Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Health care JUGGERNAUT!

June 4, 2009 By Charley on the MTA

Things that are good: There's just amazing ferment in health care policy these days, hard to keep track: 

  • Chris Dodd says there will be a health bill in a few days from the HELP committee — with a public option. Yow!
  • Ted Kennedy fights against cancer — and for the public plan! Rah Rah! (Sabutai noted this a few days ago.)
  • Obama's all over it — strong on the public plan and tying reform to cost control! YES WE CAN!
  • Health care advocates pour in $82 million in ads! Take that, Harry and Louise!
  • Bob Kuttner vs. the insurance industry — yay! (But apparently doesn't know what single-payer is. Boooo.)
  • Massachusetts is still taking the lead in reorganizing care away from quantity towards quality! Boo-ya! (Well, a possible, qualified, maybe boo-ya.)

    The Special Commission on the Health Care Payment System is proposing to reorganize the way more than $55 billion is spent on health care in this state every year.

    … The network or organization would get one annual payment for each patient, based on age or other factors, no matter how many services you use. If you stay healthy or your doctor helps you stay healthy, the organization does well. If you don’t, the providers could lose money. The commission says there would be incentives so that doctors would not limit necessary care or reject the sickest patients.

  • OK, not so good news: People go bankrupt from health care bills, even if they have insurance. It should be noted that the author of this report, Steffie Woolhandler, is a major player in the single-payer movement. Given that movement's predilections against “incrementalism”, one would assume she'd be opposed to any reform that entrenches the role of private insurers. That's the not-so-hidden subtext of this report.
Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: baucus, health-care, obama, ted-kennedy

Comments

  1. stomv says

    June 4, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    <

    p>You cannot harm me.  I’m the Juggernaut.

    <

    p>(yes that’s an Internet joke requiring youtube and headphones if you are at work)

  2. mike-from-norwell says

    June 4, 2009 at 8:04 pm

    The Special Commission on the Health Care Payment System is proposing to reorganize the way more than $55 billion is spent on health care in this state every year.

    … The network or organization would get one annual payment for each patient, based on age or other factors, no matter how many services you use. If you stay healthy or your doctor helps you stay healthy, the organization does well. If you don’t, the providers could lose money. The commission says there would be incentives so that doctors would not limit necessary care or reject the sickest patients.

    <

    p>What about the cancer patient who runs up hundreds of thousands of dollars?  How is that type of extraordinary expenditure covered in this type of scheme, or this the first step to “ice floe” care for the extremely sick and elderly?  Going through this first hand with my brother-in-law right now, where would he fit into this type of plan?  Clearly his costs would overwhelm payments on his behalf to his doctors.

    <

    p>This looks like more of an incentive to restrict services than get “everyone healthy”.  Capitation anyone?

  3. gary says

    June 5, 2009 at 9:25 am

    A Harvard University study out Thursday shows a 50 percent increase in such bankruptcies between 2001 and 2007. The vast majority of the 2,300 bankruptcy filers surveyed had health insurance when their medical problems began.

    <

    p>First, here’s the actual study referenced in your link.

    <

    p>Second, these people, David U. Himmelstein, MD,a Deborah Thorne, PhD,b Elizabeth Warren, JD,c Steffie Woolhandler, MD, MPHa should be banned from future studies or at least completely ignored.  Their “research” is partisan claptrap clothed in Harvard.  Their significant conclusions:

    <

    p>

    The share of bankruptcies attributable
    to medical problems rose by 50% between
    2001 and 2007.

    <

    p>OH MY GOD, you say, medical costs are driving the middle class into bankruptcy!  

    <

    p>Note the nuance:  “Since 2001, the PROPORTION of all bankruptcies attributable to medical problems has increased by 50%.” I actually think, based on the study, that even this very nuanced sentence is a very presumptive claim, but nevermind for now.

    <

    p>But even assuming the statement is factual, how can any study, purporting to be objective, publish such a stunning conclusion without noting that bankruptcies have declined significantly from 2001 to 2007 such that using Harvard’s numbers from the study, medical bankruptcies, in total actually DECREASED.  Yet, I dare you to find any reference to this fact in the Harvard study.

    <

    p>One can only hope, that other researchers without partisan views successfully expose, with peer reviewed studies, this most recent Warren, Woolhandlers propaganda as reserchers have done in the past.

  4. joes says

    June 6, 2009 at 1:41 pm

    Health Care is a rapidly increasing segment of the GDP, and one, in itself, that does not really create wealth.

    <

    p>There are too many conflicting goals in the industry to have an easy solution.  

    <

    p>Universal Coverage vs. Reduced Cost
    Massachusetts, which supposedly has “solved” the Health Care problem, now spends over 30% of its budget on Health Care.  Cost efficiencies should come concurrent with expansion of coverage to limit the total cost.

    <

    p>More Jobs vs. Reduced Cost
    How often do we hear that the Health Care Industry is “saving” us on the jobs front?  But are those added jobs increasing costs more than the health benefit that results?

    <

    p>Profit vs. Care
    What drives the decisions in the Health Care Insurers’ boardrooms?  What drives hospital expansions?  It is not just the profit dollars that we are paying for, but the added effort that these organizations take on in order to “grow the business” and “increase their returns”.

    <

    p>Extending Life vs. Peaceful Death
    How far should the health care provider extend a terminal patient?  21% of all health care costs are incurred in the last year of life.

    <

    p>Battery of tests vs. focused treatment
    How much health care effort is added to mitigate the risk of missing something, and maybe being sued because of the omission?  Reasonable limits on litigation may be advised.

    <

    p>I pay vs. You pay
    Putting the onus on those who provide jobs may not be the best economic solution.  A national sales tax would affect sellers more than employers, and therefore would be better for the overall economy.

    <

    p>Healthy Lifestyles vs. “What the Hell”
    It is time to bring out some carrots and sticks, and use them effectively.

    <

    p>The ARRA program has about $1.1B for health care Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER).  If this money is to be well spent, it may help resolve some of the conflicts.  It should not be a wasted effort.

    <

    p>

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.