Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

How the New York Times Endangers the Vulnerable

June 4, 2020 By joeltpatterson

After years of militarization of our police, and centuries of state-sanctioned violence against Black Americans, the New York Times runs an op-ed by a sitting (unchallenged) Senator that calls for  straight up having the military invade our own country. To learn more about the danger of this moment, we should look carefully at history (especially President Hoover ordering MacArthur, Eisenhower, and Patton to attack the out-of-work protestors and WWI veterans known as the Bonus Army–spoiler alert:  the three war heroes just followed orders.) However, I hope to call your attention to an older historical experience that is similar to current events. We can learn from the history of anti-Semitic rhetoric (which leads to violence) from this NYTimes writer, Taffy Brodesser-Akner, @taffyaknerwho risks being fired by criticizing her employer:

Here’s the thing I think about opinions, and I was taught it very young. When the anti-Semite says, “The Jew is a pig,” the Jew wants to respond, “I’m not a pig. A pig has hooves, whereas I have hands and feet. A pig has a snout, whereas I have a nose. See? Not a pig!”

Instead, the right thing to do is not to allow the anti-Semite to be comfortable telling me his opinion, not to give him space to say them, because those arguments — that I have hands/feet and a nose — do not really address what the anti-Semite is saying.

The fight isn’t fair. It is not my obligation to be reasonable in the face of it. Hatred dressed up as opinion is not something I have to withstand. HATEFUL IDIOT WANTS TO INVADE OWN COUNTRY is a great headline for a news story, and should be reported with some horror.

I love working at the Times and most days of the week I’m very proud to be part of its mission. But tonight, I understand the people who treat me like I work at a tobacco company. I stand with my colleagues.

This is the morally and intellectually correct approach.  The NYT and its editors and publishers must be called out on their willingness to elevate rhetoric that will further racist violence, like Tom Cotton’s opinion.

Not long after 2016, the New York Times ran op-ed pieces advocating that everyone consider banning non-white immigrants (the goal of Trump, Stephen Miller, and Steve Bannon) as if we were arguing about marginal tax rates, and I called up to cancel my subscription. Immigrants–documented or not–are human beings and must be treated with dignity and respect for their human rights. The guy on NYT phoneline tried to sell me on a marketplace of ideas, and I was not having it. Go to any grocery or farmer’s market where you will see people selling vegetables, fruits, cheeses, breads, meats… but you will not see nuclear waste on sale. Some ideas turn the marketplace of ideas into a hazardous zone where people are not safe.

The problem of “objectivity” in journalism goes far back. “Objectivity” was invented in the 20th Century, and the latest episode of Scene of Radio takes a rigorous, fact-based look at how white journalists, including the New York Times, promoted it at the expense of the vulnerable. I highly recommend listening to this episode (and the whole season, The Land That Never Has Been Yet) as way to understand what is undermining democracy in America.

The response needs to be overwhelming to this. And yes, the publisher could take the wrong idea from this, thinking he has driven up web traffic and shares to his website, so we really do not know if massive opposition will teach them to stop giving hate a platform, but we can not sit silently for this. This is one important step out of many that need to be taken in our country.

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
+2
0

Filed Under: Editor, User Tagged With: authoritariansim, objectivity, Tom Cotton

Comments

  1. SomervilleTom says

    June 4, 2020 at 10:45 am

    The New York Times is a media company, and a highly profitable one at that. Like every corporation, it exists to maximize the gain of its owners. It does that by generating profits and maximizing the value of its assets. Like every media company, the attention of its audience is among its most valuable assets.
     
    The most immediate way that the New York Times monetizes that attention is by selling advertising. More eyeballs, more advertising money.
     
    The unfortunate truth is that pieces like this increase attention and therefore owner value. Far from being “the wrong idea”, that is the very reason for the publisher’s existence.
     
    I agree that we need to somehow convey to the New York Times that pieces like this are unacceptable. The publisher has long refused to publish pornography because its advertisers refuse to pay for placements alongside the kind of stories that are a mainstay of publications in the UK.
     
