Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

The cost of giving birth to a baby

April 26, 2017 By Andrei Radulescu-Banu

A colleague with a corporate health plan told me that his family hospital bills – with a corporate health plan – for the birth of his baby was more than $3,000. The health plan only covered the birth of the baby after a hefty $3,000 deductible.

Moreover, the hospital sent an additional $2,000 charge claiming that they had to treat the newborn of some infection, and the treatment was not covered by the $3,000 deductible.

When my colleague pressed to find out more detail, the hospital explained this was not treating a real infection, but the possibility of an infection. It was a prophylactic treatment.

How did we get to this point? How can the birth of a baby, with a corporate health plan, cost $3000 out of pocket – and how can the hospital send an additional bill for $2,000 for treatment it thinks is needed (but apparently the insurance does not cover in the standard package)?

Don’t we have state rules in the state of Massachusetts mandating that (a) hospitals only charge what the insurance covers, (b) insurance is obligated to cover 99.999% of what is needed during child birth?

And, not to forget, when did we get to the point that corporate plans are even permitted to have such high deductibles? We have discussed this many times in the past when the subject of non-competes comes up. Employees have minimal bargaining position, when looking for a job, to stay and ask detailed questions about the corporate health plan. And weeks after they join, the corporate health plan can change from under them.

There is some history behind this. Corporate health plans offered much better benefits about ten years ago. Then, Obamacare happened. The way things were explained at many companies, corporate health plans had to change due to higher costs caused by Obamacare.

In effect, Obamacare did not create higher costs for the employees of these companies… Nor did Obamacare force these companies to change health plans. But health plan costs, and, possibly, taxes, did go up. And companies found it convenient to pass the health costs to the employees.

Municipal employees, probably, fare no better. If municipalities are in the GIC plan, they have similarly high deductibles.

There are some additional quirks to consider. Once the babies are born, I am told, they becomes a dependent of the plan, and immediately starts accruing costs with their own deductible, separate from the mother.

…So I have asked my friend how he paid for his baby. He said he charged it to his credit card.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+1
0

Filed Under: Editor, User

Comments

  1. Charley on the MTA says

    April 27, 2017 at 8:36 am

    at how un-reconciled America is with this whole business of bearing and raising children. It’s like it’s a complete afterthought, some two generations after women entered the workforce in large numbers.

    On the other end of things, the new TrumpCare treats *pregnancy* as a “pre-existing condition”:

    Have a pre-existing condition? Here's how much Zombie Trumpcare would mark up your premium: pic.twitter.com/PwaHuPcyVO

    — Topher Spiro (@TopherSpiro) April 21, 2017

    • SomervilleTom says

      April 27, 2017 at 9:01 am

      Pregnancy was treated as a pre-existing condition for decades before Obamacare. This began when the government ruled that insurance companies could not discriminate against women in their coverage. The insurance company response was to classify pregnancy as a pre-existing condition.

      I suggest that this stance towards women is no “afterthought”. It is an intentional reflection of sexist and misogynist attitudes that have dominated the GOP my entire sixty-plus year lifetime.

      The situation described in this post is immoral, and has been US policy for decades.

      Conversely, I am under the impression that Massachusetts state law prohibits the hospital from enforcing collection of the amounts rejected by the insurance company. I wonder if the OP tried simply refusing to pay. I ask because another scam practiced by health care providers for decades is to send bills for such exorbitant amounts in hopes that the recipient will see the bill and simply pay.

      My experience has been that when I withhold payment for any amount beyond the state-approved BCBS rates for whatever the procedure is, the provider always applies a credit (with name like “Insurance company adjustment”) to the bill.

      • Andrei Radulescu-Banu says

        April 27, 2017 at 11:06 am

        The way I understand it from my friend, the $3,000 is the maximum deductible per plan member. After paying $3,000, all health costs are fully covered for that plan member for one year.

        That is already outrageous, to have to shell $3,000 out of pocket for a birth delivery.

