Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Hey, Boston special election tomorrow!

November 15, 2010 By cos

The election to replace Boston City Councilor John Tobin (who left earlier this year to take a job at Northeastern) is tomorrow, Tuesday November 16th.

Matt O’Malley, who won the preliminary with 53%, is facing Jim Hennigan, who came in second.  O’Malley has run for council a couple of times recently; Hennigan’s sister Maura was a city councilor (and ran for Mayor).

The district covers the western portion of Boston starting at Mission Hill, through JP and part of Roslindale, through West Roxbury (the blue area on this map [PDF]).

Any thoughts on these candidates, or the makeup of the city council and what effects this election might have on it?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: boston, jamaica-plain, jim-hennigan, john-tobin, matt-omalley, mission-hill, roslindale, west-roxbury

Comments

  1. mike_cote says

    November 15, 2010 at 6:21 pm

    I am biased of course, because the second I heard that John Tobin was retiring, I was encouraging Matt to run.

    <

    p>I first met Matt O’Malley during the 2003 campaign, and it was because of Matt that when he became the campaign manager for Sheriff Cabral in 2004, that I did volunteer work for my first campaign ever. He was excellent on the issues then and is still excellent today. His work with the Sheriff’s office has exposed him to many issues around the poor, including recidivism and his work with MassEquality has made him a vocal advocate for equality.

    <

    p>The supporters of his campaign are from all over Boston (in my case Dorchester) and I believe Matt will do well in representing both the interests of District 6 specifically and the city of Boston overall.

  2. christopher says

    November 15, 2010 at 7:37 pm

    I have been doing a bit of volunteering for him and wholeheartedly support him.

  3. af says

    November 16, 2010 at 12:39 am

    when the other elections were held a couple of weeks ago? The polling sites were set up and staffed. Detail police were in place. Now, it has to be set up all over again, wasting valuable time and money. Is there some statute that prevents a local race running at the same time as the state and federal one?

    • cos says

      November 16, 2010 at 11:07 am

      I remember reading somewhere that the city looked into it and concluded it wouldn’t actually save money, because the expense of trying to get ready to hold this election on Nov 2 would outweigh the savings.  But now I can’t find a link.

      • kosta says

        November 16, 2010 at 12:41 pm

        • cos says

          November 16, 2010 at 6:50 pm

          Until the results of the preliminary election were in, they wouldn’t know who the candidates were.  And in this case, by the time the preliminary happened, not only were ballots printed and voter guides mailed out and voting machines probably already programmed, but absentee voting had already started.  So they certainly couldn’t have just moved the final to November 2nd.  They would’ve had to move the preliminary back by a pretty significant amount for it to make any sense.

          <

          p>Now, I don’t know whether that would’ve been practical or sensible to do, with enough advance planning.  I’m not sure what the right date for a preliminary should’ve been, to make it practical to combine the final with the national election.  And I don’t know whether that date would’ve made sense given when the seat became open, and the various deadlines associated with that: signature collection, filing deadlines, ballot printing, etc.  Maybe they could’ve done it all early enough to have made the preliminary happen a month earlier, or something.

          <

          p>But “that makes absolutely no sense at all” is definitely not true.  It may be mistaken in this instance, but it certainly makes sense in theory.

    • tom-m says

      November 16, 2010 at 11:22 am

      If one candidate already received 53% in a five-person preliminary election, there shouldn’t need to be another election four weeks later.  Seems like a poor use of resources.

      <

      p>(FWIW- I don’t live in Boston and I don’t have a horse in this race.)

      • howardjp says

        November 16, 2010 at 2:48 pm

        Has nothing to do with the candidates in this race, but the dynamic often shifts from one election to the next.  As the Globe pointed out in their article on the race the other day, John Tobin’s vote went from 800 down to 1100 up, I believe. Similarly, when Brian Honan ran in Brighton the first time, he finished well behind Jerry McDermott, only to overtake him in the final.  Many similar examples exist.  Often in Boston, progressives tend to vote more in the final election than the preliminary, and the numbers change drastically.  Though other times the numbers drop when the out of the running candidates are eliminated (’93 Mayor’s race, which was close in the preliminary, not close in the final).

        <

        p>There are other dynamics at play, endorsing organizations from Ward and Town Committees to newspapers to labor may wait until after the field is narrowed (“we like a couple of these candidates and we’ll see who makes the final”).  There may be more focus on the “frontrunners” positions, or their lack thereof.

        <

        p>As another example, what happens if one candidate gets 51%, one 48% and the third, 1%, is the preliminary winner crowned? Maybe if the winner got a “supermajority”, that would do it, but generally, let’s let democracy run its course, IMO.

        <

        p>The real interesting aspect of this election though is the question of what this district will look like in three years, post-redistricting, given the changing demographics of the city.  

        • christopher says

          November 16, 2010 at 3:11 pm

          It’s certainly OK to have rules that say majority wins on first round with runoff if no majority.

