Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Why Can’t Conservatives Be Honest About Keystone?

January 24, 2012 By steven-j-gulitti

It has been quite amusing to read over some comments posted recently that tried to portray Barack Obama as being opposed to building the Keystone Pipeline when the reality is that the president isn’t opposed to the project at all, he’s just opposed to being railroaded into a hasty decision by Republican political maneuvering. Let’s take a look at what Obama actually said: “This announcement is not a judgment on the merits of the pipeline, but the arbitrary nature of a deadline that prevented the State Department from gathering the information necessary to approve the project and protect the American people…I’m disappointed that Republicans in Congress forced this decision, but it does not change my administration’s commitment to American-made energy that creates jobs and reduces our dependence on oil.” Obama Rejects Keystone Pipeline From Canada to Texas”; http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-01-18/obama-rejects-keystone-pipeline/52655762/1

Okay so where is the evidence in the words of the president that he’s fundamentally opposed to the Keystone Project? There isn’t any, as is obvious in his comments. Furthermore TransCanada’s CEO, Russ Girling has made public his decision to reapply for a permit to build the pipeline and asked that the process be expedited so as to enable a 2014 construction start. Did Barack Obama take issue with Mr. Girling’s new request, emphatically no, thus the very argument that Obama is fundamentally opposed to Keystone is rendered moot based on this fact alone. Instead what we’ve seen here is yet another crass attempt to distort the facts to fit the ongoing ideological attack of trying to portray Barack Obama as indifferent to job creation along with his being anti-business. A further look into what the article above states reinforces this: “Obama said House Republicans forced his decision by including a provision in last month’s legislation for a short-term extension to the payroll tax cut that required him to either issue a permit to allow the 1,700-mile pipeline to be built or explain why it was not in the national interest by Feb. 21. Obama said he rejected the permit application now based on the State Department’s recommendation, which concluded there wasn’t enough time to vet alternate pipeline routes…The State Department announced in November that it would explore a new route for the pipeline and pushed a final decision on the controversial project past the 2012 election.” Thus it is more than apparent that Republicans aren’t really interested in creating jobs through Keystone either and if they were they would have pushed for some sort of expedited environmental approval process rather than having insisted on an arbitrary date so soon in coming which they knew wouldn’t allow for the legally required environmental impact studies. Moreover, Republicans and their allies are inflating the number of jobs that would be created: “Business leaders and Republicans say approving the project now would create as many as 20,000 jobs for an ailing U.S. economy and lessen dependence on foreign oil.” However according to Juliet Eilperin of The Washington Post who has followed this story closely and got her information directly from Mr. Girling of TransCanada, she said of Keystone “we’re talking more in the range of 6,500 construction jobs for both the first and second year of the project. And they’ve already spent some money that would cut into the supply chain jobs. When you’re talking about those big numbers, that includes everything, kind of indirect jobs, including who’s going to be serving these construction workers’ dinners, to other things…” “Could Keystone Pipeline Plan Be Revived After Obama’s Rejection?”; http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june12/pipeline_01-18.html

What’s clear to this writer is that Capitol Hill Republicans were trying to manufacture some sort of political victory from their defeat on last month’s legislation for a short-term extension to the payroll tax cut by forcing Obama into making a decision on Keystone that they knew would mean a rejection of the pipeline. They had hoped in turn to use this decision as a political ploy but will this maneuver ultimately come back to hurt the G.O.P.? If you look further into the permitting process and the environmental due diligence involved in this project it reveals to what extent the congressional Republicans are playing politics. Commenting on the issue of redirecting the pipeline, Juliet Eilperin said: “Their argument [ The Obama Administration] is that they had been looking at an alternative route through Nebraska which has an environmentally sensitive habitat in a place called the Sandhills region. And they had asked basically TransCanada to work with Nebraska’s Department of Environmental Quality and look for a new way to do this, and had predicted that this would delay a final decision on this pipeline permit until early 2013. When the Republicans forced a decision by a deadline that was actually Feb. 21, the administration said, there’s no way we can do it. We’re not even going to go through the pretense of analyzing it, and we are rejecting this.” Moreover, there has been cause for concern in both parties at the state level over the original Keystone route: “Elected officials from both parties in Nebraska had expressed concerns a leak in the pipeline could endanger the [Ogallala] aquifer that provides much of Nebraska’s water supply.” Why even Nebraska’s Republican governor, Dave Heineman originally opposed Keystone having the same environmental concerns voiced by the president and others. With the aforementioned understood what is the real story of Keystone – the Obama administration not caring about jobs or Beltway Republican’s being more interested in playing the politics of obstruction than anything else? I think based on Obama’s comments and concerns at the state level among Nebraska’s Republican lawmakers and the governor the answer can only be the latter. Seems pretty open and shut to me.

S.J. Gulitti

1/24/12

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: congressional-republicans, Dave Heineman Barack Obama, Keystone Pipeline, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, Ogallala Aquifer, Russ Girling, TransCanada

Comments

  1. bigmike says

    January 24, 2012 at 8:38 pm

    On the day President Obama announced his so-called decision, he made it clear that this was not a decision based on the “merits” of the case (i.e. protecting the environment), and he went on to say the following: “In the months ahead, we will continue to look for new ways to partner with the oil and gas industry to increase our energy security — including the potential development of an oil pipeline from Cushing, Oklahoma to the Gulf of Mexico.”

