Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Lessons from the “Enlightened Eight”: Republicans Can Vote Pro-Environment and Not Get “Tea Partied

July 14, 2010 By heather-taylormiesle-nrdc-action-fund

On June 26, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives voted 219-212 in favor of HR 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES). Only eight Republicans – we'll call them the “Enlightened Eight” – voted “aye.” These Republicans were Mary Bono-Mack (CA-45), Mike Castle (DE-AL), John McHugh (NY-23), Frank LoBiondo (NJ-2), Leonard Lance (NJ-7), Mark Kirk (IL-10), Dave Reichert (WA-8), and Christopher Smith (NJ-4).

Republicans voting for cap and trade in the year of the Tea Party? You'd think that they'd be dumped in the harbor by now. Instead, they're all doing fine. In fact, to date, not a single one of these Republicans has been successfully primaried by the “tea party” (or otherwise). Instead, we have two – Castle and Kirk – running for U.S. Senate, one (McHugh) who was appointed Secretary of the Army by President Obama, and five others – Bono-Mack, LoBiondo, Lance, Reichert, Smith – running for reelection.

Rep. Lance actually was challenged by not one, not two, but three “Tea Party” candidates. One of Lance's opponents, David Larsen, even produced this nifty video, helpfully explaining that “Leonard Lance Loves Cap & Trade Taxes.” So, did this work? Did the Tea Partiers overthrow the tyrannical, crypto-liberal Lance? Uh, no. Instead, in the end, Lance received 56% of the vote, easily moving on to November.

Meanwhile, 100 miles or so south on the Jersey Turnpike, Rep. LoBiondo faced two “Tea Party” candidates – Donna Ward and Linda Biamonte – who also attacked on the cap-and-trade issue. According to Biamonte, cap and trade “is insidious and another tax policy… a funneling of money to Goldman Sachs and Al Gore through derivatives creating a carbon bubble like the housing bubble.” You'd think that Republican primary voters in the year of the Tea Party would agree with this line of attack. Yet LoBiondo won with 75% of the vote.

Last but not least in New Jersey, Christopher Smith easily turned back a Tea Party challenger – Alan Bateman – by a more than 2:1 margin. Bateman had argued that “Obama knows he can count on Smith to support the United Nations' agenda to redistribute American wealth to foreign countries through international Cap & Trade agreements and other programs that threaten our sovereignty.” Apparently, Republican voters in NJ-4 didn't buy that argument.

Across the country in California's 45th District, Mary Bono-Mack won 71% of the vote over Tea Party candidate Clayton Thibodeau on June 8. This, despite Thibodeau attacking Bono-Mack as “the only Republican west of the Mississippi to vote for Cap and Trade.” Thibodeau also called cap and trade “frightening,” claiming that government could force you to renovate your home or meet requirements before you purchase a home. Thibodeau's scare tactics on cap-and-trade clearly didn't play in CA-45.

Finally, in Washington's 8th Congressional District, incumbent Rep. Dave Reichert has drawn a Tea Party challenger named Ernest Huber, who writes that Cap and Trade “is widely viewed as an attempt at Soviet-style dictatorship using the environmental scam of global warming/climate change… written by the communist Apollo Alliance, which was led by the communist Van Jones, Obama's green jobs czar.” We'll see how this argument plays with voters in Washington's 8th Congressional District, but something tells us it's not going to go over any better than in the New Jersey or California primaries.

In sum, it appears that it's quite possible for Republicans to vote for comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation and live (politically) to tell about it. The proof is in the primaries.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: cap-and-trade, clean-energy, climate-bill, climate-change, congress, nrdc-action-fund, politics-news, primaries, tea-party

Comments

  1. jconway says

    July 14, 2010 at 4:06 pm

    First off I am quite happy the NRDC is willing to work across the spectrum to defend the environment. There are a lot of moderate and even conservative Republicans (Roscoe Bartlett and Mary Bono-Mack do spring to mind) that care about the environment and are willing to protect it. Secondly it is good news to hear that the environment, particularly defending it from climate change, has become a bipartisan value. That said I do find this quote telling:

    <

    p>

    it appears that it’s quite possible for Republicans to vote for comprehensive, clean energy and climate legislation and live (politically) to tell about it.

