Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

MassDems caucuses – with implications for Senate primary

February 15, 2020 By Charley on the MTA

The MA Democratic Party is holding its caucuses over the next few weeks, to choose up delegates for the state convention on 5/30. The delegates often will declare their support for one candidate or another, if there’s a contested primary. The Ed Markey campaign in particular is putting high priority on the caucuses, as a show of organizational strength going forward. If you can see John Walsh’s fingerprints on this, good for you — back in 2006 this very site was the reporting spot for caucus results that showed Deval Patrick was for real.

The list of caucuses and dates are listed on the MassDems website. 

Anyway, the Markey campaign is claiming victory in the following places:

SOME FINAL RETURNS AVAILABLE AS OF 4 PM:

BOSTON WARD 20—MARKEY WINS

MALDEN—MARKEY WINS

LYNNFIELD—MARKEY WINS

BRIDGEWATER—MARKEY WINS

ROCKLAND—MARKEY WINS

FITCHBURG WARDS 2, 5, 6—MARKEY WINS

SUNDERLAND—MARKEY WINS

PROVINCETOWN—MARKEY WINS

BOURNE—MARKEY WINS

CHATHAM—MARKEY WINS

BELMONT—MARKEY WINS

CONWAY—MARKEY WINS

LOWELL WARDS 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, 10—-MARKEY WINS

BARRE—MARKEY WINS

WESTMINSTER—MARKEY WINS

YARMOUTH—MARKEY WINS

Sounds good for him — I don’t know how the other places went, either for Joe Kennedy or not reporting yet. If you know something hold forth in the comments!

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+2
0

Filed Under: Editor Tagged With: caucus, ed-markey, joe-kennedy-iii, ma-sen, massdems, primary

Comments

  1. Steven Leibowitz says

    February 15, 2020 at 6:47 pm

    All 12 elected delegates in Yarmouth were Markey. 2 of 3 in Chatham.

  2. Trickle up says

    February 15, 2020 at 7:16 pm

    If this translates into campaign volunteers, I guess it’s good for Markey. But the primary is not going to be decided on the basis of an endorsement at the convention.

    If anything, though, strong party support works against Markey’s brand as a maverick.

    • Christopher says

      February 15, 2020 at 9:29 pm

      I don’t recall Markey ever claiming he was a maverick vis-à-vis the party.

  3. Christopher says

    February 15, 2020 at 9:28 pm

    The sense in the room at Lowell was that overall the candidates pretty much split down the middle. I also attended Tyngsborough and Carlisle caucuses today. The former had just enough attendees to fill the slate; the latter had decent turnout, but no contested balloting. Neither appeared to have Senate campaign organization in play.

    • jconway says

      February 16, 2020 at 7:12 am

      Just a point of info-these are caucuses for pledged delegates to the state convention and candidates need to meet the 15% threshold to get on the ballot and the convention may endorse, but that’s symbolic since the primary electorate will determine the nominee? I just want to clarify their role here, since it seems different from the caucuses we hear about in presidential news.

      • Christopher says

        February 16, 2020 at 8:38 am

        Since there are only two candidates, the convention WILL endorse by default since one will get the majority. I will be shocked if either does not make the 15% to get on the ballot. You are correct that the primary ultimately decides, a recent example of the discrepancy being Josh Zakim being endorsed for Secretary of the Commonwealth, but Bill Galvin ultimately being the nominee. The endorsee is entitled to party assistance and to state that fact on the ballot. Many of the elected delegates will not be pledged.

      • pogo says

        February 16, 2020 at 11:32 am

        Nothing “symbolic” about the 15% hurdle is your not a political insider. Ask Shannon Liss-Riordan.

  4. pogo says

    February 16, 2020 at 11:30 am

    We’ve already felt the implications of the caucuses, with the withdrawal of a candidate who felt she could not garner 15% of the party insiders elected at the caucuses to attend the convention.

    The old boy network (with plenty of women participating) wins out agin.

    • Christopher says

      February 16, 2020 at 12:26 pm

      That’s not why she dropped out and conventions aren’t all party insiders.

      • jconway says

        February 17, 2020 at 12:09 pm

        I think a better question is whether this produces electable nominees. I think Gonzalez and Massie played their entire campaign to the convention hall and got crushed when real voters had their say. I frankly see Maura Healey doing the same thing if she ultimately campaigns against Baker.

        I think it scares off more first time candidates and participants than it invites in. So while it’s nice to have nostalgia about Deval (who just unceremoniously drooped out of the 2020 race after netting 0 delegates), the structure should be reformed so that median voters have a say too, not just the hard core activists of the party.