        But, then, the newborn needed some additional treatment as a result of the birth. Here’s where the hospital billed by friend the additional $2,000. We think, but are not sure, that the $2,000 is the newborn’s deductible – kicking in because she is a new plan member.

        The insurance company, he says, disagrees with the extra $2,000, and argues that the procedure billed for it was supposed to be included in the birth delivery package – thus, rolled into the $3,000 deductible.

        But – here is the second outrage – the insurance company refuses to straighten this out with the hospital. Instead, the insurance company is having my friend talk to the hospital, and coaching him what to say, to get the $2,000 deductible folded into the $3,000.

        How did we get to this point? Why on Earth does the patient have to shell thousands out of pocket for a birth procedure – and why isn’t the insurance company having the hospital changes corrected, directly, rather than leaving it up to the patient?

        • johntmay says

          April 27, 2017 at 12:50 pm

          About two hours per week, every week, on the phone with doctor’s billing offices, insurance companies, hospital’s billing offices, all to try and iron out the ongoing problems with bills. It’s absurd. My health insurance company once send me a letter, in the mail, to my house, informing me that since I have moved, I am no longer covered by their plan. I moved? Where to? And if I moved, why are they sending a letter to my “old” address? You can’t make this up.

          She spent a year on on bill before it got resolved.

  2. thegreenmiles says

    May 2, 2017 at 9:49 am

    We just had baby #2 & while we haven’t gotten bills yet, our expected cost of $3,000 was the same, and god knows how much more they’ll charge us for the extra night he had to spend under the anti-jaundice lamp.

    Private health insurance sucks and Democrats should be united behind a single-payer alternative.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

jnicholsworley James Nichols-Worley @jnicholsworley ·
4m

Check out this great article from @elicurwin about my proposal to expand the voting age in Southborough #mapoli https://www.boston.com/news/local-news/2023/03/29/southborough-looks-to-lower-voting-age-to-17/

Reply on Twitter 1641452636682731522 Retweet on Twitter 1641452636682731522 Like on Twitter 1641452636682731522 Twitter 1641452636682731522
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
5m

📛IT BEGINS IN 72 HOURS RIP VAN WINKLE
Every penny you spend will soon be monitored by US government,Global world bankers via digital transaction.Paper money said going away. MORE:government buildings,public tourist spots said not to accept cash soon.#mepolitics #mapoli #florida

Reply on Twitter 1641452467132207104 Retweet on Twitter 1641452467132207104 Like on Twitter 1641452467132207104 Twitter 1641452467132207104
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
8m

Here’s how the Massachusetts House hopes to make community college free for Bay Staters #mapoli https://www.masslive.com/politics/2023/03/heres-how-the-massachusetts-house-hopes-to-make-community-college-free-for-bay-staters.html

Reply on Twitter 1641451852888952832 Retweet on Twitter 1641451852888952832 Like on Twitter 1641451852888952832 1 Twitter 1641451852888952832
tinaascolillo Tina Ascolillo @tinaascolillo ·
8m

.@RonMariano previewed for the @bostonchamber the House’s forthcoming tax relief package & FY24 proposal, which will include MassReconnect & universal school meals. Other priorities for the House this session include health care, early education & gun reform #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1641451692280410112 Retweet on Twitter 1641451692280410112 Like on Twitter 1641451692280410112 2 Twitter 1641451692280410112
mainenewshound mainenewshound @mainenewshound ·
9m

📛IT BEGINS IN 72 HOURS RIP VAN WINKLE
Every penny you spend will soon be monitored by US government, Global world bankers, via digital transaction. Paper money said going away. MORE: government buildings, public tourist spots said not to accept cash soon.#mepolitics #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1641451533513687040 Retweet on Twitter 1641451533513687040 Like on Twitter 1641451533513687040 Twitter 1641451533513687040
dembinskis Jennifer Debin @dembinskis ·
10m

Support the Thrive Act https://www.massedjustice.org/thriveact #maedu #mapoli #ThriveAct

Reply on Twitter 1641451161252413441 Retweet on Twitter 1641451161252413441 Like on Twitter 1641451161252413441 Twitter 1641451161252413441
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.