    <

    p>But they only live to tell about it when they come from moderate districts to begin with. It is fitting that these are all blue state Republicans, even the more right wing among them. The Tea Party is politically savvy in that it has recognized it has failed to turn blue state Republicans into more right wing fanatics (look at the NY-23 special election), but they have successfully targeted red state Republicans and made them more conservative (Bennet for example), so one hopes that your organization can find innovative ways to reach out to more traditional conservatives in more traditionally conservative areas to ensure that the message truly becomes bipartisan across the political spectrum. It was a conservative, Edmund Burke, who argued that the point of government was “to keep its constitutional promise to pass on the building to future generations”, and we cannot pass on this very government and society to future generations if they very planet it occupies is in mortal danger.  

    • stomv says

      July 14, 2010 at 6:30 pm

      one hopes that your organization can find innovative ways to reach out to more traditional conservatives in more traditionally conservative areas to ensure that the message truly becomes bipartisan across the political spectrum.

      <

      p>This has been the Republican strategy since 2008.  Demand that Dems chase them with giveaways on the proposals in the name of bi-partisanship, and then maybe (but often not) vote for it anyway.

      <

      p>I say don’t waste your time.  Get the easiest votes necessary to get the bill passed; don’t waste your time with people who use Al Gore as a pejorative.  Legislating doesn’t require unanimity, bi-partisanship, or feel good.  Just get the damn votes from whomever you can and move on.

      • jconway says

        July 15, 2010 at 10:29 am

        While I agree in the short term this is a good strategy in the long run it is not. The Democrats will not always be in power, despite our best efforts, and it does make sense to make the environmentalist movement a much broader coalition that can survive administration changes. This means targeting the Republican grassroots-particularly the religious right. While we might disagree with them fundamentally on a host of issues a new generation of evangelical leaders are as passionate about conservation and saving the environment as any tree hugger. In fact since they feel the environment is a sanctified manifestation of the Lord’s good graces they might be even more committed to the cause. It is they that can change their party and force it from the grip of big business into the loving embraces of sound policy. No it won’t happen overnight, but the NRDC has to be willing to find these allies and target them now, so when they run the GOP in the next generation they might be more willing to vote on the environment. Roscoe Bartlett is as regressive as they come on national security, women’s rights, minority rights, gay rights, the economy, healthcare, etc. but he is a passionate environmentalist mostly due to his religious beliefs. There will be many others like him in the years to come. Hopefully the next Republican administration will not leave the EPA in the dark for 8 years.  

  2. historian says

    July 14, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    To what extent do those Republicans who refuse to back cuts in greenhouse gas emissions take this stance because they believe there is not problem, and to what extent do they refuse to take a stance because of political fears?

    • topper says

      July 14, 2010 at 5:35 pm

      I think the Republicans see the writing on the wall come the November elections and will position “cap and trade” as more “tax and spend.”  And they will play off widely-publicized concerns about the pseudo science of global warming.  The VP’s recent massage foray doesn’t help the public perception either despite attempts to minimize the fallout.  You can also forget about any Republican and quite a few Dems in coal and other energy dependent states.

  3. johnd says

    July 14, 2010 at 4:25 pm

    And on the other side of the aisle we have this from the Boston Globe…

    <

    p>

    MANCHESTER, N.H. – Democratic candidates in key states are embracing gun owners’ rights, winning favor from the National Rifle Association, a lobby that has long been the target of disdain from the party faithful.

    In key contests, Democrats championing gun rights
    Party’s stance softened over 3 elections
    In New Hampshire, Representative Paul Hodes, a Democratic Senate candidate, has an “A minus” NRA rating, potentially insulating him from progun rights attacks in a state that’s big on hunting and personal liberties.

    Senate majority leader Harry Reid, in a bruising campaign for reelection in Nevada, has conservative activists buzzing because the NRA is considering endorsing his reelection.

    Indiana’s Democratic Senate candidate Brad Ellsworth, who has an “A” rating from the NRA, may get the group’s endorsement this fall over GOP candidate Dan Coats, whom the NRA criticized in mailings to Hoosiers as being weak on gun rights.

    <

    p>NRA PAC contributions to Federal candidates…

    <

    p>Democrats – $148,450
    Republicans – $344,350

    <

    p>So we have a little ying and then a little yang!

