Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

The United Battleground States of America?

June 1, 2010 By pamwilmot

The United Battleground States of America?

National Popular Vote, H. 4156, is being debated in the Massachusets House of Representatives tomorrow, Wednesday (in fact, it may well be today when you read this).  National Popular Vote is a big priority for Common Cause and we have a strong coalition supporting it here in Massachusetts, including MassVOTE, MASSPIRG, NAACP, ACLU Massachusetts, JALSA, Oiste, Sierra Club, and the Black Political Task Force. We think the proposal will increase participation in elections and increase small “d” democracy — as in one person one vote, every vote equal, and the candidate with the most votes should win.  How radical!

I will update you after the vote, but kudos to Speaker DeLeo, who has been a steady supporter,  for brining it up, Election Laws Committee Chair Mike Moran who worked very hard to get everything ready for tomorrow’s debate, and sponsors Charley Murphy and Garrett Bradley (and 70 others), both of who worked like crazy last year when the issue was first debated.

If you support this proposal, please call your state representative or click here to send an e-mail message.

More on the flip.

Here in Massachusetts, a poll taken just last week showed 72% support among likely voters — 86% among registered Democrats, 68% among unenrolleds, and 54% among Republicans.

Although Natioanl Popular Vote doesn’t necessarily help one party or the other, the Republicans in Massachusetts are strangely exercised about it.  In other states, the proposal has been winning 30-40% support in the Republican caucus, but I will be surprised if we get a single Republican vote here.  (Here’s a copy of last session’s roll call in the House — it passed in the Senate, as well, and the only reason it’s not law is the clock ran out before a final procedural vote on the last day of the session though Republican threats of a filibuster helped, too.)

Yet, as the 2000 and 2004 elections demonstrate, this is really not a partisan issue. While few can forget that Bush won the election after loosing by half a million votes in 2000, they fail to appreciate that Kerry came very close to winning in 2004 with a more considerable 3.5 million vote deficit. In fact, we’ve narrowly missed the ‘wrong winner’ in 5 of the last 12 elections. Because you can’t split electors into fractions, the congressional district solution, or proporational allocation by state, yeilds the same bad result. Additionally, many gerrymandered districts are solidly safe and you would see the same lackadaisical contest you see in ‘safe’ states today.

Katherine Harris is another reason to support National Popular Vote — when an election rides on a few hundered votes (or a few thousand, which as is more frequently the case) there is a tremendous incentive to play with the rules, or commit fraud, in order to alter the result.

Think of it this way — with the Electoral College, a margin of, say, 500 votes can result in 27 electoral votes in Florida, and about 10% of the total needed to win. Under a popular vote, 500 votes is exactly that — 500 votes and less than 0.0005% of the votes needed to win. Not even a drop in the bucket. And certainly not worth the risks.

But the real reason to support National Popular Vote is the bizarre way the system affects campaigning and governing.  Candidates really only bother with the battleground states. Activists at Blue Mass  and elsewhere didn’t call voters in state to persuade them to vote for Obama — they called folks in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Virginia, or went up to New Hampshire.  Obama and McCain spent 98% of their ad money in just 15 states. States that 65% of us don’t live in. Even now, the vast majority of Obama’s travel is to swing states.  

President Bush’s press secretary, Ari Fleisher, recently defended Obama’s travel schedule in the Washington Post saying “If people don’t like it, they can move from a safe state to a swing state and see their President more.” How crazy is that?   Voters in Massachusetts should see their President just as frequently as the voters in swing states. National Popular Vote would make it so that each voter, regardless of where he or she lives, will be considered equally valuable at the height of Presidential campaign season — and after.

But there’s more at stake than whether or not Obama pays us a visit every now and again. According to a recent study by BU professor Andrew Reeves, “… a highly competitive state can expect to receive twice as many Presidential disaster declarations than an uncompetitive state, holding all else constant including the damage caused by the disaster…I find that these decisions have the intended electoral benefits — voters react and reward Presidents for Presidential disaster declarations. A President can expect a 1.7% increase in a statewide contest in return for a single Presidential disaster declaration.”

It is easy to think of far-fetched scenarios in an attempt to discredit this proposal, but there are good answers to all of them, not to mention most of these are possible — if not to a worse extent — under the current system.

One common objection is that Massachusetts would cast its electoral votes for the national popular vote winner instead of the winner in our state.  Yes, that’s not only true but it’s precisely the point of the whole thing.  One country, voting together, everyone on an equal footing.  The Electoral College stays in place, but as a rubber stamp for the popular vote in all 50 states. And we will still have bragging rights if our state goes the other way.  But we will also be relevant, and our voters will be courted, driven to the polls, and we will benefit from all the other trappings of a real campaign.  We’ll have candidate visits, rallies, and those pesky ads (yeah, I know not necessarily a plus, except for the local broadcasters).  And no more driving to New Hampshire for politicking except during primary season.We will also see our Presidents more once they’re in office.  Our concerns will matter more. And hopefully, more people will realize that all elections — from the top all the way down — really do matter.

Thanks for discussing this issue.  As you can tell, I think it’s really important.  Please call your state representative and ask him or her to pass this critical reform. And I’ll be back with an update later.  

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: common-cause, electoral-college, national-popular-vote, npv

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.