Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Unemployment remains the #1 problem for the economy

January 2, 2010 By AmberPaw 19 Comments

Unemployment by state tells the story.  Having the stock market go up, while employment remains the worst it has been in 29 years should be setting off alarm bells, not celebrations.

The fact that   Tata Tata enterprises is being wooed by Ohio but that of its 13000 workers in the USA only 1300 are American citizens should also be setting off warning bells.  What this means is wages going down, not up.

At the same time, the self-dealing elite continues to pay itself bonuses – with those bonuses worth six times the total growth in the economy  that same year! At the same time, 25 million families may face forceclosure and unemployment remains the highest in 29 years. Banker bonuses – the rest of the story

My focus remains jobs, jobs, jobs.  I have NOT been distracted by the health care debate, or the Copenhagen conference, or a terrorist rich boy, who happened to be from Africa, who set his pants on fire.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: foreclosure, outsourcing, unemployment, waqge-depreciation

Comments

  1. christopher says

    January 3, 2010 at 11:20 am

    …that the stock market is NOT the best indicator of our economic situation?  To me it almost seems like phony capitalism which doesn’t really do what the Milton Friedmans of the world theorize that it should.  Often stock value goes up from a shareholder’s perspective precisely because companies have figured out how to reap in more money while hiring fewer people.  I’m not an expert on this matter, but something that I can’t quite put my finger on definitely stinks here.

    Log in to Reply
    • kirth says

      January 3, 2010 at 12:19 pm

      Using the Stock Market to gauge the health of the economy is like using Foxwoods’ balance sheet. As long as I’ve been paying attention, Wall Street rewards companies that lay off workers. It got to the point that when Hatchet Jack Welch took over a company, its stock went up even before he started chopping workers. The market rewards the immediate bottom line, and ignores the long-term health of companies and of the economy.

      Log in to Reply
    • liveandletlive says

      January 4, 2010 at 10:38 pm

      it seems that as long as the stock market is doing OK, the headlines read that the economy is improving.  The lousy employment rate and the poor quality of life for most Americans is a secondary and insignificant news story that gets brushed off as if it’s not important.  

      <

      p>I believe the stock market is creating another unsustainable bubble.  It’s not all that far from the 14,000 it was at when it crashed. There have been dramatic rallies because somebody sneezed the right way. It’s driven by brokers who have to make money for their clients in order to make money for themselves.  It is self propelling, and not related to anything that is really going on in the country.  It is an entity all to itself.  It’s going to crash…again.

      <

      p>Paul Krugman’s NY Times Op-ed “That 1937 Feeling” gives an interesting take on what is happening, and how the good news we are supposedly getting is really just little blips that won’t last.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01…
       

      Log in to Reply
    • liveandletlive says

      January 4, 2010 at 10:41 pm

      excessive bonus money is being invested to create more money. Money making money. A gift to those with the most.
      Those profits should be reinvested into the overall well being of the country by creating jobs and increasing wages.  

      Log in to Reply
  2. johnd says

    January 3, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    National Association of Software and Service Companies, a trade organization in Delhi, also remains positive about the growth of India’s outsourcing industry. The industry is optimistic about achieving its target of $60 billion in software and services exports by March 2010. In the Indian fiscal year to March 31, the industry expects export revenue of $40.3 billion, up 29 percent from export revenue in the previous year.

    <

    p>It wouldn’t be hard to put some incentives into our tax structure to reward companies who hire Americans and punish those who export jobs. My company has support centers in the US and India. We also have development teams in both countries. The cost of an Indian Developer is 1/3 the US costs. But, if we had some incentives we could drop the Indian program easily. Otherwise, it’s hard to ignore the productivity of that many coders getting projects completed quickly at a lower price. It is how we compete since our competitors do the same thing.

    <

    p>Wonder why they don’t do something about this?

    Log in to Reply
    • kathy says

      January 3, 2010 at 12:40 pm

      I partially agree with JohnD! I think that we should punish companies that export jobs-and that move their headquarters to places like Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. But do I really trust the companies to keep jobs here after those incentives are paid out? Using Raytheon as a local example, I really don’t. Raytheon got millions in tax breaks from Massachusetts, and then moved many jobs out of state.  

