Blue Mass Group

Reality-based commentary on politics.

  • Shop
  • Subscribe to BMG
  • Contact
  • Log In
  • Front Page
  • All Posts
  • About
  • Rules
  • Events
  • Register on BMG

Even Public Radio is not on the side of the working class….

March 28, 2022 By johntmay

I received an Email from the News Desk at WBUR.

“Baker’s administration announced a new grant program Wednesday to give employers $4,000 per new hire to cover either training costs or signing bonuses for the new employees.”

The problem with a signing bonus is that it’s really just an admission that next year, you are going to take a pay cut because there is no bonus for signing on for the next year.

“Of course, the new grant program is just one piece of solving the worker shortage.”


There is NO Worker Shortage. We do seem to have a shortage of journalists who understand economics. We have a labor market and for the first time in a very long time, probably before some journalists were born, we are in a “seller’s market”. Any employer (buyer) willing to pay fair market prices for an employee (seller) will not experience any shortage.

“House Speaker Ron Mariano and Senate President Karen Spilka pointed to the prohibitive cost of childcare as a major obstacle for many women who want to get back to work. ”

Again, why must we assume that every parent WANTS to get back to work?  If wages were higher, one parent could stay home, manage the household duties, raise the kids.

 

Please share widely!
fb-share-icon
Tweet
0
0

Filed Under: User

Comments

  1. Christopher says

    March 28, 2022 at 5:33 pm

    It’s not like signing bonuses are anything new. I think when I was in college MA was offering a 20K bonus for new teachers. Besides, you seem to both complain people aren’t being paid enough AND that money is being made available to pay them more.

    • johntmay says

      March 29, 2022 at 9:31 am

      Correct, signing bonusses are not new, they are the same scam they have always been.

  2. SomervilleTom says

    March 28, 2022 at 5:56 pm

    The problem with a signing bonus is that it’s really just an admission that next year, you are going to take a pay cut because there is no bonus for signing on for the next year.

    Not in my field, and not in my wife’s field. In our fields, a signing bonus is one way that a hiring manager can bypass often-arbitrary constraints that tie compensation to a particular job classification. A signing bonus is often accompanied by a promise of a six-month salary review (for companies that normally work on a twelve-month review cycle).

    When an actual person has filled the job and is well-regarded by peers, the hiring manager is nearly always able to increase the salary to match the shortfall implied by the signing bonus.

    This is a routine approach used while real-market salaries for a given job category are rising faster than the HR guidelines for that job category.

    Again, why must we assume that every parent WANTS to get back to work? If wages were higher, one parent could stay home, manage the household duties, raise the kids.

    A different question is “Why do you oppose anything that makes it possible for women to work?”

    In many households — even MOST households — both parents want to work. In many households, the “one parent” who “could stay home, manage the household duties, raise the kids” is the man (leaving aside for the moment households with both partners are men or both partners are women).

    Once more, your commentary leaves the impression that you oppose efforts to make it possible for women to be breadwinners in a family.
    

    • johntmay says

      March 29, 2022 at 9:33 am

      Why do you oppose anything that makes it possible for women to work?

      I don’t.

      In many households — even MOST households — both parents want to work. In many households,

      Why?

      • SomervilleTom says

        March 29, 2022 at 10:19 am

        You wrote:

        Again, why must we assume that every parent WANTS to get back to work? If wages were higher, one parent could stay home, manage the household duties, raise the kids.

        Were you referring to husbands in this paragraph?

        You ask why both parents want to work in many or most households. Is it so hard to understand that both men and women want to make contributions outside their home and family?

        There are some men and women who are content to make their home and family their most important priority, and who have no desire or ambition to go beyond that domain.

        Many men and women strive for more than that.

        • johntmay says

          March 29, 2022 at 11:30 am

          Were you referring to husbands in this paragraph?

          Unlike many, I do not assume that a mother or father is best suited to be the home-keeper or the one who brings in wages by working in the market.

          Unlike many, I do not assume that working in the market is “making a contribution” that one desires more than making a contribution outside of the market. While there are some, even prominent members of the Democratic Party that have a disdain for anyone who is not working in the market – and who denigrate patrenting and supporting the family as “staying home and baking cookies”, I see this as more reasons for ordinary citizens to view the party as elitists who only view an individual based on their W-2.

          There are some men and women who are content to make their home and family their most important priority, and who have no desire or ambition to go beyond that domain.

          Frankly, I find it insulting to infer that a reluctance to work in the market while preferring to support and foster a family somehow shows a lack of ambition.

          • SomervilleTom says

            March 29, 2022 at 2:19 pm

            I’m sorry you are insulted.

            Here is what I wrote:

            Is it so hard to understand that both men and women want to make contributions outside their home and family?

            Which part of “make contributions outside their home and family” is unclear?

            Your value judgements are your own, not mine. Some men and women value the contributions they make to their home and family more than anything else. Other men and women place a higher value on the contributions they make to particular fields outside the home and family.

