Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Hey, Boston special election tomorrow!

November 15, 2010 By cos 12 Comments

The election to replace Boston City Councilor John Tobin (who left earlier this year to take a job at Northeastern) is tomorrow, Tuesday November 16th.

Matt O’Malley, who won the preliminary with 53%, is facing Jim Hennigan, who came in second.  O’Malley has run for council a couple of times recently; Hennigan’s sister Maura was a city councilor (and ran for Mayor).

The district covers the western portion of Boston starting at Mission Hill, through JP and part of Roslindale, through West Roxbury (the blue area on this map [PDF]).

Any thoughts on these candidates, or the makeup of the city council and what effects this election might have on it?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: boston, jamaica-plain, jim-hennigan, john-tobin, matt-omalley, mission-hill, roslindale, west-roxbury

Comments

  1. mike_cote says

    November 15, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    I am biased of course, because the second I heard that John Tobin was retiring, I was encouraging Matt to run.

    <

    p>I first met Matt O’Malley during the 2003 campaign, and it was because of Matt that when he became the campaign manager for Sheriff Cabral in 2004, that I did volunteer work for my first campaign ever. He was excellent on the issues then and is still excellent today. His work with the Sheriff’s office has exposed him to many issues around the poor, including recidivism and his work with MassEquality has made him a vocal advocate for equality.

    <

    p>The supporters of his campaign are from all over Boston (in my case Dorchester) and I believe Matt will do well in representing both the interests of District 6 specifically and the city of Boston overall.

    Log in to Reply
  2. christopher says

    November 15, 2010 at 7:37 pm

    I have been doing a bit of volunteering for him and wholeheartedly support him.

    Log in to Reply
  3. af says

    November 16, 2010 at 12:39 am

    when the other elections were held a couple of weeks ago? The polling sites were set up and staffed. Detail police were in place. Now, it has to be set up all over again, wasting valuable time and money. Is there some statute that prevents a local race running at the same time as the state and federal one?

    Log in to Reply
    • cos says

      November 16, 2010 at 11:07 am

      I remember reading somewhere that the city looked into it and concluded it wouldn’t actually save money, because the expense of trying to get ready to hold this election on Nov 2 would outweigh the savings.  But now I can’t find a link.

      Log in to Reply
      • kosta says

        November 16, 2010 at 12:41 pm

        Log in to Reply
        • cos says

          November 16, 2010 at 6:50 pm

          Until the results of the preliminary election were in, they wouldn’t know who the candidates were.  And in this case, by the time the preliminary happened, not only were ballots printed and voter guides mailed out and voting machines probably already programmed, but absentee voting had already started.  So they certainly couldn’t have just moved the final to November 2nd.  They would’ve had to move the preliminary back by a pretty significant amount for it to make any sense.

          <

          p>Now, I don’t know whether that would’ve been practical or sensible to do, with enough advance planning.  I’m not sure what the right date for a preliminary should’ve been, to make it practical to combine the final with the national election.  And I don’t know whether that date would’ve made sense given when the seat became open, and the various deadlines associated with that: signature collection, filing deadlines, ballot printing, etc.  Maybe they could’ve done it all early enough to have made the preliminary happen a month earlier, or something.

          <

          p>But “that makes absolutely no sense at all” is definitely not true.  It may be mistaken in this instance, but it certainly makes sense in theory.

          Log in to Reply
    • tom-m says

      November 16, 2010 at 11:22 am

      If one candidate already received 53% in a five-person preliminary election, there shouldn’t need to be another election four weeks later.  Seems like a poor use of resources.

      <

      p>(FWIW- I don’t live in Boston and I don’t have a horse in this race.)

      Log in to Reply
      • howardjp says

        November 16, 2010 at 2:48 pm

        Has nothing to do with the candidates in this race, but the dynamic often shifts from one election to the next.  As the Globe pointed out in their article on the race the other day, John Tobin’s vote went from 800 down to 1100 up, I believe. Similarly, when Brian Honan ran in Brighton the first time, he finished well behind Jerry McDermott, only to overtake him in the final.  Many similar examples exist.  Often in Boston, progressives tend to vote more in the final election than the preliminary, and the numbers change drastically.  Though other times the numbers drop when the out of the running candidates are eliminated (’93 Mayor’s race, which was close in the preliminary, not close in the final).

        <

        p>There are other dynamics at play, endorsing organizations from Ward and Town Committees to newspapers to labor may wait until after the field is narrowed (“we like a couple of these candidates and we’ll see who makes the final”).  There may be more focus on the “frontrunners” positions, or their lack thereof.

        <

        p>As another example, what happens if one candidate gets 51%, one 48% and the third, 1%, is the preliminary winner crowned? Maybe if the winner got a “supermajority”, that would do it, but generally, let’s let democracy run its course, IMO.

        <

        p>The real interesting aspect of this election though is the question of what this district will look like in three years, post-redistricting, given the changing demographics of the city.  