      Log in to Reply
      • christopher says

        January 3, 2010 at 1:06 pm

        As for Raytheon aren’t taxes calculated on an annual basis?  If we give them a tax incentive one year for creating jobs here, we can just as easily penalize them next year for moving jobs out.

        Log in to Reply
        • kirth says

          January 3, 2010 at 7:01 pm

          Penalize the state’s largest employer? Imagine the wailing – “hostile business climate,”etc. If I remember correctly, Raytheon got those incentives by threatening to move some operations out of the state. When they got their bribes to keep jobs here, they promptly began moving them anyway. It’s like an entitlement program for corporations.

          Log in to Reply
          • christopher says

            January 4, 2010 at 11:38 am

            I wasn’t necessarily talking politically easy, but then what’s the use of a friendly business climate if we get nothing from it.  Just say that each year any company that does X will be rewarded and any that does not-X will be penalized.  No need to revisit the law annually.  If the company wants to continue to be rewarded it will continue to do X.  If it does not-X it’s lose-lose as they are helping neither themselves nor the state.

            Log in to Reply
    • conseph says

      January 3, 2010 at 1:06 pm

      Great post, Jobs remain the critical issue facing the country and too many people have lost focus on how we can work to create more private sector jobs.

      <

      p>First off government incentives might help, but I believe that most employers want some certainty in the costs that they will face.  Costs that will be affected by health care reform, cap and trade and whatever else comes up over the next year or so.  Looking at the speed of proposals coming form Washington would give any employer pause when considering hiring decisions.  Its far too hard to determine the total cost of a new employee to your business.  Without some certainty they will just sit on the sidelines until there is either some level of certainty or they have no choice but to hire more.  So, before we look provide incentives to employers to hire let’s start with firming up the framework in which the hiring will take place.  Once that is done, we could then look at incentives but my fear would be that they would only further confuse rather than clarify the situation now.

      <

      p>Second, the government, at all levels, needs to focus on where and from whom they buy their products and services.  When you deal with the government they are looking for the best service at a given price point and while lowest bid does not always win, it certainly helps to be lowest.  This encourages firms that do business with the government to seek to lower their costs as much as possible.  Look at the firms working on the TARP pieces.  You have PIMCO with operations in India.  State Street with operations in India and elsewhere. And the list goes on and on.  How meaningful would it be if the government required providers to have employees actually in the U.S.?

      <

      p>Finally, we have ourselves to blame.  Much as the government seeks the lowest price possible, so do we.  You see examples of it in everyday life.  The local store closes do to Walmart or Home Depot opening up nearby.  People shop at large chain grocers rather than local grocery stores.  This past Christmas more people shopped on line than ever before. Not only does on line shopping take business from local stores it deprives the local government of sales tax revenue in many cases (a topic for another post maybe).  So we can all do our part by shopping locally with people that live and work in our neighborhoods.  It may cost a little more in terms of money, but when you factor in other “benefits” (environmental, locally owned businesses, local jobs, etc.) you have a strong reason to shop local.

      <

      p>Jobs are THE ISSUE facing our state and country and it starts with each of ourselves focusing our own actions locally and encouraging our government at all levels to take actions to make it easier for people to be put to work here and not overseas.

      Log in to Reply
    • mizjones says

      January 4, 2010 at 12:40 pm

      I would add that government, both fed and state, should take a closer look at the H1-B and other work visa situations. I know of a situation in MA where a crackerjack (experienced Princeton grad) engineer was forced to train his foreign replacement. Stories like this abound. The H1-B program was originally intended to bring in people with outstanding skills/knowledge, such that they would be catalysts for job creation here. There are lots of H1-Bs whose pay is quite low for the job listed. It is an impossible stretch to say that the low-paid ones were brought in because their skills are so special that no citizen possessing them could be found. They offer two things to employers: lower cost and a captive status, in that they cannot easily change jobs if the employer imposes abusive working conditions.

      <

      p>Abuses in other work-visa programs should be investigated as well. The low pay and fraud committed against “guest workers” makes the job situation more precarious for citizens at the low end of the economic scale.

