Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Supreme Court decision seems likely to allow DiMasi prosecution to go forward

June 24, 2010 By David 4 Comments

The Supreme Court today narrowed, but did not invalidate, the federal “honest services” law that has been used to prosecute many people charged with public or private corruption, including former House Speaker Sal DiMasi.  The essence of the Court’s holding is this:

Section 1346, which proscribes fraudulent deprivations of “the intangible right of honest services,” is properly confined to cover only bribery and kickback schemes.

If I recall correction, the essence of the case against DiMasi was a kickback scheme — he allegedly received cash in exchange for directing contracts to Cognos Corporation.  

DiMasi’s lawyer, unsurprisingly, has characterized today’s decision as a big win for DiMasi:

DiMasi’s lawyer, Thomas Kiley, said he believes the Supreme Court ruling means the statute cannot be used in DiMasi’s case.

“It’s clear that the statute has been narrowed so that it does not apply to undisclosed conflicts of interest,” Kiley said. “The court has once again tried to put a brake on the government’s use of this statute to capture all manner and means of supposed inappropriate use of office.

“This is the decision we’ve been waiting for. The decision echoes the arguments that we’ve been making.”

Kiley is right that undisclosed conflicts of interest now cannot be prosecuted under the honest services law.  And that may result in some of the charges against DiMasi being thrown out.  But I don’t see how the central allegation of the case — that DiMasi received cash in exchange for steering contracts to Cognos — is adversely affected by today’s decision.  Anyone with a better recollection of the details should feel free to correct me in the comments!

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: dimasi, supreme-court

Comments

  1. neil_mcdevitt says

    June 24, 2010 at 6:35 pm

    may be harder to prove for any number of reasons.

    <

    p>That is probably why the Gov’t so dearly loved those conflict of interest charges in the first place. Easier to prove.

    Log in to Reply
  2. stoppredatorygambling says

    June 24, 2010 at 7:01 pm

    It’s unclear why the fact Cognos and Harrah’s have a business partnership has never been mentioned in any of the news coverage about DiMasi. According to The Globe story announcing his resignation:

    <

    p>

    DiMasi blamed “powerful special interests,” particularly the gambling industry, for fueling the ethics investigations swirling around him, and predicted that gambling interests would cheer his departure. “I can hear the clanking of the slot machines now,” he said.

    DiMasi’s claim was met with little reaction.  After all, what would a software company like Cognos have in common with powerful billion-dollar casino interests like Harrah’s which is gunning for a casino in Boston?

    <

    p>

    “With Cognos we established a closed-loop marketing system to be able to support our customer loyalty objectives. From analyzing customer behavior to developing and tracking the effectiveness of focused campaigns, we can use our data to better serve our customers and in turn decide how to improve our operations to increase their overall satisfaction. Both strategies complement each other in such a way that the combination of the two is more powerful than either individually.” – Tim Stanley, Senior V.P. of Innovation, Gaming & Technology and CIO at Harrah’s Casinos in a 2009 business case study about Cognos.

    <

    p>There is no dispute that Sal DiMasi was the most powerful opponent of casinos in the state. There is also no dispute that Harrah’s and Cognos are business partners. Are these facts unrelated or is there truth to DiMasi’s claim that he was railroaded by gambling interests?

    <

    p>Les Bernal

    Log in to Reply
    • peter-porcupine says

      June 24, 2010 at 10:10 pm

      Log in to Reply
  3. david-whelan says

    June 24, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Dems reach deal on IRA (1)
  • Great economic news today (1)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)

Recent User Posts

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 3 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingIt's also amusing to hear Trump supporters blame an insi…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing"President Biden victories?" You mean, the greatest achi…
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentstesting 1 2 3 Testing One Two Three
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsSeems to be okay now...
  • johntmay on Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?Well, that's sad. Sure, your argument is a slam dunk wit…
  • fredrichlariccia on Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?Sorry, I'm done. Time to move on. :)

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

sueswanson20030 Sue Swanson @sueswanson20030 ·
30m

. #MAClimateBill requires towns wanting to ban #fossilfuels in new bldgs have zoning for #multifamily housing = this is crucial for giving ALL residents access to #climateresilient housing = win-win. @MassGov #SignMAClimateBill! #NetZeroForAll #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557726001769000961 Retweet on Twitter 1557726001769000961 Like on Twitter 1557726001769000961 Twitter 1557726001769000961
sueswanson20030 Sue Swanson @sueswanson20030 ·
31m

. #Netzero housing is NOT a $ problem = construction costs same or less v #fossilfuel bldg costs. @MassGovernor, have you read this report: https://builtenvironmentplus.org/road-to-net-zero/? Don’t block access to #cilmateresilient housing for all. Sign #MAClimateBill now. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557725570687008768 Retweet on Twitter 1557725570687008768 Like on Twitter 1557725570687008768 Twitter 1557725570687008768
sueswanson20030 Sue Swanson @sueswanson20030 ·
32m

. @MassGovernor surely you know #MAClimateBill will actually make #fossilfuel free buildings more note less accessible to low-/moderate-income households in communities ready to lead on #ClimateResilientHousing. #mapoli #SignMAClimateBill

Reply on Twitter 1557725352323350530 Retweet on Twitter 1557725352323350530 Like on Twitter 1557725352323350530 Twitter 1557725352323350530
sueswanson20030 Sue Swanson @sueswanson20030 ·
36m

. #Affordablehousing is a #climatesolution. Towns ready to lead on #fossilfuelfree bldgs must have at least 10% #affordablehousing to participate = win-win. .@MassGov sign the #MAClimateBill so ALL residents can live in #climateresilient housing. #mapoli .

Reply on Twitter 1557724554298007552 Retweet on Twitter 1557724554298007552 Like on Twitter 1557724554298007552 Twitter 1557724554298007552
erika4rep Erika Uyterhoeven @erika4rep ·
36m

A (belated) thank you to everyone who came to our Ward 2 Coffee Chat / Office Hours with
@senjehlen & @JTforWard2 right before the end of session at Lincoln Park! We discussed transit, crosswalks, taxing the rich, & dismantling neoliberalism, appreciate you all 😊 #mapoli

3

Reply on Twitter 1557724428900999168 Retweet on Twitter 1557724428900999168 Like on Twitter 1557724428900999168 Twitter 1557724428900999168
dankennedy_nu Dan Kennedy @dankennedy_nu ·
36m

Experts at #Northeastern explain why sports betting is a terrible idea. https://news.northeastern.edu/2022/08/08/massachusetts-sports-betting/?utm_source=News%40Northeastern&utm_campaign=3559256b95-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2022_03_03_02_54_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_508ab516a3-3559256b95-278484125 #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557724304867037184 Retweet on Twitter 1557724304867037184 Like on Twitter 1557724304867037184 Twitter 1557724304867037184
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.