Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Senate Ethics Bill-Good on Campaign Finance, Bad on Ethics

May 13, 2009 By pamwilmot

The Globe and Justinian (“Senate President Murray’s Best. Move. Ever.”) are right that the Senate ethics bill (here’s the text and summary) released this morning has laudable campaign finance reforms and the Senate leadership deserves kudos. The bill will eliminate campaign contributions from lobbyists, reduce campaign contributions from certain businesses, and substantially increase disclosure of campaign spending (including “sham” issue ads).  The Senate goes much further than the House here.

But the Senate also weakens, rather than strengthens, ethics enforcement and rules.  Let me count the ways (I’m sorry for the laundry list-too busy to be eloquent):

  1. It adds a “knowing” requirement to bribery and gratuities sections making prosecution harder.
  2. It removed enforcement proceedings from the Ethics Commission and puts them in the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (DALA), eliminating the Commission’s ability to interpret and apply the law [G.L. c. 268B, sec. 4(f)], although they retain the ability to determine a penalty.
  3. Removes current whistleblower protections and requires that all aspects of a file (including the identity of a whistleblower) be turned over to the subject of an investigation. Talk about chilling!
  4. Shortens the statute of limitations for violations.
  5. Requires the Commission to stop and investigation while criminal investigations are in process.

In addition, the bill fails to add critical provisions that exist in the House bill (and Governor’s bill) which apply criminal penalties to outrageous gift violations, give the Ethics Commission regulatory authority to further clarify the rules, extend the summons power, and extend the statute of limitations, and more.

None of this takes into account the lack in both House and Senate bills of a straightforward Scaccia fix.  

Call your Senator now and tell them not to take a step backwards. They should support amendments that strengthen the ethics provisions (if you can’t call, send an e-mail here). Act quickly, because this bill will be on the Senate floor tomorrow.

And stay tuned for more details as we get sponsors for these amendments!

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: campaign-finance, common-cause, ethics, pam-wilmot

Comments

  1. ryepower12 says

    May 13, 2009 at 5:03 pm

    thanks

  2. progressiveman says

    May 13, 2009 at 5:09 pm

    …from large corporations doing extensive lobbying for zoning changes, tax breaks or other issues? For instance current law has no provision for financial reporting in towns with representative town meeting.

    • stomv says

      May 13, 2009 at 5:22 pm

      Representative Town Meeting is a relatively large body, not easy to whip, and zoning changes require 2/3s majority.  It would take a massive effort to pull it off.  Not impossible mind you, but really freakin’ hard methinks.

  3. power-wheels says

    May 13, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    Have the Governor or the House used? Does the “knowing” standard apply to the public official or to the person offering the bribe? Or both? It’s been a few years since BarBri, but I seem to recall that crimes that are similar to bribery (i.e. forgery, embezzlement, larceny) are all specific intent crimes with a “knowing” standard. And does the standard really matter that much? Are there many situations where bribes are offered or accepted “recklessly” but not “knowingly”?

    <

    p>It seems to me that the focus should be on having the resources and fortitude to actually prosecute a bribery crime and then properly punishing a conviction. Your other four bullet points speak to that. But I don’t understand the objection to using a “knowing” standard.  

    • silence_dogood says

      May 14, 2009 at 4:14 pm

      Accidental bribery and intentional bribery.  The Senate and House desperately do not want to have to give up the “freebies” they get as part of their job.  The dinners, the rounds of golf, the drinks, the tickets to game because those “perks” don’t affect how they do their job.  They are loyal public citizens and just because their friend happens to want to take them golfing so they can talk about how casinos are bad for Massachusetts will in no way influence how s/he votes.

      <

      p>Ethics is about appearances, and the appearance of impropriety should be as bad as the impropriety itself.

  4. briantully says

    June 23, 2009 at 12:12 am

    Too bad the Senate dropped the whistleblower protections.

    <

    p>I was going to drop a dime on Charlie Doherty (running for mayor of Woburn) for holding a raffle at his campaign kickoff party.

    <

    p>It was nice of him to take pictures and put it on his website, though…

    <

    p>http://s774.photobucket.com/al…

    <

    p>- brian

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.