Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

House, Senate should pass public records reform by July 31st recess

July 20, 2015 By Jamie Eldridge 14 Comments

Last week, a significant step was taken on Beacon Hill towards improving our state’s public records laws. The Boston Sunday Globe reported on how backwards and outdated public records laws in Massachusetts truly are: ranking behind every other state except Hawaii.

The Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight reported out a redrafted committee bill, H.3665 on Thursday, July 16th, that would among other things create the following reforms:

• Require state agencies and municipal departments to provide records requests electronically
• Limit the cost of photocopies to 5 cents per page by state agencies and municipal departments
• Allow attorney’s fees to requesters if a court determined that they were wrongfully denied access to public records
• Assign a designated public records officer in each agency or department, for greater accountability to the record requester

Great credit on this progress goes to committee co-chairs Senator Joan Lovely (D-Salem) and Representative Peter Kocot (D-Northampton), as well as Senator Jason Lewis (D-Winchester), whose bill S.1676 mirrors the redrafted committee bill.

Since the beginning of the legislative session, newspapers from across Massachusetts, and good government groups, including Common Cause, MassPIRG, and the ACLU have been advocating for public records reforms, highlighted at the joint committee’s public hearing on public records reform bills in May. In addition, Secretary of State Bill Galvin has suggested that he may propose a ballot referendum to push reforms, if the Legislature does not pass comprehensive legislation this session.

Efforts at updating the state’s public records laws are not new. Many legislators, including myself, have been filing bills for over five years, and last session the Joint Committee on State Administration reported out a similar bill to the one reported out last week. The bottom line is our public records laws have not been significantly updated since 1973 and the time for change is now.

Unfortunately, last Friday legislators from across the state began receiving calls and emails from some of their municipal officials, asking us to vote against the bill, water down the reform, or delay its passage. The time for this bipartisan reform has come, and is in fact long overdue.

If you care about updating our state’s public records laws, making government and government decisions more transparent, and improving the public and the media’s ability to access public information, please contact your State Representative and State Senator this week, and urge the House and Senate to take up and pass H.3665 by the July 31st legislative recess.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: beacon-hill, Public Records Laws, sec.-william-galvin, state-senate

Comments

  1. fredrichlariccia says

    July 20, 2015 at 12:06 pm

    You can reach your State Representative @ 617-722-1600 AND your State Senator @ 617-722-1455.

    If you can’t get through to them personally leave your message of support for H.3665 with their aide. Having been an aide to both former Representative Mike Festa and Katherine Clark I can affirm that these calls are important and all smart politicians pay attention to what their constituents think on these issues. Speak up now and let your voice be heard.

    Thank you Senator Jamie Eldridge for your leadership on this issue and thank you to my Senator Jason Lewis, sponsor of S.1676 —both proud and strong progressives.

    Fred Rich LaRiccia
    Founder, P.O.W.A.R. (Progressives Organizing Wakefield to Advance Reform )

    Log in to Reply
  2. marek says

    July 20, 2015 at 12:18 pm

    Is it too late to get the photocopying costs at courthouses capped at 5 cents a copy too? Someone’s making a lot of money at 25 cents a copy.

    Log in to Reply
  3. dave-from-hvad says

    July 20, 2015 at 12:42 pm

    under the purview of the Public Records law?

    Log in to Reply
  4. fredrichlariccia says

    July 20, 2015 at 1:23 pm

    the sad truth is that much of the public’s business is done behind closed doors.

    If I am correct, the Open Meeting statutes do not apply to private executive sessions.

    Fred Rich LaRiccia

    Log in to Reply
    • Christopher says

      July 20, 2015 at 6:01 pm

      …though I believe most committee meetings and plenary sessions are public anyway. Bodies to which the OML does apply have very limited allowances for going into executive session.

      Log in to Reply
      • Peter Porcupine says

        July 22, 2015 at 3:09 pm

        ..unless you are a reporter, in which case the court officers will escort you out.

