Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Marijuana legalization in Colorado & Washington hasn’t increased youth use

May 10, 2016 By SamTracy

One of the main arguments against marijuana legalization is that it will inevitably increase underage people’s access to marijuana, therefore increasing their use of the drug. But two studies released in the last month — one about Colorado and one about Washington, both of which legalized in 2012 — refute that claim.

Colorado:

Anonymous surveys given to about 40,000 Colorado students before and after legalization showed “no significant change” in marijuana use by children under 18 in the preceding 30 days.

Among high school students, use went from about 23 percent in 2005 to about 20 percent in 2014. Similarly, there was no significant change in use by kids younger than 13 in recent years.

Washington:

Researchers compared 2010 and 2014 data from the Washington State Healthy Youth Survey. Each year’s survey included questions about ease of access to marijuana, alcohol, cigarettes and other illicit drugs.

There was virtually no change in the proportion of teens who reported it was “easy” to access marijuana in 2010 (55 percent), compared to 2014 (54 percent) after the new law was enacted, according to the study.

We’re learning a lot from the experiences in Colorado, Washington, Oregon, DC, and Alaska. Luckily, one of the things we’ve learned is that marijuana legalization can be done responsibly, in a way that does not increase the amount of marijuana consumed by young people whose brains are still developing. The initiative in Massachusetts will regulate marijuana very tightly, and there is no reason to expect that our results will be any different.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: colorado, marijuana, marijuana legalization, poll, survey, washington, youth, youth drug use

Comments

  1. Christopher says

    May 10, 2016 at 4:35 pm

    I have to admit to still being very skeptical, especially when it seems to fly in the face of common sense and logic. There is really no way to tell how accurate either the before or after surveys are when you are. Maybe 21 vs. 18 makes all the difference as some jurisdictions are considering raising the cigarette age. Let’s hope so.

    • Christopher says

      May 10, 2016 at 4:36 pm

      Consider “when you are” at the end of the second sentence above stricken.

    • jconway says

      May 10, 2016 at 4:41 pm

      Anonymous public health surveys are actually quite accurate and used by law enforcement agencies and public health departments to assess teen drug and alcohol usage as well as guage the statistics on other behaviors. My own bias in favor of legalization aside, I do not question the accuracy of these kinds of surveys. They are from objective government bodies and the data they collect directly assess the impact policy changes will have. In our own state it’s data like this that lead so many lawmakers to conclude he 18/21 tobacco switch would have so much efficacy.

    • SomervilleTom says

      May 10, 2016 at 8:26 pm

      However accurate this data is, it’s the best we’ve got. Some data is better than no data.

    • SamTracy says

      May 11, 2016 at 10:02 am

      Legalization drives black market dealers out of business, since they can’t compete with convenient storefronts with better product that the big majority of their customers (who are over 21) can shop at. They used to sell to anyone, including some teenagers, but now they can’t stay afloat solely on teenagers’ business so they stop selling. Now, those teenagers don’t have a reliable source of marijuana, and have to resort to getting a 21+ friend to buy it for them like they do with alcohol, which is just as hard, if not harder, than calling their dealer. That’s basically what’s happening in CO & WA.

      • Christopher says

        May 11, 2016 at 3:43 pm

        …teenagers DO get their hands on alcohol, so this isn’t going to be perfect.

        • SamTracy says

          May 14, 2016 at 8:20 am

          And if we always shot down imperfect proposals, we’d never change anything.

          • Christopher says

            May 14, 2016 at 2:21 pm

            …but I still am not convinced that it won’t get more prevalent because it is easier. Alcohol is legal. It is therefore sold at package and convenience stores and kept in many homes where kids have easy access to it. Pot is not yet legal. You can’t just go buy it in a store and I suspect most homes don’t have it lying around. I’m just really not looking forward to the cultural message, intended or not, that another drug is acceptable.

  2. petr says

    May 11, 2016 at 12:34 pm

    We’re learning a lot from the experiences in Colorado, Washington, Oregon, DC, and Alaska. Luckily, one of the things we’ve learned is that marijuana legalization can be done responsibly, in a way that does not increase the amount of marijuana consumed by young people whose brains are still developing. The initiative in Massachusetts will regulate marijuana very tightly, and there is no reason to expect that our results will be any different.