    I suggest that the best way to stop the New York Times from running pieces like this is to interrupt the flow of advertising revenue each time such a piece is published.
     
    An effective advertiser boycott is a far more persuasive response than any number of responses to the publisher itself.

  2. terrymcginty says

    June 4, 2020 at 12:37 pm

    So well put. Thank you!

  3. joeltpatterson says

    June 4, 2020 at 10:29 pm

    And notice how conservative AG Barr tries to both sides the issue of the justice system discriminating against African Americans:
    “It is undeniable that many African Americans lack confidence in our American criminal justice system,” Barr said. “This must change.”
    —WaPo
    Why do they lack confidence in it? Barr side steps the key facts: rarely are police convicted of crimes even when evidence is clear, plus many innocent African Americans have been sent to jail, plus the SCOTUS has gutted the Voting Rights Act protections for Black voters.
    Barr is using a trick to talk about this problem as it were merely perception. “What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate…”

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

brianna_asavage Brianna Aloisio Savage @brianna_asavage ·
20m

Alongside YW Boston, I am grateful for Rep Nguyen, Rep Shand, and Sen Miranda's leadership on #ParityonBoard, filed this month! #ParityonBoard #mapoli #equity #representationmatters https://lnkd.in/efxNCWAk

Reply on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Retweet on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Like on Twitter 1620117417677524993 Twitter 1620117417677524993
homesforallmass Homes for All Massachusetts @homesforallmass ·
21m

“A group approx. 25 Lynn activists drove to Boston Sat morning, where they rallied outside the State House — alongside dozens of housing justice advocates, labor union leaders and tenants — in support of a legislative rent control package.” https://www.itemlive.com/2023/01/29/lynn-activists-rally-for-rent-control/ #MApoli

Reply on Twitter 1620117240896163841 Retweet on Twitter 1620117240896163841 1 Like on Twitter 1620117240896163841 1 Twitter 1620117240896163841
andreabaldy55 Andrea Baldwin @andreabaldy55 ·
21m

Too funny @massgop #mapoli #DumpJimLyons

Kenneth Glennon @kennethglenn06

Jim Jones Lyons @JimLyonsMA team of Spaceballs are running out of time to further take the @massgop from suck to blow! Don't get your Schwartz twisted, Lyons, Door-Dash Diehl and Motormouth McMahon are preparing to jump to LUDICROUS speed to finish the job! #DumpJimLyons #mapoli

Reply on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Retweet on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Like on Twitter 1620117094988931073 Twitter 1620117094988931073
alisonkuznitz Alison Kuznitz @alisonkuznitz ·
29m

"We are taking every single precaution and really sparing no expense to ensure that both patients and providers can feel safe, that their personal information will not be shared." #mapoli https://www.masslive.com/politics/2023/01/mass-launches-abortion-legal-hotline-in-new-push-to-defend-reproductive-care.html

Reply on Twitter 1620115202388955137 Retweet on Twitter 1620115202388955137 Like on Twitter 1620115202388955137 1 Twitter 1620115202388955137
bncordeiro Brock N. Cordeiro @bncordeiro ·
33m

Rep. Rodney Elliott of the 16th Middlesex district is the newest cosponsor (34th) of An Act to reduce incidence & death from #PancreaticCancer (House Docket #393/Senate Docket #264) THANK YOU! #magov #mapoli @ACSCANMA @PanCANBoston @PanCAN @letswinpc @lustgartenfdn @worldpcc

Reply on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Retweet on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Like on Twitter 1620114111085559810 Twitter 1620114111085559810
prof_eob Dr. Erin O'Brien @prof_eob ·
36m

Compared to state leg districts in MA, districts in other New England states have higher likelihoods of women running for office:
- 108% higher likelihood for Connecticut
- 183% for Maine
- 412% for New Hampshire
- 90% for Rhode Island
- 314% for Vermont

#mapoli #NEpoli

Reply on Twitter 1620113407197446145 Retweet on Twitter 1620113407197446145 Like on Twitter 1620113407197446145 1 Twitter 1620113407197446145
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.