Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

State officials need to respect voters’ decision to legalize marijuana

December 6, 2016 By SamTracy 13 Comments

Over the past year, state officials from both parties tried in vain to scare voters away from legalizing marijuana. In spite of — or perhaps even because of — this fear-mongering, 54% of Massachusetts residents voted yes on question 4 to tax and regulate marijuana for adults over 21. But rather than accept the will of voters, some of these officials have already called for gutting this new law before it even takes effect. This is tremendously disrespectful to the people of Massachusetts and cannot be tolerated. Instead, officials should listen to their constituents and focus on implementing this new law responsibly. Below, I’ve listed three of the most important issues being discussed right now:

  1. Timeline:
    One of the most common concerns is the timeline set up by the initiative, with Treasurer Deb Goldberg even calling for an extension. But while our law will remove penalties for personal possession on December 15, 2016, retail sales would not begin until early 2018. This gives the state plenty of time to set up the Cannabis Control Commission and enact sensible regulations. In fact, it’s almost exactly the same amount of time that Colorado took to set up their industry, and they were starting from scratch. With the experience of four other states to guide us, we should have no trouble sticking to the same timetable as those trailblazers.
  2. Home growing:
    Some officials and pundits are also calling to remove the right of people to grow marijuana in their homes, with Goldberg lamenting that it would be untaxed. Yet this is part of the point — marijuana is expensive and not covered by health insurance, and because our medical marijuana law does not allow all patients to grow their own, providing this protection to all adults will finally let patients provide for themselves. And beyond that vulnerable population, it’s unlikely that this right will be exercised by many beyond the most enthusiastic hobbyists. Home brewing is legal, but my neighbors making their own beer isn’t putting the Boston Brewing Company out of business any time soon.
  3. Taxes:
    Speaking of taxes, the final proposal being floating by many politicians is drastically increasing the tax rate approved by voters. This argument sounds sensible at first: Massachusetts’ effective tax rate of 12% is much lower than that in Colorado and Washington. But it’s lower for a reason. Drafters of the initiative saw those states having trouble extinguishing their black market, since the high tax rates make it cheaper to buy off the street than in a store. And critics fail to mention that Maine also legalized marijuana this year, with an even lower tax rate of 10%. If we raise ours too high, that creates an incentive for people to buy in Maine and bring it back to Massachusetts, just like they already drive to New Hampshire for cheaper alcohol — but this time, they’d be breaking both New Hampshire and federal law.

Now, that doesn’t mean there’s no room for improvement. The initiative was smart to create a Cannabis Control Commission to regulate the industry, filling in all of the gaps that couldn’t be addressed in a ballot measure. Its members will be able to regulate everything from packaging, to warning labels, to the types of products that can be sold. For example, regulators in Colorado have banned marijuana gummy bears and other items shaped like animals, and Massachusetts regulators could, and probably will, do the same. Since the Commission will be appointed by the Treasurer, it’s almost certain they’ll be quite cautious about the new industry. This regulatory process is where Goldberg should focus her efforts, not on lobbying for a bill to gut the law.

The main role for the legislature in the post-legalization world is to decide where the new money raised through marijuana taxes goes, and I hope they steer a large portion of it to evidence-based drug prevention programs and public education. With tax revenues projected around $100,000,000 per year once the new industry is up and running, there’s even more reason to move quickly on implementation.

The political establishment already failed at scaring voters away from legal marijuana. Rather than continue their campaign of resistance, they should listen to the people and regulate marijuana responsibly.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User Tagged With: ballot-initiatives, Cannabis Control Commission, marijuana, Question 4

Comments

  1. JimC says

    December 6, 2016 at 1:32 pm

    A friend of mine who once worked on the Hill told me the timeline would have to be revised if the law passed. She said it was unrealistic.

    I don’t really understand why it becomes legal immediately, then gets regulated in 2018.

    Log in to Reply
    • Christopher says

      December 6, 2016 at 4:25 pm

      …a transition to legalization through a period of decriminalization. What I read above is that it can’t be sold commercially until 2018, not that it won’t be regulated. Issues like this are exactly why I’m no fan of direct democracy.

      Log in to Reply
      • bob-gardner says

        December 7, 2016 at 9:52 am

        Representative democracy? How’s that been working out?