    • stomv says

      July 14, 2010 at 6:31 pm

      started counting broader liberal/conservative votes in their scoring system to turn the screws on Democrats.  They did it with one SCOTUS pick, and they’ve suggested they’ll do it with another, despite there being virtually no evidence of a threat to the 2nd amendment.

      • jconway says

        July 15, 2010 at 10:30 am

        Possibly by the environmentalist movement.  

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

lalexgreen Alex Green @lalexgreen ·
36m

Folks love the imaginary Hollywood spectacle of a courtroom battle over legal rights, but @maura_healey and @AndreaForAG 's best move is to negotiate and settle a lawsuit to free disabled people from nursing homes. My latest in @CommonWealthMag #mapoli
https://commonwealthmagazine.org/opinion/healey-should-settle-not-litigate-disability-lawsuit/

Reply on Twitter 1619753327558000640 Retweet on Twitter 1619753327558000640 Like on Twitter 1619753327558000640 Twitter 1619753327558000640
rachelmiselman Rachel Miselman @rachelmiselman ·
37m

Here @WeThePeople_MA is defending the Boston police. Wait a few hours/days to see her do an about-face on this issue. It all hinges on whatever position is getting the most applause, on social media. #bospoli #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1619752962410311681 Retweet on Twitter 1619752962410311681 Like on Twitter 1619752962410311681 Twitter 1619752962410311681
notoriousvog Notorious VOG @notoriousvog ·
44m

Also UNIONS shouldn’t have influence over #PublicSafety. Any meaningful #PoliceReform MUST include set of CORE responsibilities & requirement which AREN’T subject so-called COLLECTIVE BARGAINING. Cops AREN’T cleaning ladies, they hold life & death in their hands. #BOSpoli #MApoli

Notorious VOG @NotoriousVOG

Accreditation MUST be required for PROFESSIONAL law enforcement. Every individual police officer SHOULD be required to be licensed and unable to do police work w/o such license and accreditation. Police are given too much authority and too little responsibility. #BOSpoli #MApoli

Reply on Twitter 1619751397896982539 Retweet on Twitter 1619751397896982539 Like on Twitter 1619751397896982539 2 Twitter 1619751397896982539
attychamp Linda Champion, Esq. 🔥🥰🤩 comments are my own @attychamp ·
58m

today @3 pm, The Blanc. @MassCSW we care about women/girls Commis. @CivilTamisha and I will be there to support local women/vendors helping others set their intentions, creating a 2023 vision #mapoli @TownofCantonMA @StoughtonPatch @PlymouthPatch @wbz @deskon7 @NECN #LunarNewYear

Reply on Twitter 1619747886857846786 Retweet on Twitter 1619747886857846786 Like on Twitter 1619747886857846786 Twitter 1619747886857846786
b87fm Boston 87.7 FM @b87fm ·
1h

👁‍🗨Real
URBAN
Talk🎙🔥

Wake Up WOKE » FOLLOW @NotoriousVOG In The Morning M-F 7-11a, Urban Talk, News, Politics & More 📞 (617) 440-8777.

📻 87.7fm | 📲 http://B87fm.com/player
http://tun.in/sfxnB

#NITM☕
#UrbanAgenda
#BOSpoli #MApoli

Notorious VOG @NotoriousVOG

@Livinthetruth1 That sounds good. But, trust me, in a city and state where @massdems Black & white electeds practice herd endorsement simply to take the vote out of hands of #Black & #brown voters. All your comfort-food for white consumption goes out the window.

#UrbanAgenda
#BOSpoli #MApoli https://twitter.com/Livinthetruth1/status/1619545416932147201

Reply on Twitter 1619741032811302913 Retweet on Twitter 1619741032811302913 Like on Twitter 1619741032811302913 Twitter 1619741032811302913
mattcorridoni Matt Corridoni @mattcorridoni ·
2h

“As one of 435 members of Congress it’s really hard to stand out, let alone make national news. He [@JakeAuch] pulled it off…” - @GrayMediaGroup #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1619738403846881280 Retweet on Twitter 1619738403846881280 Like on Twitter 1619738403846881280 1 Twitter 1619738403846881280
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.