      <

      p>I do not mean to be bashing immigrants and non-citizens. My criticism is reserved for the abusive employers, the laws that allow the abuse, and law enforcement that often looks the other way.

      <

      p>I wish an investigative reporter would look into how many jobs are lost to citizens due to these programs.

      Log in to Reply
      • huh says

        January 4, 2010 at 1:15 pm

        Several former India-based employees of mine took positions with an agency in NYC (against my advice).  They’re now living in what amounts to a group home in New Jersey since it’s all they can afford.  

        <

        p>$30k/year sounds like a lot when you’re in India. Once you get here, not so much, but by then, you’re stuck.

        <

        p>There’s a similar issue with oversees operations.  Everyone starts them because they’re “cheap” but neglects to factor in infrastructure, training, and time-shift issues.

        <

        p>There’s a recent trend of east and west coast companies outsourcing to firms in cheaper parts of the country, e.g. the midwest.  It makes much more sense to me.

        <

        p>

        Log in to Reply
  3. justice4all says

    January 3, 2010 at 9:18 pm

    as a “jobless recovery.”  If people are out of work, or just as bad, underemployed, then the economy has NOT recovered.

    <

    p>So where are the Democrats on this?  They control the White House and both branches of the Legislature.  Has any one of them said the “J” word in months?  

    <

    p>This new generation of job seekers will be taking to the streets if things don’t improve….and maybe then, we’ll get some action.  Right now, our elected officials are still giving champagne and caviar legislation and bail out for the banks and corporations….while our citizens are still waiting for crumbs.   My son is already talking about moving to North Carolina, because it’s too difficult to get started up here.    

    Log in to Reply
    • christopher says

      January 4, 2010 at 1:31 pm

      Not that I’m necessarily complaining too loudly because that is important too, and if done correctly it will alleviate one of the biggest specific fears about being unemployed.  However, with hundreds of members and dozens of committees it seems that Congress as an institution should be able to multitask a little better.

      Log in to Reply
      • dcsurfer says

        January 5, 2010 at 1:25 am

        That they aren’t paying health insurance premiums?  I don’t think they’ll be very alleviated when they get the mandate to fork over 300 bucks a month.

        Log in to Reply
        • christopher says

          January 5, 2010 at 11:20 am

          Most people’s insurance is courtesy of their employment.  Losing coverage would be a big scare to me upon losing a job.  I’m pretty sure there is assistance to pay the mandate up to full exemption if you’re unemployed.

          Log in to Reply
          • dcsurfer says

            January 5, 2010 at 1:11 pm

            We really need to disentangle health insurance from employers, it is a really inefficient and unfair system.  Losing coverage when losing a job is only the most obvious downside.  I can’t think of any upsides to it, unless you are one of the people enjoying an unfair advantage by working for a plum employer.  Insurance should be disentangled from marriage also.  Universal coverage would disentangle them and free people to make marriage and employment choices based on the person and the job, not their health insurance.

            <

            p>I am not sure there would be assistance, and even if there is, I bet it would be a pain in the butt to apply and make the payments.  McCain’s plan is simple, the government would pay the premiums directly for everyone.

            Log in to Reply
            • christopher says

              January 5, 2010 at 1:42 pm

              Your description of McCain’s plan sounds like single-payer, which I’m pretty sure he doesn’t and wouldn’t support.

              Log in to Reply
              • dcsurfer says

                January 5, 2010 at 2:35 pm

                under McCain’s plan, but there would be a refundable tax credit paid directly to the company that would cover the premiums of a basic plan.  Single payer eliminates the insurers and just pays the hospitals and doctors and there is no choice of plans, because there are no plans, everything is covered.  I favor a combination of single-payer for all basic medicine, and supplemental private plans for controversial or advanced procedures.

                Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)

Recent User Posts

Zero Net Energy – August 2022

August 18, 2022 By gmoke Leave a Comment

Liz

August 17, 2022 By johntmay 2 Comments

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 11 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 4 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesAs I've said several times already, the commentary on th…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI was on the interview with Rep Vitolo. He was outwardly…
  • Keith Bernard on LizFirst of all, gross. While I appreciate Ms. Cheney's cou…
  • Christopher on LizI can't imagine these days the winner not being either t…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe Boston Globe for 17-Aug-2022 reports (https://www.bo…
  • jconway on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThere have been four or five attempts to unseat Wong tha…
  • SomervilleTom on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsYes, the plugin that is broken is also the widget that p…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

cdempc Chris Dempsey @cdempc ·
10m

📢"Dempsey is Democrats’ best pick for auditor...He is the right person at the right time...he has the experience to do the job with a fresh focus on new priorities." I am so proud to be endorsed by @GlobeOpinion! http://www.dempseyforauditor.com/globe #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1560579083892826112 Retweet on Twitter 1560579083892826112 6 Like on Twitter 1560579083892826112 9 Twitter 1560579083892826112
andreadoremus 🌻🌻#VotingRights A.Doremus #AbortionIsHealthcare @andreadoremus ·
10m

Its NOT hard to cook with them. Just like any electric stove but must use correct pots. Yes, I do prefer #natgas … at what cost 😳!?

Great opportunity to #FaceTheClimateEmergency & #ActOnClimate. Thx @MassSave!#mapoli #bospoli #Boston #FridaysForFuture

https://goclean.masscec.com/clean-energy-solutions/induction-cooking/?gclid=CjwKCAjw6fyXBhBgEiwAhhiZsjR70RIsZz2ulQwbdW1hNeQErSl5wV1wknEkhfx8agLR5ARfIPJJuhoChM4QAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds

Peter McPhee @MassMcPhee

Big news! @MassSave now offering $500 rebate for induction stoves. Save energy, carbon, and your health, all while boiling water in like 1 minute. #cleancooking #electrification #energytwitter

Reply on Twitter 1560579026024120320 Retweet on Twitter 1560579026024120320 1 Like on Twitter 1560579026024120320 Twitter 1560579026024120320
dartmouthgop Dartmouth GOP @dartmouthgop ·
13m

👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 #mapoli https://twitter.com/localpoliticsis/status/1560395792631873537

Reply on Twitter 1560578183136772098 Retweet on Twitter 1560578183136772098 Like on Twitter 1560578183136772098 Twitter 1560578183136772098
keefeforrevere Patrick Keefe @keefeforrevere ·
19m

Bold enough to stand against the major firms in Boston pushing for an Olympic bid. This man has what it takes. Vision, leadership and courage. @cdempc #mapoli

Chris Dempsey @cdempc

Thank you to Revere Mayor @MayorArrigo and Councilors @in53w2, Joanne McKenna, @keefeforrevere, and @marcsilvestri43 for your support! Revere is united behind #TeamDempsey. #mapoli https://reverejournal.com/2022/08/17/local-officials-support-dempsey-for-state-auditor/

Reply on Twitter 1560576830943657984 Retweet on Twitter 1560576830943657984 1 Like on Twitter 1560576830943657984 2 Twitter 1560576830943657984
patrickmgleason patrickmgleason @patrickmgleason ·
22m

Six Years After Her Passing, One Woman’s Life’s Work Continues To Save Taxpayers Billions #mapoli https://www.forbes.com/sites/patrickgleason/2022/08/19/six-years-after-her-passing-one-womans-lifes-work-continues-to-save-taxpayers-billions/

Reply on Twitter 1560576073686999042 Retweet on Twitter 1560576073686999042 Like on Twitter 1560576073686999042 1 Twitter 1560576073686999042
bledwine Lea Benson 🍎 @bledwine ·
34m

The only thing stopping Americans from protecting each other is the @CDC & the MSM. If people were told that masking protects them from organ damage; they’d pop one on! This is basic, but the Brownstone Institute propagandists ensure ongoing contagion unto death #MAEdu #mapoli

Martha Lincoln @heavyredaction

As I argue, the “tired-public” claim is manufactured. Polling data, including very recent data, show a remarkable consistent level of support for COVID protections. For example:
4/
https://twitter.com/wsbgnl/status/1558548110833356801?s=20&t=Otk88_X3jx_VB-TYuDQCcA

Reply on Twitter 1560573056145362944 Retweet on Twitter 1560573056145362944 Like on Twitter 1560573056145362944 Twitter 1560573056145362944
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.