Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

How to cut costs without costing anything

March 26, 2009 By lawyermom

It’s time to get creative in finding ways to cut expenditures.  One obvious place that doesn’t seem to have been looked at is the criminal code.  

Property crimes are divided into misdemeanors and felonies primarily by dollar amount.  The first amount was established in 1971, when $100 was set as the maximum dollar value for a misdemeanor.  That amount was raised to $250 in 1987.  According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, using their CPI calculator, that $100 in 1971 was worth $280 in 1987.  This amount hasn’t changed since.  It was 16 years for the first increase.  Now, it’s been over 20 years, and inflation has made that $250 in 1987 worth $467 today.

If the maximum dollar value of stolen property for a misdemeanor was to be raised to $500, it would have an impact on criminal justice costs.  As misdemeanors, many cases could be diverted by the district attorney, which would keep it off the trial dockets.  It could mean different, less expensive, levels of probation supervision.  It could mean the costs of indigent representation would decrease as well, if there were no possibility of jail time, no appointed counsel would be necessary.

Also, it would be a change to keep fairness in the system.  If a kid in high school steals an iPod, it’s automatically a felony because of the retail value.  The same holds true for a cell phone.  Many kids end up with felonies on a first offense simply because of the value of the item, and as we are all aware, cell phones and iPods are ubiquitous.  

If the dollar amount for felonies was adjusted to reflect the rate of inflation over these years, it would restore some fairness into the criminal code, and not let inflation make felons out of those who are guilty only of misdemeanors.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: courts, crime, juveniles

Comments

  1. regularjoe says

    March 26, 2009 at 4:45 pm

    Do you think that an employer would find a distinction in larceny under $500 and larceny over $500?  In these days of extreme competition for the most menial jobs, employers would most likely not take a chance on anyone who has a record of crimes involving dishonesty.  I would not take a chance on someone who helped themselves to someone else’s property; I would rather hire a reformed drug addict, drunk driver, or someone found guilty of an assault than one who has shown that they cannot be trusted.

    <

    p>By the way, many felonies are disposed of in the District or Municipal Courts of this Commonwealth.  If someone were charged with larceny over $250 and the item was an ipod, that matter would very rarely find its way into Superior Court.

  2. lawyermom says

    March 26, 2009 at 8:36 pm

    Of course most of these larcenies stay in district court, but larceny over $250 is a felony regardless of what court it gets prosecuted in (it’s known as concurrent jurisdiction).  It might not matter to an employer who views a thief as a thief, it matters in sentencing for the offender.  It matters to those who receive public housing and/or housing vouchers who might have a family member with sticky fingers who could cost them their housing if they are convicted of a felony.

    <

    p>It also has a huge impact in the juvenile courts, where conviction of a felony can end an education.  Do you really want to end someone’s education over the theft of an ipod or cellphone?

    <

    p>It’s basically a question of fairness.  This dollar amount has been raised before, and it’s time to do it again.

  3. joets says

    March 26, 2009 at 10:49 pm

    In my work, I see people all the time stealing stupid crap.  Blu-rays are the biggest one.  I see more of those grow legs and walk out the door than be purchased at probably a rate of 30-1.  Sometimes I feel like we need more creative or harsher punishment for these people, but I recognize money could be saved by raising the amount for felony status.

    • regularjoe says

      March 27, 2009 at 7:45 am

      Please tell me how this reduces costs.  I do not see one difference.  Again, a high percentage of felonies are already resolved in the District or Municipal courts and your ipod or cellphone scenarios are precisely the kind that would be so resolved.  Many people charged intitially with felonies have those charges reduced to misdemeanors. Juvenile records are not provided in the records when an employer or a school requests CORI information.  Regarding your fairness argument, the theft of five hundred dollars should not be a misdemeanor.  If you stole something worth $499 from me I would be seriously impacted.  This represents more than one week of take home income for many people in our society. It represents many families’ monthly grocery costs. Stealing is wrong and the laws are lenient enough.  

      • lawyermom says

        March 27, 2009 at 9:19 am

        The last time the dollar amount for a felony was adjusted was over 20 years ago.  That $250, when it was set, is now worth just a little under $500.  Yes, many felonies get reduced, but it’s not guaranteed, and varies depending on which prosecutor is handling the case.  Some will, some won’t.  And many high school students are 17 and older, and schools will get their CORI’s.  And schools find out about juvenile records, which is why there are statutes that allow schools to permanently exclude, under certain circumstances, students convicted of felonies.

        • regularjoe says

          March 27, 2009 at 8:26 pm

          there is no finding of guilt unless said juvenile is transferred to the adult system.  CORI requests will not include juvenile information unless it is the raw CORI data that is only available to the courts, certain social service agencies like the DSS and to the police.  If you requested CORI information for a prospective employee you would not receive ANY juvenile information.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.