Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

The scourge of paid signature gatherers

June 3, 2016 By sabutai

It is such a frustration to go shopping and encounter a hired gun, being paid to gather signatures to get a referendum question on the ballot.  (And hired gun is much nicer than the phrase in my head).  Bumped into a guy the other day outside the supermarket who was hustling slots at Suffolk Downs, weed legalization, and expanding private/charter K-12 education.  Though he was reluctant to have a real conversation — he didn’t know anything of significance about the issues — he did admit that he’s paid well to come to Massachusetts from out of state to hustle signatures for whomever pays him.

While I think it’s sad that there are people who sell their principles so cheaply, this also is horrible for democracy.  I don’t think the ballot initiative process was designed to let people buy policies they can’t enact.  Nor do I know why legalizing marijuana needs to pay people to sign — I’d imagine that question would be a slam dunk.  Are there any states that prohibit paying signature gatherers?

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. Charley on the MTA says

    June 3, 2016 at 12:09 pm

    They know what works, and they’re using door-knocks to further their malice.

    Funny that we can’t get national Dems to follow Dukakis’ and John Walsh’s advice, but the Kochs are all over it.

  2. JimC says

    June 3, 2016 at 1:40 pm

    Paying someone to organize seems antithetical to the spirit of Democratic politics (and democratic politics).

    • Christopher says

      June 3, 2016 at 5:02 pm

      That’s the line of work I am trained and degreed in, thank you very much:) I don’t see anything wrong with paying people, though one person collecting for multiple questions seems odd.

      • JimC says

        June 3, 2016 at 7:30 pm

        I have no objection to professional organizing by committed people like you. But paid mercenaries engaging in politics is another matter.

  3. Mark L. Bail says

    June 3, 2016 at 5:30 pm

    the word is “scourge,” not “scourage.” I wouldn’t say anything if it weren’t a headline you can fix.

    • sabutai says

      June 3, 2016 at 6:12 pm

      A bad mistake to make….but I’m not sure I can change it, as the headline is also the link. I tried, and nothing seemed to happen.

      • SomervilleTom says

        June 4, 2016 at 11:06 am

        When you’re in the “Edit post” screen, I’m pretty sure you can freely edit the headline, I’ve done it. If not, then it might be a technical issue of some sort.

        • Christopher says

          June 4, 2016 at 6:23 pm

          …I believe that even when you do edit a headline, the URL will remain the original.

          • kbusch says

            June 5, 2016 at 3:48 pm

            been dis-scouraged!

    • petr says

      June 4, 2016 at 5:11 pm

      …’scourage’ is an interesting typo as it suggests the kind of scurrilous bravado necessary to shill a idea you don’t understand for money… on behalf of somebody else.

      Scourage indeed…

  4. jconway says

    June 3, 2016 at 6:46 pm

    My own bias for my line aside, I think when we used paid interns, either at this campaign or on the Obama campaign, to gather signatures and doorknock it was a good thing. I agree paying strangers from out of state to gather signatures willy nilly on divergent causes clearly marks that person as a special interest plant.

    And the aggressive signature gatherers in downtown Boston working for a variety of progressive causes are the worst too. I did that for part of a summer before I quit and they are paid by the piece which makes them annoyingly aggressive. I wonder if they are paid by right wing groups to discredit environmentalists and planned parenthood.

    Typically, true volunteers or paid staffers are in it for the right reasons. Obviously if I wanted to make money I wouldn’t be doing the job I’m in, but it’s definitely more than my volunteers and interns are making (which is nothing) and they really do a better job than the folks profiled here.

  5. Peter Porcupine says

    June 4, 2016 at 11:18 am

    ….why paid liberal interns, who often have more than one cause or candidate on their clipboard in the name of networking and community organizing, are OK but paid signature gatherers for things you don’t agree with are bad. Maybe they are just interning for capitalism?

    • SomervilleTom says

      June 4, 2016 at 12:41 pm

      Perhaps it has to do with what’s found on the clipboards. I guess you’re correct that the difference is only of opinion.

      Still, here’s two speculative clipboards:

      Clipboard A:
      – Build a wall along the Mexican border
      – Begin a program of gathering and executing family members of suspected Muslim terrorists
      – Advance legislation to end First Amendment protections for reporters
      – Bring charges against judges who make rulings the President disagrees with.

      Clipboard B:
      – Equal pay for equal work
      – Raise the minimum wage
      – End discrimination against LGBT individuals
      – Take substantive action against atmospheric CO2 emissions

      Maybe the gatherers for Clipboard A really are just interning for capitalism. Maybe both are a necessary evil of our current political system.

      Maybe neither group of signature gatherers would need to be paid if our economy provided decently-paying jobs for recent college graduates with staggering student debt burdens.

      • jconway says

        June 4, 2016 at 1:14 pm

        An out of state stranger who says:

        -Legalize Pot
        -Legalize Slots
        -Expand charters

        Only because he is being paid good money by special interests to do so.

    • jconway says

      June 4, 2016 at 1:12 pm

      Paid interns for any cause are good. If the MA GOP has paid interns that go out into the field-great! If either side is paying out of state strangers to gather signatures for conflicting interests, that’s bad.

      I specifically said the ones hired by PP and Environment America and the Children’s Fund who congregate on State Street in Chicago or Boylston in Boston are the worst. They are aggressive, annoying, and certainly not sincere.

      A young center-right or young center-left student getting paid to do the work they are passionate about is great, indifferent folks getting paid to aggressively harass people is bad.