        Log in to Reply
        • Christopher says

          December 7, 2016 at 2:40 pm

          My theory of representation also tends to be quite Burkean. I believe the will of the people should be filtered through elected representatives who have the resources and commitment to study an issue, mark up legislation, and make it effective. Direct democracy is a take it or leave it proposition with no opportunity to make it better and often without all the information or capacity to process it. I include myself in that even though I will vote on the questions since I believe if you don’t vote you can’t complain. In this case, the people voted for something which immediately has to be tweaked anyway, leading people to whine about not being listened to. If you feel strongly about something you are always welcome to contact your legislators about it.

          Log in to Reply
          • Peter Porcupine says

            December 7, 2016 at 3:46 pm

            .

            Log in to Reply
            • Christopher says

              December 8, 2016 at 12:47 am

              I believe that if we are going to call the President and VP elected officials they ought to actually be elected by the people. (Federal judges aren’t elected either, which is fine, but we don’t pretend that they are.) I especially don’t like when the Electoral College distribution has the effect of overriding the express will of the people. It’s simple: We should elect people to study and determine what will be law and policy, but they should in fact be elected.

              Log in to Reply
              • jconway says

                December 8, 2016 at 1:38 am

                I recall you defending it in the past. Forgive me if I am mistaken. I do remember we were alone in defending the filibuster. I know I used to defend the EC, back when I made textualist arguments here just to be contrarian and because my debating society was rather center-right so my arguments from that era tended to be as well.

                I favor abolishing it, but via direct amendment and not the uncertainty of the interstate compact. Though at this point, it’s probably the only viable route. We will need some Republicans to lose the EC while winning the popular vote, but that’s mathematically less likely based on how the system is composed

                Log in to Reply
                • Christopher says

                  December 8, 2016 at 5:12 pm

                  …but like you I favor abolishing it via constitutional amendment rather than the NPV workaround. If I ever thought the EC, and especially the winner take all allocation most states use, was a good idea, that was ages ago.

                • jconway says

                  December 8, 2016 at 8:08 pm

                  I was just asking for clarification. My own thinking on the EC has changed from my college days. And I also agree a direct amendment is a better idea than an NPV, mainly since the NPV isn’t binding and would likely be unenforceable. Both are unlikely until some Republicans start losing the EV sad to say.

      • jconway says

        December 8, 2016 at 1:43 am

        Not the voters. The legislature had nearly two years to anticipate this result and head it off. The Rogers-Jehlen proposal had stricter controls and higher taxation levels. It would’ve been easier to implement without the kind of shock we are seeing now. Goldberg and others also had ample time to prepare the Cannabis Commission.

        The idea that they were caught flat footed is absurd as polls showed this issue was at least going to come down to the wire, or be narrowly passed. They ended up underestimating the levels of support. Compare their preparation to the Gaming Commission, which they wanted, and which was ready to fleece the taxpayers on day 1.

        Log in to Reply
    • SamTracy says

      December 8, 2016 at 12:21 pm

      It takes a while to set up regulations and approve businesses to open, which is why stores couldn’t just open immediately after passage, and I think that’s reasonable. But it doesn’t take any time to simply stop arresting/ticketing people for possession, so that can be implemented almost immediately.

      One of the main reasons for its passage was that people don’t think adults should get in legal trouble for marijuana possession or home growing, so continuing to arrest/ticket people for those offenses for another year (or more) would run counter to that.

      Log in to Reply
  2. hoyapaul says

    December 6, 2016 at 9:29 pm

    but I suspect how much of this will proceed will depend on whether Sen. Jeff Sessions is confirmed as the head of the federal DOJ and what his priorities concerning marijuana will be. If he decides to take a hard line on recreational marijuana sales, which is plausible and perhaps likely, then that will surely influence both the state’s timelines and prospects of tax revenues.

    Log in to Reply
    • TheBestDefense says

      December 8, 2016 at 5:55 pm

      Sessions may try to to interfere with the states that are legalizing recreational use but I think it unlikely to be successful. I suspect his first stab will be at money laundering charges against lawyers and banks, which will limit somewhat the commercial market and consequently increase the underground and sorta-legalized market, people who grow more than is permitted under the new law and sell to friends and others on the black market. There will be no limits on the quality or safety of those products, and of course no revenue for the state.