        Log in to Reply
        • TheBestDefense says

          July 22, 2015 at 3:22 pm

          are private organizations that cannot be covered by the OML or the public records law. I know the Dem caucus rules say their caucuses are open to the public except when they vote otherwise, although the Dems routinely assume that their caucuses are closed, and I have seen reporters escorted out of them. I have never seen nor heard of a reporter being removed from a legislative committee hearing in over 40 years. Can you give us an example or two of when that has happened, Porcu?

          I am uncertain about the rules of the GOP caucus and their experience with reporters.

          Log in to Reply
  5. Pablo says

    July 21, 2015 at 2:19 pm

    We need to get a grasp of the reality of trying to run a small municipality in this state. One local resident with a cause can tie up a limited staff with records requests.

    I appreciate the need for transparency, but we need some sort of a recognition of the reality on the local level. It is all too easy for a volunteer board to get entangled in open meeting issues, even though they are doing their best to be open and transparent in their work. Meanwhile, the state legislature has exempted itself from all these open meeting and public records requirements that we need to strictly adhere to on the local level.

    It’s okay for my friend Senator Eldridge to push for greater transparency at the local level, and I agree there are some municipal offices that go out of their way to make it difficult for people to make reasonable requests for public records. However, I think the legislature should get its own act in order first, and remove its own exemptions before passing more stringent requirements on municipalities.

    Log in to Reply
    • HR's Kevin says

      July 22, 2015 at 8:13 pm

      Ideally it should not be possible for that to happen because the public records are already online and easily accessible. That really isn’t that hard.

      Log in to Reply
  6. mimolette says

    July 21, 2015 at 3:34 pm

    I’m with Pablo on this one. I wish I could be entirely enthusiastic about reform, because transparency and public access to information are central to the whole project of democratic self-government.

    But I’m tremendously worried about the costs of compliance. I’m an appointed officeholder in a gateway city, and our professional staff is already going above and beyond the call of duty in every area within their responsibility — including responding to record requests. Which can’t always be done electronically, because this is a poor city that has a lot of paper records that haven’t been digitalized. We’re understaffed, we underpay our staff because we don’t have the resources to do otherwise. My people are already working more hours than they’ll ever be compensated for, out of sheer determination to keep the wheels turning.

    We respond to record requests, but we don’t always give them priority over all else, because there are limits to what people can do in a day. If somebody shows up wanting papers that require a staff member to spend days in the archives, what happens to that person’s other work, which may genuinely be time-sensitive? Where are we supposed to find the revenue stream to pay for this, or compensate someone who already has way too many responsibilities for taking on the new public-records-officer role?

    I hope there are answers to all of this, and that I’m being unnecessarily alarmist. As I said, I agree entirely with the goal. But I am concerned that you all are assuming that every municipality in the Commonwealth can comply with this new regime without any great burden or disruption, and I’m not at all sure that’s actually true.

    Log in to Reply
    • Peter Porcupine says

      July 21, 2015 at 7:47 pm

      A single PDF can be printed multiple times. Said scanning can be automatic going forward, eliminating subsequent need for photocopying.

      I gave a problem believing your city is creating new records with a typewriter and carbon paper.

      Log in to Reply
      • mimolette says

        July 21, 2015 at 9:45 pm

        When you’re talking about the kinds of documents for which you need flat files, that may have been put away somewhere in a basement thirty years ago.

        I’m not worried about public access to newly-created records that either already exist in electronic form or that are at least simple to find and copy. I am concerned that the new rules may not fully take into account that not all documents to which public access is sought will necessarily fall into that category. We’ve had to respond to records requests that don’t: I’m not just pulling an implausible worst-case scenario out of my hat here.

        Log in to Reply
        • Peter Porcupine says

          July 22, 2015 at 1:00 pm

          Make the new requirement apply to all records created after 2000, or some other date. Dollars a page are being charged for PUBLIC records that were created and maintained on line, and that is what needs to stop.

