Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

MA Senate Calls for Constitutional Amendment Reversing Citizens United

July 27, 2012 By creightt 12 Comments

After months of delay, the Massachusetts Senate, in overwhelming bipartisan vote of 35-1, for an amendment to restore democracy by overturning the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling. Attention now turns to the House as the end of the legislative session approaches.

Click here to tell your Representative to vote for the resolution. 

The 2010 Citizens United decision overturned decades-old laws restricting corporate expenditures, ruling that they violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. The decision dramatically expanded the fabricated “corporate rights” doctrine and has unleashed a flood of corporate money into federal, state, and local elections.

Senator Jamie Eldridge, lead sponsor of the bill, had this to say:

 “The Citizens United decision dramatically dilutes the voice of every American who does not control a large corporate treasury. The health of our democracy and the integrity of our political system are at stake, and I am proud of the Senate for passing this resolution today and sending a strong message that our democracy isn’t for sale.”

Cities and towns across the Commonwealth have voted on similar measures. To date, 68 communities have voted in favor of a Constitutional Amendment including Boston, Springfield and Worcester. If a similar resolution is passed by the House, Massachusetts will join the state legislatures in California, Hawaii, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont in voicing their states’ opposition to the decision and support for a Constitutional Amendment to address its ramifications.

To learn more, visit: www.commoncause.org, www.FreeSpeechForPeople.org, www.DemocracyIsForPeople.org and www.United4thePeople.org.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: citizens-united, constitutional-amendment, legislature, massachusetts-legislature, state-senate, supreme-court-citizens-united

Comments

  1. creightt says

    July 27, 2012 at 12:52 pm

    Professor Lawrence Lessig has been one of the biggest proponents of the constitutional convention strategy. Recently he introduced a nuanced interpretation of the convention strategy with what he calls “citizens conventions.”

    Lessig’s Testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee

    Log in to Reply
    • David says

      July 27, 2012 at 1:13 pm

      It seems much simpler, and more likely to succeed, to bypass Congress entirely. That’s my proposal.

      Log in to Reply
  2. Christopher says

    July 27, 2012 at 2:45 pm

    That’s what I thought Sen. Eldridge indicated to me when I spoke with him about it a while back. Plus, David, are you sure that such a convention can propose anything? Article V doesn’t seem clear to me on that. I would submit that 2/3 of the states could pass resolutions specifically calling a convention for the purpose of considering amendments relative to campaign finance, or even to instruct that only the following proposal be considered: (insert exact proposed language here). Otherwise you run the risk of delegates pulling the same trick they did in Philadelphia in 1787 and throw out the original document entirely, contrary to instructions.

    Log in to Reply
    • David says

      July 27, 2012 at 2:55 pm

      “call for a constitutional convention limited to the Citizens United issue.”

      I don’t think an open-ended call for a convention would be a good idea.

      As I read Eldridge’s proposal, it calls for the Congress to approve an amendment that would then be sent to the states for ratification. That’s what seems to me to have no chance of getting anywhere.

      Log in to Reply
      • jconway says

        July 27, 2012 at 4:43 pm

        On the wiki page for constitutional conventions (cant
        Link on iphone) it mentions there have been more than enough states to force a balanced budget amendment but the courts are not sure if discussion can be limited to just one amendment. Conventions might have to be open ended as the first one was. I’ll defer to your legal expertise but I’m not so certain what you propose is possible.

        Log in to Reply
        • David says

          July 27, 2012 at 5:10 pm

          It’s never been tried, so nobody knows what the rules are. The wikipedia article I found said that the 2/3 threshold for a balanced budget amendment has not yet been reached (it’s 2 short). One source argues that “the political realities no doubt are that if there is an authentic national movement underlying a petitioning by two-thirds of the States there will be a response by Congress.” IMHO that’s the only way to get any action on this topic.

          Log in to Reply
  3. Christopher says

    July 27, 2012 at 3:46 pm

    I jumped to the last sentence of the promotion.

    Log in to Reply
    • David says

      July 27, 2012 at 3:52 pm

      😉

      Log in to Reply
  4. AmberPaw says

    July 27, 2012 at 10:33 pm

    And if enough states do this, what you are suggesting becomes far, far more likely. When SCOTUS gets the meaning of the law and its impact so wrong (of course in my view Montana’s Supreme Court got it right), as with the Dred Scott decision, amending the constitution – however it is done – is the solution and in this issue, massive public and support, including from our elected representatives, is the required precursor.

    Log in to Reply
    • jconway says

      July 28, 2012 at 1:13 am

      Also overturning that Montana decision shows how radical the court has become, reactionary might be the stronger and more appropriate word. Overturned a law overwhelmingly passed by Congress in Citizens and then threw fealty to precedence, states rights, and public opinion out the window with the Montana ruling. There are no originalists on the court, just right wing judicial activists.

