Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Governor Patrick’s “Profiles in Courage” moment

July 24, 2012 By ACLUm blog 5 Comments

By Carol Rose, ACLU of Massachusetts executive director

Ordinary politicians become great leaders when they take a principled stand, even at the risk of political backlash—what President John F. Kennedy captured in the phrase “profiles in courage.”

Massachusetts voters got a glimpse of that kind of political leadership last week when Senator Cynthia Stone Creem (D-Newton), the Senate Chair of the Joint Committee on the Judiciary, dissented from a conference committee’s approval of a crime bill that would expand unjust and wasteful mandatory sentencing, by forcing judges to impose one-size-fits-all sentences, regardless of the facts of an individual case.

At the final conference committee meeting, Senator Creem—joined by Senator Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester)—made a bipartisan show of good sense by pressing to allow at least a little judicial sentencing discretion. It would have allowed an individual offender to be parole-eligible after serving a substantial portion of the required maximum sentence, “in the interest of justice.”

Although the conference committee ultimately scrapped that provision and settled on a bill with a one-size-fits-all sentencing structure, the two Senators who tried to bring fairness and discretion back into the bill deserve our thanks. So do the six other Senators who joined Senator Creem in voting against the bill on Thursday, July 18, when the Senate passed it 31-7.

The bill is now on the Governor’s desk.

Senator Creem and those who voted with her understand that our hugely overcrowded prisons and county facilities house hundreds of individuals serving mandatory sentences. Any new law requiring more people to serve more and longer mandatory sentences will make that worse, at a cost to Massachusetts taxpayers of almost $50,000 a year, per prisoner.

Imagine how many folks could get clean and get a job if we had $50,000 to invest in rehabilitation and job training for each person, rather than incarceration. Locking people up regardless of the specific facts of their crime isn’t justice. It’s a waste, in both human and economic terms.

Sadly, so-called “tough on crime” bills can move forward through the legislative process, with woefully insufficient attention to matters of fairness that are essential for a criminal justice system.

Now it’s Governor Deval Patrick’s turn to do the right thing.

The Governor has said that he wants positive and meaningful sentencing reform, vowing that he’ll sign only a “balanced” bill. What the legislature has given him, while arguably improved over previous versions, remains way out of balance. It would take Massachusetts in the wrong direction, locking up more people without individualized determinations of justice, at extraordinary costs to taxpayers and public safety.

It’s time for Governor Patrick to exercise his leadership at this critical moment. He should reject or propose significant improvements to this legislation, not simply sign the bill before him.

In short, it’s Governor Patrick’s “Profiles in Courage” moment.

Please urge Gov. Patrick not to accept the harsh mandatory-sentencing bill as written.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: 3 strikes, aclu, crime, deval-patrick

Comments

  1. Christopher says

    July 24, 2012 at 10:30 pm

    What SHOULD the law say? I mean, when you make a law saying x is illegal, doesn’t the legislation include enforcement either by fine of a certain range of dollar amount or a certain range of prison term? It shouldn’t be entirely up to the judge. If it’s just judge’s discretion then a defendant’s fortunes are based on which judge he gets. This seems to raise questions of equal protection.

    Log in to Reply
    • ACLUm blog says

      July 25, 2012 at 10:31 am

      You’re right that it’s the legislature’s role to provide a range of enforcement options—but not to essentially do the sentencing by requiring a mandatory maximum. That’s our concern.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Christopher says

    July 25, 2012 at 11:25 am

    I guess I figure that when a law says “imprisonment for five to ten years” then five years is a mandatory minimum for that conviction, though I don’t know how probation, parole, or suspended sentences are counted.

    Log in to Reply
  3. johnd says

    July 25, 2012 at 2:24 pm

    Imagine how many folks could get clean and get a job if we had $50,000 to invest in rehabilitation and job training for each person, rather than incarceration.

    Imagine how much money we’d save on locks and security devices if we didn’t have to worry about thieves… imagine how safe women would feel walking the streets at night if they didn’t have to worry about robbers and rapists… imagine what ever you want but the reality is we have prisons full of people who would cut your ear off to make $50 or enough to buy their next ‘fix”. We have laws and we have sentencing guidelines, even with mandatory sentences there is some discretion so stop with the hyperbole.

    Here are the MA Court Sentencing guidelines and descriptions of mandatory minimums. Here’s an example front he site…

    Illustration 15: A 17 year old defendant with no prior record has been convicted of Trafficking in Marijuana (100 to 2,000 lb.), an offense which carries a mandatory minimum sentence of incarceration of three years. It is revealed at trial that the defendant played a minor role in the criminal conduct and was suffering from a mental disorder at the time of the commission of the offense.