    • sabutai says

      June 4, 2016 at 4:09 pm

      Interns don’t take those jobs because they don’t care how they earn money. Interns almost always work with officials whose principles they agree with, and quickly learn there are easier ways to make that money.

      These mercenaries will gather for any cause, regardless of their personal feelings. The guy I talked to didn’t know anything of substance about the initiatives at hand.

      Prostitution and drug dealing are capitalistic too. Does that make it okay, too?

  6. hesterprynne says

    June 5, 2016 at 10:07 am

    both involving Colorado’s initiative petition law, have brought us to where we are today.

    In 1988, a unanimous court (opinion by Justice Stevens) ruled that Colorado’s prohibition against paying petition circulators violated the First Amendment.

    In 1999, the court struck down three provisions of Colorado’s initiative petition law on First Amendment grounds: (1) the requirement that initiative-petition circulators be registered voters, the requirement that circulators wear identification badge bearing the circulator’s name, and (3) the requirement that proponents of an initiative report names and addresses of all paid circulators and amount paid to each circulator.

    Justice Ginsberg wrote the majority opinion. As to the issue whether petition circulators must be registered voters, Justices O’Connor, Breyer and Rehnquist disagreed and thought that requirement was constitutionally permissible. Here’s Justice Rehnquist:

    The Court today invalidates a number of state laws designed to prevent fraud in the circulation of candidate petitions and to ensure that local issues of state law are decided by local voters, rather than by out-of-state interests. Because I believe that Colorado can constitutionally require that those who circulate initiative petitions to registered voters actually be registered voters themselves, and because I believe that the Court’s contrary holding has wide-reaching implication for state regulation of elections generally, I dissent.

    • Christopher says

      June 5, 2016 at 12:54 pm

      …that states cannot prohibit non-voters from circulating nomination papers either? If so, I’m not sure Virginia got the memo since when I was living down there just over a decade ago I was told I could not gather signatures to put names on the ballot because I was not registered to vote in VA.

    • jotaemei says

      June 5, 2016 at 4:18 pm

      And F all these cranky, get-off-my-lawn hyberbolic rants. “Mercenaries”? Are some of you folks serious? Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound?

  7. stomv says

    June 6, 2016 at 6:23 am

    Do I find ’em annoying? You betcha. Such is life in the fast lane of democracy.

    Want to annoy them back? Invalidate their sheets. Stray marks. Underline a key word in the text. Be sure to sign on the sheet for the wrong town, and write your town on the address. “Swap” name and address hoping that others will follow suit. I’ve never done this, but then again I’ve never put the telemarketer on mute while I just continued cleaning the kitchen.

    • Christopher says

      June 6, 2016 at 4:23 pm

      …will only invalidate your particular signature, which is why you should collect at least 150% of what you need.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

stephforeverett Stephanie Martins @stephforeverett ·
56m

I was honored to host @RepPressley in Everett and welcome Everett/Chelsea electeds and Everett community leaders into my home! Thank you Ayanna, for your fearless advocacy and commitment to the ppl of the 7th. Happy birthday!🎂
#mapoli

3

Reply on Twitter 1621783022751125504 Retweet on Twitter 1621783022751125504 Like on Twitter 1621783022751125504 Twitter 1621783022751125504
legislataapp Legislata @legislataapp ·
59m

Tweet summary for MA State House for 2023-02-03: 172 tweets from 62 legislators. Top words: cold, warm, stay, warming, center, gun, school, tomorrow, residents, check. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1621782320687583236 Retweet on Twitter 1621782320687583236 Like on Twitter 1621782320687583236 Twitter 1621782320687583236
stephforeverett Stephanie Martins @stephforeverett ·
1h

And just like that, the Legislative Affairs Committee of the Everett City Council has zero diverse voices but no one cares as the “fight against racism” is highly selective, opportunistic, and politicized around here.
#mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1621780509205340161 Retweet on Twitter 1621780509205340161 Like on Twitter 1621780509205340161 Twitter 1621780509205340161
notoriousvog Notorious VOG @notoriousvog ·
5h

The Meaning of African American Studies. The discipline emerged from Black struggle. Now the College Board wants it to be taught with barely any mention of Black Lives Matter. #UrbanAgenda #BOSpoli #MApoli
https://www.newyorker.com/culture/q-and-a/the-meaning-of-african-american-studies

Reply on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Retweet on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Like on Twitter 1621723680685391872 Twitter 1621723680685391872
notoriousvog Notorious VOG @notoriousvog ·
5h

It’s a VERY good thing I missed the @celtics game tonight. The final score looks like a VERY stressful game.🙄🤦🏾‍♂️

🔖#UrbanAgenda
#VoiceOfBlackBoston
#BOSpoli #MApoli

Reply on Twitter 1621721253340905472 Retweet on Twitter 1621721253340905472 Like on Twitter 1621721253340905472 1 Twitter 1621721253340905472
corcoranann Ann Corcoran RN MSN @corcoranann ·
5h

Those who are chronically homeless without shelter suffer from high rates of untreated severe substance use disorders & mental illness. States have a legal & ethical obligation to step in & help vulnerable people who can’t act for themselves. #MAPOLI https://theconversation.com/the-ethical-dilemmas-behind-plans-for-involuntary-treatment-to-target-homelessness-mental-illness-and-addiction-198707?fbclid=IwAR2pYO2-l7UKBci_C7st5Jhdld1u_f_hXpbQc_HCf5vnJ9D1a1QyJ199D_8

Reply on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Retweet on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Like on Twitter 1621720926659219457 Twitter 1621720926659219457
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.