Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Bad economy net plus for Republicans

June 26, 2010 By paulsimmons

In many of the polling-related posts on this site, there has been a regrettable tendency to blame the pollster rather than address the issue.

Fortunately some Democratic pollsters look political reality in the face.

For those of you thinking that recent economic news works in our favor, here’s a Democracy Corps Analysis to the contrary:

…A declining number believe the economy is improving, with only 40 percent saying it is “starting to improve” – and a growing number believing it is getting worse. For the great majority of Americans, this is a period of uncertainty. Indeed, over 60 percent believe the country is headed in the wrong direction – stuck at that level since the first month of positive job numbers…

[snip]

Every economic indicator with political implications remains stuck – with Democrats at a disadvantage:

   * The president’s approval on the economy is stuck at 45 percent, with a majority disapproving.

   * Only 45 percent believe the president’s economic plan averted a crisis and laid a foundation for growth – compared to 49 percent who say it has made the economy worse.  This critical judgment remains unchanged over the past four months – the whole period of job growth.

   * The Republicans have a 4-point advantage on which party you trust on the economy – again essentially unchanged for three months.

   * Voters are split on whether Obama and Democrats are more for Wall Street or Main Street – unchanged in four months.

   * Voters by 48 to 46 percent would opt to protest the Democrats’ direction on the economy, rather than voting Democratic to keep recovery on track.  This 2-point deficit is marginally better, but a minor movement.

This is why Scott Brown’s vote against extending unemployment benefits is so pernicious.

The minute those benefits expire their recipients no longer count as unemployed.  “Unemployment” is defined by the government, not as lacking a job, nor as being dependent upon part-time work, but as receiving benefits.

Democrats have a bad habit of taking unemployment numbers at face value, particularly when those numbers reflect employment in construction and manufacturing industries.

Brown thus has it both ways: a vote against “wasteful” governmental spending, plus the support of those whose whose legitimate feelings of personal betrayal and abandonment trump their economic circumstances.

This is how Republicans can get away with their cynical juxtaposition of corporatist votes and populist rhetoric: with few exceptions, the Democrats abandoned their (culturally) working-class base.  Tea Party adherents may be mistaken in their analysis, but they have legitimate gripes, so far unaddressed by the institutional Democratic Party.

The Commonwealth is not exempt from this statistical sleight of hand, which renders the current economic “good news” here largely meaningless.

Fortunately for the Governor, Charley Baker can’t “do” populism to save his life, but not losing – by default – is not the same as winning.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: economy, poll, populism

Comments

  1. hoyapaul says

    June 26, 2010 at 6:32 pm

    Tea Party adherents may be mistaken in their analysis, but they have legitimate gripes,so far unaddressed by the institutional Democratic Party.

    <

    p>Any examples of the Tea Party’s “legitimate gripes”?

    • kbusch says

      June 26, 2010 at 7:25 pm

      The central narrative of Tea Partiers seems to be that the country has been “taken over” by out of touch elites. This often seems tinged with distasteful elements of anti-intellectualism and nativism.

      <

      p>However, in the case of regulatory capture, there’s a lot to be said for that narrative.

      • hoyapaul says

        June 27, 2010 at 6:07 pm

        about the “they have gripes” part; it’s the “legitimate” part that I’m still trying to find.

  2. paulsimmons says

    June 26, 2010 at 8:49 pm

    In the Massachusetts iteration of Service Economy economics, the basic system depends upon importing affluent out-of-State students who go to primarily private colleges and universities that are priced out of the reach of lower middle and lower income residents.

    <

    p>These students, plus affluent locals, upon graduation constitute the bulk of the Commonwealth’s elites.

    <

    p>There is no concern for upward social mobility for other residents, many of whom are either priced or pushed out of state.

    <

    p>The National Report Card on Higher Education gives the Commonwealth an “F” grade for this reason, despite generally good college preparation for upper middle-class students.  Even in the State college and university system, tuition and fees are beyond the reach of many residents, and there is little in the way of real financial aid.

    <

    p>There is similar class apartheid in the public school system.

    <

    p>While the problems afflicting black and Latino students are well-documented, little concern is shown for white working-class students of similar economic backgrounds. (No real concern is shown for blacks or Latinos either; elitism transcends color lines, but whites generally don’t know that.)

    <

    p>The costs of living are so high that one sees residents priced out of their own neighborhoods – including elderly homeowners, who have full property equity, but can’t pay (discounted) taxes on higher assessed property.

    <

    p>This “economic cleansing” has been State (and City of Boston) policy for almost four decades.

    <

    p>In the two-tier society thus created working class whites are expendable, and they know it.  

    • hrs-kevin says

      June 29, 2010 at 10:14 am

      MA gets an F for “affordability” but gets good grades in other areas, but if you look at report cards for other states you will find that the only state that doesn’t get an F in this category is California (which gets a C-) and we all know what kind of budget problems they are suffering.

      <

      p>You are correct that higher education is expensive and getting worse, but it is most definitely not a problem specific to this state or even this region and this report card does little to support your assertion that expensive private universities are somehow keeping everyone else down.

      • paulsimmons says

        June 29, 2010 at 11:51 am

        …your assertion that expensive private universities are somehow keeping everyone else down.

