out!

    <

    p>Shine a light on what has been going on up there for centuries.

    <

    p>Oh well, now you won’t become a million-dollar lobbyist!

    <

    p>You blowing the whistle on the others is probably too much to expect from you.  Give prosecutors some crumbs and make the best deal you can!

    <

    p>Easy come!  Easy go!

    <

    p>

    • peabody says

      October 30, 2008 at 10:24 pm

      All your colleagues are feigning shock.  

      <

      p>The Senate Ethics Committee never pinned anything on Billy Bulger.  You have nothing to worry about.

      <

      p>If you win your write-in campaign, I am confident that you will stand as proudly as the rest of the Members of the Club.

      <

      p>Diane, the only thing you are guilty of is getting caught!

      <

      p>(Note to file:  Sonia Chang Diaz will easily win the Second Suffolk senate seat.)

      <

      p>

  7. dcsohl says

    October 30, 2008 at 10:03 pm

    Says the Globe.

    • sabutai says

      October 30, 2008 at 10:41 pm

      Methinks she’s going, if not right now, then in a coupla months.

  8. johnd says

    October 31, 2008 at 10:44 am

    I don’t know if it exists but maybe we should be able to suspend a politician from their office until any outstanding charges are proven or disproved. The leadership could hear the evidence and decide if the charge has warrant. If appropriate they could put them “on hold” and then move forward.

    <

    p>Until then… Wilkerson should be GONE, Marzelli should be gone, Jefferson should be gone, Stevens should have been gone and so should anyone else who they have clear evidence on. And after they are gone they should stand trial like any of us would and go to jail if guilty AND lose any pension benefits. I’ve heard Marzelli stands to gain significant pension benefits if he stays in office until his term is over. NO MORE of this crap!!!!

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on A valedictoryI joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on A valedictoryThat’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2025 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.