            You appear to be unhappy that some people make different choices than you. That unhappiness is the result of your own judgements.

            I didn’t write that anybody shows a generic lack of ambition. I wrote instead that some have no “ambition to go beyond [their home and family]”

            You either misquote me or else you have your own private definition of “ambition”.

            Your rhetorical flourishes do not obscure the fundamental assumptions about values and priorities that are reflected in your commentary.

            It appears that you don’t like women to work outside the home. It also appears that you don’t like men or women who prioritize things outside the home higher than their homes and families. We are left to wonder how you feel about men or women who choose not to have families at all.

            I’m happy that the Democratic Party has broader values and priorities than you express in your commentary.

          • Christopher says

            March 29, 2022 at 5:01 pm

            I’d chalk it up not so much to contribution as ambition. At least to me, the reason we make strides toward equalizing opportunity to have careers between men and women is that many of both WANT to do work that interests them.

Recommended Posts

  • No posts liked yet.

Recent User Posts

Predictions Open Thread

December 22, 2022 By jconway

This is why I love Joe Biden

December 21, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Garland’s Word

December 19, 2022 By terrymcginty

Some Parting Thoughts

December 19, 2022 By jconway

Beware the latest grift

December 16, 2022 By fredrichlariccia

Thank you, Blue Mass Group!

December 15, 2022 By methuenprogressive

Recent Comments

  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftSo where to, then??
  • Christopher on Some Parting ThoughtsI've enjoyed our discussions as well (but we have yet to…
  • Christopher on Beware the latest griftI can't imagine anyone of our ilk not already on Twitter…
  • blueeyes on Beware the latest griftI will miss this site. Where are people going? Twitter?…
  • chrismatth on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022I joined BMG late - 13 years ago next month and three da…
  • SomervilleTom on Geopolitics of FusionEVERY un-designed, un-built, and un-tested technology is…
  • Charley on the MTA on This site (will be disabled on) December 31, 2022That’s a great idea, and I’ll be there on Sunday. It’s a…

Archive

@bluemassgroup on Twitter

#mapoli

headlineoptics Headline Optics @headlineoptics ·
3 Apr

OTR: Diana DiZoglio discusses potential retaliation from Mass. Legislature over audit https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/otr-diana-dizoglio-discusses-potential-retaliation-from-mass-legislature-over-audit/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter @masspolicy #MApoli #Massachusetts

Reply on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Retweet on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Like on Twitter 1642902408245420032 Twitter 1642902408245420032
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mass. Conservatives Win Big in Second MassGOP Caucus: Crush Baker 2.0/Establishment Candidate https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mass-conservatives-win-big-in-second-massgop-caucus-crush-baker-2-0-establishment-candidate/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Retweet on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Like on Twitter 1642902143123202050 Twitter 1642902143123202050
sabadosama Lindsay Sabadosa @sabadosama ·
3 Apr

A huge pleasure to join @RepDylan as he launched the #Massachusetts Friends of UK Legislative Caucus at the home of the @FCDOPeterAbbott. It was wonderful to talk about how we can collaborate to benefit constituents and deepen long-standing ties! #mapoli

2

Reply on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Retweet on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Like on Twitter 1642900909020569600 Twitter 1642900909020569600
theaaholcomb Thea Holcomb @theaaholcomb ·
3 Apr

If you're familiar with #mapoli I have questions for you!

My intern is applying for an internship there - obvs I'm thrilled. 😊 What should she know about how the MA legislature is staffed? What other essential knowledge would you pass along?

Reply on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Retweet on Twitter 1642899676125970436 Like on Twitter 1642899676125970436 1 Twitter 1642899676125970436
masspolicy MassPolicyReport @masspolicy ·
3 Apr

Mounting evidence that the citizens of MA are over taxed https://www.masspolicyreport.com/2023/04/03/mounting-evidence-that-the-citizens-of-ma-are-over-taxed/ #Massachusetts #MApoli #bospoli #MassPolicyReport

Reply on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Retweet on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Like on Twitter 1642898875705970690 Twitter 1642898875705970690
erintiernan Erin Tiernan @erintiernan ·
3 Apr

It's April in #mapoli which means budget season is in full swing. The House will soon pitch a tax relief proposal alongside their 2024 fiscal plan.
- @MBTA staffing shortage cou;d keep trains from running on time
- Auditor DiZoglio won't back down
https://masster-list.com/2023/04/03/massachusetts-house-tax-package-could-be-a-tango-with-healey/

Reply on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Retweet on Twitter 1642898790221770752 1 Like on Twitter 1642898790221770752 Twitter 1642898790221770752
Load More

From our sponsors




Google Calendar







Search

Archives

  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Twitter




Copyright © 2023 Owned and operated by BMG Media Empire LLC. Read the terms of use. Some rights reserved.