Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Boston 2024 CEO says he’d vote “yes” on ballot question banning public funding for Olympics

June 25, 2015 By SamTracy

Tuesday, the United Independent Party announced that it has officially partnered with Yes On 1, the organization that led the anti-gas tax initiative last year, to run a campaign for a ballot question that would protect taxpayers from the cost of a potential Boston 2024 Olympics. It’s a case of strange bedfellows, since the UIP opposed Question 1, but the groups agree on the need for preventing taxpayer money from being used for the Olympic games. The initiative would bar state funding from going towards anything other than transportation improvements.

Yesterday, during a radio debate with No Boston Olympics, Boston 2024 CEO Rich Davey was asked what he thought about the UIP initiative, responding, “I would vote yes on that, absolutely.” This is big news, since while Boston 2024 had previously said they’d support a statewide referendum, they’d been hazy on the specifics. Endorsing the UIP initiative, which is broad and binding, signifies that they’re willing to truly commit to not using taxpayer money for the Games.

So if even the bid committee supports a ban on using public money for the Olympics, why aren’t our elected officials getting on board? The legislature recently voted down an amendment to the same effect, instead opting to require a hearing before they spend any taxpayer money. How about the legislature listens to the will of the voters and passes the ban, so citizens don’t have to waste the time and money on a ballot initiative that does it for them?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: ballot-initiative, ballot-questions, Boston 2024, Evan Falchuk, olympics, taxes, united independent party

Comments

  1. HR's Kevin says

    June 25, 2015 at 12:24 pm

    We all know that there is absolutely no way we can have the Olympics without massive public spending. You just simply have to pretend to yourself that the public money is only going to be spent on “infrastructure” projects that we would/should have done without the Olympics. It also pretends that public money will not be spent on overtime for Government workers in fire, safety, public works and other departments (and does anyone really believe that the Federal Government is really going to cover *all* the costs of security). It also pretends that the host city is not *required* to financially guarantee the Olympics.

    The *only* iron-clad way to ensure that massive sums of public money will not be spent on the Olympics is to not host them.

    • SamTracy says

      June 25, 2015 at 3:18 pm

      While the UIP initiative would be binding and have some real teeth to it, making the state government unable to give funding (including bonds), you’re right that it wouldn’t stop all public spending. Ballot initiatives can’t bind municipalities, so Boston and surrounding communities could still end up footing some of the bill. And agreed, it would certainly at least cost the city in police overtime.

      • HR's Kevin says

        June 25, 2015 at 3:32 pm

        Let’s be clear here, actual revenues generated by the Olympics in terms of ticket sales, merchandise, and broadcasting fees will only cover a small portion of the costs. Corporate donations will bring in some more revenue, but mostly at the cost of other charities. The rest has to come from the Government. There is no where else it can come from.

        Personally, I am *far* more worried about municipal costs than state costs. As you not, this measure does not affect municipalities at all, and Boston looks like a huge money pot to Boston 2024. They see large tracts of highly valuable commercial land that will make billions for developers if they can wrested away from their current users. I don’t see how this ballot initiative is going to prevent them from exploiting every piece of real estate they can get their hands on.

      • ryepower12 says

        June 25, 2015 at 10:59 pm

        Only Boston is forced to sign on the dotted line to being accountable to pay for any and all cost overruns.

        So if a state initiative didn’t apply to Boston’s government, then the state initiative isn’t anywhere near enough protection for our state’s residents.

        Boston simply can’t afford to take on this level of risk, and if a statewide ballot initiative can’t apply to Boston, then it’s time to pull the plug altogether.

  2. jcohn88 says

    June 25, 2015 at 1:37 pm

    (1) Given how many times Rich Davey has lied about the bid, there is no reason to believe he would not when asked this question.

    (2) If you read the IOC Host City Framework that was just released earlier this week, you will see that there will certainly be a lot of public money–at all levels of government—used. Here’s a snippet:

    Government and municipal authorities will also need to deliver a range of services which fall under their jurisdiction, and which should be coordinated with other Olympic Games operations. The provision of government/municipality services typically include the areas listed below, although the context of the specific host city and host country will determine the exact scope of government-delivered services, so this list should not be considered exhaustive:

    – Urban cleaning and waste
    – Security – Transport
    – Medical services
    – Business continuity planning
    – Legislation and regulatory support to enable operations
    – Brand protection

    (3) One form of public money that Falchuk’s amendment does not cover–but which Boston 2024 certainly wants–is tax incentives for development, and that’s a problematic piece of corporate welfare of its own.

  3. Christopher says

    June 25, 2015 at 2:08 pm

    News today reported that they will present a new plan to the USOC at their next meeting, which as of now still supports Boston, but wants to see more public support.

    Kevin is right to point out that the line on what is publicly funded will be blurry no matter how you slice it, but I see the CEO’s willingness to embrace the principle as significant.

    • HR's Kevin says

      June 25, 2015 at 3:38 pm

      They are at least recognizing that opposing the ballot initiative was going to be a huge loser for them.

      I still wouldn’t say they are really listening in any genuine sense. They are still in no way living up their promises of transparency. Notice how we still have absolutely no financial details? I would be willing to bet when that when they finally have the 2.0 reveal, it will be very light on budget details.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.