      Outright arrests by the FBI will likely be limited to large commercial growers. Charlie Baker will face a question on those cases about whether he authorizes the use of state resources (e.g. State Police and National Guard) to assist them, as he did on the Vineyard this year http://www.mvtimes.com/2016/07/27/feds-snatch-islanders-medical-marijuana-plants/

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recommended Posts

  • There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing (3)
  • Promises made, promises kept (2)
  • Dems reach deal on IRA (1)
  • Great economic news today (1)
  • IRA passes 51- 50! (1)

Recent User Posts

There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing

August 10, 2022 By terrymcginty 6 Comments

Site issue: Unable to reply to comments

August 10, 2022 By SomervilleTom 2 Comments

Why do PUKES oppose $35 insulin for diabetics with private insurance?

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 3 Comments

Promises made, promises kept

August 8, 2022 By fredrichlariccia Leave a Comment

Schedule F

August 7, 2022 By johntmay 4 Comments

Statement by President Biden on passage of the Inflation Reduction Act

August 7, 2022 By fredrichlariccia 1 Comment

Recent Comments

  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingThe Court has just given Trump until 3 pm tomorrow to ap…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingAG Garland just announced the search warrant has been un…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingI would not be surprised at all to learn that Trump deli…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingCould it also mean that KARM-A-LAGO might want to divert…
  • johntmay on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This TimingIt's also amusing to hear Trump supporters blame an insi…
  • fredrichlariccia on There Is Not A Chance the White House is Happy With This Timing"President Biden victories?" You mean, the greatest achi…
  • johntmay on Site issue: Unable to reply to commentstesting 1 2 3 Testing One Two Three

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

jllederman Jesse L. Lederman @jllederman ·
28m

Shout out the activists, organizers, residents, and legislators who came together to stamp out subsidies for biomass incinerators in the now signed MA climate bill! #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557876924722053122 Retweet on Twitter 1557876924722053122 Like on Twitter 1557876924722053122 Twitter 1557876924722053122
chandreyeedas chandreyee @chandreyeedas ·
47m

Thanks @MassGovernor for signing the #mapoli #climate bill into law!This law:
✔️Expands all-electric buildings, reducing utility bills & indoor air pollution
✔️Targets 2.5M 🏡 powered by offshore wind by 2027 
✔️Electrifies transportation🚗🚚🚌
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/11/science/baker-signs-major-climate-bill-into-law

Reply on Twitter 1557872228368355328 Retweet on Twitter 1557872228368355328 Like on Twitter 1557872228368355328 Twitter 1557872228368355328
mszafranski413 Matt Szafranski @mszafranski413 ·
49m

Outgoing #Chicopee @RepWagner has made an endorsement to succeed him: @ShirleyChicopee. Yet, @JoelforChicopee continues to line up his own nods less than a month before the #8thHampden's Democratic primary. #mapoli https://www.wmasspi.com/2022/08/briefings-retiring-wagner-backs-arriaga-but-mcauliffe-still-racking-up-support.html

Reply on Twitter 1557871566796607489 Retweet on Twitter 1557871566796607489 Like on Twitter 1557871566796607489 Twitter 1557871566796607489
jenistar jenistar ☮️♥️&neurodiversity! @jenistar ·
52m

Thrilled to see over 40 residents here at the Canton Democratic Town Committee Meet the Candidates night! #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1557870761322463242 Retweet on Twitter 1557870761322463242 Like on Twitter 1557870761322463242 Twitter 1557870761322463242
conservativeind Kimberly Morin @conservativeind ·
54m

OMFG this is CRIMINAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #MApoli

Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok

Boston Children’s Hospital (@BostonChildrens) is now offering “gender affirming hysterectomies” for young girls

Reply on Twitter 1557870464252387328 Retweet on Twitter 1557870464252387328 2 Like on Twitter 1557870464252387328 12 Twitter 1557870464252387328
mass_eon Equitable Opportunities NOW! @mass_eon ·
57m

Thank you @massgovernor for signing and @KarenSpilka & @RonMariano for advancing this landmark cannabis equity legislation!

People of color have waited too long for Question 4's promise of restorative justice and equitable economic opportunity.

Onward to implementation! #mapoli

Dan Adams @Dan_Adams86

🚨🚨NEW: MA Gov. Charlie Baker has signed into law extensive reforms to the state's marijuana industry. The measure will create a loan fund for equity entrepreneurs, crack down on municipal fees, and allow cannabis cafes, among other provisions. #mapoli

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/11/marijuana/sweeping-cannabis-bill-becomes-law-after-yearslong-effort-reforms/

Reply on Twitter 1557869678164410373 Retweet on Twitter 1557869678164410373 Like on Twitter 1557869678164410373 1 Twitter 1557869678164410373
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2022 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.