          Log in to Reply
    • TheBestDefense says

      July 22, 2015 at 3:04 pm

      The Mass Municipal Association met with Rep Peter Kocot on this subject yesterday, according to the State House News Service:

      “Rep. Peter Kocot, a Northampton Democrat who co-chairs the Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight, said on Tuesday he had a “very productive” meeting with the Massachusetts Municipal Association, which worried his bill would impose a burden on local governments.

      “They bounced some ideas off of us,” said Kocot, who said he anticipates more concrete recommendations from the lobbying group that represents municipal officials later in the week.”

      The full article is longer and goes into a bit of detail on the general proposal and the muni impact in particular.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Dems reach deal on IRA (1)
  • Great economic news today (1)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)

Recent User Posts

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 6 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingThe Court has just given Trump until 3 pm tomorrow to ap…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingAG Garland just announced the search warrant has been un…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingI would not be surprised at all to learn that Trump deli…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingIt's also amusing to hear Trump supporters blame an insi…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing"President Biden victories?" You mean, the greatest achi…
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentstesting 1 2 3 Testing One Two Three

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

dana_drugmand Dana Drugmand @dana_drugmand ·
30m

Baker signs major climate bill into law 👀
Reporting by @dharnanoor & @shankman #mapoli #cleanenergy https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/11/science/baker-signs-major-climate-bill-into-law/?event=event25 via

Reply on Twitter 1557861764863336450 Retweet on Twitter 1557861764863336450 Like on Twitter 1557861764863336450 Twitter 1557861764863336450
democracy_16 Democracy_420☮️ @democracy_16 ·
32m

A Team Trump in filthy #miami means three Old irrelevant republican manbabies jerking each other off❓

#MiamiBeach #thevillages #tampa #MarALago #bocaraton #banker #ethics #mapoli

ANDREINA @PISIS1345

Report: An Extra-Paranoid Team Trump Is Freaking Out About a Possible “Mole” in Its Ranks http://dlvr.it/SWT707

Reply on Twitter 1557861366517620743 Retweet on Twitter 1557861366517620743 Like on Twitter 1557861366517620743 Twitter 1557861366517620743
teresa_ftw Teresa English @teresa_ftw ·
40m

Looking forward to support legislation next session to continue this work! No longer will #Billerica have a climate denier as our State Representative #GreenJobs #RenewableEnergy #ProblemSolving #mapoli

Logan Malik @logandmalik

The #MAClimateBill has been signed into law!✅ This is an exciting moment for MA & a big victory for #CleanAir, #CleanEnergy, & #ClimateJustice. Thank you to the hundreds of advocates who have been fighting day in & day out for #ClimateAction. YOU ALL are the true #ClimateHeroes

Reply on Twitter 1557859281550151681 Retweet on Twitter 1557859281550151681 1 Like on Twitter 1557859281550151681 1 Twitter 1557859281550151681
rachelkay4wtown Rachel Kay, Education Enthusiast @rachelkay4wtown ·
42m

Now @ShannonForAG is winning me with the language of data, accessibility and my favorite, transparency. #maagelection #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557858761410334720 Retweet on Twitter 1557858761410334720 Like on Twitter 1557858761410334720 Twitter 1557858761410334720
senmikemoore Michael O. Moore @senmikemoore ·
44m

For years now, MA has been falling behind on sports betting, leaving this huge market segment to the black market.

Our bill takes a balanced approach to sports betting, allowing people to wager on their favorite sports teams while also making sure they’re protected. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557858404500119553 Retweet on Twitter 1557858404500119553 Like on Twitter 1557858404500119553 Twitter 1557858404500119553
rachelkay4wtown Rachel Kay, Education Enthusiast @rachelkay4wtown ·
47m

Data! Now the host is speaking my language. #mapoli #maagelection #dataanalysis

Reply on Twitter 1557857464703500292 Retweet on Twitter 1557857464703500292 Like on Twitter 1557857464703500292 Twitter 1557857464703500292
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.