Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Hoosiers, Razorbacks, Loons and Anti-Gay Laws

April 1, 2015 By massmarrier

The hounds are not going to stop yelping, snarling and nipping. What we’ve seen in milder versions elsewhere and recently in extreme ones Indiana and Arkansas will continue. They are in the end expressions of the same anti-gay craziness that brought us one-man/one-woman DOMA-style laws and amendments throughout the country.

There is one key motivation — homophobia, and one key catalyst — perceived cleverness.

[If you are a podcast sort, you can catch my 19-minute rant on this instead here instead or also.]

Among the cascades of coverage, we are too tightly focused. There are also big themes and implications beyond the literal and details. Instead of looking beyond the obvious, we have largely the spurious and specious, including:

  • Oh, gee, the 20 states with Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) laws and 12 more with them in the works are just copying the 1993 Federal version that courts subsequently ruled inapplicable to states.
  • Honk. Wrong. That was before the SCOTUS’ Hobby Lobby and Citizens United decisions giving personhood to companies and their big shots. The 1993 law actually protects religious rights as of Native Americans to use peyote without fear of being fired for positive blood tests later. It offers true First Amendment shields to people, rather than encouraging people to harm, hinder and hurt other people under a ruse of felt sense of creed.
  • Without such laws, those with deeply held religious (a.k.a. fundy Christian) beliefs will be persecuted, prosecuted, and even made to solemnize same-sex marriages against their will)
  • Beyond risible. RFRA champions have been on the air, including NPR, claiming absolutely that in all the states with these statutes, no LGBT person has been denied products, services or any accommodation, and none ever will be. That’s asking to disprove a negative, but I’ll put good money that we’ll see these cases and that the states, particularly with Indiana-style versions, have offered solid protection civilly and criminally. Where there is no sexual orientation/identity protection, the burden falls squarely on the wronged people to prove the are not “burdening” those claiming religious offense.
  • These laws are a First-Amendment expression. They only work to ensure the free exercise of religion.
  • Forget that. South Carolina, Indiana and almost certainly Arkansas’ when it goes through play with the legal concepts of what imposes a substantial burden on someone claiming religious exemption, and with whether the state or federal government is party to any action or has a compelling interest in the matter. In short, this aspect also shifts the burden to any victim of discrimination, offering huge expense and time to prove wrongdoing.

Michael’s Crystal Ball

 

You are welcome to check me on these predictions. I see:

 

  1. Mike Pence has screwed himself out of a shot at being the 2016 GOP nominee for POTUS. He has been positioning himself as not as crazy as the other likely candidates, but he proved unable to shepherd his fellow Republicans in the General Assembly. He angered left and right. The country sees Hoosiers politics for what it is and that’s on him.
  2. Attacks on and end-runs around gay rights won’t stop. Just as and anti-equality types have kept up a relentless assault on same-sex marriage, even with the probability of a SCOTUS Loving-v.-VIrginia type of ruling soon, this First-Amendment ruse has become the weapon of choice of anti-gay sorts.They will push and pass these RFRA laws as they did the DOMA-style ones until courts beat it out of them.
  3. Cleverness (and concomitant  smugness) will rule the legislative battlefield. As with passing DOMA laws and amendments to stymie marriage equality, RFRA laws patterned loosely on the 1993 version are too hard for anti-gay types to avoid. When they think they have latched onto legal tricks and loopholes, they’ll go for it. (Think Prez Clinton’s parsing of “what your definition of is is” and remember that it failed for him.) When lawyers/legislators who are sure they have outsmarted lefties and gays and such they have to go with it. No matter how bad the blowback is on Indiana and Arkansas, they won’t be able to check themselves.

 

This all bodes ill for our political discourse.

Our current configuration of conservative SCOTUS justices is extreme unlikely to back away from its corporations and their bosses are people dystopia fostered in Citizens United and Hobby Lobby rulings. Moreover, the SCOTUS has long been loath to mandate nationwide in traditionally states-rights areas. Finally, if as expected, the summer ruling legalizes US same-sex marriage, that probably is all the SCOTUS can handle.

One might think the heavy-handed obviousness we saw in Hobby Lobby should never happen, much less be replicated. If you pardon the expression, honest to God, we allegedly believe as a nation that our First Amendment prevents the huge blunders of England. We supposedly want to protect the religious from government, as well as the public from theocrats.

How is it what we have forgotten the second aspect of the First Amendment?

Notes for the research minded

The wording of the Indiana law is here.

The version the Arkansas legislature passed is here.

Content analysis by the WaPo is here.

Distinctions drawn by the NYT are here.

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: arkansas, citizens-united, gay-rights, Hobby Lobby, indiana, lgbt, Pence, religion, RFRA, scotus

Comments

  1. sabutai says

    April 1, 2015 at 8:04 pm

    Pence’s reaction is a slow-motion political equivalent of the slightly racist older uncle being bewildered when everyone yells at him for his “jokes” at a family gathering. It’s as if the 21st century hasn’t made it to the State House yet.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.