        • tom-m says

          November 16, 2010 at 5:09 pm

          There were five candidates and the combined vote totals of four of those candidates still lost to the 5th candidate by 6 percentage points.  In most places, you hold a preliminary election to weed out candidates, unless someone wins an outright majority.  I just don’t see why he’d need to have to win another majority a second time around.

          <

          p>I don’t know all the specifics of the races you cite- did any of those candidates win a majority in the preliminary election only to lose in the final?  That just doesn’t seem right.  50%+1 should be the threshold in either election.

          • howardjp says

            November 17, 2010 at 9:39 pm

            But the 17 point fluctuation in the Rush-Tobin race 46-37 Rush to 54-46 Tobin is strong evidence of the difference between preliminary and final elections. Likewise the Brighton elections over the years (McLaughlin-Izzo; McLaughlin-Bracken, the aforementioned Honan-McDermott) were all subject to major fluctuations with the more “progressive” candidate often finishing 2nd in the prelim and winning the final.

            <

            p>All I’m saying is be careful of what you wish for ..

  4. hrs-kevin says

    November 16, 2010 at 9:45 am

    I just voted (for O’Malley) and unsurprisingly hardly anyone has shown up to vote, just 33 in my precinct so far. I really don’t understand why they couldn’t schedule the special election to go on the regular primary and election days. If I didn’t drive by the polling place on a regular basis, I might have forgotten all about it even with the steady flow of campaign mailers.

    <

    p>I actually think that either Hennigan or O’Malley would make a good councilor for the district, but O’Malley has more directly relevant experience and clearly has wanted the job for longer.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

andreadoremus #WomanLifeFreedom🌻🌻A.Doremus #AbortionAccess4All @andreadoremus ·
28m

#boston #bospoli #mapoli #ReImagineCommunity #PainIntoHealing #decarceration #right_to_health #FreeHer @justicehealing @CourtWatchMA @MassBailFund #NoNewWomensPrison

Citizens for Juvenile Justice @cfjjma

Join JDAI’s S2PP Working Group to Disrupt & Eliminate the School-to-Prison Pipeline on March 29th 3-6pm on Zoom to hear from people with lived experiences and experts in education and youth justice.

Registere here: https://buff.ly/3xolDA8

Reply on Twitter 1640018334900011008 Retweet on Twitter 1640018334900011008 Like on Twitter 1640018334900011008 Twitter 1640018334900011008
andreadoremus #WomanLifeFreedom🌻🌻A.Doremus #AbortionAccess4All @andreadoremus ·
30m

#mapoli #Boston #bospoli

Citizens for Juvenile Justice @cfjjma

🚨New Session Action Alert 🚨

Contact your state legislators today to co-sponsor key youth justice bills.

See more information on this session's key youth justice bills at https://conta.cc/3X7sSqC.

Reply on Twitter 1640017932460670976 Retweet on Twitter 1640017932460670976 Like on Twitter 1640017932460670976 Twitter 1640017932460670976
poeboston Dan Currie @poeboston ·
36m

Landlords rarely hike the rent by 10 percent. So why do they hate @MayorWu’s cap proposal? https://www.bostonglobe.com/2023/03/25/business/landlords-rarely-hike-rent-by-10-percent-so-why-do-they-hate-mayor-wus-cap-proposal/?event=event25 via @BostonGlobe > #bospoli #mapoli #inequality #realestate #development #displacement #affordablehousing #rentcontrol #paytoplay @BostonNeighbor

Reply on Twitter 1640016464638885888 Retweet on Twitter 1640016464638885888 Like on Twitter 1640016464638885888 Twitter 1640016464638885888
openletterbot Open Letters @openletterbot ·
44m

🖋 Sign Say NO to the TikTok Ban! and I'll deliver a copy to your officials: https://twitter.com/messages/compose?recipient_id=835740314006511618&text=sign%20PEIJMN 📨 No. 50 is from Thamar to @RepKClark, @SenMarkey and @SenWarren #MA5 #MApoli #MApols

Reply on Twitter 1640014272356061185 Retweet on Twitter 1640014272356061185 Like on Twitter 1640014272356061185 Twitter 1640014272356061185
jimaloisi Jim Aloisi on Mastodon as: jaloisi@better.boston @jimaloisi ·
1h

Leadership Lacking from #mapoli T Board - Banker & Tradesman https://bankerandtradesman.com/leadership-lacking-from-t-board/

Reply on Twitter 1640008037451829249 Retweet on Twitter 1640008037451829249 Like on Twitter 1640008037451829249 1 Twitter 1640008037451829249
progressivemass Progressive Mass @progressivemass ·
1h

Where are you going to be this upcoming Wednesday? That's right: joining us for a roundtable on why the @CommonStartMA bill will be transformative for parents in MA. See you there! #mapoli #MARunsOnChildcare

Sign up at https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZwpce-orjkoEtfpNYy9fXw99r72x9PRAh3v

Reply on Twitter 1640005868371468290 Retweet on Twitter 1640005868371468290 2 Like on Twitter 1640005868371468290 1 Twitter 1640005868371468290
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.