Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Please add an “Access to Justice” section to the Democratic Platform

February 15, 2009 By AmberPaw 2 Comments

And I requested the addition of “access to justice” as one of the areas of the Democratic Platform.  Without access to the courts to enforce rights, or be protected against state action, no citizen has any rights at all.

I note that John Adams must have been aware of this, in drafting the ringing “Open Courts Clause” included as “Article XI of the Declaration of Rights of the Inhabitants of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts”.

The vision for the government of our state involved three co-equal branches of government, which as a system of checks and balances would prevent tyranny.

Thus, the Judicial Branch cannot be treated as a mere agency – nor castrated by the appropriation power or the appointing power without harming democracy at its very core.

Therefore, “Access to Justice” must be a core value, and a topic in its own right.

The topics within “Access to Justice” include an independent judiciary, funding for the Judicial Branch sufficient to guarantee access to justice which is, as article XI in the Declaration of Rights requires:

“Every subject of the commonwealth ought to find a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries or wrongs which he may receive in his person, property, or character.  He ought to obtain right and justice freely, and without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay; comforably to the laws.”

NOTE:  Without sufficient funding to hold an adequate number of trials and motions, the requirement of “without delay” cannot be met by the judicial branch.  Without adequate support for the provision of legal services to those who cannot afford counsel, Article XI is a mockery.  It should be the Land Court that ensures justice for the tenant and property owner.    It should be the Juvenile Court that ensures that juveniles – and families – are treated fairly by schools and the Department of Children and Families.  And access to justice requires both access to courts, and to legal counsel for those of modest means, not only the wealthy if the “ought to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it” is not a mockery, and an empty promise.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: access-to-justice, indigent-defense, legal-services

Comments

  1. judy-meredith says

    February 16, 2009 at 4:44 pm

    But wondering where to put it and how to describe the population to be served.

    <

    p>We already have to fight hard to protect various programs with an exploding client list like the Committee on Public Counsel Services,, Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corp, Mental Health Legal Advisors, Correctional Legal Services. All found under the Judiciaryin the budget. None of their “constituencies” have very powerful supporters, except maybe the Constitution.  

    <

    p>    

    Log in to Reply
  2. tedf says

    February 17, 2009 at 10:49 am

    AmberPaw, I agree.

    <

    p>I don’t know if you read about Chief Justice Marshall’s remarks yesterday. While I think many state court systems are facing worse problems than ours, it’s clear we’re in for a period of belt-tightening. We need to cut expenses in a way that minimizes the loss of access to justice.

    <

    p>Here is one idea for reducing the judiciary’s budget that occurred to me the other day while I was sitting in a Suffolk County Superior Court session. Each courtroom has a court officer, who sits at a little desk while court is in session. I think the court officer is there primarily to provide security. But judging from appearances, many of them aren’t, let’s say, in tip-top shape. Mostly they seem to do crossword puzzles or, in a few amusing cases I’ve seen, flirt with the court reporters or clerks before the judges enter the room. Also, court reporters seem to man every session, even where the only people in the room are lawyers arguing motions in run-of-the-mill civil cases.

    <

    p>It seems to me the courts could save some money–I have no idea how much–by using court officers only in sessions where there is an actual need for real security. I note that when I worked in the federal courts after law school, I never saw a security person in the courtroom except where there was a specific need for one, but in those cases, the U.S. Marshal’s office would send a hard, ex-military-looking officer rather than a portly civil servant waiting out his time until pension. We should get rid of these sinecures if we are serious about tightening the belt.

    <

    p>And to the extent the courts have a real concern about security, they could start by adopting cheap but effective measures, such as requiring attorneys to pass through the security screening at the entrances to the buildings. I’ve always been shocked that I can enter the court building without passing through a metal detector simply because I have a bar card.

    <

    p>TedF

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 9 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe Boston Globe for 17-Aug-2022 reports (https://www.bo…
  • jconway on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThere have been four or five attempts to unseat Wong tha…
  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…
  • Christopher on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsNow we seem to have lost the ability to rate comments, h…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

teapartyusa1 Chris Lynch @teapartyusa1 ·
52m

In Dorchester, white conserve-a-dem political operatives are dragging white progressives.

In D.C. conserve-a-dem Joe Manchin came to terms with 49 @SenateDems to finally get these urgent needs addressed #MaPoli #BosPoli

603 Forward @603Forward

Because our delegation voted for the #InflationReductionAct - we’re finally pushing back against the climate crisis, we’re lowering health care + energy costs for families, we’re fighting inflation, + we’re getting giant greedy corporations to stop freeloading. #NHPolitics

Reply on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Retweet on Twitter 1559944214254960641 Like on Twitter 1559944214254960641 1 Twitter 1559944214254960641
edforboston Ed Flynn 愛德華費連 @edforboston ·
54m

Partnered w/city and state leaders on a letter to @MBTA. It is critical for our seniors, persons with disabilities, immigrant neighbors, BPS/community college students & working families in Chinatown to have a shuttle bus stop during the Orange Line shutdown. #bospoli #mapoli

Boston.com @BostonDotCom

Boston leaders call on the MBTA to add shuttle bus stop in Chinatown during Orange Line shutdown
https://trib.al/kz1qxqo

Reply on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Retweet on Twitter 1559943704412037121 Like on Twitter 1559943704412037121 1 Twitter 1559943704412037121
wtfdic_hour Brian Riccio @wtfdic_hour ·
56m

Once again, @JimAloisi depending on the kids that have no idea who or what he really is to make him seem like he's not or never has been an influence peddling lowlife. #mapoli? #mapoli!

Gintautas Dumcius @gintautasd

I also spoke with @JimAloisi, who pushed for a similar proposal in 2009 as the state's transportation chief.

“The test of a really good idea is whether it can survive the public debate and scrutiny for 13 years," said Aloisi. "And it has.”

Reply on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Retweet on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Like on Twitter 1559943272411308033 Twitter 1559943272411308033
hubobserver The Hub Observer 💎 @hubobserver ·
56m

"Democrats are firing on all cylinders." LOL #mapoli

Deval Patrick @DevalPatrick

The #InflationReductionAct cuts costs, creates good-paying jobs, and fights the climate crisis. And it's paid for responsibly, with taxes on the big corporations that hide their profits overseas.

Democrats are firing on all cylinders. Now, let's get out and vote this November.

Reply on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Retweet on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Like on Twitter 1559943180371595264 Twitter 1559943180371595264
activate_media Activate Media @activate_media ·
57m

VETERANS FOR PEACE SHOW Sunday, August 14th, 2022 - Activate Media https://buff.ly/3bP3B36
#boston #cambridge #worcester #lowell #nyc #manchester #providence #portland #bospoli #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Retweet on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Like on Twitter 1559943007759175682 Twitter 1559943007759175682
waltham_s Waltham Night's Watch @waltham_s ·
58m

Aww, Sam Racioppi is running for MA legislature, he has six tweets, none are about #mapoli or his district, and one is about us! We're flattered Sam!

Reply on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Retweet on Twitter 1559942824690388992 Like on Twitter 1559942824690388992 8 Twitter 1559942824690388992
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.