        Log in to Reply
        • christopher says

          November 16, 2010 at 3:11 pm

          It’s certainly OK to have rules that say majority wins on first round with runoff if no majority.

          Log in to Reply
        • tom-m says

          November 16, 2010 at 5:09 pm

          There were five candidates and the combined vote totals of four of those candidates still lost to the 5th candidate by 6 percentage points.  In most places, you hold a preliminary election to weed out candidates, unless someone wins an outright majority.  I just don’t see why he’d need to have to win another majority a second time around.

          <

          p>I don’t know all the specifics of the races you cite- did any of those candidates win a majority in the preliminary election only to lose in the final?  That just doesn’t seem right.  50%+1 should be the threshold in either election.

          Log in to Reply
          • howardjp says

            November 17, 2010 at 9:39 pm

            But the 17 point fluctuation in the Rush-Tobin race 46-37 Rush to 54-46 Tobin is strong evidence of the difference between preliminary and final elections. Likewise the Brighton elections over the years (McLaughlin-Izzo; McLaughlin-Bracken, the aforementioned Honan-McDermott) were all subject to major fluctuations with the more “progressive” candidate often finishing 2nd in the prelim and winning the final.

            <

            p>All I’m saying is be careful of what you wish for ..

            Log in to Reply
  4. hrs-kevin says

    November 16, 2010 at 9:45 am

    I just voted (for O’Malley) and unsurprisingly hardly anyone has shown up to vote, just 33 in my precinct so far. I really don’t understand why they couldn’t schedule the special election to go on the regular primary and election days. If I didn’t drive by the polling place on a regular basis, I might have forgotten all about it even with the steady flow of campaign mailers.

    <

    p>I actually think that either Hennigan or O’Malley would make a good councilor for the district, but O’Malley has more directly relevant experience and clearly has wanted the job for longer.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (2)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 1 Comment

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI appreciate you writing this diary. This primary seems…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingKLEPTOCRAT GRIFTERINO is not the VICTIM; he's the PERPET…
  • Christopher on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingRepublicans: How dare Merrick Garland politicize the DOJ…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingThe Court has just given Trump until 3 pm tomorrow to ap…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingAG Garland just announced the search warrant has been un…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingI would not be surprised at all to learn that Trump deli…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
1h

Man sentenced to prison for role in Massachusetts drug trafficking organization run in public … https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/14/man-sentenced-to-prison-for-role-in-massachusetts-drug-trafficking-organization-run-in-public/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1558690386695966721 Retweet on Twitter 1558690386695966721 Like on Twitter 1558690386695966721 Twitter 1558690386695966721
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
2h

State Senator talks about new gambling law in Mass. | Sports | http://eagletribune.com https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/14/state-senator-talks-about-new-gambling-law-in-mass-sports-eagletribune-com/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1558677805608579074 Retweet on Twitter 1558677805608579074 Like on Twitter 1558677805608579074 Twitter 1558677805608579074
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3h

The Column: Signs of the times? – Lowell Sun https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/14/the-column-signs-of-the-times-lowell-sun/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1558673528496332803 Retweet on Twitter 1558673528496332803 Like on Twitter 1558673528496332803 Twitter 1558673528496332803
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
3h

Arizona Speaker of the House Republican Rusty Bowers on Trumpism:

"The rule by thuggery and intimidation. They found a niche, they found a way, and it's fear. People can use fear, demagogues like to use fear as a weapon. And they weaponize everything."

#mapoli #nhpolitics

Aaron Rupar @atrupar

Rusty Bowers on Trumpism: "The rule by thuggery and intimidation. They found a niche, they found a way, and it's fear. People can use fear, demagogues like to use fear as a weapon. And they weaponize everything."

Reply on Twitter 1558672251893022720 Retweet on Twitter 1558672251893022720 Like on Twitter 1558672251893022720 1 Twitter 1558672251893022720
stevenl57 Steve Leibowitz @stevenl57 ·
3h

So there was a tweet from Senator Warren that the #MBTA mess is on the Governor. She's not wrong, but it is incomplete. You can debate the pie slice, but you cannot exclude the Legislature on this, where the culture of kicking cans down the road, prevails. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1558670098029846530 Retweet on Twitter 1558670098029846530 Like on Twitter 1558670098029846530 Twitter 1558670098029846530
lowellcouncilor Darius Mitchell_ Massachusetts Governor 2022 🇺🇸 @lowellcouncilor ·
3h

JOE BIDEN, KAMALA HARRIS, THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS HAS SHOWN ZERO PASSION OR EMOTIONAL CONNECTION FOR BLACK AMERICA 🇺🇸! IT’S OLD! THEY ARE OLD!!

THE PARTY OF SLAVERY! THAT’S WHAT WE ARE WITNESSING!

#MAPOLI #BOSPOLI #NHPOLITICS

Reply on Twitter 1558662516443680769 Retweet on Twitter 1558662516443680769 1 Like on Twitter 1558662516443680769 2 Twitter 1558662516443680769
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.