    … without disputing the news as good, I will point out that Massachusetts geography is distinctly different than that of Washington (7x greater in land mass, for instance) or Colorado (bigger) or Alaska (even bigger).

    It is this difference, which translates into a difference in mobility, that might prove a problem for Massachusetts. Yeah, the black market will shrivel up and die if the nearest illicit drug buy is a several hour trek. However, there is no place in the CommonWealth that is more than an hours drive to another state… As far as I know, marijuana will continue to be illegal in New Hampshire, Vermont, New York and Rhode Island. And we can expect the black market there to continue, perhaps thrive depending upon the vigilance of respective state police at the borders. I expect, if the measure passes, that Massachusetts will see in an increase in tourism… but what is bought here, I gather, will have to be smoked here…

    So, don’t get me wrong, the survey seems sound and results in good news. But I don’t think we can discount the geography. That should be factored into the ultimate legislation…

    • ryepower12 says

      May 11, 2016 at 4:51 pm

      Washington and Colorado may be many times our size in landmass, but most of their land mass is very, very empty.

      Like Massachusetts, both Colorado and Washington are dominated by their urban centers, which are plenty dense.

      Surely, Denver, Colorado Springs and Aurora would present no such geographic problems for a black market, and those three cities are over 25% of Colorado’s population. Washington is similarly centered around a few big cities, although Washington has a few more of them.

      While the states certainly have rural areas, they are relatively small parts of the population. And given the rates of addiction and abuse that often occur in poorer rural areas, I don’t think the black market has any geographical issue with getting their goods to market in them.

      • petr says

        May 11, 2016 at 8:10 pm

        Washington and Colorado may be many times our size in landmass, but most of their land mass is very, very empty.

        No “but” necessary there. That’s the argument. Of the choices available to teens (or anybody) in the old paradigm — buy illegal here, or trek across the ‘very, very empty’ spaces to buy it illegally there — the very fact of ‘very very empty’ spaces makes the default — a local purchase– so much more attractive.

        That’s not the case in the CommonWealth… that is if you accept the argument made herein that black markets for a specific good dies entirely when that specific good is legalized. If the illicit trade can’t compete, locally, with the legitimated trade, for all the reasons listed previously in this diary, and withers on the vine… the choice of trekking to New Hampshire, Vermont, New York or Rhode Island remains. Nor is this merely theoretical: I grew up in Scituate Mass at a time when you couldn’t buy alcohol in the CommonWealth on a Sunday. We thought nothing of trekking to New Hampshire on Sunday afternoons to purchase alcohol. I also spent two years living in Colorado (working at a ski resort in the winters and at a golf course in the summers) and I can tell you, for any commodity you can name, legal or no, if you couldn’t purchase it locally then you were SOL.

        • SamTracy says

          May 14, 2016 at 8:25 am

          It will make the black market a shadow of its former self, since there’s currently a massive black market in MA. But even in Colorado and Washington, there is still a black market (more in Washington because their taxes are higher), and we have black markets for loose cigarettes, DVDs, purses, and many other legal products. Shrinking the black market from a powerful force into a relatively tiny concern is still a great accomplishment, though.

        • SomervilleTom says

          May 14, 2016 at 10:19 am

          What we call the “black market” for marijuana is organized crime.

          Marijuana was not interesting to organized crime until the Reagan-era “war on drugs” caused its street price — and hence its profitability — to skyrocket. The primary impact of the “war on drugs” has been to replace amateur weed sellers with professional (and far more violent) criminals.

          Legalizing marijuana in Massachusetts will be a significant step towards reversing this foolish and failed Reagan-era policy. Real progress requires legalization at the federal level, and that will come with time.

          In the meantime, though, if marijuana is legal in Massachusetts then I’m not sure why people would drive to New Hampshire, Vermont, New York or Rhode Island to buy more expensive weed (I guess Maine just doesn’t count. 🙂 ). If marijuana is LEGAL in Massachusetts and illegal in the surrounding states, then I suspect residents of those surrounding states will be driving to Massachusetts to buy their weed.