        • Christopher says

          February 17, 2020 at 4:25 pm

          They DO have a say! C’mon, by now you’ve been around long enough to respect the process a bit more than that (or at least stop making false claims). The primary still governs and if you can’t 15% of the not-so-hardcore party activists you’re not getting very far anyway. Besides, as a candidate I would find a convention of a finite number of delegates a lot less daunting than a statewide popular campaign anyway. There is not enough correlation to make a case either way to argue that convention either helps or hurts our nominees.

          • jconway says

            February 18, 2020 at 12:57 pm

            Dan Cohen, a long time progressive political strategist, would strongly disagree with you. The process definitely discouraged Joe Avellone, Juliette Kayeem, and other potential Democratic candidates from competing to the convention. Setti Warren stopped his campaign before that step as well. All were more than capable of beating Baker.

            This Senate primary lost Scott Pemberton and now Shannon Liss Riordon, a black man and white woman respectively, who did not have the resources to run the kind of campaign to to get on the ballot.

            This has nothing to do with the party at all, but I still have no idea how Trump can run his company (and run taxpayer tabs to it!) from the White House, but Dan Wolf has to choose between his little airline and running for Governor. A choice Baker did not have to make as Harvard Pilgrim CEO.

            State primary voters have been denied the right to choose from a wider pool of diverse candidates who opted out before there was a vote. It really mirrors the national primaries that way. Just like Obama is cited as the reason to keep Iowa, so is Deval as the exception to the rule that insiders kiss the ring while outsiders stay outside of it.

            • Christopher says

              February 18, 2020 at 1:50 pm

              Wait a second! Avellone and Kayyem DID last until convention. They did not get a ticket out of convention, but if you can’t get 15% there’s not much chance of primary victory either. Setti Warren would have made it past convention just fine (He had John Walsh, after all), but did not have money to continue. Progressive political strategists aren’t exactly process experts themselves. Convention operations are a lot less expensive, and arguably more grassroots based, than statewide ad wars. Pemberton and Liss-Riordan were up against two big names – not their fault, just reality, and don’t cite irrelevant race and gender matters. I really expect you of all people to at least get your facts straight!

              • jconway says

                February 18, 2020 at 10:51 pm

                Both would have been better contenders than Coakley, the insiders favorite. Both would have gotten enough signatures to qualify. It’s a process that’s hostile to first time candidates and Beacon Hill outsiders. I think it hurts our competitiveness in the general. Me of all people is a hard core political junkie who has had zero desire to go to one of these things.

                • SomervilleTom says

                  February 18, 2020 at 11:05 pm

                  @ zero desire:

                  I have to say that my one experience way back near the dawn of creation — when Ed Markey was the upstart outsider running for a seat in the House — made me never want to return.

                  I don’t even remember what was so bad, other than sheer tedium. I just know that I’ve never been remotely tempted to attend another one.

                • Christopher says

                  February 19, 2020 at 12:06 am

                  My understanding is they were very different back then.

                • Christopher says

                  February 19, 2020 at 12:06 am

                  Both DID get the signatures to qualify. Since the deadline for that is before the convention they could not have participated in convention if they had not. (Grace Ross, for example could not contest Deval Patrick’s re-nomination at the 2010 convention because she did not get the signatures, and BTW why is a convention threshold unreasonable but a signature threshold isn’t?) I don’t know that they would have been better general election candidates than Coakley, but I can’t imagine them beating her in a primary. Plus, if we must accept the premise that convention is a gathering of insiders then Steve Grossman and not Martha Coakley got the convention endorsement that year. I’m sorry that you’ve elected to play the cynic rather than join the fun. The correlation between insiders and convention success is not actually that strong.

      • pogo says

        February 18, 2020 at 11:49 am

        Almost by definition political conventions is all party insiders. I suppose you don’t consider yourself an “insider”. And the timing her withdrawal–her campaign was trying to get people to run as delegates–and her citing “obstacles to running” points to the convention. Of course, the prospects of running against opponents with access to millions of dollars from the donor class, Im sure was another hurdle.

        • Christopher says

          February 18, 2020 at 12:14 pm

          It was money that caused her to withdraw, plus she was just plain up against two big names. I’m on the state committee so I suppose do qualify as an insider, but I chaired a ward caucus on Saturday at which at least two of the three delegates have never participated in the past, and from your comments I’m guessing you never have either. I really wish people who criticize the process knew what they were talking about!

        • SomervilleTom says

          February 18, 2020 at 12:55 pm

          Since your definition of “party insider” is “someone who attends political conventions”, then of course your perception is that all the attendees were political insiders.

          Have you ever been to one yourself? Have you ever attended a caucus?