      Log in to Reply
    • SomervilleTom says

      July 28, 2012 at 9:34 am

      The Dred Scott decision was announced on March 6, 1857. It took eleven long years and a civil war for the first effective response to the Dred Scott decision to happen — the thirteenth amendment, outlawing slavery, was adopted on December 6, 1865. Its constitutional reverberations still echo throughout the land — the 24th amendment, forbidding poll taxes, was adopted in January of 1964 (more than a hundred years after Dred Scott), and the dark side STILL aggressively pursues voterID laws (which should be illegal under the 24th amendment unless free ID is made available to each and every voter).

      I agree that massive public support is a required precursor. The Occupy movement is a HUGE player in this (arguably the driving player). I strongly suspect that the realistic and imminent threat of a second civil (or perhaps revolutionary) war between the 99% and the 1% will be needed.

      The 1% will not voluntarily remove this foot against the throat of the 99%. The political process can bring this about without violence only when the oppressors recognize that effective non-violent change is the only way to avoid a violent revolution that they will lose anyway.

      In this regard, the unfolding of events in Egypt, Libya and Syria is highly instructive.

      Log in to Reply
  5. bluewatch says

    July 28, 2012 at 10:18 am

    This state Senate action on Citizens United is simply political theater.

    It would be far more important for the Senate to pass the Election Reform Act, which already passed the House. That act includes pre-registration of 17 year olds, and random audits of vote counting machines. A majority of state senators favor the legislation.

    But, our Senate President, Terry Murray will not allow that bill to come to the floor for debate and vote. She’s afraid of the Voter ID debate, because she comes from Plymouth, which is conservative.

    Terry Murray is a profile in Cowardice.

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Why I’m Voting for Sonia (2)
  • Biden gets terrorist Al-Zawahiri (1)
  • Dems reach deal on IRA (1)
  • Great economic news today (1)

Recent User Posts

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 1 Comment

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

IRA passes 51- 50!

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Recent Comments

  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentsSeems to be okay now...
  • johntmay on Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?Well, that's sad. Sure, your argument is a slam dunk wit…
  • fredrichlariccia on Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?Sorry, I'm done. Time to move on. :)
  • johntmay on Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?A hip replacement in the USA runs about $40,000, $13,500…
  • SomervilleTom on Speaker Pelosi Leads On Democracy Yet AgainIn other words, sometimes the Speaker grandstands -- and…
  • SomervilleTom on Speaker Pelosi Leads On Democracy Yet AgainIt appears that you in fact have none of the answers. It…
  • Christopher on Speaker Pelosi Leads On Democracy Yet AgainSometimes the Speaker leads Congressional delegations -…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

qpalfrey Quentin Palfrey @qpalfrey ·
12m

Great to be among friends this evening at the @ProWRoxRoz potluck! Thank you for having me! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1557513686159396864 Retweet on Twitter 1557513686159396864 Like on Twitter 1557513686159396864 Twitter 1557513686159396864
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
12m

Violent Fugitive Wanted for Attempted Murder Arrested in Auburn https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2022/08/10/violent-fugitive-wanted-for-attempted-murder-arrested-in-auburn/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1557513643805159424 Retweet on Twitter 1557513643805159424 Like on Twitter 1557513643805159424 Twitter 1557513643805159424
dsoq Deb Soc - Use ALL the tools to #StopTheSpread! @dsoq ·
12m

In Mass., COVID "case rates were significantly higher in students + staff in school districts that removed masking requirements, compared to districts that..." still said #MaskUp.
Masks work!
#mapoli @MAPublicHealth @ProgressiveMass @TogetherWeMask @PublicHealth @mandatemasksus

OHA Context & Commentary @OHAinContext

Impact of Lifting School Masking Requirements on Incidence of COVID-19 among Staff and Students in Greater-Boston Area School Districts: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

Masks work.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.08.09.22278385v1

Reply on Twitter 1557513472342122496 Retweet on Twitter 1557513472342122496 1 Like on Twitter 1557513472342122496 1 Twitter 1557513472342122496
rwwatchma Trump's election fraud hoax undermines democracy @rwwatchma ·
13m

Trump Signed Law That Could Get Him 5 Years In Prison For Mishandling Classified Docs https://www.politicususa.com/2022/08/10/trump-signed-law-on-classified-docs.html #mapoli #nhpolitics

Reply on Twitter 1557513362371756032 Retweet on Twitter 1557513362371756032 Like on Twitter 1557513362371756032 Twitter 1557513362371756032
tomsullboston1 Thomas Sullivan @tomsullboston1 ·
15m

#bospoli #mapoli

Reuters @Reuters

U.S. President Joe Biden signed into law the PACT Act of 2022 saying as a nation 'we have one truly sacred obligation, to equip those we send into harms way and to care for them and their families when they come home'

Reply on Twitter 1557512749319688193 Retweet on Twitter 1557512749319688193 Like on Twitter 1557512749319688193 Twitter 1557512749319688193
andrewqmr Andrew Quemere @andrewqmr ·
27m

Woah, @Tanisha4MA just closed out the @SecretaryOfMass debate by saying she would refuse to put Trump's name on the 2024 ballot and force him to take her to court.

@BillGalvin4MA said he would only do so if Trump was convicted of insurrection.

#mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557509818138730497 Retweet on Twitter 1557509818138730497 1 Like on Twitter 1557509818138730497 7 Twitter 1557509818138730497
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.