          I, frankly, doubt that Massachusetts authorities (or those in neighboring states) will bother posting border patrols to snag residents of neighboring states returning home with weed purchased for their individual consumption. Among other things, that seems like a very effective way to increase the pressure to legalize weed in our neighboring states.

          This measure will surely reduce the influence of the black market, and that’s good enough for me.

          • Christopher says

            May 14, 2016 at 2:16 pm

            …that a key point of a union such as ours is that states CAN’T set up border patrols at state lines.

        • ryepower12 says

          May 16, 2016 at 6:04 pm

          No “but” necessary there. That’s the argument.

          NO, that was not my argument.

          My argument was that the vast majority of people who live in those states live in densely populated areas within those states — areas with plenty of density to make any black market feasible. And my argument is factually correct.

          This:

          Of the choices available to teens (or anybody) in the old paradigm — buy illegal here, or trek across the ‘very, very empty’ spaces to buy it illegally there

          isn’t what happens for the vast majority of people in those states, because the vast majority of people live in large cities or towns/cities near large cities.

          if you couldn’t purchase it locally then you were SOL.

          What can’t you purchase in Denver, or Seattle? In Aurora or Tacoma? It’s cities like these in Washington and Colorado where large majorities of the population live. Maybe it wasn’t that day back in the olden days when you lived there… but in case people haven’t noticed, we’ve had a trend going on several decades now where people are moving into urban areas and out of rural ones. Those trends hold true in Washington and Colorado, too.

          I made a second argument, which you ignored completely, suggesting that rural areas have plenty of drug addiction, which would suggest the black market is having no trouble reaching those places — contrary to your thoughts. You’ve offered no evidence to suggest otherwise. If a post office can deliver to these places, drug dealers can find one addict willing to go to them as a means of supporting their own addiction — including addicts who are open on Sundays. Drug distribution ain’t that hard when there’s a market, but their markets can collapse if we want them to by legalizing and regulating their current product of choice.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
42m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America" We now assess it is another Chinese surveillance balloon."
#mepolitics #mapoli #nhpolitics #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Retweet on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Like on Twitter 1621701812741963776 Twitter 1621701812741963776
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
44m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America"
#mepolitics #mapoli #nhpolitics #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Retweet on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Like on Twitter 1621701130848804864 Twitter 1621701130848804864
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
47m

📛Update: Pentagon Press Secretary Brigadier General Patrick Ryder said this tonight: "We are seeing reports of a balloon transiting Latin America"
#mepolitics #mapoli #mexico

Reply on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Retweet on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Like on Twitter 1621700490823143424 Twitter 1621700490823143424
openletterbot Open Letters @openletterbot ·
1h

🖋 Sign and I'll deliver a copy to your officials: https://twitter.com/messages/compose?recipient_id=835740314006511618&text=sign%20PDCRWI 📨 No. 13 is from Emily to @SenMarkey and @SenWarren #MA04 #MApoli #MApols

Reply on Twitter 1621696742017363968 Retweet on Twitter 1621696742017363968 1 Like on Twitter 1621696742017363968 Twitter 1621696742017363968
repkearney Patrick Kearney @repkearney ·
1h

It’s -4 outside and like a proper New Englander I’m having @nonashomemade ice cream. Shoutout to all the Scituate small businesses on this February’s First Friday #mapoli @ Scituate Harbor https://www.instagram.com/p/CoOSzeVMAIZ/?igshid=YTgzYjQ4ZTY=

Reply on Twitter 1621693771732733952 Retweet on Twitter 1621693771732733952 Like on Twitter 1621693771732733952 1 Twitter 1621693771732733952
projectbread Project Bread @projectbread ·
1h

Thank you, Reo John Barrett, for cosponsoring HD766/SD1013 and investing in the health and future of our children. Passing #SchoolMealsforAll is key to increasing equitable access to healthy, nutritious food for all students –so no child goes hungry. #FeedKidsMa #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Retweet on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Like on Twitter 1621691006990307328 Twitter 1621691006990307328
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.