          It takes money — big money — to compete against marquee names like Ed Markey and Joe Kennedy III, even more so when one is an incumbent.

          It seems to me that donor count and average donor wallet size is the determining factor, far more so than insider/outsider status.

          • jconway says

            February 18, 2020 at 12:58 pm

            It seems to me that donor count and average donor wallet size is the determining factor, far more so than insider/outsider status.

            That’s still a huge problem in our democracy and one the ostensible Democratic Party should be working to resolve rather than defend.

            • SomervilleTom says

              February 18, 2020 at 1:33 pm

              Oh, I agree completely. I’m certainly not defending it — to the contrary, I want to explicitly name it so that it can be addressed.

              I’m just saying that this is a problem of wealth concentration, not insider/outsider status.

              In my view, false narratives like the insider/outsider meme distract attention from the core issue of wealth concentration.

            • Christopher says

              February 18, 2020 at 1:52 pm

              Last I checked the Dems were the party more likely to try to ameliorate the impact of money.

  5. BKay says

    February 16, 2020 at 1:16 pm

    I don’t know the results caucus by caucus, but looking at (clearly unofficial!) results on social media — total delegates at the end of the day yesterday were: 137 Markey, 107 Kennedy.

    Notably, most of the elected delegates for Kennedy were first-time delegates/caucusers, new to the process. Looks like there’s some excitement out there. And, no matter who you’re supporting, increased voter involvement seems like great news for democracy! Looks like win-win on that front!

  6. TheBestDefense says

    February 18, 2020 at 7:46 pm

    The Democratic State Convention had a brief moment of relevancy. It started when progressives used the 1981 convention to launch a behind-the-lines attack on the King administration as the Dukakis re-election campaign geared up to take on the man who had bumped him from office. We kicked ass, organized a Progressive Caucus and convinced the convention to adopt a platform that was extraordinarily progressive. We knew that it was about using the convention as an organizing tool, not the platform, so we flooded the caucuses. MarDee, Kathy K, John and Gerry McD were fantabulous as our unofficial field generals.

    After the success of the Re-Match in 1982, we doubled the size of the DSC and pushed out the King people, many of whom went to the GOP. The convention played an important role for a few election cycles but it and the enlarged DSC became as useful as tits on a bull. Nobody in the voting public cares about the convention. I quit the DSC when it lost relevance.

    The DSC is useless because in the age of money politics, a bunch of self-aggrandizing wannabes who cannot deliver even 100 votes mean nothing.. Let’s face it: if you are elected in a DSC caucus, it is because you cannot win a real election. There is no longer any reason to waste significant resources on the convention or the party. If you are a candidate in play, for example Deval in his first run, you use it as an organizing tool and take over the party to keep out the opposition. The platform means shit unless it is built on a genuine grassroots statewide movement.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

shocks legitimate businessman @shocks ·
22m

we’ve fucked up housing policy so badly that it’s making fuckin worcester expensive #mapoli #bospoli

Reply on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Retweet on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Like on Twitter 1620373810259312641 Twitter 1620373810259312641
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
33m

You’re paying for it: Massachusetts abortion hotline now offers free legal advice https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/01/31/youre-paying-for-it-massachusetts-abortion-hotline-now-offers-free-legal-advice/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Retweet on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Like on Twitter 1620371068514111488 Twitter 1620371068514111488
projectbread Project Bread @projectbread ·
1h

Thank you, @senjehlen, for cosponsoring HD766/SD1013 and investing in the health and future of our children. Passing #SchoolMealsforAll is key to increasing equitable access to healthy, nutritious food for all students –so no child goes hungry. #FeedKidsMa #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Retweet on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Like on Twitter 1620362251491315713 Twitter 1620362251491315713
headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
2h

New jails are popping up coast to coast. These activists share how to fight back. https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/01/31/new-jails-are-popping-up-coast-to-coast-these-activists-share-how-to-fight-back/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Retweet on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Like on Twitter 1620343385658916870 Twitter 1620343385658916870
massgopdaily Daily GOP News @massgopdaily ·
3h

Another one in the L column for Lyons as his last ditch effort to rid a vote against him (through appeal) fails. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Retweet on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Like on Twitter 1620335349993201664 Twitter 1620335349993201664
legislataapp Legislata @legislataapp ·
3h

Tweet summary for MA State House for 2023-01-30: 140 tweets from 46 legislators. Top words: jamieeldridgema, senjehlen, repjimoday, reproequity_now, progressivemass, senjasonlewis, erika4rep, legal, juliancyr, abortion. #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Retweet on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Like on Twitter 1620332764472942592 Twitter 1620332764472942592
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.