  2. Mark L. Bail says

    January 25, 2012 at 8:09 am

    your headline by two words.

  3. steven-j-gulitti says

    January 29, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    What I don’t understand about Obama is why he hasn’t learned how to punch back and punch hard at the right. He has been letting them land punches on him for three years and he had better learn, and learn soon, how to go right back at the right when they lie about or distort what he’s about and what he’s been saying.

  4. steven-j-gulitti says

    January 29, 2012 at 6:40 pm

    Yeah I catch you drift i.e. “About Keystone?”

    • Mark L. Bail says

      January 29, 2012 at 6:57 pm

      Why can’t conservatives be honest? Is is because they believe their own lies or they don’t care as long as they get their way?

  5. centralmassdad says

    January 29, 2012 at 8:41 pm

    Gasoline is $3.50/gallon and fuel oil is near $4, and expected to go up again– maybe by a lot if things go ill with Iran– even though there hasn’t been a cold winter driving up demand, and even though the economy is sucking wind.

    Expensive energy + shitty economy = bad news for incumbent. I don’t think anyone expects Democrats to support the thing: it is an energy project, all of which are opposed by Democrats except for wind farms, and sometimes not even those. So most people will think: he is going to oppose it anyway, and is looking for a way to blame the GOP without saying “not happening” outright.

    If he doesn’t expect to oppose the thing, then he showed his ass by appearing to oppose, and will wind up pissing off Dems by not clearly opposing, and pissing off non-Dems by opposing, and will look weak and indecisive to all.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

notoriousvog Notorious VOG @notoriousvog ·
5h

The Meaning of African American Studies. The discipline emerged from Black struggle. Now the College Board wants it to be taught with barely any mention of Black Lives Matter. #UrbanAgenda #BOSpoli #MApoli
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/q-and-a/the-meaning-of-african-american-studies

Reply on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Retweet on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Like on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Twitter 1621723680685391872
notoriousvog Notorious VOG @notoriousvog ·
5h

It’s a VERY good thing I missed the @celtics game tonight. The final score looks like a VERY stressful game.🙄🤦🏾‍♂️

🔖#UrbanAgenda
#VoiceOfBlackBoston
#BOSpoli #MApoli

Reply on Twitter 1621721253340905472 Retweet on Twitter 1621721253340905472 Like on Twitter 1621721253340905472 1 Twitter 1621721253340905472
corcoranann Ann Corcoran RN MSN @corcoranann ·
5h

Those who are chronically homeless without shelter suffer from high rates of untreated severe substance use disorders & mental illness. States have a legal & ethical obligation to step in & help vulnerable people who can’t act for themselves. #MAPOLI https://theconversation.com/the-ethical-dilemmas-behind-plans-for-involuntary-treatment-to-target-homelessness-mental-illness-and-addiction-198707?fbclid=IwAR2pYO2-l7UKBci_C7st5Jhdld1u_f_hXpbQc_HCf5vnJ9D1a1QyJ199D_8

Reply on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Retweet on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Like on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Twitter 1621720926659219457
b87fm Boston 87.7 FM @b87fm ·
5h

👁‍🗨Wake🆙WOKE
& gET BlackK
w/ Boston's
UNAPOLOGETIC
Urban VOICE⤵
@NotoriousVOG

🖤WEEKDAYS
🕖7 to 11a
📲Call/Text⤵
(617) 440-8777

📻Listen 87.7FM | http://b87fm.com/player
http://bit.ly/2nilQR3

🔖#NITM☕
#UrbanAgenda
#BOSpoli #MApoli

Only BLACK-Eyed 👁‍🗨VIEW
of BOSTON👇🏾

Notorious VOG @NotoriousVOG

Although it's receiving more national than local coverage as local press is too busy covering violent Black/brown BPS kids. Still, I wonder if a Black Dorchester mom MURDERED her 3 kids, would she receive such sympathetic coverage, postpartum depression or not—doubtful! #BOSpoli

Reply on Twitter 1621719590932811776 Retweet on Twitter 1621719590932811776 Like on Twitter 1621719590932811776 Twitter 1621719590932811776
logcabingb Log Cabin Republicans of Greater Boston @logcabingb ·
5h

Transparency is out the window. #mapoli

CW Magazine @CommonWealthMag

Gov. Maura Healey said that she will not introduce legislation that would make her office subject to the Massachusetts Public Records Law. https://buff.ly/3DANOPI

Reply on Twitter 1621716112596410369 Retweet on Twitter 1621716112596410369 Like on Twitter 1621716112596410369 Twitter 1621716112596410369
our_cambridge Your Cambridge MA @our_cambridge ·
5h

-3°F #CambMA

Seriously, do you really think the living rooms of John Kerry's 180ft yacht, and Bill Gates' 175ft yacht, are a frigid 48°F tonight like your room, and they are shivering under electric blankets trying to stay warm???

#ClimateHoax #MEnews #Vermont #Mainer #MApoli

3

7News Boston WHDH @7News

Arctic blast set to bring dangerously cold temps, wind chills to New England

https://whdh.com/news/arctic-blast-set-to-bring-dangerously-cold-temps-wind-chills-to-new-england/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_7News

Reply on Twitter 1621715420720861186 Retweet on Twitter 1621715420720861186 Like on Twitter 1621715420720861186 Twitter 1621715420720861186
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.