        <

        p>It’s not the existence of these universities, but the lack of scholarship funding available to low- and moderate-income students and families – including those admitted to State-supported institutions; and the their lack of adequate public school preparation that is the issue here.

        <

        p>Nor did I say that the problem is limited to Massachusetts, although ranking 49th out of fifty in State per capita aid to public higher education does present temptations…

        <

        p>The emergence of a politically powerful populist Right nationwide is based on the exploitation of legitimate grievances.  Pursuant to the Massachusetts-specific variant:

        <

        p>I did say that there is little or no concern for the tangible interests of low- and moderate-income residents of the Commonwealth; using education support (or the lack thereof) as one of several symptoms of the larger disease.

        <

        p>Some private universities, notably Harvard, have good scholarship programs for needy students, but, in my opinion,  their role in disrupting communities by unchecked expansion trumps the good they do for individual students.

        <

        p>However a cost/benefit analysis of the role of nonprofit property owners in Greater Boston, and their payments-in-lieu-of-taxes, would be at least of monograph length, and would obscure the larger point.

        <

        p>

  3. bob-neer says

    June 26, 2010 at 10:47 pm

    Unfortunately, I do not think your assertion is correct:

    <

    p>

    “Unemployment” is defined by the government, not as lacking a job, nor as being dependent upon part-time work, but as receiving benefits.

    <

    p>This is how the government defines unemployment.

    • paulsimmons says

      June 27, 2010 at 3:57 pm

      While I was searching various policy sites, I found this:

      <

      p>

      …Unemployment is sometimes thought to include only those individuals who are drawing unemployment insurance benefits. However, many outside this group are considered to be unemployed. Examples include those who have exhausted unemployment benefits but continue to seek work, new labor market entrants – including recent high school and college graduates – and those who are not covered by unemployment insurance, such as the formerly self-employed.

      <

      p>This does not rebut my larger point. From the same source:

      <

      p>

      The official definition of unemployment also excludes certain groups who are sometimes thought of as being unemployed or “underemployed.” Those who would like to work, but who have stopped looking for work – so-called discouraged workers – are not counted in the official definition because they are not actively seeking work. People working part time who would prefer full-time work are also not counted as unemployed because they are working – albeit fewer hours than they would like. Finally, those who are not employed (i.e., did work for pay or profit) and do not fit the above definition of unemployed are classified as “not in the labor force.”

      <

      p>This does not contradict my premise.

      <

      p>Northeastern’s Center for Labor Market Studies documents the condition of blue-collar workers’ unemployment in Massachusetts; and deals (here and here) with the implications of a “recovery” that leaves lower-income workers behind.

      <

      p>Insofar as Massachusetts-specific political effects, I refer you to the economic cross-tabs in today’s Boston Globe/UNH Poll.

  4. dave-from-hvad says

    June 28, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    (that usually substitutes in my case for economic analysis) that the economy will not substantially improve as long as we’re bogged down in two expensive wars.

    <

    p>As long as Iraq and Afghanistan are draining our Treasury, we will not have the resources to invest in real job creation.  I say this is a gut feeling because I rarely hear this point made by economists, so maybe I’m completely wrong about it.

    <

    p>But if one does accept this premise, it seems doubly unfortunate that the Democrats in Congress and the White House continue to support our virtually unlimited engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan.  These wars bring no positive political or  practical results for Democrats — just a steadily rising body count and continuing bad economic news.

    <

    p>The politics of this situation work right into the Republicans’ hands.  Obama has to figure out how to get us out of these two countries asap or he will be a one-term president.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

shocks legitimate businessman @shocks ·
34m

we’ve fucked up housing policy so badly that it’s making fuckin worcester expensive #mapoli #bospoli

Reply on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Retweet on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Like on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Twitter 1620373810259312641
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
45m

You’re paying for it: Massachusetts abortion hotline now offers free legal advice https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/01/31/youre-paying-for-it-massachusetts-abortion-hotline-now-offers-free-legal-advice/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Retweet on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Like on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Twitter 1620371068514111488
projectbread Project Bread @projectbread ·
1h

Thank you, @senjehlen, for cosponsoring HD766/SD1013 and investing in the health and future of our children. Passing #SchoolMealsforAll is key to increasing equitable access to healthy, nutritious food for all students –so no child goes hungry. #FeedKidsMa #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Retweet on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Like on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Twitter 1620362251491315713
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3h

New jails are popping up coast to coast. These activists share how to fight back. https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/01/31/new-jails-are-popping-up-coast-to-coast-these-activists-share-how-to-fight-back/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Retweet on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Like on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Twitter 1620343385658916870
massgopdaily Daily GOP News @massgopdaily ·
3h

Another one in the L column for Lyons as his last ditch effort to rid a vote against him (through appeal) fails. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Retweet on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Like on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Twitter 1620335349993201664
legislataapp Legislata @legislataapp ·
3h

Tweet summary for MA State House for 2023-01-30: 140 tweets from 46 legislators. Top words: jamieeldridgema, senjehlen, repjimoday, reproequity_now, progressivemass, senjasonlewis, erika4rep, legal, juliancyr, abortion. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Retweet on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Like on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Twitter 1620332764472942592
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.