    In this instance because the defendant has no prior conviction for a level 7 or level 8 drug trafficking offense, the judge has the discretion, upon finding one or more mitigating factors, of departing from the mandatory minimum sentence and sentencing the defendant in accordance with the guidelines. Factors that may warrant mitigation in the above example include the defendant’s age, role, and/or mental health at the time of the offense.
    Under no circumstances, however, is the judge obligated to depart from the mandatory minimum sentence of incarceration.

    A mandatory minimum is no more than saying a crime of “X” will get 1 to 10 years sentence but in no case will it be less than 1 year. I have always felt that that was exactly what 1 – 10 years meant.

    Log in to Reply
  4. johnd says

    July 25, 2012 at 2:25 pm

    Site for sentencing…

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries (3)
  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (1)
  • Real “Center” is Economically Nationalist/Culturally Moderate (1)

Recent User Posts

Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid Primaries

August 12, 2022 By jconway 7 Comments

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 8 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Recent Comments

  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesTommy Vitolo was directly responsible for the Brookline…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThis comment exemplifies why I'm done with "Progressive…
  • Keith Bernard on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesDon't get mad at Progressive Mass because Tommy Vitolo i…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe other half of Wakefield (Precincts 4 - 6) is in the…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesThe 9th Essex district James and I share as fellow Wakef…
  • fredrichlariccia on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesYou hit the nail on the head here. Namely: Holier than T…
  • SomervilleTom on Progressive Mass Shouldn’t Back Stupid PrimariesI appreciate you writing this diary. This primary seems…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

dembinskis Jennifer Debin @dembinskis ·
39m

Shameful. The proposal brought to the board did not incorporate any input taken during the public comment period. State education board approves controversial proposal raising MCAS graduation requirements https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/15/metro/state-education-board-vote-today-raising-mcas-graduation-requirements/?event=event25 @BostonGlobe @DianeRavitch #mapoli #maedu

Reply on Twitter 1559294770907938827 Retweet on Twitter 1559294770907938827 Like on Twitter 1559294770907938827 1 Twitter 1559294770907938827
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
40m

What’s in the new Massachusetts cannabis bill? – WGBH https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/15/whats-in-the-new-massachusetts-cannabis-bill-wgbh/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1559294494737977344 Retweet on Twitter 1559294494737977344 Like on Twitter 1559294494737977344 Twitter 1559294494737977344
kevineconnor Kevin Connor @kevineconnor ·
42m

You almost have to respect the audacity of this column. #mapoli
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/15/opinion/maura-healey-odd-prosecution-dean-tran/

Reply on Twitter 1559293943371763712 Retweet on Twitter 1559293943371763712 Like on Twitter 1559293943371763712 Twitter 1559293943371763712
tanisha4ma Tanisha Sullivan, Candidate for MA Sec. of State @tanisha4ma ·
48m

If @BillGalvin4MA hadn’t BLOCKED a lawsuit in 2017 challenging the state’s requirement that eligible voters register 20 days before an election, we would have same-day voter registration today. His reason? “Paperwork.” This moment demands so much more #mapoli #democracy

Reply on Twitter 1559292453995307008 Retweet on Twitter 1559292453995307008 1 Like on Twitter 1559292453995307008 4 Twitter 1559292453995307008
votehalbert David Halbert @votehalbert ·
52m

Don't forget, tonight's the night to join us and learn how @cdempc is going to use the Auditor's role to make state government more equitable, innovative, and effective for people in every corner of the Commonwealth. See you at 7. #mapoli #bospoli

Chris Dempsey @cdempc

Join Mayor @wutrain and me this Monday, 8/15, at 7PM for a *Virtual Meet & Greet* and grassroots fundraiser. All are invited! Thank you to @votehalbert @mdmcclos @RachelPoliner @JeremyComeau and so many other amazing Co-Hosts!

#mapoli #bospoli

http://www.actblue.com/donate/081522virtualmg

Reply on Twitter 1559291605655457794 Retweet on Twitter 1559291605655457794 1 Like on Twitter 1559291605655457794 3 Twitter 1559291605655457794
mysteriousrook Ed Lyons @mysteriousrook ·
56m

Yes! Go help @CommonWealthMag continue to save #mapoli from narrative-driven politics and policy coverage. I enjoy the regular thrills and befuddlement* I get from them.

(* I sometimes think, “what the heck is that?” when they write about some policy thing I’ve never heard of.)

MassINC @MassINC

We're hiring!🚨 @CommonWealthMag is seeking an experienced journalist to join our small team where creativity and teamwork are important. See the full job description, benefits, and instructions to apply here. https://buff.ly/3cH6IGq #hiring #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1559290385549168645 Retweet on Twitter 1559290385549168645 1 Like on Twitter 1559290385549168645 1 Twitter 1559290385549168645
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.